As if 2020 couldn’t get any crazier. The October surprise has arrived two weeks early.
The answer is 53. That’s how many Republican Senators there are right now. I know everyone is wondering if Trump will name a nominee for the vacated seat, and if McConnell will bring it to a vote. He has just released a statement saying, yes, he will be bringing the nominee to a vote:
McConnell is 100% right. The Scalia vacancy in 2016 is different from this because there was a Democratic President and a Republican Senate. This time Republicans have the White House and the Senate.
Does McConnell have the votes, though? Traitorous Alaska “Republican” Lisa Murkowski has already said she will not vote to replace Ginsburg until after election day. She says “fair is fair.” Except, no, as we just went over, it’s not the same situation. Democrats didn’t have the votes in 2016 and they don’t have the votes now. Lisa Murkowski is just looking for an excuse to sell out her party.
On top of that, we also have to worry about Mitt Romney, who is more loyal to the media than the GOP. And Susan Collins of Maine is another weak link.
That brings us down to 50 votes, which works because we’d still have Pence to cast the tie-breaker.
There’s a long time, however, between now and the vote. If you thought Kavanaugh was bad, this is going to be 100x worse. I am legitimately concerned for the safety of whomever the nominee is. The Democrats literally have nothing left but the threat of violence. It’s how they do things nowadays. They just riot and burn and destroy. Biden has already issued thinly a thinly-veiled threat that if he doesn’t win the election there will be more violence. This is where the Democrats are now. They are fully third-world. They have fully embraced Gangsterism.
Short of violence, how can the Democrats possibly oppose this next SCOTUS nominee more than they opposed Kavanaugh? They literally tried to frame him for rape. Are they going to frame this next one for murder? It can’t get much worse than Kavanaugh. That’s why I’m worried they’re about to get really violent.
People are saying Trump should nominate a woman because Ginsburg was a woman. I despise this line of thinking. We’re the party that claims to be against identity politics, and yet here we are playing by the Democrats’ rules. We are under no obligations to nominate a woman. The Republicans should nominate someone who is going to be a strong, America First nationalist for decades to come. That’s the only qualification that matters. In fact I think Trump should nominate a white male just because it will piss off the Democrats that much more.
My initial thought on hearing the news was that this would boost Democratic turnout. It would ramp their desperation up to another level. But the more I thought about it, the less I actually believe this will be a major factor in the election. Ginsburg’s death and the Supreme Court in general is not an issue that motivates everyday voters–especially “low information” voters. This is a massive deal in the Beltway. It’s a massive deal to highly-engaged white liberals, but they already had their hair on fire over this election. They are already highly motivated by their extreme hatred of Trump.
On top of this, these people generally live in deep blue states/cities anyway. New York, California, Chicago, Seattle, etc. This is not going to make a difference for swing voters in the midwest. This does not really move the needle with the working class. Most voters are not motivated by the Supreme Court. They care about more immediate issues like their wallets, crime, jobs, etc. They don’t have time to worry about the Supreme Court. Only political junkies and journalists care about the Supreme Court, so they’ll inevitably make this a massive story because it’s a massive story to them.
This just had to happen now, huh? Awfully interesting timing.
At any rate, Republicans need to get this nominee confirmed ASAP. The Democrats are going to go bananas no matter what. That shouldn’t impact the Republicans’ actions at all. You cannot let the bratty children throwing a temper tantrum control the government.
The Democrats don’t have the votes, so they have to resort to lies, slander, bullying, intimidation and even outright violence in order to try to scare the Republicans into doing their bidding.
Apparently, in a statement released by Ginsburg’s family, she said “my most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new president is installed.” A rotten partisan Democrat til the very end.
It was a mistake of her to say that. A more diplomatic way to go about it would’ve been “Until after the election.” That would have been dignified and responsible. But no. Her last words were a swipe at Trump. And why did she use the word “installed” instead of “elected”? That’s an odd choice of words.
Any sympathy or goodwill that Republicans may have been willing to offer in the wake of her death is now gone in an instant. Republicans are under no obligation to grant her dying wish. She should have retired years ago, when Obama was in office. Instead she got greedy and arrogant, assuming Hillary would win, and stuck around. The fact that she will be replaced by Trump is her fault and her fault alone.
No sympathy at all. She made her death about Trump–or at least her family did. We are under no obligations to defer to her wishes. Her dying wish is basically summarized as, “You better vote the bastard out.”
If that’s how it’s going to be, then screw it. No sympathy.
This is going to make Kavanaugh look like high school drama. Get ready for the rioting and chaos to start up again. It’s going to get extremely ugly. The media is going to kick the fake news and lies into overdrive. Prepare to hunker down. This is going to be bad. I don’t know what’s about to happen in this country. But it’s going to be very bad.
What is with all these white ladies voluntarily renouncing their White Privilege and trying to pass as black? Why would they want to subject themselves to all the oppression and mistreatment black people are subject to in this country? It just doesn’t make any sense!
Here we go: yesterday a judge in Pennsylvania “sided with Democrats” and ruled that ballots could be counted up to three days after Election Day:
Democrats in Pennsylvania get three days to forge enough ballots to drag Biden ahead in the state.
And now, this just in, in Michigan, they get two weeks:
Two whole weeks. Hopefully the election is in the bag already and Michigan isn’t a pivotal state, because this situation is completely and totally FUBAR now.
Republicans and Democrats are both accusing each other of planning to steal the election, but the Republican concerns are far more plausible and valid than the Democrats’.
Democrats’ case that the election will be stolen rests on either the oft-repeated “black voter suppression,” which is so stale it has become an election year tradition. They said it in 2016, 2012, 2008, 2004 and even 2000. But this is shown to be nonsense by the fact that the 2020 Trump campaign is making a push for black voters on a scale that no prior Republican presidential campaign has come anywhere close to. Trump’s polling numbers put him on track for the best Republican performance with black voters in four decades. He is constantly touting black job and economic gains that have come under his administration in an effort to cut into the Democrats’ lopsided margins with black voters. “Blexit” isn’t just a Twitter hashtag, it’s a full-fledged, registered 501(c)3 political action organization. Trump is genuinely trying to bring black Americans into the Republican tent in massive numbers.
The other Democratic theory–more like fantasy–is that Trump will simply refuse to leave the White House when he loses, which will then justify a military coup and/or a full-fledged violent revolution in the street. Again, this is all wishful thinking; since November 8, 2016, Democrats have been dreaming of one day seeing Trump arrested and escorted out of the White House in handcuffs. And they will seize on any excuse to riot in the streets.
None of these leftwing election theft theories hold any water. On the other hand, the Republicans are offering a simple, straightforward and plausible theory: that the Democrats are preparing to use unprecedented levels of easily-defrauded and highly fungible universal mail-in voting and post-Election Day ballot harvesting to pull Biden over the finish line once they have an idea of how far behind they are. Democrats are making a push for never-before-seen universal mail-in voting, which is highly susceptible to fraud.
Common sense would tell you that mail-in ballots should have a deadline before Election Day so that we can have a winner declared on Election Day. It’s not like people aren’t aware the election is coming up. People have had years to prepare for this. There is no good reason the deadline for mail-in ballots shouldn’t be a week or even two weeks prior to Election Day.
But there is a bad reason: because allowing ballots to be counted after Election Day allows Democrats to see how many votes they need to fabricate.
They’re setting up the steal before our very eyes and apparently there’s nothing that can be done about it.
Democrats are done with democracy. They’re not taking chances and allowing the people to decide the president ever again.
About one year ago, the New York Times launched “The 1619 Project“, a highly ambitious undertaking that, in its own words, sought to, “reframe the country’s history by placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of [the United States’] national narrative.”
In other words, completely rewrite American history so that black people are the protagonists and white people are the antagonists.
No more learning about the Quakers and the Puritans fleeing to the “New world” for religious freedom. No more learning about the Revolutionary War and the Constitutional Convention.
It is non-stop indoctrination of the “black people are oppressed, white people are the oppressors” narrative. It promotes the narrative that, in the words of Tim Kaine, America “created” slavery and “didn’t inherit it from anybody.”
The 1619 Project is the narrative that America was created for the sole purpose of oppressing and enslaving black people, and that the people that founded this country collectively made it their lives’ mission to oppress black people. Every law ever written, every word of the Constitution, every word of the Declaration of Independence–all of it was written by people who were single-mindedly intent on oppressing black people.
The whole “freedom” thing? A myth. The real point of America is to be mean to black people.
Because radical black ethnonarcissists in America today believe everyone is as obsessed with “blackness” as they are.
More about the 1619 Project:
The project was timed for the 400th anniversary of the arrival of the first enslaved Africans in the Virginia colony in 1619, and suggests that this date represents the “nation’s birth year.” It is an interactive project directed by Nikole Hannah-Jones, a reporter for The New York Times, with contributions by the newspaper’s writers, including essays on the history of different aspects of contemporary American life which the authors believe have “roots in slavery and its aftermath.”
They aren’t lying about wanting to completely rewrite American history.
If the 1619 Project was merely some article by a radical black nationalist published by the New York Times, it wouldn’t be that big of a deal. But it’s way more than that now: it is now starting to be taught in schools across the country. According to Northwestern University:
Imagine a high school classroom where the history teacher asks the students how societal structures continue to support the enslavement of Black people. Then the conversation continues to dissect the role of slaves in the development of America, abandoning the predictable narrative of the Civil War, emancipation, freedom.
That curriculum exists. The Pulitzer Center helped turn The New York Times’ The 1619 Project — which received worldwide attention when it was published last year — into a curriculum that’s now taught in more than 4,500 schools nationwide.
I’m sure the math doesn’t break down this evenly, but 4500 schools divided by 50 states is 90 schools per state.
The 1619 Project was created by people who harbor an impossibly deep and ferocious hatred of America and white people in general. They seek nothing less than the complete disenfranchisement and dispossession of white Americans.
Today, which is apparently “Constitution Day,” Trump (and VP Pence) delivered remarks at the first-ever “White House History Conference”, held at the National Archives. In his remarks, President Trump announced that he will soon be signing an executive order to create a “national commission to promote patriotic education” called “The 1776 Commission”. Here is the full video of his remarks, and here is a link to the transcript:
Our mission is to defend the legacy of America’s founding, the virtue of America’s heroes, and the nobility of the American character. We must clear away the twisted web of lies in our schools and classrooms and teach our children the magnificent truth about our country. We want our sons and daughters to know that they are the citizens of the most exceptional nation in the history of the world.
Because the 1619 Project teaches them the exact opposite: that they are citizens of the most wicked and RACIST nation in the history of the world, and that they should hate themselves accordingly.
The 1619 Project is the latest in a long line of anti-American alternative histories that began with Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States,” only this one is way more obviously anti-white.
When I was in high school not all that long ago (I graduated in 2009, very early in Obama’s presidency), US history lessons were already pretty heavily focused on slavery and the Holocaust (i.e. the “white people are dangerous and bad narrative”), but they still had some degree of balance and emphasis on the founding and American exceptionalism.
We learned that America’s system of government–a constitutional republic–was the first of its kind and marked a turning point not only here on this continent but in world history, after which the relationship between men and their governments would never be the same again.
Prior to 1776, monarchy was the rule around the world. Government was largely defined as a “ruler-subject” relationship, and people had little to no say in regards to the laws under which they lived.
We learned that the Founding Fathers of America were some of the smartest, wisest and greatest men to ever live because of the unique system of government they created.
Now, of course, American representative democracy as implemented by the Founders was incomplete, and so it evolved and expanded over time–most notably 1828 with Andrew Jackson, the 15th Amendment in 1870, the 19th Amendment in 1920, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. But though America did not begin as a fully representative democracy, all of those expansions to the voting franchise listed in the previous sentence were conceived, justified and ultimately signed into law based on the words the Founding Fathers had written in 1776 in their blueprint for America, aka the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.“
It was this line that ultimately led to the abolition of slavery, too.
I think the reason I’ve always believed in American exceptionalism is because it’s what I was taught in school. But things have changed significantly over the past decade or so.
It goes beyond just the Founding Fathers, too. When I was in school, we learned about the Civil Rights movement through the perspective of Martin Luther King Jr, whose most famous line was “I have a dream that one day, my children may be judged not by the color of their skin, but the content of their character.” I grew up with the “colorblind America” ideal, but that’s long gone: now, nothing can matter more than race. It’s a complete inversion, the point of which is to divide America along racial lines rather than bring all races together under the American flag.
Now, you can argue that the Roman Republic beat us to the punch as far as democracy goes, and that our belief in the uniqueness of American democracy is short-sighted and naive, not only in its ignorance of the fact that the Roman Republic came first, but also in forgetting how the Roman Republic ended and what came after it.
America may yet go the way of the old Roman Republic–and there are a growing number of people out there who argue that this wouldn’t really be a bad thing–but I think the American Republic can still be turned around and saved so long as we reverse course now.
That’s what Trump is trying to do with the 1776 Commission: reverse course before America raise an entire generation of radical, America-hating leftwingers. More from Trump’s speech:
On this very day in 1787, our founding fathers signed the Constitution at Independence Hall in Philadelphia. It was the fulfillment of a thousand years of Western civilization. Our Constitution was the product of centuries of tradition, wisdom, and experience. No political document has done more to advance the human condition or propel the engine of progress. Yet, as we gather this afternoon, a radical movement is attempting to demolish this treasured and precious inheritance. We can’t let that happen.
The left wing mobs have torn down statues of our founders, desecrated our memorials, and carried out a campaign of violence and anarchy. Far left demonstrators have chanted the words, “America was never great.” The Left has launched a vicious and violent assault on law enforcement, the universal symbol of the rule of law in America. These radicals have been aided and abetted by liberal politicians, establishment, media, and even large corporations. Whether it is the mob on the street or the cancel culture in the boardroom, the goal is the same: to silence dissent, to scare you out of speaking the truth, and to bully Americans into abandoning their values, their heritage, and their very way of life.
We are here today to declare that we will never submit to tyranny. We will reclaim our history and our country for citizens of every race, color, religion, and creed. The radicals burning American flags want to burn down the principles enshrined in our founding documents, including the bedrock principle of equal justice under law. In order to radically transform America, they must first cause Americans to lose confidence in who we are, where we came from, and what we believe.
This is the crux of it. In order to ensure unchecked and permanent power for themselves, the radical left must first disabuse Americans of their attachment to outdated ideas like “freedom” “We the People,” and “the rule of law.”
As many of you testified today, the left wing rioting and mayhem are the direct result of decades of left wing indoctrination in our schools. It’s gone on far too long. Our children are instructed from propaganda tracks like those of Howard Zinn that try to make students ashamed of their own history. The Left has warped, distorted, and defiled the American story with deceptions, falsehoods, and lies.
There’s no better example than the New York Times totally discredited 1619 Project. This project rewrites American history to teach our children that we were founded on the principle of oppression, not freedom. Nothing could be further from the truth. America’s founding set in motion the unstoppable chain of events that abolished slavery, secured civil rights, defeated communism and fascism, and built the most fair, equal, and prosperous nation in human history.
We embrace the vision of Martin Luther King, where children are not judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. The Left is attempting to destroy that beautiful vision and divide Americans by race, in the service of political power. By viewing every issue through the lens of race, they want to impose a new segregation and we must not allow that to happen. Critical Race Theory, the 1619 Project, and the crusade against American history is toxic propaganda. Ideological poison, that if not removed will dissolve the civic bonds that tie us together, will destroy our country. That is why I recently banned trainings in this prejudiced ideology from the federal government and banned it in the strongest manner possible.
The only path to national unity is through our shared identity as Americans. That is why it is so urgent that we finally restore patriotic education to our schools. Under our leadership, the National Endowment for the Humanities has awarded a grant to support the development of a pro-American curriculum that celebrates the truth about our nation’s great history.
He’s taking direct aim at the 1619 Project. He correctly identifies the unique danger it–and anti-American school curriculum in general–poses to the survival of this country.
The blue checks on Twitter are calling Trump’s speech “fascist,” unsurprisingly. Pro tip: if your biggest concern is the supposed “rise of fascism in America,” it’s probably not the best idea to tell people that a Presidential speech emphasizing things like “freedom” and “national unity” constitutes fascism. Lots of Americans are going to look at Trump’s remarks and think, “If that’s fascism, then I guess I’m a fascist.”
“Trump Youth” is also a trending topic on Twitter. Get it, like “Hitler Youth”? Very original and fresh, right?
So brainwashed are the libs that they reflexively associate patriotism with Hitler.
See how bad thingsalready are?
These brainwashed libs on social media shrieking about the 1776 Commission and calling it “Nazism” are in fact Exhibit A for why the 1776 Commission is so vitally important.
Newt: “Look, the #1 problem in almost all these cities is George Soros-elected, leftwing, anti-police, pro-criminal district attorneys who refuse to keep people locked up. Just yesterday, they put someone back on the street who was wanted for two different murders in New York City. You cannot solve this problem–and both Harris and Bidenhave talked very proudly about what they call ‘progressive district attorneys.’ Progressive district attorneys are anti-police, pro-criminal and overwhelmingly elected with George Soros’ money, and they’re a major cause of the violence we’re seeing, because they keep putting the criminals back on the street.”
Deep manly-voiced bossy woman Fox News anchor (off-camera): “I’m not sure we need to bring George Soros into this.”
Newt: “Well he paid for it. Why can’t we discuss the fact that millions of dollars–“
Shrill, smirking, corporate HR Nazi-esque woman: “No he didn’t. I agree with Melissa, George Soros doesn’t need to be a part of this conversation.”
Newt: “….Okay…? So it’s verboten…?”
*long, awkward silence*
*end of segment*
What the hell just happened here? These women just completely shut Newt down after he mentioned George Soros.
At least we now have confirmation that Fox News is compromised.
Newt Gingrich is 100% correct, which is why they had to silence him here.
Just days ago, Newt tweeted this out:
Because he’s funding all of them. And if they don’t immediately silence anyone who mentions his name, they run the risk of losing that funding.
Why is all this rioting and looting happening? Why is Antifa running free in major cities? Why isn’t anybody doing anything about this?
It’s not like we don’t have the ability to get this under control. We’re not like Mexico where our law enforcement simply cannot compete with the criminals, and therefore the criminals run a large part of the country.
Our police are perfectly capable of getting this under control. But they do not. And these criminals run free.
It’s because someone is telling the police to stand down, and someone is letting these criminals out of jail.
Soros has been buying off big city DAs for years now.
Liberal billionaire George Soros has quietly flooded cash into local district attorney races across numerous states in recent years, notching yet another victory Tuesday in Philadelphia.
Larry Krasner, a progressive defense attorney who has joked that he built a career that made him “completely unelectable,” made his way out of a crowded Democratic field of eight candidates before defeating Republican prosecutor Beth Grossman by more than 40 percentage points in Tuesday’s district attorney election in Philadelphia.
Krasner, who has represented Occupy Philadelphia and Black Lives Matter, and has sued the police department more than 75 times, had a major fundraising advantage that was provided almost exclusively by Soros, who has made it a mission to fund district attorney races throughout the country and has notched victories along the way.
The Soros operation is the same in nearly every city: The financier will establish political action committees, pour money into local races, then turn around and shut them down once the election is over.
On April 28, Soros initially cut a $1,450,000 check to the Philadelphia Justice and Public Safety PAC, a super PAC that was established with the sole intent of backing Krasner. The PAC lists its address as the Perkins Coie law office, a Washington, D.C.-based powerhouse law firm that represents a number of Democratic politicians, committees, and interests. Whitney Tymas, who has been involved with a number of Soros PACs, is the operator of the Philadelphia Justice & Public Safety PAC.
Soros gave $214,000 more to the PAC on May 23, bringing the total amount in support of Krasner to $1.7 million, an unusual high for the average district attorney race. This was the first time a PAC had supported a candidate for district attorney in the city.
City DA races never see this type of money spent. Not even in big cities like Philadelphia.
The billionaire financier has channeled more than $3 million into seven local district-attorney campaigns in six states over the past year — a sum that exceeds the total spent on the 2016 presidential campaign by all but a handful of rival super-donors.
His money has supported African-American and Hispanic candidates for these powerful local roles, all of whom ran on platforms sharing major goals of Soros’, like reducing racial disparities in sentencing and directing some drug offenders to diversion programs instead of to trial. It is by far the most tangible action in a progressive push to find, prepare and finance criminal justice reform-oriented candidates for jobs that have been held by longtime incumbents and serve as pipelines to the federal courts — and it has inspired fury among opponents angry about the outside influence in local elections.
Soros has spent on district attorney campaigns in Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas through a network of state-level super PACs and a national “527” unlimited-money group, each named a variation on “Safety and Justice.” (Soros has also funded a federal super PAC with the same name.) Each organization received most of its money directly from Soros, according to public state and federal financial records, though some groups also got donations from nonprofits like the Civic Participation Action Fund, which gave to the Safety and Justice group in Illinois.
After the Louisiana and Mississippi races, Soros next piled money into two of the biggest jurisdictions in the country: Houston’s Harris County (his lone losing effort so far) and Chicago’s Cook County, where he funded one of several groups that helped Kim Foxx defeat incumbent state’s attorney Anita Alvarez in a high-profile primary campaign dominated by the 13-month delay between the police shooting of Laquan McDonald and the indictment of the police officer involved.
As if the “13 month delay” is supposed to be inherently a bad thing? Were they supposed to send the officers to prison for life without a fair trial? Actually, that’s a rhetorical question. The left would probably answer yes.
Kim Foxx, you probably remember, was the Chicago DA who let Jussie Smollett off the hook.
While Soros has spent heavily in 2015 and 2016, a broader national push into local prosecutor campaigns is expected to intensify in the next few years, thanks to longer-term planning and candidate recruitment. A Safety and Justice group has already organized in Ohio, according to campaign finance filings there. But it has not yet disclosed raising or spending any money.
And intensify it has. What you’re seeing now in 2020 is the payoff–this was the end-goal of Soros’ plan to “overhaul” the “justice” systems of big cities in the US.
The St. Louis prosecutor who threw the book at the McCloskeys? Soros-funded:
St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, who was boosted by Soros in her campaign, drew controversy when she announced her office was bringing felony charges against Mark and Patricia McCloskey, the couple who brandished guns outside their home as protesters marched by in June.
Wonder why San Francisco is out of control? Soros-funded DA:
San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin, another beneficiary of Soros-tied contributions, recently defended the movement to defund police. In a discussion with Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., earlier in July, Boudin questioned whether money going to police was “the most effective” use of taxpayer dollars.
Soros is behind all of it:
In a Washington Post op-ed he co-wrote with Baltimore DA Marilyn Mosby, [Philadelphia DA Jerry] Krasner threatened to have federal officers arrested and charged if they overstep their authority in his jurisdiction, after officers in Portland were accused of using excessive force.
“Should Trump send federal agents who engage in the same illegal vigilante activities, unlawfully assaulting and kidnapping people, they will face criminal charges from our offices,” Krasner and Mosby said.
In Contra Costa County, Calif., District Attorney Diana Becton – also backed by Soros – changed how her office handles police shooting cases, removing deputy district attorney Barry Grove from his role as the main prosecutor in such cases, switching to a team approach, according to the Mercury News.
Becton also announced earlier this month that she was filing hate crime charges against Nichole Anderson and David Nelson, White people who were allegedly caught painting over a Black Lives Matter mural.
This is the end-result of Soros’ efforts. It goes on and on.
“There’s this recent development [where] George Soros has been coming in, in largely Democratic primaries where there has not been much voter turnout and putting in a lot of money to elect people who are not very supportive of law enforcement and don’t view the office as bringing to trial and prosecuting criminals but pursuing other social agendas,” Barr told Martha MacCallum. “They have started to win in a number of cities and they have, in my view, not given the proper support to the police.”
Last month, two Virginia prosecutorial candidates ousted incumbents in local Democratic primaries — after Soros’ Justice and Public Safety PAC poured nearly a million dollars into their campaigns.
He backed Parisa Dehghani-Tafti to beat Arlington County Commonwealth’s Attorney Theo Stamos, and supported former Justice Department employee Steve Descano in his race against Fairfax County Commonwealth’s Attorney Raymond Morrogh. Campaign finance reports show Dehghani-Tafti received $583,000 and Descano received $392,000 just from that PAC. Meanwhile, Stamos and Morrogh raised $162,000 and $242,000, respectively, for their entire campaigns.
The money gave Tafti and Descano a significant financial advantage over the incumbents, despite their lack of experience. The Washington Post reported that while the two challengers have never prosecuted a case in a state court, they beat candidates with more than 60 years of experience between them.
It’s all starting to make sense now.
Most normal Americans have got to be wondering right now, “Man, how and why did things suddenly get so bad in so many of these major cities?”
Soros is the why and the how.
But apparently you’re not allowed to mention that on Fox News, which is funny because most of the articles I cited in this post were from Fox News’ website.
Everything with the Democrats these days is an inversion–the complete and polar opposite of the truth. Hillary says that unless we have mass online censorship by Facebook, Google and Twitter, then we don’t have a democracy. She says we cannot have a democracy and freedom of speech at the same time.
They have labeled any speech that represents a threat to their power as “disinformation” and demand it be banned accordingly. In reality, the so-called “disinformation” and “election-related lies” is the honest truth. It’s the mainstream media that is responsible for “disinformation.”
Hillary and the Democrats love “disinformation.” They rely on it to gain power. It’s the most important thing in the world to them: to ensure people are misinformed by the media, by Hollywood and at school. The truth is the biggest threat to their power, which is why they label it “disinformation.”
Hillary is saying, essentially, that we can either have a democracy, or we can have a Chinese-style censored internet. And she’s in favor of the latter, obviously.
The Democrats are in full-blown panic mode right now. They’re pulling every last thing out of their bag of tricks and trying desperately to save Joe Biden’s campaign.