The worst thing about the Trump-era legal standard of Partisan Judges Are Our Supreme Rulers is the propaganda “media” smugly pretending every anti-Trump ruling is not blatant partisanship at work, and acting as if obviously partisan judges are totally beyond reproach, so long as they rule against Trump.
According to the “mainstream media,” you’re not allowed to take issue with this because Judges Reign Supreme:
“An Obama judge in San Francisco issued a nonsensical, lawless order May 24 temporarily stopping President Trump from accessing reallocated military funding to pay for the construction of a desperately needed wall on the nation’s leaky southern border. The case will almost certainly end up before the Supreme Court in the future.”
The nation WILL be flooded with poor third-worlders and there’s nothing the Orange Man can do to stop it!
“U.S. District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr., appointed by then-President Barack Hussein Obama in 2014, enjoined the Trump administration “from taking any action to construct a border barrier” with reassigned U.S. Department of Defense funds in parts of Arizona and Texas known as Yuma Sector Project 1 and El Paso Sector Project 1.
During the confirmation process before the U.S. Senate, Gilliam insisted that judges should be impartial.
“I believe that the most important attribute of a judge is the commitment to faithfully and impartially apply the law in every case, without regard to the type of matter or the identity of the parties,” he said.”
Spoiler alert: he was lying his ass off.
“The leftist judge reportedly made large donations to Democrats from 2007 to the end of 2014 when he was sworn in as a judge.
Gilliam gave $6,900 to the presidential campaign of the man who appointed him, divided between $4,600 to Obama for America and $2,300 to the Obama Victory Fund. The judge also donated a separate $13,500 to Obama for America and Obama Victory Fund 2012, along with $4,500 to the Democratic National Committee.”
Just terrific.
Not a hint of partisanship. Not a hint of corruption. How DARE you even suggest that a Federal Judge be anything less than completely unbiased, perfectly rational Vulcan-esque superior lifeform.
“The Law Has Spoken! Trump’s border wall is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!”
Under the “ORANGE MAN BAD” legal doctrine, the Wall is illegal.
You are not allowed to question this judge’s reasons or legitimacy. Show some respect!
If you want to read up on the nonsensical reasoning this “judge” used to arrive at the conclusion of “NO MORE WALL!” then by all means visit the link at the top.
But personally, I can’t stomach reading about yet more blatant, in-your-face corruption. I just don’t want to. This judge is openly and ostentatiously corrupt and doesn’t care who knows it, so sure is he of his own untouchability.
His ruling may as well have read: “Yeah, I’m partisan as all hell. Yeah, I donated thousands of dollars to Obama, who later returned the favor by nominating me to be a federal judge. Yeah, I pretended to be non-partisan so I would be confirmed by the Senate. Yeah, I just issued a bullshit ruling with no legal legitimacy whatsoever purely to stop the border wall being built by any means necessary. And yeah, I’m gonna get away with all of it, because I’m part of the Uniparty and I have the media, the Democrats, Hollywood, Big Business, Academia and Silicon Valley backing me up.”
I don’t care to read about the “Judge’s” contrived ruling because there is no way a border wall is unconstitutional. The Secure Fence Act was signed into law in 2007 with Senators Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, John Kerry and many other prominent Democrats voting in favor of it.
Now all the sudden these same Democrats and their cronies would swear on a stack of Bibles that the Constitution explicitly states a border wall is not permitted.
They are coming up with every possible bullshit excuse to stop this wall from going up despite the fact that it’s what the American people voted for.
I’ll just say this: the Swamp will be drained one way or another. The American people are not going to tolerate this forever.
We can do this the easy way or the hard way. The “easy” way is that the Uniparty simply respects the result of the 2016 election and allows Trump to clean house in Washington and build his big beautiful wall.
But of course we know the Uniparty will never do this, so it has to be the hard way.
What’s “the hard way”? The Uniparty ain’t gonna like “the hard way”. It looks a lot like what’s going on in France.