Month: April 2019

Nielsen’s Firing As Homeland Security Boss is a Small Victory Against the Uniparty Swamp

This had to happen. There was no way the person in charge of securing the homeland could keep her job in the midst of the biggest foreign invasion of the homeland since the Alamo in 1836:

“Nielsen’s resignation as DHS secretary comes amid a surge of illegal immigration at the U.S.-Mexico border and an expanded Catch and Release policy that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency has been tasked with carrying out.

Catch and release has been expanded because there are so many illegals being apprehended at the border we literally don’t have anywhere to put them.

“During Nielsen’s tenure as DHS secretary, illegal immigration has increased nearly every month over the last year and a half. Simultaneously, the Trump administration has yet to construct a border wall on new land at the southern border that did not previously have barriers built by the Bush and Obama administrations.”

Those two sentences alone are ample reason to fire her.

“Most recently, officials with the National ICE Council accused Nielsen of “grossly” mismanaging DHS and failing to acknowledge that the agency had been operating an expanded Catch and Release policy for border crossers and illegal aliens for months.

Sadly, Nielsen, like so many of Trump’s Cabinet Secretaries and White House officials, represented the enemy within: the swamp rats who have infested this Administration and have largely succeeded in steering it away from the MAGA Agenda and towards the Swamp Agenda of the past 30 years.

“As Breitbart News chronicled, Nielsen previously served in the Bush administration overseeing a crisis team following the destruction of New Orleans, Louisiana, by Hurricane Katrina in 2005. The Bush administration had waved federal regulations to allow an unlimited level of illegal immigration into the Gulf Coast to take low-skill jobs rebuilding the region. Nielsen previously chaired a World Economic Forum committee that authored a report praising mass migration into Europe. For her confirmation process to DHS, Nielsen worked with an assortment of allies that worked vigorously in the 2016 presidential election to oppose Trump, including Frances Townsend and Tom Ridge.”

Again: the enemy within.

She had to go.

There is a consensus brewing among Trump supporters that Trump needs to nominate former Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach to take over Homeland Security, and I agree: Kobach is one of the few (arguably the only) prominent American politicians out there that is genuinely an immigration hawk.

That’s not an exaggeration, either.

Of course, Kobach’s genuine desire to stop illegal immigration and cut down on equally harmful legal immigration as well will probably prevent him from being confirmed by the Senate if he were actually nominated.

You know the Uniparty Propaganda Media would work overtime digging into Kobach’s past to find something, anything he said that they can present, without context, in order to disqualify him. His nomination fight would be highly contentious because the Uniparty will sense the threat of an actual, genuine Trumpian nationalist gaining power.

If that fails, they’ll just fabricate a sexual misconduct allegation against him and that should give the Fake Republicans in the Senate (Romney, Collins, Murkowski) all the cover they need to join their Democratic colleagues to defeat Kobach’s nomination.

This is why the Swamp cannot be drained.

This is why Trump’s agenda has gone sideways.

The Swamp is simply too vast and powerful to be drained by one measly President.

Virtually every “viable candidate” for a high-level government post has risen through the ranks of the Uniparty over the past several decades. The Uniparty filters out those who would deviate from its dogmas and their careers never get very far.

The only way to rise in Washington is to fully submit to and support Uniparty Dogma.

This is where there is such a scarcity of genuine Trumpian Nationalists available for him to staff his Administration with.

The only reason Trump himself was able to become President is because he avoided the political world until he was 70 to run for the only national office that was directly elected by the American people. In other words, the Uniparty could only try to stop him by spreading fear and lies among the people. It had no direct way to stop him.

I’ve said it before but Trump could only have ever become President: he would never have made it through the Senate as a nominee for a Cabinet post. The Swamp would never have approved him.

But while Trump was able to get elected, the problem is he’s been forced to staff his administration with Uniparty Members and Swamp Loyalists, because they’re the only “qualified” candidates for the top jobs.

Let’s hope Trump nominates Kobach and gets him through the Senate.

It’s a long shot, but it’s basically our only hope to get the border under control.

How the Uniparty Works: Republican Pretends to Disagree With Dems on Open Borders

This, right here, is a perfect example of how the Uniparty works: Mitt Romney knows damn well the Democrats will never “put aside the partisan bickering” and do something about the open border–after all, they want thousands of illegals pouring into America every single week.

This is how Romney pretends to disagree with Democrats, and how he can plausibly claim he’s against open borders. “Hey, I tried to get something done on the border, but gosh darnit, wouldn’t you know it? Those Democrats wouldn’t budge!”

Republicans always “call on Congress to act” when they know damn well Congress won’t lift a finger.

But then Republicans can say, “Hey, we tried, but Congress wouldn’t act. Oh well.”

That was the plan all along.

The plan is to be seen raising a big fuss about Those Dastardly Democrats, Darn Them!

But that’s it. No action at all.

Keep in mind that Senator Romney, who supposedly wants to secure the border, voted against President Trump’s emergency declaration to build the wall.

He says we need to go through Congress to secure the border, even though he knows Congress will never, ever, ever in a million years secure the border.

This is how Republicans support open borders while pretending to oppose open borders.

Hopefully you get what I’m talking about when I use the term “Uniparty.”

Here’s how the Uniparty works:

The Democrats call the shots.

The Republicans pretend to oppose the Democrats, but it’s all for show.

It’s all designed to give the American people the impression that they actually have a choice in how their country is governed, when really they don’t.

The Republican Party is like the Washington Generals, that team that always loses to the Harlem Globetrotters.

Republicans are the losers-by-design. They always lose, the Democrats always win.

The only reason the Republican Party exists is to give the public the illusion that America is not a One Party State.

“Hey, we’re not like Communist China or the Soviet Union or North Korea: we actually have a CHOICE when it comes to our politics. We have TWO parties! We’re freeeeeeee!”

Really? We have a choice?

If we have a choice then why is one of our two parties completely and totally impotent?

When has it ever done anything that its voters actually voted for?

The tax cuts? Is that why you voted for Trump? Were tax cuts even mentioned during the 2016 campaign? As I recall it, Trump’s three main points during the campaign were 1. Build the Wall, 2. Drain the Swamp, 3. Hillary is a Crook. That’s why people voted for him. Not tax cuts.

I’m not saying the tax cuts aren’t good–I’m saying they were not top priority for Trump or his voters during the 2016 campaign, and yet as soon as he took office, suddenly tax cuts became top priority.

As far as I can tell, the wall is not built, the swamp is not drained and Hillary is not in prison. But we got some tax cuts.

So please, try again: when has the Republican Party ever done anything that its voters actually voted for?

Oh, we get “conservative judges” on the federal judiciary?

Then why have multiple judges appointed by Republican George W. Bush overturned Trump Administration policies? Why is it a well-documented phenomenon that Supreme Court Justices get more liberal the longer they serve? Why has Chief Justice John Roberts, appointed by George W. Bush, slowly drifted leftward over time and now become the court’s “swing vote”?

And most importantly, why don’t we ever see the opposite happen–that is, why don’t we see Democrat-appointed judges drift to the right over time?

Why is it always “conservative” judges getting more liberal with age?

Because that’s how the Uniparty system is designed. That is how the political system in America works nowadays. We live in a one-party state.

We laugh at all those supposedly inferior foreign countries like Russia and Turkey with controlled and token opposition parties–“haha, idiots, they think they actually have a choice in their elections.” but the joke is also on us: that’s how America works, too.

Just like democracy in Russia, Turkey and China is a sham, it has become a sham here, too. It’s just that most of us don’t yet realize it.

There are Democrats, and Democrats who call themselves Republicans.

That’s it.

Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez Speaks to Black Crowd, Inexplicably Develops Accent of a Southern Planter from the 1850s

Even though this chick is in the news seemingly daily, I try to avoid contributing to the media-induced national obsession over her by mentioning her sparingly on this site.

People on our side need to understand that if they want to deny the Uniparty propaganda media the ability to dictate the “national conversation” then they probably shouldn’t go along with it so often.

Also, a lot of Conservatives On Twitter™ seem a tad obsessed with her and it’s kind of weird.

But this was impossible to resist. She went before a crowd of black people and then inexplicably began talking like Leo DiCaprio in Django Unchained:

“This is what building power looks lahk. This is what changing the country looks lahk. I’m proud to be a bartender. Ain’t nothin’ wrong with that.”

Mmmm child, all a y’all gon’ be dead in ’bout twel yeeahs if we don’ do sum’ ’bout this ol’ climate change, y’undastand?

Man, who does she think she is–Hillary Clinton?

A great point by Mike Cernovich on how social media has allowed us to subvert the Uniparty media gatekeepers on virtually everything. In the days before social media, we would have to simply believe the Uniparty media’s account of things:

Undoubtedly a positive development, which is why social media companies are on a mission to boot us all from their platforms. They want to retake the ability to control the narrative and shape our realities.

When Woke Corporate Virtue Signaling Goes Wrong: Venus Razors Edition

Venus Razors is of course owned by Gillette:


First of all, why is a major corporation encouraging morbid obesity?

This woman has tits on her back for crying out loud.

Anna obviously very unhealthy. She needs a diet and exercise plan, not a glamour photoshoot. She has to weigh 400 pounds.

And as @WokeCapital pointed out on Twitter:

“This 180 year old company, which represents the US economy by virtue of its place on the Dow, has the chutzpah to talk about the “rules” as if they aren’t the ones in charge.”

Excellent point. The worst thing about corporate virtue signaling (really the left in general) is their presumption that they’re being countercultural and rebellious.

Venus Razors is owned by Gillette, which in turn is owned by Proctor and Gamble, a $260 billion company.

Please stop this nonsense.

As Scottish mom would say, “DISGUSTENG.”



So. Much. White. Privilege.

Being white in America puts you at such an advantage that ethnic minorities are desperate to avoid being counted as white on the next census for fear of missing out on all the great benefits of diversity quotas:

“Certain ethnic groups are opposing their classification as “white” on the upcoming 2020 Census because they say the diversity quotas of corporations and universities will hurt their educational and job opportunities.

Wasn’t there a time in America where people were denied jobs and opportunities due to the color of their skin? I think they had a name for it, but it’s not coming to me. . .

“Arab and Persian residents in the United States told the Los Angeles Times that while they plan to participate in the 2020 Census, they fear they will be lumped in with the racial category of “white” Americans.

The U.S. is home to about three million southwest Asian, North African, and Middle Eastern residents, according to an analysis by the Times. The vast majority, about 80 percent, have called themselves “white” on previous census surveys.

The ethnic groups, though, fear declaring themselves “white” will give them a disadvantage in the education system and job market, as universities and corporations have favored diversity quotas.”

Drop an alien in from outer space and tell him that in a nation of whites and nonwhites, nonwhites get preferential treatment in applying for jobs and colleges, as well as in school funding–oh, and they’re also allowed to be racist and even encouraged to advance racially supremacist ideas and policies. Then ask the alien which group, white or nonwhite, is “privileged.”

The answer is obvious.

Back in the 1960s and 1970s, the Civil Rights movement convinced the ruling political class that, yes, minorities (at that time just black people) really were second-class citizens and that the situation had to rectified. We refer to the period of black oppression preceding the Civil Rights Era as “Jim Crow.”

So the Great Society and Affirmative Action programs of the Johnson and Nixon administrations (yes, even that supposed racist right-winger Nixon was all about affirmative action and big government programs) essentially created a system where, in order to eliminate white privilege, the system would attempt to “make up” for a century of oppression and begin favoring nonwhites over whites.

It was seen as the only way to eventually bring about equality between blacks and whites in America: if the system had for centuries favored whites and oppressed blacks, then it was time for blacks to be favored and whites to more or less take a back seat. In time, due to the preferential treatment, blacks would eventually “catch up” to whites and then we could transition to a system where all the races were treated equally.

That was the idea.

But here’s the thing: the government-enforced preferential treatment and welfare for nonwhites a. backfired disastrously and did not actually improve conditions minority communities, and b. still continues to this day, with no end in sight.

There was no timetable for the affirmative action system; it was just implemented and left in place indefinitely. And so we’ve had a system that favors nonwhites and disfavors whites for over five decades now.


If America is still racist and oppressive to nonwhites, then here’s the question: why is it universally agreed that Jim Crow ended in the mid-1960s?

If America is still extremely racist and oppressive to nonwhites, then what is the present period (1965-present) called? Why don’t we continue to use the term Jim Crow to describe this present-day supposed nightmare for nonwhites?

Of Course the Biden Bashing is in Bad Faith

I’m seeing a lot of this from our side lately:

Uh, yeah–no shit.

Of course we know Biden’s creepiness is not really a big deal in the grand scheme of things. He’s obviously not in the Harvey Weinstein category nor has he even been accused of any sexual misconduct to speak of. In fact basically all the “allegations” against Biden have been caught on camera and probably aired on national television over the past decade or so.

None of us actually think Biden sniffing a lady’s hair or even resting his hand on her thigh rises to the level of disqualifying or indictable.

But that’s not the point. The point is making the left play by the same rules they make us play by. And that means pretending Biden’s relatively benign creepiness is totally disqualifying and equivalent to forcible rape.

This is what #MeToo has done: mundane physical contact gets conflated with straight-up felony rape.

It was always going to come to this: first came the allegations against Harvey Weinstein and actual genuine sexual predators and rapists, and then came all the “inappropriate touching” or simply “male creepiness” piggybacking and exaggeration to capitalize on the mass hysteria.

The mentality is, “Well, if it’s open season on men and #BelieveWomen is the low standard of proof that must be met, then fire at will.”

Once the floodgates opened, it was inevitable that it would come to this. Once the Weinstein stuff went public, it began a cascade of allegations–some true, some false, some serious, some not serious–based on the presumption that every one would be believed and grouped in with the worst, until finally, everyone just concludes that men are all dangerous predators, period, and that masculinity must be “abolished.”

If that is how the game is to be played, then at the very least Democrats should have to play by those rules, too. If masculinity is toxic, then that includes Democrat men.

Even more important, it wasn’t our side that revived the Creepy Uncle Joe topic. It was his 2020 Democratic Primary rivals, specifically probably the Beto campaign.

This is Democratic fratricide and we’re just egging it on in hopes of causing maximum damage.

So quit your bitching, Principled Conservatives. Quit your moral fretting and stop pretending this is “beneath you.” The leftists you so desperately try to please and gain the moral approval of are the worst offenders at bad faith character assaults.

What Ocasio-Cortez and the Populist Left Get Right

Tucker Carlson nicely sums up what Ocasio-Cortez actually gets right about the present state of America:

“So how did she get so famous? Why do people like her? Well, if we are being honest, we’ve got to say it’s because not everything she says is wrong. See how, in this same town hall, Ocasio-Cortez takes a break from her idiotic climate theology to offer what turns out to be a fairly insightful critique of the American economy.

“We have runaway income inequality. We are at one of our most in-equal points, economically speaking, in American history,” she said. “We are dealing with a crisis of how our economy is even made up. Our economy is increasingly financialized, which means we are making profits off of interest — off leasing your phone, off of doing all of these things. But we aren’t producing, and we aren’t innovating in the way that we need to as an economy.”

The annual incremental updates to the iPhone do not count as “innovation.”

“No other party wants to talk about this. The Republicans are in fetal position; they just don’t want to be unpopular anymore. They will do anything not to be unpopular. The Democrats want what they have always wanted – total and complete control over you and this country. Neither party will say that our economy, at its core, is badly distorted. Any economy based on interest payments isn’t really an economy. It’s a scam.”


“Healthy countries innovate. They make things. They don’t treat people like interchangeable widgets. They don’t worship finance. In a healthy country, bankers aren’t heroes. Private equity is not the highest paid profession. Nobody brags about working at a hedge fund. In America right now, we have the opposite, unfortunately. And that’s why Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has a constituency — not because she is impressive, she is not. But because she is one of the very few people who will say the obvious about growing corporate tyranny in this country.

This doesn’t mean she is right about anything else. Taking power from the banks and giving it to Ocasio-Cortez, as she proposes, would not solve our problems. It will just put an even dumber person in charge. But she is right about the financialization part.

Freeing myself from the “intellectual” conformity of the “Pro-Business” right was one of the best things I’ve done recently: it has allowed me to see clearly that government is not the root of all evil in this country. It’s Big Business married to Big Government that is truly the problem, and yet millions of Conservatives cannot admit this because they have been indoctrinated to worship the “free market”.

Since I no longer consider myself a “Conservative,” I am free to agree with Elizabeth Warren in saying we absolutely should break up the big tech monopolies, although I’m sure we disagree on the exact reasons why. I no longer have to sit here and pretend Wall Street is Awesome and that it contributes to the greater good.

Yes, Ocasio-Cortez is largely a dumbass who mostly deserves ridicule, but on this she’s right: our economy is wildly distorted.

And yes, the “financialization” of the economy largely began under Reagan.

Stuff like this gives me a glimmer of hope that perhaps the right and left can actually come together to challenge the Uniparty Quadrumvirate of Washington, Wall Street, the Corporate Media and Silicon Valley.

But then I realize that the grassroots left’s answer to corporate usury and monopolization is socialism.

And the fact that they’re fully-on board with flooding America with foreigners and turning it into a third-world shithole–there’s no compromising with them on that.

Still, there’s got to be some common ground we can work with.

Economic populism transcends left and right.

Don’t Call Them Journalists, Call Them Fascists

#Journalists spend every waking hour of their lives defending our freedoms from would-be tyrants like Drumpf, and don’t you forget it:

“CNN anchor Christiane Amanpour asked former FBI director James Comey on Tuesday if he should’ve restricted people from saying “lock her up” because the phrase amounts to “hate speech.”

Comey asserted during the interview that President Donald Trump targets private citizens with investigations and the power of the executive, citing Trump “calling for the locking up of his political opponents, including people like me.”

Um, no, Comey, actually that was you and your great Obama Administration pals James Clapper and John Brennan targeting private citizens (specifically Donald Trump) with investigations. It was you abusing the power of the executive.

Never forget: whatever crimes or sins the Uniparty accuses our side of, it is the Uniparty that is invariably guilty of those very crimes and sins.

“Amanpour seized on Comey’s use of the phrase “locking up,” and wondered if the FBI should censor the use of “lock her up” in reference to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“Of course, ‘lock her up’ was a feature of the 2016 Trump campaign,” Amanpour said. “Do you in retrospect wish that people like yourself, the FBI, I mean, the people in charge of law and order, had shut down that language — that it was dangerous potentially, that it could’ve created violence, that it’s kind of hate speech. Should that have been allowed?”

“Should that have been allowed?”

Should that have been allowed?

Who the fuck is Christine Amanapour to ask “should that have been allowed”?

Let me explain something to you, lady: no matter how highly you Propagandists think of yourselves, it is not up to you to determine what free Americans are “allowed” to say.

It’s not up to anyone.

The very fact that she’s even asking that is proof positive that our ruling class is flat-out opposed to free speech.

That’s not a question that anyone in a free society even asks. The very idea of “not allowing” certain things to be said should never have even popped into her head.

That it did cross her mind, and that she asked the question, is a revealing glimpse into how these people’s minds work: they consider themselves the arbiters of what we proles can and cannot say.

When Journofascists like Christine Amanawhatever hear Trump supporters chanting “Lock Her Up!” they think, “Should we allow them to say this?”

Even though there ultimately was no FBI crackdown on anti-Hillary chants, in Christine’s mind, America is already a country of rulers and subjects. No prizes for guessing which category she sees herself in.

Comey, for his part, answered the question wisely, although I don’t believe for a second he actually meant what he said:

“Comey explained the First Amendment to Amanpour, replying, “That’s not the role for government to play. The beauty of this country is people can say what they want, even if it’s misleading and it’s demagoguery.”

You know your country is in a bad place when the former head of the Uniparty Secret Police FBI has to explain the concept of Free Speech to a bloodthirsty “Journalist” who wants to gag anyone who’s not With Her.

As Ace of Spades put it:

“It’s amazing how pro-censorship “journalists” are, but simultaneously whiny about Trump’s threats to “open up the liable laws” or merely call them “fake news.”

Pick one (1) position and stick to it, would-be tyrants.”

CNN and all the other Uniparty Propaganda Outlets are not even remotely necessary for a healthy, thriving and free country.

In fact, they are now the main obstacles to a healthy, thriving and free America.

American Lives Don’t Matter

The worst part about being killed by a terrorist, illegal alien or other protected class in America: your death will be entirely in vain.

In fact, you will be treated as an inconvenience by the media, which will try to sweep your death under the rug and make your story go away as quickly as possible.

The public will never remember, or even know, your name. Your death will be counted as simply the cost of doing business in a Multicultural Society by a nation that will not learn anything or be compelled to change anything in the wake of your preventable death. The “media” works tirelessly to ensure this.

If you were killed at the hands of a terrorist or an illegal immigrant, wouldn’t you at the very least want people to learn from your death, and take steps to prevent any more Americans from ever suffering the same fate as you?

You’d think that’d be the least a person murdered by a terrorist or an illegal could ask for: just please, America, learn from my death and make the changes necessary so that no one else has to suffer this same fate.

But you will not be the last person killed by a terrorist, an illegal immigrant or someone from a Protected Class. Not by a long shot.

Nothing will get in the way of Big Corporations and their cheap labor, Democrat politicians and their new voters, and upper-middle class white liberals and their virtue signaling. They will not bat an eye if their immigration policies result in you being murdered by someone who shouldn’t even be here.

If you think the Big Corporations and Uniparty Politicians give a fuck about you dying at the hands of an immigrant they brought in, you thought wrong.

How many Americans have to be killed by Islamic terrorists and illegal immigrants before upscale white liberals just looking to feel good about themselves for supporting Multiculturalism are overcome with guilt due to the unnecessary murders they directly enabled? The answer is that there is no number high enough. They will never care.

When will the “media” start caring about American Lives? The answer is never.

Off the top of your head, name one American killed on 9/11. There were over 3,000 of them.

Name one American killed at the Pulse Nightclub shooting.

Name one American off the top of your head killed in San Bernardino.

Name one American who was killed in the 2017 New York City truck terrorist attack.

That’s what I thought. You probably had almost entirely forgotten about San Bernardino and the NYC attack.

Mollie Tibbetts’ name quickly disappeared from the news the second it was discovered her killer was an illegal. We stopped hearing about her, because at that point she became an inconvenience to the Uniparty.

Kate Steinle only became a semi-household name because Donald Trump kept bringing her up in 2016 no matter how much the Uniparty Propaganda Department tried to ignore her murder at the hands of an illegal immigrant.

And to make matters worse, our criminal “justice” system will probably let your murderer skate because Racial Justice™. Kate Steinle’s illegall immigrant killer was found not guilty of murder by a jury of his peers. Mollie Tibbetts’ killer successfully got his trial moved to a “less white” county where a presumably “less white” jury will be more likely to acquit him, because racial tribalism trumps blind justice in America 2019.

If you’re a black person killed by the police, however, you will become a household name and a martyr for the great cause of Equality, even if you were the aggressor and police had every right to shoot you. Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin will live forever as martyrs; black bodies in a maliciously racist White Trumpian Hellscape.

While every black person killed by police is all over the news and their names are immortalized, what about white people killed in cold blood by black people?

Let’s go over some examples just from 2019 the media ignored entirely simply because the victim-perpetrator relationship did not fit their narrative:

And what about this from just last week, where Samantha Josephson, a 21-year-old white girl from the University of South Carolina out partying last Friday night, accidentally got into the car of Nathaniel Rowland, a 24-year-old black man, after mistaking him for her Uber driver, and wound up kidnapped and murdered:

“A Clarendon County man was arrested Saturday in connection with the death of a 21-year-old University of South Carolina student who mistakenly got into a car that she thought was an Uber rideshare she ordered.

Nathaniel David Rowland, 24, was captured in the vicinity where Samantha Josephson disappeared around 24 hours earlier, Columbia Police Chief Skip Holbrook said.

Rowland will be charged by the State Law Enforcement Division with murder and kidnapping, Holbrook said.

“This was a bad scene,” the chief said.”

A lot of good Samantha’s White Privilege did her that night.

Her murder is a story but not a headline story. It’s not dominating the news cycle. Most Americans probably never heard about it.

And the race of her killer is not mentioned.

In Chicago this past week, two cops were making a drug bust when an armed gang of black men surrounded them and threatened to kill the police unless they let the perp go. As someone on Twitter pointed out, had the cops fired their weapons, “the news media would have been all over them, metaphorically skinning them alive.”

Chesapeake, Virginia, March 26, 2019: 30-year-old Stephanie Branierd is robbed and murdered by three black people while delivering their pizza:

“CHESAPEAKE, Va. — Chesapeake police detectives arrested three people who are accused of being part of the robbery and shooting that left a pizza delivery driver dead.

Tuesday, a spokesman for the Chesapeake Police Department said that officers arrested the following people on these charges:

Tonagee Franciosa Ravenel, 19, Robbery, Conspiracy to Commit Robbery, and Use of a Firearm in the Commission of a Felony

Antonio Cerroane Britton, 18, Robbery, Conspiracy to Commit Robbery, and Use of a Firearm in the Commission of a Felony

Semiya Mone Davidson, 20, Robbery, Conspiracy to Commit Robbery, and Use of a Firearm in the Commission of a Felony, Felony Eluding, and Child Endangerment.”

Paul Kersey has so many more examples just like these. And none of these stories are deemed fit to be brought to your attention by the “Mainstream Media,” because the “Mainstream Media” is the enemy of the people, and because White Lives Don’t Matter.

Did these white people all deserve to be killed because of the Legacy of Slavery?

The truth is the truth: black-on-white murder is far more prevalent in this country than white-on-black murder despite the fact that white people make up over 60% of the population and black people make up around 13%.


In 2015, 500 white people were killed by blacks. 229 black people were killed by white people. That means black-on-white homicide is more than 2x more prevalent in this country than white-on-black homicide despite there being 4.5x more white people overall.

And hell, black-on-black homicide is routinely ignored because the media only wants to publicize stories where the white person is the villain. Not all #BlackLivesMatter. If you’re a black person in America and you are murdered, the only way the media will care is if it’s at the hands of a police officer.

If White Privilege actually existed, don’t you think this statistic would be more widely-known? The fact that it isn’t widely known or publicized by the media at all points to the exact opposite of White Privilege, if anything.

Reporting the truth is racist if the truth reflects poorly on a core Democratic voting group. And that’s what it is: The Party and its propagandists would not care a lick about black people if they voted 90% Republican and would in fact be demonizing them even worse than they currently demonize white people.

But as it is, until #Blexit actually happens (if it happens; I have serious doubts it will) every white person murdered in cold blood by a black person is treated as a step toward “racial justice,” an infinitesimal payment on the gigantic debt white people owe to blacks for the Legacy of Slavery and Jim Crow.

Every American killed by a terrorist or an illegal will be treated as collateral damage.

This is the reality of being murdered while white in America: no lessons will be learned, no changes will be made, no eyes will be opened.

Your death will be entirely in vain.

Now that Joe Biden’s Creepiness Has Resurfaced, the Uniparty Establishment is Rushing to Defend Him

We Right Wing Conspiracy Theorists™ have been pointing out Joe Biden’s creepiness for years:

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 1.32.12 PM.png

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 1.29.51 PM.png

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 1.30.14 PM.png

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 1.40.21 PM.png

This guy consistently gets way too close for comfort to just about any woman–or girl–that has the misfortune of coming within arms reach of him.

Here he is KISSING Chuck Grassley’s wife on the lips:

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 1.52.56 PM.png

We’ve been saying this for years: what the hell is wrong with this guy, and if he’s this handsy in public, how much worse must he be in private?

Our valid questions about this creep have consistently been either ignored or dismissed as Conspiracy Theorism by the “mainstream media.”

But now the Creepy Uncle Joe storyline is back in the public eye again, and not because of us pesky rightwingers: this time, it’s a Democrat who is apparently trying to #MeToo the former Vice President.

An article entitled “An Awkward Kiss Changed How I Saw Joe Biden” by a woman named Lucy Flores is making rounds:

“In 2014, I was the 35-year-old Democratic nominee for lieutenant governor in Nevada. The landscape wasn’t looking good for my party that year. There were no high-profile national races to help boost turnout, and after the top candidate bowed out of the governor’s race, “None of the Above” ended up winning the Democratic primary.

So when my campaign heard from Vice-President Joe Biden’s office that he was looking to help me and other Democrats in the state, I was grateful and flattered. His team offered to bring him to a campaign rally in an effort to help boost voter turnout. We set the date for November 1, just three days before election day.

[. . .]

I found my way to the holding room for the speakers, where everyone was chatting, taking photos, and getting ready to speak to the hundreds of voters in the audience. Just before the speeches, we were ushered to the side of the stage where we were lined up by order of introduction. As I was taking deep breaths and preparing myself to make my case to the crowd, I felt two hands on my shoulders. I froze. “Why is the vice-president of the United States touching me?”

I felt him get closer to me from behind. He leaned further in and inhaled my hair. I was mortified. I thought to myself, “I didn’t wash my hair today and the vice-president of the United States is smelling it. And also, what in the actual fuck? Why is the vice-president of the United States smelling my hair?” He proceeded to plant a big slow kiss on the back of my head. My brain couldn’t process what was happening. I was embarrassed. I was shocked. I was confused. There is a Spanish saying, “tragame tierra,” it means, “earth, swallow me whole.” I couldn’t move and I couldn’t say anything. I wanted nothing more than to get Biden away from me. My name was called and I was never happier to get on stage in front of an audience.”

Now nothing in Flores’ story is Weinstein-esque and disqualifying, nor does she break any new ground as it pertains to Creepy Uncle Joe–unless of course you consume a news diet of exclusively Uniparty Propaganda, in which case Biden’s creepiness has never before been brought to your attention.

But the real story, again, is that the complaints against Biden today are now coming from Democrats rather than Republicans.

Why are Democrats turning on Biden? Because the party’s leftwing base can already see what’s happening: Biden 2020 is just like Hillary 2016, i.e. the Establishment Approved™ candidate who will talk a big game about “change” and “feeling your pain,” but ultimately exists to protect the status quo.

In every election, the Uniparty Establishment pushes candidates from each party on the American public. They have their “frontrunner” candidates that they want most, but they also have backups in case their frontrunners flop. For example, in the 2016 GOP primary, the Uniparty’s “frontrunner” was Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio was their backup.

Almost every time, the Uniparty Establishment’s candidates become the major party nominees.

If the American people must be allowed to vote, and the Uniparty Establishment can’t really do anything about that, then they will rig our elections by making us choose between two Uniparty candidates, who despite being from different parties can each invariably be counted on to continue the same Uniparty policies: pro-Big Business, pro-endless war, pro-immigration, pro-free trade, anti-American.

That’s why I use the term “Uniparty.”

No matter who wins the election, the Uniparty always wins.

The only time in recent history when the Uniparty’s chosen candidate did not win a major party nomination was 2016, when Donald Trump beat out Jeb Bush.

You could also argue for 2008, when Obama beat out Hillary Clinton, but Obama was always full Uniparty Establishment. He may have seemed like the longshot outsider candidate in 2008, but the eagerness with which major corporations (three of his top seven largest donors were Megabanks) and Establishment politicians flocked to him proved otherwise.

And so Joe Biden is the Uniparty Establishment’s frontrunner candidate for 2020 for obvious reasons: he’s a known quantity, having been in politics for over 45 years and therefore fully corrupted, and is about as Establishment as it gets these days.

The Uniparty Establishment hopes Biden will be able to appeal to white working class voters in the Rust Belt–who after several decades of voting Democrat went for Trump in 2016–and bring the White House back in to Uniparty Establishment hands.

This is why you’re seeing the Uniparty Media spring to Biden’s defense. The Bezos Post spins it thusly:

C’mon, it’s just “Biden’s affectionate, physical style.” Bezos Post also wrote off Biden’s creepiness as part of his “warm, upbeat persona.”

I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that the Bezos Post has for the past two months now been attacking Bernie Sanders, one of the few Democratic candidates not controlled by the Uniparty Establishment:


Yesterday’s edition of Meet the Propagandists Press continued the Defend Joe mission:

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 1.56.55 PM.png

Please excuse me while I vomit over the phrase “fleshy world of 60s and 70s politics.”

And here we’ve got Establishmentarian Dick Durbin playing defense for Biden:

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 1.57.25 PM.png

It could not be more transparent what’s going on here.

Despite the fact that the increasingly “diverse” Democratic Party is growing increasingly unaccepting of white people, the Uniparty wants Biden as the 2020 Democratic nominee because they know the path to retaking the White House goes through the Rust Belt, and a Diverse™ Democratic nominee like Kamala Harris or Cory Booker will have little to no appeal in those critical states.

But the Democratic base (more nonwhite and socialist than ever) can already sense that the Powers That Be are forcing a white, male neoliberal, Biden, on them. And so the rebellion against Biden has begun.

This is not just my speculation, either. Lucy Flores herself admitted it after she published her article about Biden:

Flores was a Bernie supporter in 2016 and is on-record opposing Biden. She was recently spotted at a Beto rally.

The Democratic base does not want Biden.

No, the Democratic base wants to be force-fed Beto O’Rourke instead.

“We don’t want the hand-picked candidate of the Uniparty Establishment! We don’t want another Hillary Clinton!”

They want Beto, a media-manufactured, astroturfed pseudo-phenomenon foisted upon idiots who believe they’re supporting a “movement” and going against the Establishment.

But guess again: there would be no Beto O’Rourke if the Establishment Media did not build him up and promote him 24/7 last year.

I live in Chicago and saw multiple people walking around with “BETO” shirts and laptop stickers. The guy was running for Senate in Texas. The only way he gains national prominence is through a deliberate and concerted media effort. The media wouldn’t shut up about Beto skateboarding and playing in a rock band. It’s utterly laughable to suggest Beto is a grassroots, anti-Establishment candidate.

Beto is Obama all over again.

Revolt against Biden and the Uniparty all you want, Democrats.

Just know that the Uniparty has backup candidates, and the Fake Hispanic from Texas you’re swooning over has Establishment written all over him.