“Social media giant Facebook has now officially banned white nationalism and white separatism from its platform.
Motherboard reports that in a major policy shift, social media firm Facebook has officially banned white nationalism and white separatism from its platform. Facebook will also begin directing anyone that posts about these topics to a nonprofit aimed at helping individuals leave hate groups. The policy is set to be implemented next week following backlash from civil rights groups.”
That wouldn’t happen to be the SPLC, would it?
And what’s with these “civil rights groups”? It’s not the 1960s anymore. Quit with the victimhood myth-peddling.
“Facebook will begin banning any content that explicitly praises or promotes white nationalism or white separatism next week. Phrases such as “I am a proud white nationalist” and “Immigration is tearing this country apart; white separatism is the only answer,” will now be entirely banned from the platform. The decision was officially made at Facebook’s Content Standards Forum this week, Fishman stated that Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg was involved in the decision but roughly three dozen Facebook employees worked on the policy.”
Even though immigration objectively and undeniably is tearing this country apart, you’re not allowed to point it out.
But what if someone says, “Immigration is tearing this country apart,” and doesn’t include the “white separatism is the only answer” part? Is that still bannable?
I guess we’ll find out.
And Facebook doesn’t care about nonwhite nationalism, do they? You can say “I hate white people and I can’t wait until they’re a minority in this country,” and not only not face any bans but probably have your posts actively promoted by Facebook’s algorithms.
Because we’ve gotta combat White Privilege, after all. So we’ve gotta let nonwhites be openly racist against white people–even allow them to call for white genocide–because that’s social justice.
Wanting a majority-white America: that’s white nationalism and completely intolerable.
Wanting a majority-nonwhite America: you’re on the side of the angels.
La Raza and other Hispanic groups openly support the reconquest of the American southwest via mass immigration to reclaim what they believe to be their mythical ancestral home of “Aztlan,” but Facebook is not concerned about this.
This is not Facebook mistakenly buying into the bullshit media narrative that White Supremacism is running amok and killing people by the day.
This is Facebook supplementing that bullshit media narrative. Facebook and the media are simply different divisions of the same Globalist Uniparty Establishment.
The goal is to further demonize white people and suppress dissident speech online.
Pretty soon everyone to the right of John McCain will be defined as a “white nationalist” and banned accordingly.
Remember, "white nationalism" is any White people critical of mass immigration, multiculturalism & "diversity" in the west.
This should make it perfectly clear who is the most hunted & hated group. They had these plans way before NZ.https://t.co/eAYPwnPuZf
American women are so empowered in 2019 that they can admit to drugging and robbing men and nothing will happen to them.
And still they enjoy preferential treatment due to the widespread perception that they are “oppressed victims of the patriarchy.”
After a video surfaced of Cardi B admitting to robbing and drugging men, the singer is explaining herself.
In the clip from an Instagram Live recorded three years ago, the rapper said, “I had to go strip, I had to go, ‘Oh yeah, you want to f–k me? Yeah, yeah, yeah, let’s go back to this hotel,’ and I drugged n—–s up, and I robbed them. That’s what I used to do,” (via Hip Hop Ratchet) she explained.
After horrified social media users responded to the 26-year-old star’s confession with the hashtag #SurvivingCardiB (in reference to the R. Kelly documentary “Surviving R. Kelly”) Cardi took to Instagram to explain her actions.”
Yeah, I don’t give a shit about her “explanation” of her actions. She can go fuck herself.
And there’s more, too. As she was drugging and robbing unsuspecting guys, she also tricked them into having sex with trannies while they were completely blacked out on a combination of alcohol and drugs:
“You know me. I meet a guy, I’m gonna take him out, I’m gonna get him all perc’d up [the opiate drug Percocet] and everything, then bring a bitch around, we’re gonna have a threesome, and when he wakes up he’ll be like, ‘What the fuck?’ Yeah because the bitch was a tranny.”
By the way, this happens all the time. Women do this stuff all the time, especially hookers. Lots of guys have had it happen to them, I know a few personally.
One guy I know here in Chicago had this happen to him while in a car, and afterwards, he was dropped off in the hood at like 3am without a phone, wallet or keys.
But I guess women are #Oppressed #Victims so they’re allowed to do this. Whatevs!
This is “female empowerment” for you, right here.
And to further underscore the double standard women are held to in this country, we all know Cardi B will not be dropped by her record label. The celebrity class will not ostracize her. The radio will not stop playing her songs.
This will all blow over in a week with no lasting damage to her career.
If a male rapper bragged about drugging, raping and robbing unsuspecting women, not only would his career be over, he would go to jail for a very long time.
Gotta love Male Privilege!
I say it almost every day: any group the media portrays as “victims” are in reality the oppressors, and any group the media portrays as “oppressors” are actually the victims.
Do not for one second entertain any of this garbage about “Male Privilege.”
“A report in Huffington Post recently revealed the case of Wikipedia editor Ed Sussman, who was paid by media clients such as NBC and Axios to help diminish critical material. Paid editors operating in a similar manner to Sussman have worked on behalf of CNN contributor Hilary Rosen and the CEOs of Reddit and Intel, among other clients.
Other conduct by Sussman not covered by the Huffington Post shows him authoring fluff pieces for NBC executives and getting his proposed changes approved by another paid Wikipedia editor.
The report by Ashley Feinberg detailed former journalist Ed Sussman’s work as a paid Wikipedia fixer for clients such as Axios, NBC, and Facebook. Sussman did this work through the firm WhiteHatWiki, which he argues follows Wikipedia policies. Sussman disclosed his paid editing on Wikipedia and ostensibly worked within the rules by having other editors approve proposed changes.
However, Feinberg’s article noted several of Sussman’s requests involved removing or watering down potentially damaging material about clients, even when citing sources considered reliable on the site. Such removals would appear to violate Wikipedia’s neutrality policy.
In one example Feinberg cited, Sussman requested changes to the page of Axios journalist Jonathan Swan regarding a false report he made last September claiming Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was resigning. A line noting the incident in Swan’s article was replaced with a paragraph hyping that Swan was “the first to report” Rosenstein’s offer to resign, despite the offer being refused. Sussman backed this spin with a New York Times article treating the incident as a failure of the Axios reporting model, a fact not mentioned in Sussman’s proposed edit.
We’re increasingly running out of places to turn. There is no escaping the left.
There is nowhere you can go where you won’t be bombarded with Democratic Party propaganda and brainwashing. You can’t escape it.
Wikipedia being corrupted by the left is particularly scary because while you can avoid cable news, modern Hollywood movies and a good deal of social media, most people cannot avoid Wikipedia.
Want to learn about, I don’t know, anything? Wikipedia.
Want to know about King Henry VII? You go to Wikipedia.
Want to know about the Mughal Empire? The Iranian Revolution of 1979? Chaos Theory? The Younger Dryas period? Wikipedia.
Want to know about a foreign politician whose name you’ve been hearing recently? You go to Wikipedia and read up.
Want to read up on crime statistics? Wikipedia.
But now even Wikipedia is feeding you leftwing propaganda. The left has now poisoned the well of Wikipedia, which represents basically the sum total of human knowledge.
That is an extraordinarily evil crime against humanity. I’m not exaggerating, either.
I have suspected this for a while because I spend a lot of time on Wikipedia. It’s hard to miss. What made me most acutely aware of the corruption of Wikipedia–and this will give you a sense of just how far-reaching and pervasive Wikipedia’s bias is–was my recent interest in the Great Pyramids and the Sphinx in Egypt.
To try to keep it brief, I’ve been watching a lot of videos on YouTube about the “true age” of the Pyramids and the Sphinx or the “true purpose of the Pyramids.” Lots of stuff by Bright Insight’s channel, as well as Joe Rogan, Robert Schoch, Brien Foerster and Graham Hancock. These guys’ arguments about the pyramids are generally written off derisively as “conspiracy theories” because they challenge the “mainstream consensus” that the Pharaohs built the pyramids in Egypt around 2500 B.C.
Basically their argument–these guys are geologists who study rocks and weathering–is that there’s a lot of evidence that the Sphinx is much, much older than the Dynastic Egyptians and could be as old as 80,000 years old, which would of course lead to the obvious question, “Then who the hell had the ability to build that thing 80,000 years ago? Certainly not the cavemen.” A possible explanation is that there was an advanced human civilization here on earth many tens of thousands of years ago, but was wiped out by some cataclysm and all that remains of it today are its stone monuments.
Also, there’s lots of theories that say the Pyramids are likely way older than 5500 years old, and others postulate that there’s no way the Pyramids were built to be tombs for the Pharoahs of Old because there are no hieroglyphics in them, they don’t resemble the actual tombs for the Pharoahs at the Valley of the Kings, and because of just how massive an undertaking it was to build those pyramids–all that for a dead guy?
Anyway, to make a long story short, a lot of these articles on Wikipedia denounce the “alternative theories” about the age/purpose of the pyramids as “pseudoscience” because it is rejected by the mainstream Egyptologists. Bright Insight talks about this specifically in a lot of his videos, although I can’t find the specific ones.
The point is, Wikipedia is pushing the Establishment Consensus on things as seemingly inconsequential and irrelevant as the Great Pyramids.
If they’re pushing Establishment Propaganda on subjects like that, the obvious question is how many additional topics are they pushing Establishment Propaganda on?
“NORTH HOLLYWOOD, LOS ANGELES (KABC) — Outrage has grown at Walter Reed Middle School in North Hollywood, as the school faces layoffs and increased class sizes due to a law limiting funds for schools with a higher white student body.
The Los Angeles Unified School District provides more funding for schools where the white population is below 30 percent.
In a letter to parents, the district noted the highly regarded middle school had been above the percentage for the past couple years.”
But I was told predominantly white schools were hogging all the education funding and depriving needier minority schools Because Racism, and that this perpetuates a vicious cycle where minorities are held down due to their sub-par schools?
It gets better:
“The racial formula was a condition imposed by court decisions dealing with desegregation in the 1970s.”
Wait, now you’re telling me that the American education system has been diverting funds away from white schools to nonwhite schools since the 1970s?
They’ve been aware of the disparity in outcome between white and nonwhite schools since the 1970s, and have been trying to close the gap for nearly 50 years, and still not much has changed?
Not only does White Privilege not exist, it hasn’t existed for a long time.
And as for why increased funding for minority schools hasn’t translated into better results in minority communities, maybe that’s because 50+ years of Liberal Welfare Statism and Victim Narrative peddling is the problem, not White Racism.
“Jussie Smollett will not be prosecuted for allegedly faking a racial attack, because all charges have been dropped. Jussie and his lawyers will address the media at 8:45 AM PT. We will live stream.
Jussie and his lawyers ran to court Tuesday morning in Chicago, where he was facing 16 felony counts of lying to police in the alleged racial and homophobic attack.
Jussie will surrender his $10,000 bond. But, that’s it. The case is over.
We’re told the State’s Attorney, Kim Foxx, told Chicago police she was dropping the case because Jussie would have only gotten community service if convicted and she said he has already performed community service so there is no point in prosecuting him. We could not find any record of Smollett doing community service.”
Other than, y’know, to dissuade people from faking hate crimes, but then again, the Powers That Be have a vested interest in encouraging more and more minorities to fake white hate crimes.
We’re told Chicago police are “furious” and feel something untoward is going on with Kim Foxx.”
Undoubtedly. She’s a Chicago Democrat after all. Hello.
If you can bear to read the rest, Jussie is now officially the Victim:
“Jussie’s lawyers say, “Today, all criminal charges against Jussie Smollett were dropped and his record has been wiped clean of the filing of this tragic complaint against him. Jussie was attacked by two people he was unable to identify on January 29th. He was a victim who was vilified and made to appear as a perpetrator as a result of false and inappropriate remarks made to the public, causing an inappropriate rush to judgment.”
So if Smollett is complete exonerated and innocent, why did he have to forfeit $10k and do community service?
They’re so corrupt they can’t even get their story straight, and it’s because they know it doesn’t matter–nobody’s gonna do shit to them.
They don’t even care who knows they’re corrupt.
Besides, even if Smollett wasn’t actually the victim of a hate crime, just the reality of living as a gay black man in America makes him a victim all the same.
His heart was in the right place. He was just trying to raise awareness of how dangerous life is for minorities in Trump’s America™.
To borrow a term the “media” has grown fond of, Smollett’s claims rang true, even if they weren’t actually true.
And hey, after 300 years of slavery and 100 years of Jim Crow, a black man in America is ENTITLED to making a mockery of the justice system! Sheesh.
“A source close to Jussie says the prosecution’s case “disintegrated.” As we reported, there were issues with the $3,500 check the 2 brothers, Ola and Abel Osundairo, received from Jussie. The Police Superintendent had said the money was payment for the fake attack, but it appears it was actually for physical training.”
“Just days after Jussie Smollett told Chicago police he had fought off a pair of attackers who targeted him in an apparent hate crime, Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx tried to persuade Police Supt. Eddie Johnson to turn the investigation over to the FBI.
Foxx’s call to Johnson came after an influential supporter of the “Empire” actor reached out to Foxx personally: Tina Tchen, a Chicago attorney and former chief of staff for former First Lady Michelle Obama, according to emails and text messages provided by Foxx to the Chicago Sun-Times in response to a public records request.”
The Obamas personally intervened to rig this case.
But why would they want the FBI taking over the case? At first glance, it would appear an FBI investigation is the exact opposite of what you’d want if you were hoping to pull strings and get someone let off the hook.
Well, as we learned over the past two years with Comey and Parkland and the Russia Hoax, the FBI is completely corrupt from top to bottom, and the fact that Democrats now demand FBI investigations left and right is all the proof you need, because the Democrats are corrupt top-to-bottom. They view the FBI as their fixer and secret police force, covering up their own crimes while terrorizing their enemies.
The Obamas wanted the Jussie case in the “right hands.” And those hands were the FBI’s. That should tell you all you need to know about the FBI.
In America 2019, there are some people exempt from the law, and some people whose lives are ruined for no reason other than their political affiliation:
Imagine if a white male actor faked a hate crime against himself by pretending black men attacked him in the middle of the night— then was subsequently acquitted of all charges. #JussieSmollett is an utter perversion of justice who just DESTROYED the myth of white privilege.
Over the past few years, we have been told relentlessly by Serious Journalists and Very Important People that action must be taken to stop the spread of misinformation and fake news, namely on major social media platforms.
The Aspen Institute, a prestigious think tank that hosts the trendy annual Aspen Ideas Festival, described as “the nation’s premier, public gathering place for leaders from around the globe and across many disciplines to engage in deep and inquisitive discussion of the ideas and issues that shape our lives and challenge our times,” and which features such high-profile attendees as Bill and Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Mitt Romney, Joe Biden, Stephen Breyer and Bill Gates, put out an article last year entitled “How to Stop the Spread of Fake News on Social Media.”
A few weeks after the 2016 election, The New York Times published a roundtable debate on how to stop the spread of fake news:
NYT felt so strongly about fighting fake news that it ran a major advertising campaign called “Truth” to show how serious it was:
According to NYT, “the truth is under attack” and is “more important now than ever.”
The Brookings Institution also published a long essay on how to combat the spread of fake news and disinformation.
Everyone who’s anyone agrees: fake news is bad, and we need to figure out how to stop it from spreading.
Facebook, the entity possessing perhaps the most influence over the spread of fake news and misinformation, weighed in on the matter in April 2017:
“We know people want to see accurate information on Facebook – and so do we. False news is harmful to our community, it makes the world less informed, and it erodes trust.”
“It’s not a new phenomenon, and all of us — tech companies, media companies, newsrooms, teachers — have a responsibility to do our part in addressing it.”
I totally agree.
“When it comes to fighting false news, one of the most effective approaches is removing the economic incentives for traffickers of misinformation. We’ve found that a lot of fake news is financially motivated. These spammers make money by masquerading as legitimate news publishers and posting hoaxes that get people to visit their sites, which are often mostly ads.”
I think you get where I’m going with this: we have “spammers” masquerading as legitimate news publishers and bombarding people with hoax stories. . .
. . . Trying to get people to visit their sites, which are mostly just ads:
And not only were news outlets pushing fake news and misinformation for clicks and ad revenue, they were doing so knowing full well it was a hoax:
I think it’s clear by now: action must be taken against CNN and its partners in crime who spent the past two years knowingly pushing a hoax story about high treason and Russian Collusion for ratings and clicks.
By Facebook’s own criteria, CNN should be given the Alex Jones Treatment.
And it wasn’t just CNN that pushed the Russia Hoax. Every major “news” outlet in America did so as well, from WaPo to NYT to NBC and MSNBC as well.
The New York Times had its own section dedicated to the Hoax entitled, “Trump and the Russians.” I have to post it in multiple screenshots because a large advertisement takes up most of the first shot:
I’m starting to think NYT was just kidding with all the “Truth” grandstanding:
The Washington Post was even worse than the New York Times and arguably even worse than CNN if we just go by the level of hyperbole in their headlines:
Facebook, Twitter and all the major social media providers must deplatform CNN, Washington Post and the New York Times immediately for their role in spreading false news and misinformation.
What sort of message would they be sending if they allowed these phony news outlets to spread all this fake news and misinformation without holding them accountable? After all the Serious Rhetoric and hand-wringing about fake news and misinformation?
And it wasn’t just the news outlets that fanned the flames of the conspiracy. There were major politicians and officials involved:
Adam Schiff should be deplatformed.
Former CIA head John Brennan as well:
The list goes on and on and on. Virtually all the biggest names in the Democratic Party and in the “mainstream media” peddled this debunked conspiracy theory, knowingly deceiving the American public and perpetrating the greatest hoax in history.
We must take steps to ensure they are never able to do so again.
“So now what? For starters, Twitter, Facebook, Google and other Silicon Valley tech companies should remove all Russian collusion conspiracy theorists from their platforms.
After all, social media networks didn’t hesitate to ban Alex Jones of Infowars and others for spreading misinformation and/or conspiracy theories, so why not ban House Majority Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Schiff, Eric Swalwell, John Brennan, Beto O’ Rourke and scores of media hacks who’ve all done the same?
And what about Google? Will it continue to allow search results that yield now-debunked conspiracy theories surrounding Russian collusion and the Trump campaign? Or will they do the right thing and scrub misinformation and lies to stop the hoax from perpetuating?”