Month: January 2019

Leftwing Fascism Has Arrived, and it Will Only Get Worse

America 2019: the left’s intolerance of the right is now absolute, total.

See:

You can’t even politely disagree with leftists.

If you express any opinion they disagree with, even if you do so modestly and even if you express partial agreement with them, they will still storm out in disgust.

The slightest deviation from leftism is proof that you are evil. They don’t want to talk about it. They don’t want to debate it. They don’t want to hear another perspective.

They want nothing to do with you.

They cannot stand to even be around you.

Forget going on a date with them–they won’t even speak to you if your views are not in complete alignment with theirs.

Even partial disagreement is intolerable.

There’s a word for what leftists have become in 2019: bigots.

You know how it’s “racist” to judge a person based on their skin color rather than the content of their character, i.e. without actually getting to know them personally? Well, leftists have taken to judging people based on their political views. If you disagree with them in the slightest, they want nothing to do with you whatsoever. They’ve already made up their minds about you. That’s bigotry.

Leftists are bigoted against us.

But it’s more than mere bigotry. If someone’s private views are bigoted, that’s one thing, but if they’re acting on that bigotry, and trying to impose their will on the group of people they are bigoted against, that’s way, way worse.

That’s fascism.

Nobody tell him Obama was the one who put kids in cages.

Whoever said the trend towards secularization in the West would make us more mellow, tolerant and less fervent was full of it. Christianity may be in decline in the West, but religious fervor certainly is not. When you read things like the above, how can you deny that leftism has become a religion? The main Abrahamic religions, Christianity, Islam and Judaism, are centered on full, unequivocal acceptance of the One True God and categorical rejection of all other gods. Leftism demands the same.

Anyway, I have no problem if a leftist disagrees with me or even hates me for my politics (although I contend the latter is very unhealthy).

But when they start trying to take action against me and my livelihood because of my politics, that’s something I will not stand for.

They crossed a line with the Covington Catholic kids. They wanted–still want, even now–those kids’ lives destroyed. They want them blackballed from colleges. Some leftists literally want them dead:

Dxk6_olXgAAGtKN.jpg

It’s not just our ideas and views that are intolerable, either: it’s us, ourselves.

Who needs a fascist government when American leftists are already well on the way to full-blown fascism? Don’t you see where this will lead? If you believe it is completely unacceptable and intolerable for someone to have different political views than your own, and you’re talking about excommunicating people for their views, how much of a stretch is it for you to call for extreme measures to deal with dissident voices?

The left no longer cares about opposing our ideas and views. The left is now going after the people who hold those views. That is a major shift that cannot be understated.

This ends with gulags.

https://twitter.com/Cville_TMP/status/1087554245035999232

Who needs Ingsoc and Big Brother when we have American leftists?

That’s basically the point Jim Geraghty makes in a recent column at the otherwise mostly worthless National Review:

“There is no sinister, government-run mass-surveillance system watching our every move.

Okay, there actually is, and it’s called the NSA, but Geraghty is talking about a 1984-style panopticon with black helicopters hovering outside your window and telescreens:

“The vast majority of us chose to carry around smartphones with cameras, and some of us chose to livestream so much of what we see, whether it’s dramatic or not. Big Brother isn’t watching; the mob is — at least when a particular moment is pitched to potential viewers as dramatic and demanding attention.

Pitched by whom? The Uniparty Propaganda Department, better known as the media. We’ll get to this later.

But yes, the larger point here is true: we’re always being watched and judged–not by Big Brother but by our fellow citizens and their smartphones.

“There is no sinister, government-run system for punishing those who say or do controversial or unpopular things. Groups of often-anonymous individuals on social media take it upon themselves to enact their vision of justice — demanding the identification of anyone seen acting controversially in social media videos, declare them “guilty of hate crimes,” and demanding “action” against them.

The Covington Catholic kids are the perfect example of what Geraghty is trying to say here. A totalitarian police state state did not try to destroy their lives. Their fellow citizens–those who recorded them and shared the video on social media–did.

“There is no state pressure needed to get private institutions to turn against suddenly ostracized individuals. Employers will quickly fire anyone who they deem to be a sufficient public-relations headache. Publishers preemptively warn authors that they will not stand by them if they become “the subject of public disrepute, contempt, complaints or scandals.” In the face of sufficient social-media outrage and negative press coverage, churches and religious schools will publicly promise to contemplate expulsion. Local officials with no jurisdiction over any particular affair will welcome “a tidal wave of condemnation.”

There is no state-run system for collective punishment; there is instead individuals calling for all colleges to express skepticism about any applicant from Covington Catholic High School.

The leftwing fascists themselves can’t fire you from your job, but they can certainly pressure your employer to fire you, so it’s basically the same thing.

“No hostile foreign power had to invade to impose these conditions upon Americans. No sinister cabal took control of the reins of our government. No one tore up the Constitution and imposed martial law or suddenly announced a new regime of seemingly random spotlighted surveillance and draconian social punishment for deviating from the mob’s amorphous definition of acceptable behavior. Groups of not-particularly famous, not-particularly powerful Americans chose to impose this new system upon all of us.”

Our Founding Fathers created a system of government incapable of being corrupted and turned into a totalitarian police state.

So the American totalitarians simply decided to turn every other institution in America into their totalitarian police state. The media. Hollywood. Academia. Social media platforms. Big business. They’ve all been either weaponized against us our turned into propaganda factories against us.

And the Constitution doesn’t say anything about reigning them in–it tells only the federal government what it can and cannot do to us.

Now, don’t get me wrong, there are parts of the federal government that are part of the American police state–most prominently the Department of (In)Justice and the FBI, and the #Resistance bureaucrats trying to gum up the works–but the greater point Geraghty is making is that our fascist tyranny operates a lot differently than Oceania’s.

Geragthy is saying America 2019 is not a government-administered 1984-style tyranny, but rather a ground-up, mob-based tyranny more akin to the period of mass hysteria following the French Revolution, known today as the Reign of Terror.

But what Geraghty misses is the fact that the leftwing mob is not organic. It didn’t just spontaneously materialize on its own. It is the collective product of decades of media/entertainment industry/academia brainwashing and narrative peddling. If we are living in the midst of a French Terror-style tyranny (to be clear: my example, not Geraghty’s), it’s important to point out that the French Terror was directed and overseen by the Committee of Public Safety. The “media” is our own Committee For Public Safety, directing the rage of the brainwashed mob at new targets seemingly weekly.

The leftwing mob operates on social media platforms run by Silicon Valley giants who have tilted the playing field dramatically in the mob’s favor. And it is assisted by big corporations that are compelled to not only placate and pander to the leftwing mob, but to openly promote its political agenda (e.g. Nike, Gillette, Apple, MasterCard, etc.)

Geraghty does sort of allude to corporations doing the bidding of the mob, and also points out that the Catholic Church buckled almost instantly and accepted the left’s lies on the Covington Kids, wasting no time throwing them under the bus. But Geraghty ultimately returns the focus of his post back to the leftwing mob itself.

Geraghty is right when he says leftwing fascism is not the result of us being conquered by a foreign enemy–the left is the enemy within. But I’d rather be fighting a foreign enemy because there’s no mistaking who the enemy is and what he wants.

The sinister cabal has not taken over our government entirely, because obviously we have Trump, but it’s taken control of a large chunk of it; that’s the Deep State. At this point, with all the stuff we’ve seen from Comey, Strzok, Ohr, Brennan, Clapper and the rest, you’d have to be willfully ignorant to deny the Deep State exists. However, at any rate, the sinister cabal doesn’t really need to take over government when it has control of the media, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, academia and corporate America. They didn’t have to tear up the Constitution to tyrannize us because the Constitution says nothing about non-governmental tyranny.

Geraghty is dead wrong in implying that the lefwing mob more or less exists in a vacuum and is self-driven, organic and spontaneous. The leftwing mob is a symptom of the problem, not the problem itself.

Still, he’s correct in a general sense that our current form of tyranny bears little resemblance to what the 20th century taught us tyranny would look like when it eventually ensnared America.

The most significant difference, however, between America 2019 and both 1984 and the guillotines of the French Terror, is that both Oceania and the Terror were the end points, while America 2019 is still a work in “progress.” In fact, I would even argue that we’ve only just begun our descent into tyranny and totalitarianism.

America can, and will, get worse. Much worse.

***

I’m hesitant to say “we” did this to ourselves, because we means all of us. But you and I had no part in this. We’re the ones constantly on the defensive, pushing back against the “media” and the mob (which are two sides of the same coin).

I didn’t want any of this. I wanted to be a sportswriter when I was younger. This was because I assumed the America of my adulthood would be like the America of my childhood, meaning mostly undisturbed by politics. When I was 17, I never imagined that within a decade, American life would be almost entirely consumed by politics. In fact, I never envisioned myself having anything much to do with politics as an adult. I figured I’d vote and maybe learn a bit more about the politicians themselves, but never anything significant. Times were different: you used to be able to go a whole day without thinking about politics. Isn’t that incredible?

Back in “the day,” people could live their whole lives without paying serious attention to politics. Sure, they’d tune in during elections and major historical moments like the JFK assassination, the Moon Landing, Watergate, the Iran Hostage Crisis, Lewinsky, 9/11 and the Iraq War, but for the most part, people were fully concerned with other things, like their careers, families, communities, churches, hobbies, pastimes and other non-political activities. But that’s not how America is anymore. We can’t ignore politics anymore.

Today, America feels like I imagine the run-up to the Civil War felt: the growing divide at the forefront of everyone’s mind, rumblings of secession, a sense of irreconcilability, and the fear that it was all building up to something very big and very bad.

Once I became politically “awakened,” I realized that becoming a sportswriter meant devoting my life to something ultimately inconsequential. I could have attempted to put my head in the sand and tried to ignore politics, but that’s no longer possible in this country. At some point, I would have been dragged in. Basically all of us have been dragged in by now.

And when that happens, you don’t fuck around: you choose a side and get after it.

I wish we could go back to the way things were “back in the day,” when you could mostly ignore politics and still take for granted that no matter who won the next election, the country and your own life would be more or less the same, that America would always exist and be the most powerful country on earth, and that you could get along just fine with people regardless of their politics.

But now, in 2019, we can no longer take any of those things for granted. We can’t just say, “At the end of the day, we’re all still Americans,” because each half of the country wants nothing to do with the other half.

What do we even have in common anymore? Love of country? Pfft. That’s a one-sided “issue” now. A shared history? Diversity has undone that. A shared culture? “Mainstream” pop culture has basically become a giant middle finger to President Trump and everyone who supports him, so no, we don’t have a shared culture because half the country is explicitly unwelcome to it.

We’re barely even a nation in any meaningful sense.

It’s not entirely the left’s fault. America’s global superpower status–and the resulting way of life we’ve all grown accustomed to–is threatened by the rise of China, Russia and Islam. The left didn’t do that.

But the demographic and cultural transformation of this country is a product of the left. The fact that white people are now actively discriminated against and hated–that’s the left’s doing. Republicans are treated like second-class citizens at work, at school and basically everywhere else besides our private homes–the left did that. (And we’re only Republicans in the first place because we’re against the left’s fascism; now we’re treated to more fascism for that.) The left is waging the War on Traditional Masculinity and Traditional Values. The left is pushing for drag queens to teach our children.

The left is undoing our way of life. You and I didn’t ask for any of this.

It’s in smaller things, too: movies nowadays are getting to the point where they’re becoming unwatchable because they prioritize pushing leftwing dogma first and entertainment second. Look at the list of this year’s Oscars nominees for Best Picture; most of them are in the running purely because of what they represent politically:

  • Black Panther”? It’s an ode to Black Power that casts whites as oppressive colonizers the world would be better without. Objectively, Black Panther is pretty average as far as Marvel superhero movies go (and was nowhere near as good as Infinity War, which was also released in 2018) but only Black Panther gets Oscars love because of its Social Impact and its Powerful Message that Black People Are Awesome and White People Suck.
  • “BlacKKKlansman”? It’s an anti-white film based on the premise that White People Are Racist–really breaking new ground there.
  • “Vice” trashes former Republican Vice President Dick Cheney.
  • “Bohemian Rhapsody” glorifies Freddie Mercury, the gay former frontman of Queen.
  • “Green Book” is about Racism in the 1960s.

The left has ruined entertainment because it decided entertainment is simply another way to push its political, racial and cultural dogma on the American people.

I would love it if I could just ignore all that stuff and focus on Sportsball, but that would mean essentially acquiescing to the left’s vision for this country, which I will never do.

You can’t be un-redpilled. You can’t buy back in to the same lies that have people chanting “BLACK LIVES MATTER!” blaming whitey for everything, and thinking that the most #powerful message a movie can send is that White Racism Is Bad, or that It’s Okay To Be Gay. It would be impossible for me to go back to believing the white race isn’t under attack, and that traditional masculinity isn’t also under attack, and that Women Don’t Have Equality In This Country.

There is no possible way you or I could withdraw from the political battlefield without consciously deciding to be cowards and surrendering to the left.

Ignoring politics is a de facto acceptance of the left’s fascist vision for this country. And so we have no choice but to fight.

If the past few years have shown anything, it’s that as our challenge to the left’s status quo and dominance has actually borne fruit (mainly in the form of Trump getting elected, as well as our growing presence online which allows us to both avoid and subvert the “media,” the nexus of the left’s power) the left’s fear of us has grown.

For the first time in a very long time, we’re actually getting somewhere. The left feels genuinely threatened, and their fear of us actually succeeding and toppling their system has manifested in their growing intolerance and efforts to destroy us. This is why they lie about us in the “media,” deplatform us on social media and try to get us fired from our jobs: because we’re actually producing results.

Their present fascism and intolerance is a direct result of our success over the past several years, meaning that the more gains we make culturally and politically, the more they will turn up the fascism and wrath.

When America was run by a Uniparty, where the Democrats called the shots and the Republicans pretended to oppose them, the left was just fine with letting us live our little lives in peace. Bush, Romney, McCain: those guys represented zero threat to the left’s dominance. The left was happy to let us have those guys leading us.

But not Trump. Oh, no: definitely not him. He represents a real threat to the Uniparty. He represents actual change. A wall!? Of course we can’t have a wall! It would slow the demographic transformation of the country and deprive Corporate America of an unlimited supply of cheap labor! Why, they’d actually have to hire Americans and pay them decent wages! Unacceptable! Trade rebalancing and tariffs? No way–multinational corporations had a good thing going with all that cheap foreign labor via outsourcing. Getting America out of the endless wars? Are you kidding me?!?! The military-industrial complex needs those endless wars! The list goes on.

Now that we’ve begun to rebel, they’re cracking down. That’s why you’re seeing this alarming behavior out of them today. They believe they can still squash the rebellion, put the genie back in the bottle, by coming down hard on any and all dissenting voices.

This is going to get worse before it gets better, but just know that the nastier and more intolerant the left becomes, the more we are succeeding.

Ben Shapiro: Front-Runner

When the leftwing mob comes for you, Ben Shapiro will not be there to defend you.

In fact, he’ll probably take the leftwing mob’s claims at face value and rush to condemn you, like he did with the Covington Catholic kids:

gfdsgdfgdsfgdsf.PNG

His initial move was to retweet this:

DxiqzgdXQAIDn4t.jpg

Because Ben is the Good Kind Of Republican, and everyone needs to know it.

Also, he’s since gone back and un-retweeted this.

When the tide turned and it became clear that the Covington Kids were being railroaded by the lying “media,” Ben quickly ran to the front of the line and began #OwningTheLibs:

DxiqzgZW0AAldKX.jpg

Be sure to buy a “Liberal Tears” mug in the Daily Wire store.

This is our supposed Greatest Champion. This is the guy who is going to deliver us to the promised land by #owning every last lib.

Get real. This front-running fraud is more concerned with being on the Right Side of History (the title of his new book) which basically means being the first to condemn Trump and the right the moment the “media” trots out its latest Fake Story.

Whenever the Uniparty media comes out with a “bombshell” fake story about Trump and Russia, look at Ben’s Twitter feed. He’ll invariably be tweeting out something along the lines of, “Wow. If true, this is really, really bad for Trump.” Or, “If true, there’s no way Trump survives this.” Or, “This is simply unacceptable, if true.”

Ben always presumes good faith on the part of the “media” even though it has proven time and again to be acting in bad faith. Ben presumes guilt on the part of Trump and his supporters because the “media” said so.

Then, when the “story” inevitably unravels due to pressure and skepticism from real rightwingers, and the “story” is shown to be yet another of the Uniparty media’s failed and exposed propaganda operations, Ben Shapiro will put out viral videos of himself DESTROYING and WRECKING the media’s lies.

Playing by the Uniparty media’s rules and automatically adhering to its assumptions and then opportunistically turning around to attack the Uniparty media for clicks and views. That’s True Conservatism, folks.

Peak Millennial?

Is this the most millennial thing ever said?

Of course she had to say “like”.

Beginning all your statements with an unnecessary “like” is textbook millennial.

Ocasio-Cortez is the poster girl–I mean posterperson, I mean posterpersyn–of the millennial generation.

She has it all: staggering historical ignorance, considerable unmerited self-regard, and of course a zealot’s obsession with the Religion of Climate Change. Repent, ye carbon sinners, or thou shalt be incinerated by Mother Gaia upon the turning of twelve winters!

Millennials trivialize World War II by comparing it to (nonexistent) man-made climate change because they believe nothing that happened before they were born matters, except to the extent that they can  misrepresent it to attack their present day political enemies, (i.e. White people Did Slavery to Black people, slavery was like Super Bad, so White people today are also like evil and like owe us recompense and stuff or whatever.)

Much of this historical ignorance can be attributed to the fact that millennials have been bombarded and brainwashed by Uniparty propaganda since birth, be it from the television and entertainment industry, the Ministry of Truth (commonly known as the mainstream media), and academia and public schools.

Still, ignorance is not a valid excuse.

Millenials love to exaggerate things. “I’m like literally DYING of hunger.”

Her remark here is no different. “OMG guys, like, Climate Change is our World War II.”

Ocasio-Cortez is the ultimate millennial. That’s not a good thing.

Fortunately, Generation Z–exemplified by the Covington Catholic kids–is based and redpilled and loves Trump.

 

The Real Racism Problem in America

Absolutely disgusting:

https://twitter.com/BreakingNLive/status/1087401654121627648

This is a video shot by “Black Israelites” protesting at the Lincoln Memorial the day of the encounter between Covington Catholic students and a crazy, toothless fraudster Indian.

Some of the most racist quotes:

[To a black student with the white Covington Catholic students] “You got all these dirty ass crackas behind you, with red ‘Make America Great Again’ hats on, your coon ass: you wanna fight your brothers!”

“You, nigga! With all these crackers with racist-ass Make America Great hats. Get your Uncle Tom ass outta here!”

“Look at all these peckerwoods [. . .] Look at all these dusty-ass crackas! With that racist garbage on!”

And towards the end, “Look at this mob of dirty animals.”

This guy–and many, many others like him–really believes it’s not possible to be racist against white people. No matter how vile and racist his statements objectively are, he gets to be openly racist against white people because White People Are Racist!

White Teenagers in MAGA Hats: *literally just standing there*

Black Israelite Radical: “DUSTY-ASS CRACKERS! CAN’T STAND IN THE SUN FOR 5 MINUTES! FUTURE SCHOOL SHOOTERS! DIRTY ANIMALS!”

And it’s the white teenagers in MAGA hats who are the racists.

It really is astounding that the recent spread of racism against whites is justified because… WHITE PEOPLE ARE RACIST!

Imagine having such little self-awareness that you launch into a barrage of racism against a person or group of people because you believe them to be racist.

Who are the victims of “institutional racism”? Well, think of it this way: White people have to look over their shoulder before sharing any slightly off-color joke. But these black Israelite guys did not think twice before recording themselves yelling hateful and noxious racism at a group of white teenagers. They recorded this themselves, then posted it online. They were proud of what they said!

And nothing will happen to them. They won’t be banned from social media, they won’t lose their jobs, they won’t face legal action.

Yes, we do live in a racist society. Anti-white racism is allowed in America. By not punishing or condemning it, our society encourages it.

Things are getting to a dangerous point.

The demonization and dehumanization (a term the left loves) of white people in America is almost complete. Soon white people will be so reviled that virtually any act of aggression against them will be not only tolerated but encouraged.

Social media platforms routinely ignore the most vile and monstrous rhetoric imaginable when it’s directed against white people, even children, including violent fantasies and death threats. Ignoring it is de facto endorsement.

I got a 12-hour “time out” from Twitter for calling Jim Acosta a “dumbass,” but leftists can fantasize about shoving white children into woodchippers and nothing happens.

We cannot count on the Uniparty media to save us. The Uniparty media is all too happy to automatically presume guilt and malice on the part of a white person even if the white person is in reality the victim. The Uniparty media is fully on board with Kill Whitey.

The Republican Party is more likely to apologize for mythical White Privilege than it is to call out anti-white racism. Republicans were stumbling over themselves to denounce the Covington Catholic kids within seconds of the story breaking, even without researching it for themselves.

President Trump has only just now weighed in on the Covington Catholic situation:

Wish he would have said more, but at least he said something.

For now, we are on our own. It’s only going to get worse.

The left has stoked such a visceral hatred against whites that people erupt in uncontrollable hatred and rage at the sight of a white person in a Trump hat.

THERE’S THE RACIST! GET HIM! HE’S RACIIIIIIIST! MAKE HIM PAY!

Your kind ain’t welcome around here, racist!

Of course they don’t have rights, they’re RACIST!

Whoever said “racist” has become the n-word for whites was right.

Never Stop Smirking

“Grrr, that smug, smirking privileged white kid! I HATE HIM!!!!

I WANT TO HIT HIM IN THE FACE WITH A SHOVEL!!!!!!”

IMG_4039.jpeg

This was how the left responded to the latest Fake News Outrage which supposedly was a clear demonstration of White Privilege: a smirking, entitled White Oppressor said to be harassing an innocent, Victim Indian.

The left seized on the easy, bias-confirming narrative and immediately whipped up one of the most vicious online lynch mobs in recent memory.

This one was especially nasty, too. The sheer hatred launched at this kid–a high-schooler, but the left doesn’t care because to them, all whites are guilty and evil, no matter how young they are–should be a major eye-opener.

Even though the left’s initial narrative was shown to be completely false (and the opposite to be true: the kid was being harassed by the old guy), they’re still furious.

The real problem leftists have with the Covington Catholic kid was that he’s white, male and supports Trump. Even though the kid is completely innocent of any actual wrongdoing, he’s still guilty of being an unapologetic white male Trump supporter, and that is the greatest sin of all.

The Covington Catholic Student who has been singled out by the left is Nick Sandmann. Here is his account of what happened:

“I am providing this factual account of what happened on Friday afternoon at the Lincoln Memorial to correct misinformation and outright lies being spread about my family and me.

I am the student in the video who was confronted by the Native American protestor. I arrived at the Lincoln Memorial at 4:30 p.m. I was told to be there by 5:30 p.m., when our busses were due to leave Washington for the trip back to Kentucky. We had been attending the March for Life rally, and then had split up into small groups to do sightseeing.

When we arrived, we noticed four African American protestors who were also on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. I am not sure what they were protesting, and I did not interact with them. I did hear them direct derogatory insults at our school group.

The protestors said hateful things. They called us “racists,” “bigots,” “white crackers,” “faggots,” and “incest kids.” They also taunted an African American student from my school by telling him that we would “harvest his organs.” I have no idea what that insult means, but it was startling to hear.

It’s okay to be racist against white people, and even okay to be racist against black people who hang out with white people.

Because we were being loudly attacked and taunted in public, a student in our group asked one of our teacher chaperones for permission to begin our school spirit chants to counter the hateful things that were being shouted at our group. The chants are commonly used at sporting events. They are all positive in nature and sound like what you would hear at any high school. Our chaperone gave us permission to use our school chants. We would not have done that without obtaining permission from the adults in charge of our group.

At no time did I hear any student chant anything other than the school spirit chants. I did not witness or hear any students chant “build that wall” or anything hateful or racist at any time. Assertions to the contrary are simply false. Our chants were loud because we wanted to drown out the hateful comments that were being shouted at us by the protestors.

After a few minutes of chanting, the Native American protestors, who I hadn’t previously noticed, approached our group. The Native American protestors had drums and were accompanied by at least one person with a camera.

I.e., they were looking to stir up controversy knowing the Ministry of Truth would take their side. Which is exactly what happened.

“The protestor everyone has seen in the video began playing his drum as he waded into the crowd, which parted for him. I did not see anyone try to block his path. He locked eyes with me and approached me, coming within inches of my face. He played his drum the entire time he was in my face.

It was the drum guy trying to intimidate Sandmann, not the other way around.

“I never interacted with this protestor. I did not speak to him. I did not make any hand gestures or other aggressive moves. To be honest, I was startled and confused as to why he had approached me. We had already been yelled at by another group of protestors, and when the second group approached I was worried that a situation was getting out of control where adults were attempting to provoke teenagers.

This kid is so much more grown-up, mature and level-headed than any of the protesters harassing him and the thousands of adult-children leftists online fantasizing about hitting him in the face with a shovel.

“I believed that by remaining motionless and calm, I was helping to diffuse the situation. I realized everyone had cameras and that perhaps a group of adults was trying to provoke a group of teenagers into a larger conflict. I said a silent prayer that the situation would not get out of hand.

During the period of the drumming, a member of the protestor’s entourage began yelling at a fellow student that we “stole our land” and that we should “go back to Europe.” I heard one of my fellow students begin to respond. I motioned to my classmate and tried to get him to stop engaging with the protestor, as I was still in the mindset that we needed to calm down tensions.

I never felt like I was blocking the Native American protestor. He did not make any attempt to go around me. It was clear to me that he had singled me out for a confrontation, although I am not sure why.

It’s because you’re a white male Trump supporter. You’re the enemy. If you haven’t learned that, you will as you reflect on it.

“The engagement ended when one of our teachers told me the busses had arrived and it was time to go. I obeyed my teacher and simply walked to the busses. At that moment, I thought I had diffused the situation by remaining calm, and I was thankful nothing physical had occurred.

I never understood why either of the two groups of protestors were engaging with us, or exactly what they were protesting at the Lincoln Memorial.

Because you were a bunch of white kids wearing MAGA hats. And because the left is always protestsing.

“We were simply there to meet a bus, not become central players in a media spectacle.

You may not want to fight the left, but the left wants to fight you.

“This is the first time in my life I’ve ever encountered any sort of public protest, let alone this kind of confrontation or demonstration.

I was not intentionally making faces at the protestor. I did smile at one point because I wanted him to know that I was not going to become angry, intimidated or be provoked into a larger confrontation. I am a faithful Christian and practicing Catholic, and I always try to live up to the ideals my faith teaches me – to remain respectful of others, and to take no action that would lead to conflict or violence.

I harbor no ill will for this person.

But he harbors a tremendous, almost incomprehensible, ill will for you. He hates you for being born.

“I respect this person’s right to protest and engage in free speech activities, and I support his chanting on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial any day of the week.

He does not reciprocate.

“I believe he should re-think his tactics of invading the personal space of others, but that is his choice to make.

I am being called every name in the book, including a racist, and I will not stand for this mob-like character assassination of my family’s name.

Sue ’em. Then, sue ’em some more.

“My parents were not on the trip, and I strive to represent my family in a respectful way in all public settings.

I have received physical and death threats via social media, as well as hateful insults. One person threatened to harm me at school, and one person claims to live in my neighborhood. My parents are receiving death and professional threats because of the social media mob that has formed over this issue.

Welcome to America 2019: this is what happens to people guilty of the crime of being a white male Trump supporter.

“I love my school, my teachers and my classmates. I work hard to achieve good grades and to participate in several extracurricular activities. I am mortified that so many people have come to believe something that did not happen – that students from my school were chanting or acting in a racist fashion toward African Americans or Native Americans. I did not do that, do not have hateful feelings in my heart, and did not witness any of my classmates doing that.

You may not hate them, but they hate you. And that’s why you were dragged into this against your will. That’s why all of us will ultimately be dragged into this fight whether we want it or not.

The bleak reality of America in 2019 is starting to dawn on this young man. Millions of his fellow Americans have been brainwashed by propaganda and Fake News to hate him, and his only crime is being a white male Trump supporter.

Sandmann’s statement continues a bit with some boilerplate and a plea for peace, but we’ve covered the most important stuff here.

If you were wondering why the left was so particularly incensed and so especially vicious in this instance, it’s because the kid was white and male.

The left has a special kind of hatred reserved for white, Trump-supporting males.

Any rational person would see a situation where a grown man is trying to intimidate a young teenager by walking up and banging a drum in his face, but the left saw the young teenager as a powerful oppressor simply because he’s white.

Somehow, Sandmann, who had the cable news “media”, Hollywood and corporate America, and even his own school, attacking him, is the privileged one.

The left makes up “white privilege” as an excuse to hate white people. There is no other reason. If white privilege existed, this kid would have gotten the benefit of the doubt; he wouldn’t have been slandered mercilessly by the “media.”

When leftists saw the brave MAGA kid smirking in the face of the nutbag trying to intimidate him, they simply lost it. They could contain their hatred no longer. They erupted into a violent, bloodthirsty rage:

https://twitter.com/rezaaslan/status/1086806539552284672

#VerifiedHate.

They hate white people so much, more than you and I can possibly imagine:

Just a blue-checked Hollywood leftist fantasizing about shoving white high school kids into a wood chipper as they scream for their lives.

Wanna know what will happen to Jack Morrissey? Nothing.

That’s real privilege.

Keep in mind that many cucked Republicans instinctively took the Blame Whitey narrative at face value, too. Only a few apologized for being wrong:

Don’t expect an apology from the various acronymed Ministry of Truth “news” outlets that spread the Fake News. They knew what they were doing all along.

And of course leftists who quickly joined the outrage mob showed exactly what I stated above: they weren’t actually furious because they believed the Covington Catholic kids did anything wrong. Leftists’ rage was colossal because a white male wearing a Make America Great Hat not bowing to leftist harassment and bullying.

Leftists don’t actually have any interest in who was right or wrong in the situation, because white people are automatically wrong simply for existing.

I’m done wanting our enemies to apologize when they wrong us. Their intent is always and everywhere to harm us by any means necessary, and so their apologies will always be disingenuous. They won’t actually mean it if they say sorry, nor will they actually learn anything and change in the future.

So what’s the point of an apology?

No, instead of demanding apologies, I just want the right to fully realize the sheer ferocity of the left’s hatred for us. I want the right to realize that there is no rationalizing with these leftists consumed by irrational hatred and brainwashed beyond hope–at least from our perspective: we will never change their minds. They have to choose to take the red pill on their own.

I only want people on the right to see clearly and grasp the reality of the situation we find ourselves in today in 2019. Many on the right still don’t grasp how badly the left hates us, and thus still more or less think this is all a game. I hope the Covington Catholic incident changes that.

The bottom line: If the left wants to push more and more white people into supporting white identity politics and embracing racial consciousness, they’re doing a great job. The more they attack white people as a group, the more white people will respond as a group. What other choice is there?

More and more white people are coming to realize they’re under attack for their skin color. The left wants white people dead and replaced, and with each passing incident like this, more white people are becoming aware of it.

If the left wants white solidarity, this is how they get it.

***

Never stop smirking in their faces. It drives them up a wall, because it shows you’re self-confident and you refuse to give in to their bullying. It shows that they can’t faze you.

They want you to hang your head in shame and beg for forgiveness. They want you to prostrate yourself on the ground before them in fear of their wrath.

Honestly, they’d prefer you just rolled over and died.

Never.

Keep smirking.

It’s a bigger “fuck you” to the left than even literally saying “fuck you.”

With a smirk, you are not only telling them but showing them, “You won’t beat me.”

Good for you, Nick Sandmann: You refused to back down or be provoked in the face of leftist bullying, and for that you are a hero and an example all of us should live by.

Nick Sandmann: the brave young man who taught us that the best weapon against the left is a smirk.

Wow, Shocker: Another Supposed Trump “Bombshell” Report Falls Apart

This was how it began Thursday night:

I knew when I saw the headline that the story would likely fall apart in short order, and I tweeted as much at the time:

I left it at that because I wanted to wait for the story to unfold (i.e. unravel) before spending time and energy discussing a matter that was probably totally false. Entertaining false allegations only gives them more credibility.

Though the story was suspect from the beginning, this may come as a surprise but cable news immediately ran with it under the presumption that it was true, and began calling for impeachment proceedings, although I’m not sure “began” is the correct word because that would imply there was a prior point in time where they weren’t calling for impeachment.

According to Daily Caller’s Amber Athey, who had the unfortunate job of watching CNN and MSNBC all day, the two networks collectively used the word “impeach” 179 times on Friday as they obsessively discussed the BuzzFeed story.

Before we go any further, let me just say: The only way you could believe the BuzzFeed story is if you were already convinced President Trump is a criminal.

When did so many people become convinced that Donald Trump is a career criminal? The man was a prominent American public figure and celebrity for decades prior to running for president, and to my knowledge he was never considered an unscrupulous criminal, or a racist, until he ran for President.

The only reason you’d believe Trump is a career criminal is because you were brainwashed by all the past Fake Bombshell Headlines. Now do you see why the “media” runs these stories even though they fall apart within 48 hours? Far fewer people see the reluctant correction than the initial false headline. Fake News brainwashing works. I wrote about this on the old Medium site that the media primes or “softens up” the public to be more likely to believe the next anti-Trump “bombshell.” If you already think Trump is a criminal, you’ll have no problem believing the next “bombshell” report that supposedly offers new evidence that he is.

Anyway–right off the bat, there were a number of questions about BuzzFeed’s story that cast doubt about its veracity:

  1. Trump never actually ended up building a Trump Tower in Moscow.
  2. Trump never actually ended up meeting with Putin during the campaign.
  3. As Breitbart’s John Nolte puts it: Donald Trump Jr. already testified, truthfully, about the very thing Trump told his attorney, Michael Cohen, to lie about.
  4. The sources for the story were anonymous, described by BuzzFeed as “two federal law enforcement officials involved in an investigation of the matter.”

Personally, I can’t see Trump instructing Cohen to lie to Congress. I just can’t. This was why I was instinctively skeptical of the headline when I first saw it. The whole premise simply was not believable to me. I couldn’t picture it happening. It did not jibe with my understanding of Donald Trump. This, of course, is an entirely personal opinion based on no more than a gut feeling, but I’m sure many of you feel the same way and thus were also instinctively skeptical of the BuzzFeed story.

The next morning, legitimate reporters who actually care about facts and truth were already raising questions about the core claims of the story:

https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1086232944937701377

BuzzFeed’s “story” began unraveling almost immediately.

Then, yesterday around 4:30pm, in a surprising move, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s office stepped in and debunked the story:

I certainly was not expecting Mueller to come out and douse this story with cold water, but John Nolte has an explanation:

“The sphinx himself fact-checked [the media’s] lying asses.

The last thing Robert Mueller needs are unexpected expectations around the report he will someday release about the Russia collusion hoax, so he and his team of Democrat lawyers must have watched in abject horror as the media way-way-way over-promised on what would deliver — which is a slam-dunk impeachment case.

Make no mistake, Mueller is a dirty cop out to see Trump impeached. But he can’t overturn the 2016 election. He can’t meet that goal if his report is so over-hyped it lands with a thud.”

The cable “news” networks were jizzing themselves over the BuzzFeed “story” all day Friday. It was so bad that Mueller had to step in and shoot the story down out of his desire to manage expectations.

Of course, it wasn’t just the Lyin’ Brian Stelters and Fake Jake Tappers and Chuck the Cuck Todds of the world that pushed the BuzzFeed story as if it were true.

You’ll be surprised to learn that your favorite True Conservatives™ and cucks could barely contain their glee at being afforded another opportunity to pooh-pooh President Trump’s moral character:

There’s our greatest champion, Ben Shapiro, instantly giving the BuzzFeed “story” the benefit of the doubt simply because all the Cool Liberal Blue Checkmarks were treating it as if it were rock solid. Ben is our LeBron James, our Captain America. We can always count on him to Destroy The Libs and fight for what’s right!

Of course Ben retweeted a couple of his Tru Con™ Sisters:

Screen Shot 2019-01-19 at 2.21.17 PM.png

These guys evidently never learned in grade school that when you copy your buddy’s homework, you have to change it up a little bit to make it less obvious to the teacher.

The True Conservatives™ should try making it less obvious that they’re pushing the exact same talking points as the Uniparty Propaganda Department.

 

It’s awfully curious that the “media’s” “mistakes” always, without fail, go in one direction: against President Trump. 🤔🤔🤔

That’s how you know the American “news media” isn’t really a “news media” at all, but instead the Uniparty’s Propaganda & Character Assassination Department. An honest, truth-seeking press would (occasionally) make mistakes that paint both political parties in a bad light, but our “media’s” “mistakes” only go one way.

At best the frequency of these “mistakes” prove our “media” is sloppy and amateurish. All but the most deranged Trump haters in the country would agree. (Unfortunately, our “media” is comprised of the most deranged Trump haters in the country.)

This is how you know stories like BuzzFeed’s are not actually “mistakes” but rather desperate attempts to create false narratives in the general public and eventually engineer an unjust impeachment.

Now the “media” is playing the “innocent mistake” card as if Buzzfeed actually prioritized telling the truth over painting Trump in a negative light.

If they were mistakes, they were easily avoidable mistakes that anyone with a shred of honesty and integrity wouldn’t have made.

That’s how you know they weren’t mistakes.

***

Whenever a supposed “bombshell” about Trump drops, and the media is claiming it’s “different this time” and that Trump is cooked, simply rewatch this video:

The Left is Ready to Stop Pretending to Oppose Open Borders

This is how it goes. First, the right accuses the left of wanting some policy goal (say, gun confiscation and repealing the Second Amendment) which the left pretty obvious wants. The left, however, knowing that said policy goal is wildly unpopular with the American people, vehemently denies they want the policy.

However, before long, the left will inevitably come out in favor of the policy goal they previously spent a good deal of energy denying they wanted.

Leftists in 2012: “Nobody wants to take your guns.”

Leftists in 2018: “Repeal the Second Amendment, and we’re coming for your guns”

rzew0pare3401.jpg

This guy is definitely gonna wrestle your guns away from you:

Screen Shot 2019-01-18 at 4.52.05 PM.png

Or maybe that’s a girl. I genuinely can’t tell.

At any rate, today, “We are coming for your guns” is the mainstream consensus position of the Democratic Party, even though several years back they vigorously denied it and claimed they supported and respected the Second Amendment.

When did they change their minds? Never: they’ve always wanted to confiscate all the guns and repeal the Second Amendment. The only difference now is that they feel safe showing their true colors.

It was the same thing with gay marriage: prominent Democrats insisted right up until the 2012 election that they opposed gay marriage and believed marriage was between a man and a woman. Then they all publicly came out in favor of gay marriage. They were always privately in favor it, and we on the right knew it all along, but by 2012 they felt as if it was politically safe for them to come out and admit it.

Socialism is another thing Democrats have always pretended to be against while privately being in favor. Then the proud and open socialist Bernie Sanders ran for President in 2016 and was quite popular, proving once and for all that, yes, Democrats are socialists. The party’s new face is Congresspersyn Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who is proud to be a “democratic socialist”. Democrats are socialists. They’ve always been socialists, of course, but now they’re comfortable with admitting it.

And the Uniparty “media” claims we’re the ones who have taken an extreme turn.

The latest issue the Democrats are about to stop pretending to oppose is open borders. Someone named Farhad Manjoo wrote an opinion piece for the New York Times entitled, “There’s Nothing Wrong With Open Borders.” Remember the day January 16, 2019, because that’s the moment the Democratic Party took the first step toward formally and publicly supporting open borders (“formally and publicly” being the key words, because they’ve always been for open borders privately):

Screen Shot 2019-01-18 at 5.21.30 PM.png

Here’s an excerpt:

“The internet expands the bounds of acceptable discourse, so ideas considered out of bounds not long ago now rocket toward widespread acceptability. See: cannabis legalization, government-run health care, white nationalism and, of course, the flat-earthers.

Yet there’s one political shore that remains stubbornly beyond the horizon. It’s an idea almost nobody in mainstream politics will address, other than to hurl the label as a bloody cudgel.

I’m talking about opening up America’s borders to everyone who wants to move here.

Imagine not just opposing President Trump’s wall but also opposing the nation’s cruel and expensive immigration and border-security apparatus in its entirety. Imagine radically shifting our stance toward outsiders from one of suspicion to one of warm embrace. Imagine that if you passed a minimal background check, you’d be free to live, work, pay taxes and die in the United States. Imagine moving from Nigeria to Nebraska as freely as one might move from Massachusetts to Maine.

When you see the immigration system up close, you’re confronted with its bottomless unfairness. The system assumes that people born outside our borders are less deserving of basic rights than those inside. My native-born American friends did not seem to me to warrant any more dignity than my South African ones; according to this nation’s founding documents, we were all created equal. Yet by mere accident of geography, some were given freedom, and others were denied it.”

Fantastic reasoning: it’s “unfair” that most of the world was not born in America, the greatest country on earth. So let’s just let everyone in the world move to America!

This is how it starts. First an Op-Ed in the New York Times, then the rest of the Democratic Party elite will come out in favor of open borders. Right now, GOP virtue signalers and cucks are pushing back against the claim that the New York Times itself has formally come out for open borders, pointing out that it’s only an op-ed writer who has come out for open borders and he doesn’t necessarily speak for the NYT overall:

Come on. Stop denying what we all know to be true. I know Guy Benson and the rest of the Fake Republicans dream of one day writing for the New York Times, but this is just ridiculous.

Manjoo’s op-ed was the NYT testing the waters to see what kind of response it would get. If the response was negative, they could say, “Hey, it’s just an op-ed. Doesn’t mean it’s the official position of this newspaper. That’s one guy’s opinion. We just published it.”

But we all know better. Nobody publishes an op-ed unless they more or less agree with it. Outlets only provide platforms to those views which they seek to promote. Only a fool would believe otherwise. I know the disclaimer at the bottom of every op-ed says “this does not necessarily reflect the views of the paper at large,” but we all know what’s going on. The NYT very seldom runs op-eds by people who go against Uniparty dogma.

Eventually the NYTimes editorial board will formally announce the paper’s support of open borders. We all know it’s coming.

More to the point, we all know the left has always wanted open borders. 

Now, they’re finally audacious enough to admit it.

What could be the next issue the left “evolves” on? Pedophilia. I’m serious. You don’t have to look very hard to find SJWs and freaks on Twitter trying to argue that there’s nothing wrong with pedophilia. And Twitter isn’t exactly doing much about it, either.

If you think it’s ridiculous that pedophilia could one day in the future (10-15 years down the road) come to be openly embraced by the left, consider that in 1985 it was also pretty inconceivable to think that the Democrats would in just under 30 years make support for gay marriage their party’s official stance.

Summed up, the process for Democratic “evolution” on issues is as follows:

  1. “That’s ridiculous. Nobody wants x.”
  2. “Okay, maybe some of us want x.”
  3. “The Democratic Party now officially endorses x.”
  4. “Anyone who opposes is evil.”

Open borders is the next x. They’re about to go from, “You’re crazy. We don’t want open borders.” To: “Anyone who opposes open borders is racist.”

What will follow? It’s anyone’s guess. There are a number of contenders, including polygamy and pedophilia.

There’s also free healthcare and welfare for illegals (already happening in California and New York City), as well as voting rights for illegals, but I would say open borders automatically includes healthcare, welfare and voting for foreigners, no?

Another contender would be the War on Traditional Masculinity, but the American Psychological Association has already formalized the left’s opposition to that.

Perhaps they’ll come out in open support of white genocide next? “War on White People? Pfft. That’s absurd. White people have the most privilege!” Eventually, “Actually, the War on White People is Good and anyone who opposes it is Evil.”

The bottom line is that anything you suspect leftists truly want, they probably do, no matter how much they deny it.

***

Also, I keep seeing all this talk about how we need millions of foreign immigrants (presumably low-skilled ones) to combat our “population crisis” and ensure that we remain a nation with a steadily increasing population. From the Manjoo piece:

“Economically and strategically, open borders isn’t just a good plan — it’s the only chance we’ve got. America is an aging nation with a stagnant population. We have ample land to house lots more people, but we are increasingly short of workers. And on the global stage, we face two colossi — India and China — which, with their billions, are projected to outstrip American economic hegemony within two decades.”

Oh, no! Our GDP might not increase as much! Why is GDP the be-all, end-all? Why is GDP the measure of a nation’s worth.

Don’t get me wrong, to a large extent, GDP does tell you a good deal about the state of a given nation, but you can’t boil everything down to GDP.

“More people = more workers = more production = higher GDP = Everything Awesome” is how the globalist elite thinks.

We have a depraved culture of sex and hedonism, a crisis of masculinity, an opioid epidemic ravaging our communities, a spiritual and emotional void caused by superficial consumerism and obsession with entertainment, eroding family values and families themselves, and we are balkanizing into self-segregation along ethnic and racial lines.

And our elites think all we need is more immigrants to boost GDP.

On a related note, Britain apparently never got the memo that immigrants boost GDP. Britain’s GDP per capita (the measure that matters the most) declined by almost 20% in just four years primarily due to increased migration:

https://twitter.com/porter14159/status/1085707152835125248

Tolerant and Progressive Leftists, Who NEVER Delve into Conspiracy Theorism, Convinced Trump is Blackmailing Lindsey Graham for Being Secretly Gay

The Uniparty “media” cannot conceive of any decent person willfully supporting President Donald Trump (and, by definition, opposing the Uniparty), so they ascribe Trump support to us either being evil, racist, unbelievably stupid, or all three (usually it’s all three).

Writing off our Trump support as a product of evil and/or stupidity is how Uniparty elites comfort themselves and avoid the rather obvious truths that they are massively unpopular, their globalist ideology has failed horribly over the past few decades, and that the party is basically over for them as their chickens come home to roost.

In order to explain to themselves why Lindsey Graham has recently become one of Trump’s loudest and most prominent supporters, they’ve concocted this story that Trump is blackmailing Graham over Graham’s supposed closet homosexuality.

It’s not just the blown-out whore Chelsea Handler saying this, either. Newly-elected Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar (you know, the other “YAAAS QUEEN! THE FUTURE IS FEMALE AND MUSLIM! HIJABS ARE LIBERATING!” Congresswoman) pushed this rumor on CNN yesterday:

It was too much for even CNN. Of course, they didn’t scold her for being homophobic, like they certainly would’ve if a Republican was floating gay rumors about a prominent Democrat; they merely asked her to provide some evidence to back up her claim, which she could not do, obviously.

Here’s my question about Trump supposedly blackmailing Lindsey Graham: why now? There have been rumors about Graham being gay for years. He’s in his 60s and has never married. He’s been in the Senate for over a decade. The idea that Graham is secretly gay is nothing new. He probably is.

So why didn’t Trump “blackmail” Graham from the start of the campaign back in 2015? Remember, Graham was a candidate for President way back when. He didn’t make it very far, but he was running. Why didn’t Trump blackmail him from the start?

You think Trump has only now become aware of the “Graham is gay” rumors? Trump is the king of rumors. He’s good friends with the editor of the National Enquirer. He knew disgraced former New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman was a perverted scumbag years before any of the #MeToo stories dropped about him. I don’t buy for a second that Trump only recently became aware of the Graham rumors. He’s probably known about them for years.

And if Graham is being blackmailed by Trump, why does Graham occasionally side against the President? He did yesterday over the matter of Trump canceling Nancy Pelosi’s overseas trip:

I bet this is all part of Trump’s sinister plan to not make the blackmailing too obvious.

Trump probably contacted Graham yesterday afternoon and said, “Hey, Liberace, they’re on to us; tweet out something negative about me to throw them off.”

I’m sure this happened.

A couple things:

  1. I thought the left was too #Smart and #Virtuous to believe in conspiracy theories? I thought they were above that? I was under the impression that we nutty right-wingers are the only ones who believe in conspiracy theories?
  2. How does this Graham speculation not fall under the category of “OMG HOMOPHOBIA!!!!”? Even if Graham is gay–and I’d bet he probably is–then what’s the big deal? Even if the left is simply attacking Trump for blackmailing Graham over his alleged homosexuality, shouldn’t the #Tolerant and #Progressive leftists be rushing to the defense of a Gay Man Being Victimized By A Straight White Oppressor? Instead they’re throwing every gay slur in the book at Graham, calling him a cocksucker and all sorts of things. Shouldn’t they instead be saying, “President Trump, LEAVE LINDSEY GRAHAM ALONE! Your homophobia has no place in America in 2019! There is NOTHING WRONG with Graham being gay!” Their wrath is trained clearly on Graham here, not Trump. Seems like #VictimBlaming if you ask me.

Why can’t the left make up its mind about Trump? Is he literally retarded and possibly completely out of his mind, or is he an Evil Genius, as they’re suggesting with this blackmail conspiracy? Which is it? Is Trump dumber than a four year old child, or is he a scheming, megalomaniacal super genius?

The Colbert Late Show tried to be funny asserting the former:

Is Trump a three year old who writes with crayon, or is he a ruthless, Machiavellian schemer blackmailing Lindsey Graham? It can’t be both.

Also worth pointing out for the umpteenth time: the left cannot meme. This just isn’t funny. People who are full of raging hatred have no room for humor.

What’s Going on With Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Health?

The Ministry of Truth is in full phalanx-mode over Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s health. What, exactly, is going on with her? We can’t get a straight answer. The only time any news of Ginsburg’s health is mentioned in the Uniparty “media” is when they can spin it into a positive.

Yet clearly she’s not doing well. Back in September, she made an appearance at George Washington University Law School in front of a large crowd, and could barely keep her head up. Not only that, merely speaking seemed taxing and laborious for her. Look at this footage:

She is obviously in failing health. It often took her a while to respond to questions, she loses her train of thought, and her voice is soft and weak. She weighs no more than 70-80 pounds and can barely lift her head.

We are not buying for a second that this woman is in good health.

As we recently heard, she had cancer “nodules” (I put the word in quotes only because I have no idea what a “nodule” is and don’t want to pretend otherwise) removed from her lungs. A week ago, the Supreme Court’s official statement on the matter was as follows:

“Post-surgery evaluation indicates no evidence of remaining disease, and no further treatment is required.”

According to the Ministry of Truth, she’s fit as a fiddle and ready to get back into her Killer Workouts which are so balls-to-the-wall a 27-year-old POLITICO reporter could not even handle them. Doctors estimate that Ginsburg will live to be 117, and plans to run in the Boston Marathon this summer.

Okay, I made some of that stuff up, but sadly not all of it.

Anyone with a functioning brain can see that the woman in the video above is clearly in failing health and has no business being on the Supreme Court in that state. It’s straight-up cruel of Democrats to force her to remain on the bench in her condition solely because of their overriding and all-consuming hatred of Donald Trump. They don’t care a lick about her as a person, they only care about #Resisting Trump. If they had any compassion at all, they’d let her retire and live out her remaining days in peace and privacy with her friends and family.

Returning to the original question of her cancer: maybe it’s just me, but does anyone else have no recollection of hearing about her being diagnosed with cancer several months back? I do not remember hearing anything about it in the Uniparty “media”. Do you?

A Google search shows that Minitrue remarked on Ginsburg’s cancer surgery on December 21 of last year, but only the surgery.

I narrowed the dates on the search to prior to Dec. 21, 2018, but nothing came up–nothing about a diagnosis of cancer:

dsafadsfasfa.PNG

As far as I can tell the general public had no idea Ruth Bader Ginsburg had cancer prior to December 21, 2018.

I’m not talking about when she was diagnosed with colon cancer in 1999, or pancreatic cancer in 2009.

I’m talking about this past year. Where was the announcement that she had lung cancer?

It doesn’t appear there was one.

A physician named Brian Joondeph wrote an opinion column yesterday in the Daily Caller asking a few questions about Ginsburg’s recent surgery:

“The statement is curious, however. As a physician myself, I am acutely aware of medical wording and nuance. With medical malpractice attorneys hiding behind every corner, physicians are careful how they create medical statements, especially when there is little absolute certainty in the medical world.

“No evidence of remaining disease” could simply mean that they removed the two cancerous nodules they found on a lung scan after her recent fall. If these nodules represent cancer that spread from her previous colon or pancreas cancer, the doctors removed what they found in her lungs. This doesn’t speak for cancer that might have spread to her liver, brain or bones.

“No further treatment is required” might imply that she is cancer free. It could also suggest the opposite, that she has metastatic cancer that is no longer treatable, other than hospice care, and that further treatment is futile at this point, hence not required.

The media were giddy with excitement that the liberal lion of the court was ready to get back to her job of thwarting President Trump. TMZ caught a glimpse of her, “emerging for the first time” from her Washington, D.C., apartment. CBS reported that her recovery is “on track” with “no sign of remaining cancer.”

Fox News echoed the others by saying her recovery was “on track”, although they curiously described her recent surgery as, “early-stage lung cancer surgery.” Not so if it was metastatic cancer, meaning stage four and quite advanced.”

The bottom line here is that Minitrue is oddly tight-lipped about Ginsburg’s health as of late. We don’t fully know what’s going on.

And this isn’t just me saying that; it’s a practicing physician saying it. She might have stage-four cancer and we wouldn’t even know.

All this leads to the recent (within the past few days) rumors swirling that Ginsburg now has pneumonia and is in failing health. Of course, there’s nothing about her possibly having pneumonia coming from the Ministry of Truth, but a website called the Santa Monica Observer was the first to report it two days ago:

“As any reader of the Santa Monica Observer knew last September, Ruth Bader Ginsburg has developed lung cancer. The 85 year old Supreme Court Justice had surgery as quietly as possible on December 22, 2018.

Following surgery, she has developed complications including pneumonia. Pneumonia often afflicts elderly post surgery patients in the US, since antibiotics have resulted in Multi Resistant Strains of the lung infection.

The left and the main stream media have tried to put on a brave face as Ginsburg missed three straight days of argument this week, interviewing cancer doctors to say that she would recover. They claimed that she was working in her hospital room, knowing that it was untrue.

No one in the media or in the Democratic party want to face the awful truth that President Donald Trump is about to replace one of the Court’s most liberal justices.”

You might be thinking, “What the hell is the Santa Monica Observer? No credibility.” That’s a valid concern because I, too, had never heard of the Santa Monica Observer until today, but apparently they were the first to report on her initial lung cancer diagnosis back in September, which they were then attacked by Minitrue over, even though it wound up being borne out by events:

“When we broke the news in September, which we obtained from a confidential source in Justice Ginsburg’s inner circle, the left went on attack.

Snopes.com labelled our prediction that Ginsburg would undergo cancer surgery then retire, #FakeNews. Sadly it wasn’t.”

Here’s what Santa Monica Observer said in September:

“U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has had a re-occurrence of malignant melanoma, she has told her law clerks. Ginsburg was treated in 1999 for colon cancer and had surgery in 2009 for pancreatic cancer.

She has told key Democratic members of the Senate about her medical condition, including ranking Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee Dianne Feinstein. This explains in part the “take no prisoners” attitude of the Democrats during the Kavanaugh nomination, carefully orchestrating weak 37 year old allegations against Kavanaugh by Women he barely remembers knowing in High School and College.”

Is Santa Monica Observer correct? Only time will tell, but the pneumonia rumors are swirling and have more credence now given that Fox News just reported Ginsburg had to back out of a scheduled speaking event in New York that is not until February 6.

If Ginsburg is so healthy and fully recovered, as the Ministry of Truth is reporting/wishing, then why did she back out of this scheduled event that is taking place several weeks in the future?

A site called “Inquisitr” tried to “debunk” the recent pneumonia rumors with an article headlined, “Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is Not Fighting ‘For Her Life’ With Pneumonia, Despite Outlet’s Claim.” But the Inquisitr piece only attacks the credibility of the Santa Monica Observer, pointing out that SMO claimed Ginsburg had melanoma when in reality it was an early form of lung cancer.

However, we don’t know that she doesn’t have melanoma. We have only been told by Official Sources that she had the lung cancer cleaned up.

And even if we grant that SMO was incorrect about the melanoma claim, they were still correct overall about her having some form of cancer, and that was back in September.

In case you were wondering, apparently, lung cancer surgery often leads to pneumonia for older patients. Joondeph:

“The latest concern is that Justice Ginsburg could develop pneumonia, a common complication of lung surgery, particularly in the elderly and infirm. Pneumonia is often called “the old man’s friend” not to be sexist but because, “left untreated, the sufferer often lapses into a state of reduced consciousness, slipping peacefully away in their sleep, giving a dignified end to a period of often considerable suffering.”

The bottom line is, if Ruth Bader Ginsburg has pneumonia, we are not going to hear about it from the media.

Her health is a closely guarded secret, which can only mean that the outlook is not good.

Nancy Pelosi Tries to Delay the State of the Union Address to Silence Trump; Trump Responds by Canceling Pelosi’s Overseas Trip

Boy, I’m sure glad Democrats retook the House so they could Restore Civility and Dignity to Washington and prevent Orange Man from destroying our Institutions:

“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi renewed her call Thursday to delay the State of the Union address, saying the date is not “sacred” and President Trump should wait to deliver his message to the nation until the partial government shutdown ends.”

There are two reasons behind this:

  1. Nancy is trying to use the SOTU as a bargaining chip to force Trump to reopen the government without funding the wall, which is what the Democrats have wanted all along. “Reopen the government without wall funding and I’ll let you deliver the State of the Union.”
  2. Above all, Pelosi does not want Trump to be able to deliver a nationally televised address in which he can make the case for a border wall. The Democrats have no good answer for why we can’t have a border wall because their motives on immigration are totally malevolent. They would prefer to not debate at all. No which lie they trot out for why the oppose the wall–“It’s Immoral” or “It won’t work” or “We already have a secure border–they can never publicly say the real reason: “We want to demographically transform this country by importing foreigners who will vote almost exclusively for us, and to secure cheap labor for our big business allies.”

Pelosi, of course, trotted out a bunch of bullshit to pretend she’s not simply trying to deny Trump a platform to speak:

In her letter to the president, Pelosi cited security concerns and the need for proper protection at events such as the State of the Union to ensure the “continuation of government.”

But senior Homeland Security officials fired back, saying that despite the fact that their personnel have not been paid, they have been preparing for months for the State of the Union event.

“We are ready,” one official told Fox News Wednesday. “Despite the fact members of the Secret Service are not being paid, the protective mission has not changed.”

Security will be just fine. Capitol Hill is right down the street from the White House; it’s not far at all.

I was listening to Dan Bongino’s podcast yesterday (highly recommended by the way, he’s the man) and Bongino, who is ex-Secret Service, said there is not one iota of truth to Pelosi’s claims. The Secret Service is more than capable of handling security for the State of the Union, with or without a government shutdown.

After all, Trump has been just fine the past 27 days despite the shutdown.

Rand Paul, however, has a suggestion: just hold the SOTU in the Senate chamber if Pelosi won’t allow it in the House chamber.

If, as Pelosi says, the date of the SOTU is “not sacred,” then neither is the venue, no?

The Senate chamber is smaller than the House chamber (100 Senators vs. 435 Representatives) but it would look largely the same to a television audience. Trump certainly has this option on the table.

But because we have a fighter in the White House, President Trump didn’t just try to make do with the hand Pelsoi dealt him.

He went on the offensive: using Pelsoi’s own logic that with the government shut down it’s far too dangerous for high-ranking government officials to travel, Trump sent the following letter:

“Dear Madame Speaker:

Due to the Shutdown, I am sorry to inform you that your trip to Brussels, Egypt and Afghanistan has been postponed. We will reschedule this seven-day excursion when the Shutdown is over. In light of the 800,000 great American workers not receiving pay, I am sure you would agree that postponing this public relations event is totally appropriate. I also feel that, during this period, it would be better if you were in Washington negotiating with me and joining the Strong Border Security movement to end the Shutdown. Obviously, if you would like to make your journey by flying commercial, that would certainly be your prerogative.”

Isn’t it awesome to finally have a Republican who’s not a whimpering pussy?

Rush was loving it:

erawetertrte.PNG

I can’t wait for all the Principled Conservatives to erupt in anger at Trump’s move while mostly ignoring Pelosi’s.

Never forget that the only actual “principle” they have is a visceral, personal hatred of the President. That’s it.

Speaking of which, Ben Shapiro, predictably opposes Trump’s move, because why actually fight back when #Facts and #Logic will suffice?

Because pointing out that leftists are lying totally works!

Ace of Spades:

“The cucks always support some alternate plan that is not actually on the table, and are always against the plan that is on the table.

Hey Ben, why don’t you challenge her to a debate? That always works. You always bring home massive W’s when you challenge people to debates on Twitter.”

This is why, ultimately, Ben Shapiro is not on our side.

More Ace:

“I can’t wait to hear the wailing from the cucks. The screeching that by treating Nancy Pelosi to the exact same level of contempt she’s shown to him he has “violated sacred norms” that require “men” to behave like sissies.”

And of course the lying propagandists of the Ministry of Truth have gone into full lying propagandist mode. Fake Jake Tapper of CNN insinuated that Trump is basically trying to get Nancy Pelsoi killed:

Hey, Fake Jake: suck one. You are the Enemy of the People.

As I was saying the other day, Trump’s instincts are almost always correct, and his instincts are spot-on here: shove it right back in the Democrats’ faces.

Keep the pressure on them: don’t stop until we get a wall.