Month: March 2019

Trump Exonerated, but Mueller Report Will Not Change a Thing

Readers of this site, but mainly the old site on Medium before it got deleted, will know that I have rejected this Trump Russia Collusion Conspiracy Theory since it began in late 2016.

I have constantly pushed back on everything: every leak, “bombshell,” and confident media declaration that the “Walls are closing in” every step of the way.

I haven’t written about the Russia probe much as of late because it has already been clear for months that there was no collusion or conspiracy with Russia. The whole thing had become boring, tedious. It stopped being fun to debunk the latest “bombshell” report on Trump and Russia because it became abundantly clear there never was any collusion.

But at long last, the day has come where Special Counsel Robert Mueller has concluded his investigation: there was no collusion.

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 7.19.54 PM.png

The reason I have pushed back since the start is because the premise of the whole thing was on-its-face absurd: it required believing Russia can actually alter the outcome of a US presidential election in the first place.

Collusion Conspiracy Theorists could never convincingly explain how Russia altered the outcome of the election. But they were willing to believe the implausible scenario that Russia Made Hillary Lose because in 2016 they had come to believe that her victory in the election was a given, and that there was no way she could possibly lose.

When Trump shocked everyone and won, Uniparty Establishment figures and Democratic voters did not have a reckoning with reality or ask themselves why they didn’t see it coming, and what prevented them from doing so. They didn’t say, “Hey, maybe we’ve been living in a bubble. Maybe we need to expose ourselves to other ideas and news sources so our worlds aren’t shattered like this again.”

No, instead what they did was concoct an outlandish excuse for why their supposedly unstoppable candidate lost to the candidate who supposedly had no chance: “Trump only won because he colluded with Russia!”

The Russia Collusion Conspiracy served two important needs for despondent leftists in the wake of Trump’s victory: it delegitimized the result of the election, and provided a way to hopefully overturn the result of that illegitimate election.

They didn’t believe in the Conspiracy because it was compelling, they believed it because they needed it to be true. Their goal since the election was to get Trump impeached as soon as possible, and the Mueller probe was the most promising means to that end.

In this regard, it was never really about Russian Collusion at all: that was merely a means to an end. It has always been about impeachment, and they will cling for dear life to whatever story they feel can lead them there: Russia Collusion, obstruction, Stormy Daniels, 25th Amendment, whatever. It’s always been about finding a means to an end.

The second reason to have been skeptical of Trump Russia Collusion from the start was the sheer ridiculousness of idea that Trump would actually reach out to Russia and basically sell his soul in exchange for the Presidency.

How could people come to believe that a prominent American businessman and celebrity, who has never before had his allegiance to America questioned, and who was never said to be in bed with the Russians, suddenly became a Russian Pawn in 2016? Where was all the Trump Russia talk before 2016? Trump had been famous for decades prior to running for president and there was never any talk that he was actually a traitor for the Russians.

It was always ludicrous to believe Russia had acquired an American Presidential candidate. It requires a ridiculous belief that the Kremlin is so powerful and omnipotent that it could actually steal the American presidency.

But people didn’t step back and think about how absurd the whole thing was. They didn’t ask themselves if it was more likely that Russia manipulated 63+ million Americans into voting for a Kremlin Pawn, or that the people who voted for Trump did so because he actually, I don’t know, genuinely appealed to them.

The third reason the Russian Collusion Conspiracy was always unbelievable is that as time passed and Republicans in Congress (namely Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows) and in the media (namely Mollie Hemingway, Lee Smith, Andy McCarthy, Michael Doran and Victor Davis Hanson, among many others) began pushing back on the narrative, they found compelling evidence that the whole thing was actually a set-up by the deep state and the media.

In other words, the real conspiracy has been revealed: the Clinton campaign, the Obama intelligence community, and the “mainstream media” worked together to attempt to frame Trump for Russian collusion. The fabrication emerged from them, not from any suspicious activity on Trump’s part. This is a critical distinction because it demonstrates the malicious nature of the whole thing: those peddling the Russian Collusion theory did not simply get it wrong, they knowingly leveled false accusations against this President for the sole purpose of taking him down.

Fourth, Trump Russia Truthers also could never explain how, if it was Wikileaks’ email dumps about Clinton that made her lose, why the public should not have been allowed to learn those **true facts** about Hillary Clinton.

First, during the campaign, they insisted that there was nothing important revealed about Hillary in the Wikileaks emails. Then, when Hillary lost, they claimed it was the Wikileaks emails that made her lose. Obviously both cannot be true, but let’s take them at their word on the last one because it is their official position now.

How is it that revealing true facts about Hillary Clinton constitutes “manipulating” an election, while hiding those very same true facts about Hillary Clinton was not in any way manipulating an election?

This was all lost in the hysteria over Wikileaks: why, exactly, was it bad that the public got to learn more about Hillary? Why should those emails have been kept secret? Only because they reflected badly on her, and many others in the media, in a negative light? I thought transparency was a good thing.

If the emails were full of false information, Clinton Partisans should have said so. But they didn’t. They only claim that the Wikileaks emails hurt Hillary and should have never been released, leading us to the inevitable conclusion that they would have preferred we remain in the dark about Hillary Clinton.

Even if you accept the premise that Wikileaks is a Kremlin “cut out” or whatever the media/Deep State started calling it, and even if you accept the premise that Wikileaks’ actions were the means by which Russia boosted and supported Donald Trump’s campaign, then how exactly does Wikileaks exposing true facts about Hillary Clinton constitute manipulating or rigging an election?

It would seem to me that the concealment of True Facts constitutes rigging an election more than the release of them.

And this is a position taken by all of the hardcore Russia Conspiracy Theorists in the media as well, just not when it comes to Hillary Clinton. Consider that they’ve been saying Trump’s hush money payments to Stormy Daniels and other models he slept with constitutes “manipulating an election” because he prevented the public from knowing the truth about him.

So for those with the capacity for free and independent thought, as well as a distrust of the “media,” it was quite clear all along that the Trump-Russia Collusion conspiracy theory was a load of nonsense.

And this leads to the next major point about the Mueller conclusion: it will not change much.

On our side, it’s not as if Trump supporters can possibly think any lower of the media.

Best case scenario it might cause prominent Republican journalists and pundits, who for some reason still give the “mainstream media” the benefit of the doubt and the presumption of good faith and credibility, to slowly realize the truth.

But on the whole, this will not turn many people against the “media.” If you don’t realize by now that the “mainstream media” is pure Uniparty Propaganda, you never will.

Democrats will not stop believing Trump colluded with Russia. And even the few who do give up the Collusion angle will still not give up the impeachment mission: they will quickly move on to the next pretend scandal.

I can’t tell you how many “IT’S MUELLER TIME” memes I’ve seen in response to Trump’s tweets, or in response to pro-Trump statements on social media: liberals thought it was a given that Mueller would bring down Trump. It was only a matter of time. They were so certain of it and will not just accept that they were massively wrong.

Just look at how out-of-control the Mueller worship was:


Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.02.08 PM.png


Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.02.34 PM.png

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.03.37 PM.png

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.02.53 PM.png

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.04.29 PM.png

And here’s my personal favorite:

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.04.59 PM.png

You can buy “It’s Mueller Time” pint glasses, shirts, mugs, signs, buttons and more:

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.06.11 PM.png

I hope it’s starting to sink in just how brainwashed these people are.

I mean, my goodness:

Here we have Bill Maher admitting he’s been brainwashed by the media, and that whatever cable news says, he believes.

This is the leftist mindset in a nutshell: they will not–cannot–accept reality.

This will not cause any additional people to lose faith in the media, including the people for whom this Mueller probe was their reason to get out of bed in the morning. Again, this is because it was never truly about Russian Collusion, but rather impeachment. The impeachment dream is still there even if the Russian Collusion dream is dead.

This will not cause any Democrats to reflect and reckon with reality. They will not think to themselves, “Boy, maybe I’ve misinformed and lied to. Maybe I should start listening to the people who have been calling this Russia business a hoax for the past two years.”

They won’t do that because it was never about letting the facts guide them. They didn’t believe in the Russia Collusion Conspiracy because it seemed to be true, but rather because they needed it to be true. It was based on emotion.

Worst of all, the media will not be held accountable for this, or anything else, ever. The media was doing exactly what it was designed for: relentlessly pumping out Democratic Party propaganda.

If you think there will be consequences for the media after this, you are wrong. They will move on from this like it never happened. Like they didn’t spend the past two-plus years screaming about Russian Collusion and the Walls Closing In and predicting Trump and his family would be carried out of the White House in handcuffs.

The “media” will move right on to the next bogus impeachment pipe dream as if this whole Russia business never happened.

Look at this spin:

A “cover-up”!

Really? I thought Mueller was the most honorable man in America:

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.05.41 PM.png

Now he’s part of the cover-up?

We don’t have a media. At least, the so-called “mainstream media” is not a media in any real sense: it is 100% a Uniparty propaganda factory.

To understand how bad things have gotten, recall that the New York Times and Washington Post won Pulitzer Prizes for their coverage of a made-up scandal. The Pulitzer Prize is, like the Academy Awards, now worthless and indicative of nothing but producing Uniparty propaganda.

If we actually had a media, this would ruin the careers of loads of prominent television personalities (they don’t deserve to be called journalists) and politicians, namely:

  1. CNN–the entire network.
  2. The Washington Post
  3. The New York Times
  4. Rachel Maddow
  5. Joe Scarborough & Mika Brzezinski
  6. Rep. Adam Schiff
  7. Rep. Jerry Nadler
  8. Rep. Maxine Waters
  9. Rep. Ted Lieu
  10. Benjamin Wittes

But we don’t have a media. We have a Uniparty Propaganda Department. And so none of those people or outlets will be punished or held accountable, because they were simply doing their jobs.


Everyone Loves Refugees–Until They’re Asked to Take Them into Their Homes





Just not in my home:

This is priceless.

A guy goes around in Sweden asking people if they support letting in “refugees.” They all answer affirmatively.

Then he asks them if, hypothetically, they’d be willing to take a refugee into their own home. They all answer affirmatively again.

But then he brings out Ali, a young Middle Eastern guy, and asks the Swedes if they’d be willing to let Ali come home and live with them right there on the spot.

Would they be willing to back up their compassionate rhetoric with actual compassion?

I’m sure you’ll be shocked to learn that no, no they would not be willing to do that.

Not a single one says yes. They’ve all got some excuse for why they can’t.

I don’t get it. Diversity is supposed to be our strength, and yet none of these Swedes want to make their households stronger through diversity.

What gives?!

We must expose and humiliate these virtue signaling white liberals who demand we take in a limitless amount of refugees but then want nothing to do with the refugees once they are actually here.

The Left Hates Us More Than We Can Possibly Imagine

Truly these people are our enemies:

I don’t know how Eric was able to restrain himself from pummeling that walking, talking pile of human garbage to a bloody pulp.

Lord knows it’s what he deserved.

The left’s hatred for us knows no bounds.

They don’t hate our ideas, they hate us.

The Right Doesn’t Control a Single Major American Institution–Including Big Business

There is no major institution in America that represents the right. Not one.

We’ve long known the “media,” Hollywood, academia and Silicon Valley were far left, but popular wisdom has held that there were at least a few major American institutions that were not totally captured by the left.

As recently as 2012 or so, it was thought that Big Business leaned right, along with the Church and the military. But now we know this is not the case.

Seeing this is what spurred me to write this:

This is why it’s laughable for leftists to rail against “evil right-wing corporations”: corporate America is not right-wing in any real sense at all. Leftists have way more than just Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream on their side.

Leftists: you are not up against any sort of powerful institutional force whatsoever–outside of the American people themselves, that is. Leftists have fully become The System: the cultural & power Establishment has become leftist, and leftists have become the cultural & power Establishment. They have become one.

But even in “pre-pre-revolutionary” America (prior to 2014), before literally everyone and everything in society was sucked into the political vortex, the argument that Big Business was an institution captured by the right was pretty thin: it was basically, “Because businesses want lower taxes.” And that was it.

But while Big Business does always seek lower taxes (and they just got them last year) that doesn’t necessarily make them right-wing. Amazon, which hasn’t paid a single dime in federal taxes in two years, was also paying very little under leftwinger Obama:


In other words, under the neoliberal economic order that began in the 1980s with Reagan, Big Business in America had relatively little to worry about no matter which party was in control: they did well under Reagan, they did well under Clinton, they did well under Bush, and they did well under Obama.

And there’s far more than taxes to the corporate game: much of it is regulation, which contrary to popular misconception, Big Business mostly welcomes because it always has a hand in writing those regulations. The effect of most government “regulation” is to further entrench multinational megacorporations (MNMCs) and suffocate competition, continuing the process of concentrating entire industries and sectors of the economy into the hands of a small number of MNMCs.

Culturally, Big Business is committed to eroding traditional values.





Major corporate sponsorship of gay pride parades:





So Corporate America is fully on-board with the gay agenda. Whether or not it’s genuine or cynically-motivated corporate virtue signaling doesn’t really matter: the end result is all the same.

And this is all without even mentioning Corporate America’s support for mass immigration for cheap labor, which is turning America into a third-world hellhole.

The one major corporation that isn’t on board with the “progressive” leftwing agenda is Chick-Fil-A, and Chick-Fil-A is often in the news over its support of “anti-LGBT” political causes. This in fact proves the point that Big Business is far left: it’s considered news when a major company actually deviates from the progressive consensus.

As for the other institutions that are supposedly “conservative”: the military? Maybe most of the soldiers and veterans are, but the Pentagon and top military brass are not conservative. The upper-echelon of the Pentagon is one giant revolving door with the defense contracting and weapons industries, with top brass often playing both sides of the military industrial complex game to keep America at war constantly.

And culturally, the Pentagon is very “progressive”: it wants trannies in the military, and women on the front lines. Not because they would make America’s military stronger (in fact they would do just the opposite), but because the Pentagon is fully on-board with the “progressive” agenda.

The Church is conservative? Did you see how the Catholic Church was at the front of the line to impulsively denounce the Covington Catholic kids earlier this year in the wake of the media’s lies about them?

And the Communist Pope obsessed with climate change, open borders and socialism? He may officially claim marriage is between a man and a woman, but he also says God “made” gay people gay so there’s some serious inconsistency there. I’d bet the former position is disingenuous and the latter is more in-line with his true beliefs.

The Church is not conservative. Many Catholics may be conservative, and individual parishes may lean conservative, but institutionally, as an overall cultural force, the Catholic Church is not conservative.

At least we have Chick-Fil-A.

🚨 White Privilege Alert! Black Pro Boxer Goes on Anti-Gay Rant, Media Mum

Imagine if a white guy did this:


“If any fag, punk-ass n*gga come up on me, tryin’ to touch me, or all that gay shit, I’m letting you know right now: if I ain’t got my gun on me, I’m knockin’ you the fuck out. If I got my gun, I’m shooting you in the face. I’m not playin’ around. That’s on God. I don’t like gay shit.”

Media headline if he was white: “Gun-toting redneck threatens to punch and SHOOT gay people in his presence.”

If a white guy threatened to shoot any gay people in his presence, he would be under immediate FBI investigation and his career would be over.

This would be all over the news and we’d be subject to endless panel discussions about how gays in America are under assault by white people.

But yeah, we need to worry about white privilege in this country.

White people can get away with anything, man.

In completely unrelated news, I have a new favorite boxer.

Diversity is Italy’s Strength

Western culture is being enriched, one burning school bus full of children at a time:

Are you really surprised this isn’t all over the news, though? C’mon.

The Senegalese migrant said he was lashing out against Italy’s new, more restrictive immigration policies under Salvini.

So of course the only logical thing to do is to go back to open borders and flooding the country with thousands of African migrants per month.

After all, they seem like such nice people who fit in well!

If we don’t reopen the borders for them, they’ll burn our children alive.

What are you waiting for? Reopen those borders!



British Woman Under Police Investigation For “Misgendering” a Tranny

The absolute state of Britain:

“When Caroline Farrow, a Catholic commentator, and transgender rights campaigner Susie Green, agreed to take part in a television debate about a controversial Girl Guides policy, producers would have expected differences of opinion.

But while the conversation on screen was certainly heated, it was what happened off-air when the pair continued the debate on Twitter that resulted in a six-month-long police investigation.

Mrs Farrow, a mother of five with strong religious views, allegedly used the wrong pronoun when referring to Ms Green’s transgender daughter.”

“Misgender” a tranny on Twitter: SIX MONTH POLICE INVESTIGATION!

Imagine living in a country currently experiencing Islamic pedophile rings, acid attacks, a knife crime epidemic, and Islamic terrorist attacks all due to elite-imposed mass Muslim migration, and the police have all their energy and time trained on you for using the wrong gender pronoun on Twitter.

Not only have native-born Westerners become second-class citizens in their own countries, they are now actively persecuted for daring to voice any dissent against the sexually degenerate, multiculturalist agenda being forced on them.

If you think this is an isolated incident, guess again:


Hey, anyone remember what free speech was like?

Americans: this is our future if we give any ground to the left on “hate speech laws.”

Those of you tempted to believe the left is acting in good faith when it says it doesn’t want to abolish free speech, only to “curb hate speech”: this is what they want.

The Bezos Washington Post is so Shamelessly Full of Shit it Will Make Your Head Spin

For the past two years, the Bezos Washington Post has been fretting and wringing its hands over the supposed dire threat to journalism and journalists in the Fascist Age of Trump. In their telling of things, nothing but blue check-adorned “journalists” at Uniparty Propaganda Outlets like WaPo stand in between America and the Fourth Reich under Fuhrer Trump, but Trump is going to appaling lengths to silence those intrepid “journalists” who stand in his way.

Trump is so incredibly dangerous to #Journalists, You Guys. It is so important to highlight just how dangerous daily life has become for #Journalists under Trump:

Screen Shot 2019-03-20 at 7.24.12 AM.png

WaPo is so Seriously Concerned about the safety of #Journalists in the age of Trump that it aired a multimillion-dollar Super Bowl commercial last month on the matter:

Screen Shot 2019-03-20 at 7.29.35 AM.png

Yes, it’s totally logical to believe fascist dictators who are hostile to the press allow the press to run ads raising awareness about how hostile to the press the fascist dictator is during the biggest television event of the year.

You’d think jack-booted thugs were routinely busting into newsrooms across America and smashing up printing presses, and that brave critics of the Trump Regime were disappearing in the night.

If you read the Bezos Washington Post, you’d get the impression that it has never been more dangerous to be a journalist in America.

But then the Bezos Post goes and runs an Op-Ed by Turkish Sultan Recep Erdogan:

They spend three years pretending Journalists Are Under Attack In Trump’s America and then allow a platform to the Turkish Dictator who currently has more journalists locked up in prison than any other world leader:

Screen Shot 2019-03-20 at 7.41.18 AM.png

But Trump is the real threat to #Journalism, people.

They don’t mean any of it. Not a word. It is all virtue signaling and propaganda.

Their supposed concern over the safety of journalists and the state of journalism in America is 100% disingenuous political propaganda designed to fill your head with lies about President Trump.

Screen Shot 2019-03-20 at 7.45.15 AM.png

As a general rule, just assume that the polar opposite of whatever these “news outlets” in America say is the truth.

Criticizing Donald Trump is not “brave”–it’s basically a one-way ticket to Twitter Celebrity Status and getting a gig on cable “news.”

The US government is not going after “journalists”–half of them are in bed with the Deep State as launderers and mouthpieces for their anti-Trump leaks.

And the Washington Post is not sticking up for journalists who are increasingly endangered–it is knowingly and happily giving a platform to the single greatest threat to actual journalists anywhere in the world.

This should give you a sense of just how dishonest–and shameless–the Uniparty Propaganda Media is.

It is that bad.

This is Clown World Journalism.

Democrats’ 2020 Platform: Destroy America

First, Democrats want to dumb down the electorate even further by allowing 16-year-olds to vote.

Then they will pivot to abolishing the electoral college to effectively disenfranchise the flyover states and have our elections decided by a few highly populated coastal urban areas. 20 million people live in the New York metro area, 18 million in the greater Los Angeles area, 10 million in the Chicago metro area, 7 million in the Bay Area, 6 million in the DC area, 5 million in South Florida, 4 million in the Seattle area: right there, that’s 70 million people. Game over.

Then they want to increase the size of the Supreme Court and pack it with Democrats.

Abolish ICE, the government agency that protects our borders, in order to allow millions more of illegals to flood in each year. Oh, and Democrats want to give those illegals drivers’ licenses and allow them to vote.

Dems claim border security is not even an issue:

The Democrats have gone so bananas that they make Obama in 2008 look like a straight-up closed-borders nationalist:

Also note the actual journalism on display in someone from CNN actually taking a Democrat to task in a debate. That’s gone now, too.

And for good measure, Democrats are also officially on board with infanticide. Third trimester abortions are now the “conservative” position in their party.

That’ll just about do it for America.

Suffocating Taxation

This is the tweet of the day:

That will be all.