I’m traveling all weekend so my posts will be sparse but I wanted to share this in the wake of several Democrat-controlled states legalizing abortion right up until birth. This is Vox’s snarky scold from 2016:
Your daily reminder that these 30 year old millennial #Journalists consider themselves vastly superior to the President of the United States. They are beyond certain that their IQs are 40-50 points higher than his.
This is why they’re so quick to lecture and condescend him–and, by extension, us.
They don’t know jack shit.
In fact, that’s probably letting them off the hook: the leftists at Vox knew full well they were lying when they wrote this article.
They were lying to cover up their abortion extremism.
The header photo is of NY Governor Andrew Cuomo signing the bill into law that would allow abortions up until birth. Cuomo is beaming, and surrounded by triumphant Democrats who simply Love Abortion and want everyone to know.
This is yet another position that the left has revealed its true, radical colors on.
Since then Democrats have pretended to only favor early-term abortions.
They always try to move the conversation to make us look like the extremists by asking, “Well would you support an abortion in the case of rape, incest or threat to the mother’s life?” But cases like this are so rare they’re hardly even worth discussing.
In 2019, they have let the mask slip: they’ll kill the baby as its being born. They don’t give a fuck. A woman’s Constitutional Right to Consequence-Free Sex must be preserved.
Keep in mind that, while rare, there have been cases of babies being born at only 21 weeks of pregnancy. It happened in 2014 in Texas, and the child is still alive today.
This is what babies look like early in pregnancy:
They’re very small at this point, no larger than the palm of your hand, but there’s no doubt whatsoever that that is a human life. And Democrats don’t care.
Democrats do not have “#SCIENCE” on their side on abortion. Not even close.
Consider this: if a single-celled bacteria were found on Mars tomorrow, all the newspapers would have “LIFE ON MARS!” as the front-page headline.
And yet the self-described Party of Science here in America is trying to tell us that a 40-week-old baby in a mother’s womb about to be born is not actually a human life.
“Science” cannot rationalize killing a child. Democrats are just trying to avoid the guilt that would inevitably come from admitting the truth.
If they admit that a child in a mother’s womb is a living human being, then they also have to admit that they support murder-for-convenience.
The right to be a whore shall not be infringed.
imagine being a semi-conscious fetus floating in oblivion when a needle comes out of nowhere and headshots you for the insta-kill because your mother would rather make PowerPoints for $60K/y than raise you pic.twitter.com/OFbHoMewkR
“Empire” star Jussie Smollett was brutally attacked by 2 men who beat him up, put his head in a noose and screamed, “This is MAGA country.”
Sources directly connected to Jussie tell TMZ, the actor arrived in Chicago from New York late Monday, and at around 2 AM he was hungry and went to a Subway. We’re told when shortly after he walked out on his way home, someone yelled, “Aren’t you that f***ot ‘Empire’ n*****?”
The 2 men — both white and wearing ski masks — viciously attacked Jussie as he fought back, but they beat him badly and fractured a rib. They put a rope around his neck, poured bleach on him and as they left they yelled, “This is MAGA country.”
Are you kidding me?
No one in Chicago, not even the most die-hard Trump supporter (there are more of us than you think) would ever declare this city “MAGA country.”
Right off the bat, this story is not believable.
“ThatGrapeJuice.Net first posted this letter which was sent to Fox Studios in Chicago with cut out letters spelling, “You will die black f**.” Our sources say the letter was sent 8 days ago.
The envelope the letter arrived in appears to say MAGA in the upper left corner.”
It looks like it was written and drawn by a five year old.
But then again, that would fit with the left’s perception of Trump supporters as being literally retarded.
And why would they write “MAGA” on the envelope? Would the sender really want Trump to get blamed for this?
This is so pathetic.
And of course, Chicago police are already shooting down the claim that the attackers said “This is MAGA country!”
Chicago police deny claims that Jussie Smollett identified attackers as white or heard them reference "MAGA" country. "According to the victim, the offenders’ faces were concealed," police tell @robbysoavehttps://t.co/aqOAYlXOpK
“Baron Von Munchausen asks a good question: Who walks around at 2am in 15 degree weather with abottle of bleachon the off-chance one might run across someone of a minority race or sexual orientation? This just does not seem like a random racial/homophobic attack, which means that’s probably not actually the motive.
Assuming the threatening letter is connected to this attack, it suggests a more personalized motive, and long-building grudge. It just doesn’t seem likely that celebrity stalkers would find their quarryout on the street— they’d encounter them where they would plausibly know they were to be found, like at home, or at work, or at some event the media announced in advanced they’d be attending.
The facts as they are currently being claimed suggest both a random, opportunistic attackanda planned attack against a specific person for a specific reason. Obviously, these cannot both be true. There’s something wrong here.”
Now from what I understand the attack happened near a Target store, so I guess that could explain where the attackers got the bleach from.
But I also don’t know of any Target stores in this city that are open at 2am.
This “attack” happened outside. So the “attackers” just happened to be carrying around bleach and a noose.
This will shock you but Jussie Smollett is a hardcore Trump hater, so he definitely has no motive to fake this:
So far, Chicago PD has not been able to find any video of the attackers:
Not only this, but they have no video of the attack itself:
Chicago police say detectives have reviewed hundreds of hours of surveillance footage but haven’t found any yet that shows the alleged attack on “Empire” actor Jussie Smollett. https://t.co/zj2fs1MUyX
There are cameras all over the place in big cities. You can’t take five steps without being on closed-circuit TV.
The truth will come out eventually.
Yet how many people will believe this nonsense instinctively and never see the real story when it unravels? How many people will take this unfounded allegation as further confirmation that white people are awful, and that Trump is a RACIST who has declared open season on oppressed minorities?
How many NPCs are “LITERALLY SHAKING!” and “WOW, JUST WOW” over this?
The real hate crime is deliberately lying about white Trump supporters in order to demonize them as a group.
There is no such thing as “racially charged.”
This attack was not “possibly” homophobic. It was a racist and homophobic attack.
If you don’t like what is happening to our country, then work to change it. It is no one’s job to water down or sugar-coat the rise of hate crimes. https://t.co/QAi0IYtSeR
“What is happening to our country.” Get outta here.
I’ll tell you what’s happening to our country: You’re allowed to straight up lie about Trump supporters so long as the lie fits with the anti-Trump racial grievance narrative the left so desperately wants to be true.
In the days of Jim Crow, white people used to falsely accuse black people of crimes because the white people knew they’d be believed over the black people. The attitude was, “Well, he’s black, so of course he’s guilty.” We’ve all read “To Kill a Mockingbird.”
Today, the exact opposite is true: any accusation leveled by a black person at a white Trump supporter is automatically believed.
The US “media” wasn’t inherently skeptical of this baseless allegation. It immediately ran with it under the presumption that it was true, because as everyone knows, black people are Super Oppressed, and everyone also knows Trump supporters are violent bigots who do exactly this kind of thing all the time. It’s gotta be true!
This is brainwashing, straight up.
So what’s the real story? We don’t know yet, but this is a good guess:
The 2016 election between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton can be seen as a battle of the sexes, with Hillary Clinton representing (or, more accurately, cynically co-opting) the feminist sentiment (manifested post-2016 in the angry Pussy Hats of the Women’s March), and Trump, epitomizing the braggadocious, domineering alpha male always being surrounded by beautiful women.
Hillary Clinton came of age in the 1960s wave of feminism, and represented Feminism 1.0, i.e. Aging Boomer Feminism. Her candidacy and presumed easy victory was painted as the moment every feminist since the late 1960s was working toward.
Trump, on the other hand, was an unapologetically masculine throwback to a time when men felt no shame in being, well, men. He was clearly the most masculine and alpha Republican candidate in the field, humiliating his rivals for being “weak” and “low energy.” Trump was basically calling all his Republican competitors beta males, i.e. lesser men, the whole time. Obviously the voters preferred the alpha male.
Trump has never spent a second pondering his supposed “toxic masculinity.” He doesn’t feel like he owes women anything. He doesn’t pander to women and feminist talking points, and as 2016 showed, he was not at all reluctant to savage Hillary Clinton in the same manner he humiliated his mostly-male Republican primary opponents. While other candidates would have balked at truly taking off the gloves against Hillary out of fear of being called a sexist, Trump had no such reluctance. He pulled no punches and felt no inherent need to roll over for her due to guilt over having Male Privilege.
Hillary on the other hand had traditionally been a smug, cynical, conniving, entitled shapeshifter, who would trash her husbands mistresses as bimbos and skanks while simultaneously claiming to be a champion of women. But by 2016 Hillary had come to represent the shrill, nagging, angry, sexless hag. Either way, she represented the type of woman that most men either resent or fear.
Trump was the wild card the feminists and the Uniparty were not expecting. They were expecting Hillary to make short work of some cowed, politically correct Establishment Republican pussy like Jeb Bush who wouldn’t have the audacity to try to truly win the 2016 election. Again, 2016 was Hillary’s Moment and everyone knew it. As the Uniparty-anointed Embodiment of Feminism, Hillary was entitled to winning the presidency in 2016, because men were said to be obligated to step aside and let women take over the reins of power in this country. That was what Hillary’s victory was to represent: a landmark cultural changing of the guard, a sweeping away of the last vestiges of the “old America” of the Patriarchy and traditional gender roles.
In short the two candidates can plausibly be seen as stand-ins for the competing ideals of the Patriarchy and the Matriarchy. Trump was the embodiment of the powerful alpha male that traditionally ran this country, while Hillary was supposed to embody the dawning of a New Age of Feminism In reality, Hillary was merely a grating, off-putting reminder of what it looks like when women try to be powerful.
But while we’re told endlessly that this country is a Patriarchy that oppresses women brutally and systematically, Hillary was actually the one who was supposed to win. She was anointed as the Uniparty Establishment’s chosen candidate, even though her candidacy was supposedly a repudiation of the ruling Patriarchy. (The fact that many prominent Republicans supported her over Trump makes sense only if you view them not as actual Republicans, but instead as members of the Uniparty, which is the Democrats and the the Republicans-in-name-only who pretend to oppose the Democrats in order to maintain the illusion that the American people actually have a say in government.)
So to recap: Hillary, the woman, was said to be the great threat to the Patriarchy that supposedly controls this country, yet Hillary was also the chosen candidate of the political elite, the media, Wall Street, big business, Silicon Valley, academia and the military industrial complex. Please tell me how a country’s power Establishment that is said to be a Patriarchy anoints a woman as its choice for President. 🤔🤔🤔
In reality, Hillary’s campaign was not a grassroots, countercultural revolution against the dominant Patriarchy. That was all a facade to trick NPC voters into getting excited to support the same old Uniparty Globalism they’d had forced on them for the past several decades prior.
There is no longer a Patriarchy in this country, but the Uniparty finds it useful to invoke it as a bogeyman to keep the feminists angry and energized.
And that’s why 2016 wasn’t a true “battle of the sexes.” Hillary was not a legitimate, paradigm-shaking feminist: she was a power-hungry politician who played the part when it was politically advantageous to do so.
Ultimately, 2016 was a repudiation of the ruling Uniparty and its globalist policies which have destroyed American manufacturing and are transforming this country demographically. It wasn’t a battle of the sexes.
2020 will be the real battle of the sexes.
The 2020 presidential campaign is already underway, with nearly half a dozen Democrats announcing their candidacies for the party’s nomination. While there are still many more names out there that will eventually join the race, the Democratic establishment seems to have already decided that Sen. Kamala Harris of California will be the one who wins the nomination in the end.
Today’s Democratic Party is the party of women and nonwhites, and Kamala Harris is both. This makes her basically entitled to the party’s nomination by default. In simple terms, Harris can claim to be the most oppressed of all the candidates in a party where being oppressed is everything. Being both nonwhite and female, Kamala Harris is “doubly oppressed.”
She will be the 2020 Democratic nominee. No male candidate can credibly claim to be more deserving of the party’s nomination over her, nor can any white woman.
If the other Democratic candidates do indeed buy into the grievance-mongering intersectional bullshit they’ve been selling for the past several years, none of them even have a right to challenge her for the party’s nomination. The party that has been insistent that identity is everything cannot now turn around and say, “Well, no, actually: don’t focus on my skin color and gender, listen to my ideas.”
Anyway, future 2020 Democratic nominee Kamala Harris also represents the second iteration of feminism, and this feminism is far more dangerous than anything posed by the first wave.
This is Donald Trump’s greatest challenge. In 2016 it was the Uniparty Establishment, in 2020 it will be Empowerment Feminism (and the Uniparty Establishment).
While Hillary Clinton got married and stayed dutifully by her husband’s side even as he cheated on her left and right, Kamala Harris is the Gen X #empowered feminist who stayed single until she was 50, using her “freedom” to sleep her way up the ranks of California politics and eventually into the US Senate.
Both Hillary and Harris, of course, only got to where they are due to the men in their life. Hillary Clinton would be nothing without Bill, and Kamala Harris’s career was launched in large part by her carrying on an affair with former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown.
Hillary Clinton used her gender for sympathy, Kamala Harris used her vagina to get what she wanted out of men in her pursuit of power.
But the real difference between Equality Feminism (Hillary) and Empowerment Feminism, (Harris), is that the latter actively encourages women to forgo marriage and motherhood in favor of sleeping around and career advancement. This is devastating for the country. Empowerment Feminism is far more dangerous than Equality Feminism.
Hillary didn’t represent a massive upending of the traditional American social order. Kamala Harris does.
Despite being the most successful and unencumbered generation of women in human history, Empowerment Feminists still consider themselves oppressed. They have the highest levels of educational attainment of any generation of American women, the highest incomes, the most options professionally, sexually and financially–and, not coincidentally, they also have the most support from and representation in America’s power Establishment. Additionally, women today can ruin men’s lives with made-up rape or domestic violence accusations and face no consequences at all, Because #BelieveWomen. Men are 10x more likely than women to be killed at work, and men comprise the vast majority of the most dangerous jobs. And yet Empowerment Feminism is much angrier and more obviously hateful toward men.
Equality Feminism was primarily focused on obtaining abortion rights and more favorable divorce and domestic violence laws. It represented somewhat of a threat to the traditional American social order, but not a dire threat.
Equality Feminism wanted women to somewhat level the playing field within the Patriarchal American society, while Empowerment Feminism wants to completely upend the whole system and turn it into a full-fledged Matriarchy.
Empowerment Feminism is about surpassing–and, if necessary, destroying–men. It takes a zero-sum view of men and women: when a man succeeds, it must necessarily be at the expense of a woman. And so in order for women to succeed, it must necessarily come at the expense of men as a group. This is why they sleep around and focus on their careers instead of settle down, get married and become mothers.
Right now, Harris’s core constituency is the single, white 30-something urbanite cat lady. Basically the blue check feminists on Twitter, many of whom just got laid off by either Huff Post or BuzzFeed. In other words, while there are many American women who have chosen the career-focused whore path in life, it has not yet become the “default” path for women. But if Harris is elected President, it will be.
That’s what Kamala Harris represents. She represents the “career-oriented” #empowered whores who are destroying this country.
She represents the legitimization of the thot, the amoral female who sleeps around, rejecting marriage and motherhood in favor of her career.
Now, I know the obvious response will be that I’m only saying all this because I want to “Keep Women Down” and send them back to the kitchen, but that’s not what this is about. Honestly. It’s not base sexism or misogyny.
It’s not that I envy or fear Kamala Harris because she represents #independent women who don’t need no men. The problem is that women like her encourage other women to live destructive and toxic lives that will result in their unhappiness and the ruin of American dating and sex.
The nuclear family is the foundation of a healthy, thriving America. Unavoidably. Empowerment Feminism is the greatest threat to the nuclear family since the welfare programs of the 1960s, which have already done a number on nuclear families.
If all women come to believe the best way to live is to sleep around until they become rich and powerful, we are screwed. Women will never settle for decent, even moderately successful men because they’ll all be looking for a Willie Brown of their own to put them on the fast track to becoming a Senator.
The problem is, this will never happen for 99% of women.
These women have to stop believing being a whore is empowering. Having 40 different sex partners is not empowering.
But these women will not realize it until they’re well into their 30s and single, when no half-decent guy will want anything to do with them.
At the end of the day, it’s about rejecting destructive, whorish behavior.
“Then why is not bad when men sleep around?!?!” they’ll retort.
Because men were made to sleep around. That’s how we’re wired biologically.
Women are wired to attach themselves to a strong, successful man for protection and financial stability.
See, the cold hard truth is that men don’t hit The Wall after 30. Men over 30, even into their 50s and 60s, can still attract young beautiful women.
But women basically have to find a guy by the time they’re in their early 30s or else they’re in big trouble. Older women are not nearly as desirable as younger ones.
Women in their 20s are wasting their sexual primes whoring themselves out and sleeping with dozens of guys because they’ve been told that it’s “empowering” to do so.
In reality they should be spending their 20s trying to find the right man–while their sexual market values are highest.
Just because being a whore for 30 years enabled Kamala Harris to sleep her way into power doesn’t mean it’s how every woman ought to live. It won’t work for every woman; in fact, it won’t work for the vast majority of them.
Plus, why does it seem like feminism is not driven by any natural, internal desires and biological tendencies but simply out of envy of men?
The reason men build businesses and empires and seek power is because of our natural tendency to conquer and dominate. We’re biologically driven. Women don’t have that innate biological drive to build and conquer and rule.
Women may think seeking power Just Like Men Do will satisfy them or provide meaning in their lives, but it won’t. A life driven by envy is neither meaningful nor satisfying. Envy is not fulfilling.
Same with women sleeping around: they’re not doing it because they are naturally driven to spread their seed far and wide, but rather Because Men Do It So Why Shouldn’t I Be Allowed To, Huh? HUH!?
It’s childish and silly.
It’s driven completely by envy.
Women don’t really want power. They don’t want to spread their seed–and at any rate that’s not even possible for them.
They’ve just been told that their lives are totally meaningless unless they try their hardest to live like men.
Another thing women do that’s motivated entirely by envy: bodybuilding.
I’m not talking about women who go to the gym and get toned and in shape–Lord knows I love a girl who’s in shape. I’m talking about the girls who get big and ripped.
Why do they do it? It’s not because it makes them more attractive to men. The vast majority of guys are disgusted by women who are ripped.
News flash: men like boobs, not pecs. And there is nothing hot about a girl having a firm, muscley ass and ripped, bulging quads.
Men work out to get big and strong because that’s what women are attracted to.
Women work out to get big and strong because. . . why, exactly?
It’s not to attract men.
Instead it’s out of envy; this If Men Do It, I Want To Do It, Too! attitude.
Again, it’s childish and ridiculous.
Oh, you need to be able to defend yourself, Ripped Girl? Maybe if you spent your time trying to attract a strong, alpha male you wouldn’t have to worry about that in the first place. And, news flash, no matter how big and ripped you get, you still won’t be able to overpower a man trying to rob or rape you. You’re better off buying a gun or a taser.
Anyway, all this is to say that Empowerment Feminism as represented by Kamala Harris must be defeated in 2020. It cannot be validated and rewarded with the Presidency, or it will be the end of this country.
Fortunately, we have the ultimate alpha male in Donald Trump standing in the way.
I’m sure most of us assumed Nancy Pelosi’s reasons for preventing President Trump from delivering the annual State of the Union address in the House chamber were a combination of the following:
A pathetic attempt to gain leverage over Trump.
An attempt to actively suppress the President’s voice and prevent him from speaking directly to the nation about his immigration policies.
But what if it has something to do with the potential incapacitation or even death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg? During a State of the Union address, the nine Supreme Court Justices join the House and Senate bodies in the audience, and sit prominently in the front row, meaning Ginsburg would be in attendance.
If the State of the Union address is held and she is not in attendance, it raises some obvious questions: Where is she? What is the state of her health? How long has she been unable to leave her home? When will she be able to return? Is she able to fully carry out her duties as a Supreme Court Justice in her state?
Perhaps the real reason Pelosi is stonewalling the State of the Union is because she wants to delay it until Ginsburg is healthy enough to attend.
Or, many are even suggesting it’s because Ginsburg already dead and the Democrats are trying to keep it a secret for as long as possible.
Keep in mind that Ginsburg hasn’t been seen publicly in weeks and the Uniparty media could not be less interested in finding out why. I’ve seen some claims that she was last seen 18 days ago, but when I Googled “Ruth Bader Ginsburg last public appearance” the top result was from December 15, 2018, when she did an interview in New York with NPR. We don’t really have a solid answer for when she was last seen.
Also, recall that when First Lady Melania Trump underwent a medical procedure and wasn’t seen in public for several weeks back in May 2018, the media was all over it: “FIRST LADY HASN’T BEEN SEEN IN 18 DAYS!!!” the headlines blared:
So the media definitely keeps tabs on these things. They are fully aware of how long it has been since Ginsburg was last seen, yet they’re not asking any questions and demanding to know the truth. That’s because they already know the truth and are in fact working to cover it up, rather than expose it.
We know how important Ginsburg is to the left. If she leaves the Supreme Court and Trump appoints her successor, the court will have a 6-3 Republican majority. This will be a major sea change moment in the history of the court.
Leftists know the end is near for Ginsburg, yet persist in a state of willful self-delusion over the whole thing, with “journalists” writing pathetic propaganda pieces about how she supposedly is a gym rat and her workouts are so intense that even young men in their 20s can’t handle them.
Is it that much of a stretch to believe the Democrats and their propagandists in the media are covering up the true state of Ginsburg’s health, or even that she is dead?
Would you put it past the Democrats? Would you put it past the Uniparty media?
I’m not saying I think Ginsburg is already dead, because I don’t see how Democrats would benefit from keeping that a secret–unless they really are planning on keeping it a secret for the next two years, when they hope to have a Democrat in the White House.
At most they could delay the news of her death breaking a few weeks, perhaps a month. What would they gain from that?
It’s possible they’re trying to wait out the end of the current Supreme Court term, which ends in late June. The Supreme Court generally hears cases from October through June, with the months July through September being off-months.
But can they really go full Weekend At Bernie’s with her until July? No way, right? Even if the Uniparty media works tirelessly to stonewall and keep the secret, it will somehow get out over the course of the next five months. It’s impossible to keep that a secret.
Right now, their official line is that Ginsburg is healthy and recovering at home, “staying on top of her work” there. What’s more likely is that her clerks and staff are doing everything for her, writing her opinions for her and making statements to the press.
But even this is unacceptable: a major part of being a Supreme Court Justice is being present in the courtroom and hearing the oral arguments of a case. Right now we have eight of the nine Justices present hearing arguments.
At the very least, we deserve to have a time frame for when Justice Ginsburg will be back and able to fulfill the requirements of her job. If she has to miss work for an extended period of time, she owes it to the American people to at the very least say so.
Preferably, Ginsburg would just resign and spend her remaining days with her loved ones, but Democrats will not allow that to happen.
Fox News briefly ran this graphic last week, then claimed it was a “technical error”:
Why would they even have the graphic prepared in the first place? How could they accidentally run it?
Could it be that the person responsible for putting the graphic on live TV was either not in-the-know that Fox’s official stance on the matter was to be part of the cover-up? After all, Fox has been slowly becoming more and more anti-Trump and pro-Establishment as of late. Or, could the person who ran the graphic potentially have been trying to subvert his Establishment superiors and get the truth out to the public?
This is more believable than, “Whoops, due to a technical error we accidentally created a graphic for Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death, and then also accidentally put it on live television for the whole country to see.”
“Yes, we dated. It was more than 20 years ago,” Brown wrote in the San Francisco Chronicle.
“Yes, I may have influenced her career by appointing her to two state commissions when I was [California] Assembly speaker. And I certainly helped with her first race for district attorney in San Francisco.”
This woman fucked her way up the ranks of California politics and eventually into the US Senate, and now she has her eyes on the White House.
“Brown appointed Harris — about 30 years younger than Brown and just a few years out of law school – to two well-paid state commission assignments on the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board and the California Medical Assistance Commission, the Washington Free Beacon reported.
The former mayor also connected Harris with campaign donors, which helped her outraise her opponent for San Francisco district attorney, Business Insider reported. Brown’s involvement in her election raised questions as to how Harris would remain impartial, given his enormous political clout.”
What an #Empowered and #Independent woman Kamala Harris is. Truly an inspiration for young girls everywhere.
Girls, you can be anything you want to be! All you have to do is seek out powerful men 30 years older than you are and spread your legs open for them!
Willie Brown is a notorious lothario, but has been married to his first wife since 1958, and was married during his affair with Harris.
Kamala Harris is not only an ambitious whore, but a conniving one as well. Look at what Brown had to say about how Harris treated him after she got what she wanted:
“The difference is that Harris is the only one who, after I helped her, sent word that I would be indicted if I ‘so much as jaywalked’ while she was D.A.,” Brown wrote. “That’s politics for ya.”
What a cold, conniving, ungrateful bitch.
There’s a name for this kind of thing, where a female not only discards a man after sex, but tries to kill or destroy him. It’s called “Sexual cannibalism” and it is observed in nature mostly in spiders and other arachnids. It’s how the black widow spider got its name. Kamala Harris tried to do the same thing to Willie Brown.
So now one of the early front runners for the 2020 Democratic nomination for President is a conniving, back-stabbing thot.
That’s what’s at stake in America.
Now, I am under no illusions that the White House is a Sacred And Hallowed Place which has only ever been occupied by individuals of impeccable character and honor. Lord knows our man Trump has done some shit in his life. We’ve had depraved presidents.
Let’s not pretend our presidents have all been demigods incapable of err and sin. They’re all human beings just like you and me.
We’ve had some decent men in the White House, and we’ve had some very bad men in the White House.
But we’ve never had a whore in the White House.
Can you imagine how many other men Harris banged in her quest for power?
Harris didn’t get married until she was 50, in 2014. Probably the reason behind this is she didn’t want to be encumbered by a husband and kids as she fucked her way up the ranks of California politics.
Kamala Harris is the #Empowered, amoral modern feminist par excellence. Forgoing marriage and motherhood to “focus on her career” and fucking her way up the political ladder while pretending to be a #Strong, #Independent woman.
The stakes are clear: the Democratic Party intends to disgrace the White House and the nation by making a thot our President.
Our Founding Fathers are rolling over in their graves knowing that Kamala Harris, who has been plowed more times than a Kansas corn field, might become President.
This is truly a sign of Western Civilization’s terminal decline. The alpha male is pathologized and vilified, while a whore can be rewarded with the Presidency.
In Diverse™ societies, the “melting pot” is a myth.
What actually tends to happen is tribal fragmentation, where loyalty to one’s racial/ethnic tribe trumps loyalty to country.
Assimilation works up to a point: the European immigrant groups of the turn of the century assimilated quite well over time, to the point where today you would hardly be able to distinguish their descendants from 12th generation Americans.
And even some post-1965 immigrants (i.e. non-Western) have Americanized fairly well, but the key to that is small numbers. In other words, there’s little trouble assimilating 20 or so non-Western immigrants into a community of, say, ten thousand Americans.
But mass immigration from non-Western/Anglosphere nations does not work.
Instead of assimilation, we see separation and tribalism.
What Ilhan Omar is doing here should not be surprising. She’s pursuing the interests of her group (Muslims) over the interests of the country at large.
Leniency for ISIS recruits is obviously and undeniably bad for America overall, but it’s good for Muslims.
Ilhan Omar couldn’t give less of a shit about America overall. She was elected to represent the Somali Muslims of her district in Minnesota, and she will do so even at the expense of the nation at large.
That’s post-1965 “Diversity” for you.
In the era of Western “Diversity,” the country itself becomes little more than lines on a map, and most people and groups have little attachment to the country itself–its history, its traditions, its culture, its people. The groups living within the lines have competing interests and often deeply resent one another. For all intents and purposes, the “nation” dies when it becomes a hodgepodge of “diverse” subgroups.
To the extent that subgroups comprising diverse societies do care about the affairs of the greater nation itself, it’s only to extract benefits for themselves at the expense of everyone else, i.e. government handouts and largesse via redistribution of wealth.
Why do you think Democrats today only talk about: a. how much their racial subgroups are #oppressed and b. establishing new government handout programs (e.g. free healthcare, free college tuition, more welfare) for their voters funded by the wealthy?
The Democratic Party exists primarily to plunder the the white, wealthier (or “privileged”) majority and redistribute that wealth to less wealthy, nonwhite (“unprivileged”) groups.
The only group not allowed to take its own side, of course, are white people.
The Democrats are allowed to explicitly be the nonwhite party that seeks to act in the interests of nonwhites at the expense of whites.
But the mere suggestion that the Republican Party respond to this by pursuing the interests of whites will get you banned from social media, fired from your job and socially ostracized in real life.
If the Democrats want white identity politics, this is how they get it: keep encouraging nonwhites to pursue their interests at the expense of whites, and keep vilifying whites as the Great Satan. White people will become more “racially conscious” over time if you keep attacking them for being white.
Ilhan Omar is allowed, even encouraged, to pursue the interests of Somali Muslims at the expense of America at large. White Americans, meanwhile, are smeared as RACISTS told to shut up and deal with it because they have “white privilege.”
Democrats have been telling white people they’re racists for wanting to do anything about the deliberate and malicious destruction of their own race.
The blatant unfairness will unavoidably lead to the rise of white identity politics: if the nonwhite races are allowed to do it, and at the expense of white people no less, then white people will inevitably follow suit.
“The sharp nighttime ring or the rude knock at the door. The insolent entrance of unwiped jackboots of the unsleeping State Security operatives.
“The traditional image of arrest is also what happens afterward, when the poor victim has been taken away. It is an alien, brutal and crushing force totally dominating the apartment for hours on end, a breaking, ripping open, pulling from the walls, emptying things from wardrobes and desks onto the floor–and the crunch of things being trampled beneath jackboots. And nothing is sacred in a search! During the arrest of the locomotive engineer Inoshin, a tiny coffin stood in his room containing the body of his newly dead child. The ‘jurists’ dumped the child’s body out of the coffin and searched it. They shake sick people out of their sickbeds, and they unwind bandages to search beneath them.”
That’s from Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago, in a section describing the terrifying brutality and inhumanity of a nighttime raid in the Soviet Union.
Early this morning in South Florida, before the sun was up, the Uniparty Secret Police raided the home of Roger Stone, assault rifles drawn, and dragged him off into custody.
Why was Roger Stone’s home raided before the sun rose this morning?
Because Roger Stone is an ally of President Donald Trump, and that’s what happens to allies of President Trump.
What does the Stone indictment actually say? Is Stone accused to partaking in a conspiracy? Is there anything about Russia at all?
As in the cases of every other arrest of a Trump associate over the past two years, this has nothing to do with any conspiracy or Russia. Here’s the indictment:
“One count of obstruction of an official proceeding, five counts of false statements and one count of witness tampering.”
All process crimes–meaning Mueller found nothing Stone did prior to the investigation that he could arrest Stone over. All the charges stem from the “process” investigation itself. Just like with Michael Flynn and the others, except for Manafort, whose arrest was over lobbying activity in 2006, dating back way before he joined the Trump campaign.
Obviously this pre-dawn raid on Roger Stone was completely unnecessary. Stone has no criminal history, is not a threat to resist or escape, and had been charged with nothing but process crimes that resulted from him being investigated by straight-up predators.
But the FBI still treated him like a mafia don with a rap sheet a mile long.
When you think of the Soviet Union, you think of jackbooted secret police busting through the door in the middle of the night and carrying people guilty of nothing but political dissent off to the gulags.
Now that’s the reality in America 2019.
And it gets worse. Guess who was there with cameras ready before the sun even came up? CNN. They claim they learned of the raid independently and through hard workin’, sleeves rolled up Big-J Journalisming, even though it’s painfully obvious they were alerted in advance by either Mueller or the FBI:
CNN’s ability to capture the arrest of Roger Stone was the result of determined reporting and interpreting clues revealed in the course of events. That’s called journalism. #FactsFirsthttps://t.co/71zu7RylxX
At least in the Soviet Union, the state media didn’t pretend to be #Independent and #Unbiased like our Uniparty media does.
CNN is gaslighting and lying directly to your face.
That’s how little respect the Uniparty has for you: they don’t even care if you know they’re lying, because they know they’re untouchable.
The FBI colluded with CNN to add extra humiliation and theater to Roger Stone’s arrest.
Not only this, but they wanted all the Fake News-believing NPCs to get the impression that this whole Trump-Russia Investigation is Very Serious Business. The optics of a pre-dawn FBI raid signify ‘This Is A Big Deal”–after all, we’re talking about the investigation of a Stolen Presidency here! This is the highest of high crimes, so of course the Uniparty elite trying to overthrow Trump has to make it look the part.
If there’s two things police state totalitarians are good at, it’s making innocent people look guilty, and propaganda.
If, indeed, Trump and his cronies did collude with Russia to steal the election, then this is what the investigation of such an unthinkable crime would look like, no?
CNN–the enemy of the people–is more than happy to assist Mueller in the optics department, the smoke and mirrors to give the NPC public the impression that this is all legitimate and Very Serious Business.
We now have the “news media” working hand-in-hand with the Deep State to terrorize and humiliate political dissidents guilty of nothing other than having the audacity to support Donald Trump.
I’ve been saying this for a while, but I like the way Dan puts it:
Journalism is dead. It’s gone. It’s buried. You’re on your own now in the search for truth. Relying on “journalists” to interpret events in the Trump era is a fool’s errand. They’re full-time activists now, nothing more. Treat them as such.
On his podcast the other day he kept repeating it: “Journalism is over. Finished.”
All we have now is propaganda. Stop holding out hope for the “mainstream” “media” to ever report the truth or aid our cause. It will not happen.
“Any minute now, the media will realize they were wrong and make this right! They’ll rush to the Covington Kids’ defense because the Covington Kids are innocent!”
No, the media will not. Just because our side is in the right does not mean the media will defend us. In fact, they hate us more when we’re in the right–which is almost always.
The media does not make mistakes. It didn’t make a mistake with the Covington Kids–it wasn’t “fooled” by Nathan Phillips’ lies.
The media knowingly pushed an explicitly anti-white, anti-Catholic, anti-Trump narrative based on a falsehood.
The media didn’t get “tricked.”
It got caught.
There is no “journalism” anymore–at least not at WaPo, CNN, NYT, CBS, NBC, ABC, etc. There is only propaganda. This is why I refer to them collectively as the Ministry of Truth, or the Uniparty Propaganda & Character Assassination Department.
It goes way beyond simply being biased towards one side more than the other. The “media” is fully Democratic. It doesn’t just favor the Democrats; the “media” and the Democratic party are one and the same.
Look at what the Bezos Post published today, nearly five days after the Covington Catholic situation occurred and well after the truth of the matter came out:
The face-off between Catholic school teens and a Native American elder is a reminder of 500 years of conflict https://t.co/P2uv0ZLNBj
The acronyms may change, but they’re all part of the same Ministry of Truth. They’re just the many individual tentacles of the same foul beast.
I now finally understand that old quote (often attributed incorrectly to Mark Twain):
“If you don’t read the newspaper, you’re uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you’re mis-informed.”
It’s better to be uninformed than misinformed. An uninformed person can learn the truth. The misinformed person, under the false impression that he already knows the truth, will vehemently reject the actual truth because it conflicts with what he has already been told and accepted as the truth.
Thomas Jefferson made this observation over 200 years ago (and yes, this is actually a real quote):
“Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.
I will add, that the man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them; inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods & errors. He who reads nothing will still learn the great facts, and the details are all false.”
It is better to consume no news at all than to watch the news and read the paper.
This is because the “news” isn’t actually “news.” It’s propaganda.
“If True” Journalism is the epitome of “enemy of the people.”
They fill people’s heads with lies and fantasies and justify it by saying, “if true.”
“According to law enforcement sources familiar with the matter, on his first day as President, Donald Trump reportedly called Vladimir Putin and offered him the entire US nuclear arsenal in exchange for a sweet real estate deal on a Trump Tower in Moscow. Trump also reportedly said to Putin, “And thanks for helping me take down Hillary. I couldn’t have done it with you, Vlad. That I can tell you.” If true, this report confirms that President Trump did indeed collude with Russia to steal the election, and only ran for President to obtain lucrative business deals.”
That’s “If True” Journalism.
That’s the “standard” our supposedly elite news outlets have adopted.
Could you imagine if that was the standard I used on this site? My credibility would be zero. I would never be able to build a good name for this site. Thus, because this is a new, upstart site trying to make a name for itself, I actually have a major incentive to report the truth, which I do.
But our “mainstream media” outlets have no such incentive. They’re long-established and trusted names, and no matter how many times they are exposed as liars and propagandists, people still read them and hold them as the standards of journalism. People are still inherently suspicious of any story that doesn’t originate in the “mainstream” “media”.
There’s something about being on TV and having a print newspaper distributed nationwide that translates, in people’s minds, to credibility. Underlying that belief is the assumption that this is America, not Soviet Russia, and only foreign shitholes have propaganda ministries in place of a news media. America is better than that.
Sadly, no: America is not better than that. Bad people have been in control of America’s major institutions for a long time, and bad people are the same, whether they’re in America or Soviet Russia or Venezuela or anywhere else.
The American people, of course, are still good as ever. Our Constitution is still the greatest founding document in history. But our rulers are bad.
Bad rulers are the same everywhere, and if bad people take power here in America, they can and will do exactly to us what they’ve done all over the world throughout history.
And they have.
The major institutions in our country–from the media to academia to government–are just as easily corrupted by bad people as the major institutions of any other country. The Constitution cannot save us from bad people taking control of the country.
Our Founding Fathers knew this, too. President John Adams, 1798:
“While our Country remains untainted with the Principles and manners, which are now producing desolation in so many Parts of the World; while the [government] continues Sincere and incapable of insidious and impious Policy: We shall have the Strongest Reason to rejoice in the local destination assigned Us by Providence.
But should the People of America once become capable of that deep simulation towards one another and towards foreign nations, which assumes the Language of Justice and moderation while it is practicing Iniquity and Extravagance, and displays in the most captivating manner the charming Pictures of Candour frankness & sincerity while it is rioting in rapine and Insolence: this Country will be the most miserable Habitation in the World.
Because We have no Government armed with Power capable of contending with human Passions unbridled by morality and Religion. Avarice, Ambition, Revenge or Galantry, would break the strongest Cords of our Constitution as a Whale goes through a Net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
Our Constitution is virtually worthless if bad people are in power–they’ll just ignore the Constitution. And they’ll take over all the other major power insitutions in the country and corrupt them toward their malicious ends.
Stop thinking America is immune from all the problems seen around the world. Even our Founding Fathers knew we weren’t.
Here’s the solution: never, ever, ever click on a link to the Washington Post or the New York Times or any of the other acronymed Ministry of Truth organs.
Deprive them of the clicks and pageviews.
They don’t deserve to be treated as if they’re credible and honest, because they’re not.
Treat them like they deserve to be treated: marginalized and ignored.