Month: May 2019

Paul Joseph Watson Banned from Facebook and Instagram; Trump Silent

The famous conservative YouTuber has been banned from Facebook and Instagram. He’s not banned from YouTube or Twitter, but give it time.

Here’s his video:

Expect his YouTube channel with 1.6 million subscribers to disappear any day.

Paul is one of the biggest names to be banned. He stopped affiliating himself with Alex Jones and InfoWars a few months ago, has never said anything anti-Semitic, and to my knowledge hasn’t done or said anything that the Silicon Valley Fascists can misrepresent as “dangerous.” I watch almost all of his videos and it’s clear that the reason he was banned was because he’s too effective and persuasive.

Paul says he was given no reason:

However, Facebook placed him in the same category as terrorists and a mobsters:

This is one of the first social media bannings where it was obviously about simply silencing an effective voice. That’s it. They just wanted to shut him up because he was reaching and persuading too many people. Pure political censorship.

Paul went out of his way to distance himself from the alt-right, the white nationalist movement, anti-semitism–all the taboos that get you banned. And still it didn’t matter: he was banned anyway.

Right now on social media, many prominent Trump backers are pledging to withhold their support for Trump in 2020 until Trump does something about this.

Mike Cernovich retweeted dozens of people who tweeted screenshots of themselves blocking Trump and his top advisors, most commonly Trump’s social media chief Dan Scavino. The idea is to send to a message to them about what is happening to the President’s supporters on social media.

These people have a point.

Think of how messed up this is: social media personalities like Watson, Jones, Milo and Loomer (all the names banned yesterday) were instrumental in getting Trump elected in 2016, now they are being purged from social media–losing their livelihoods in the process–for their pro-Trump, anti-Uniparty views, and Trump seemingly has turned his back on them.

They had Trump’s back when no one else did, now Trump has turned his back on them. He must redeem himself and come to their aid somehow. He’s the President of the United States, for God’s sake. He must do something. Something more than a tweet–but the way things have gone lately, I wonder if Watson and the rest will even get a tweet from Trump. These people are being persecuted because of their support of Trump.

But I guess Trump has new priorities and new friends, like the Establishment donors who snubbed him in 2016:

Screen Shot 2019-05-02 at 10.41.11 PM.png

Wonderful. He’s gone full Establishment.

Looks like we’re on our own.

How the Government Will Use Social Media to Find, Purge and Eliminate Dissidents

One thing that just occurred to me: Twitter and Facebook make purges and genocides so much easier and efficient for those in power.

Genocides of the past were sweeping, blanket genocides: “Kill all Jews,” or “Kill all the Armenian Christians,” etc. That’s messy business.

Governments that want to eliminate dissidents used to have to target whole populations to eliminate the dissidents among them. For instance, if an evil government decided Group X was a problem, it would simply engineer the genocide of Group X whole hog. It’s too difficult and time consuming to sort the Bad Xs from the Obedient Xs, so the simple solution is to just kill all Xs.

But now, in the age of social media, we all pour our hearts and souls out online. We cannot help it. All of our inner thoughts on politics, society and the world are shared and saved publicly online for all to see.

We out ourselves as subversives voluntarily because we cannot help ourselves from sharing our feelings and opinions. In doing so, we make “precision purges” significantly easier for governments.

Why take the time and effort–and not to mention risk the backlash from the “international community”–to wipe out a whole group of people when you can simply target the specific dissidents who have willingly outed themselves for you?

Essentially social media platforms, which began as digital “town squares” where we could share our views on virtually anything freely and without fear of backlash, will become–if they haven’t already, and I’m sure they have in some countries–gigantic self-incrimination machines.

Social media will allow the government to easily and almost effortlessly identify the subversives and the Problem Children who must be silenced and, one day, eliminated.

Who is guilty of Thought Crime? Who must be reeducated? Who is not sufficiently Loyal to the Party? Who does not love Big Brother?

It’s not very hard to find them because they’re publicly stating so on social media!

How easy would it be for Facebook and Twitter to monitor their platforms for Subversive Opinions, relay the identities of the Dissidents to the government, and then the government sends its secret police to knock on your door late at night and take you away?

In 1984, it was kinda tough for the Party to catch Winston Smith. They had to bait him to get him to reveal his Subversive Motives.

But nowadays it would be so easy: all you have to do is look up someone’s social media profile and you’ve got a window into their soul.

Of course, we are already in the early stages of this today. Social media companies are banning and shadowbanning people based entirely on their political views.

Social media giants claim they only ban “dangerous” accounts, but some blue check liberal fantasized about shoving the Covington Catholic kid into a woodchipper and he didn’t get banned. That’s because he was advocating the Right Kind of Violence:


Jack Morrissey’s account is still active. He turned his account on private but he was not banned. I just checked.

And this psychopath who also didn’t get banned:

The Right Kind of Violence does not get banned.

Social media purges are based almost entirely on your political views.

Anyway, my point here is that Silicon Valley is already in the first stages of silencing and eventually eliminating political dissidents.

Of course it’s a great leap from banning people on social media platforms to kidnapping them in the middle of the night, but that is only because the Uniparty Establishment believes the problem of political dissent can be effectively dealt with by simply banning those preaching Revolutionary Ideas from social media.

In other words, they believe that once they ban you, that’s the end of you. You’re not going to take to the streets and start organizing or plotting against them in real life.

Silicon Valley Fascists correctly observe that most people are little more than keyboard warriors who won’t actually put their money where their mouths are in real life. You may preach about The Revolution all day online, but will you actually go out in real life and make it happen? For the vast majority of people, the answer is no.

But this could change in the future. The worse things get, the more likely actual Revolution becomes, and the more desperate the Uniparty will be to silence dissidents.

If Trump gets reelected in 2020 despite Silicon Valley’s crackdown on right-wing voices following Trump’s victory in 2016, it could lead to an even greater crackdown on dissident voices. This in turn will (hopefully) lead to an increase of real-world, actual revolt against the Uniparty Oligarchy.

That’s how it escalates to the point of real-world purges.


Although, how do we know that our government doesn’t already imprison dissidents at black sites and gulags at various places around this country?

“Oh, the government can’t have black sites. We’d find them.”

Really? Would we? Most people don’t even leave their homes except to go to work. We’re all too busy watching TV and going online. Who is out there looking for black sites? And who is trespassing on government property over high barbed-wire fences and barriers?

“Google Maps would see them.”

Keep dreaming. Google is Uniparty. Plus, it’s not like these hypothetical black sites would be obvious and conspicuous. Keep the prisoners indoors and it looks like a military base from above.

“People would speak out if their loved one or friend was kidnapped or murdered by the government.”

Oh, really? And they’d be dismissed as kooks because the police would conclude that there was no foul play and it was a suicide or something. That’s what happened with everyone who got in the Clintons’ way. Seth Rich is exhibit A: the “Official Narrative” is that it was a robbery gone wrong even though there was no robbery and he was shot in the back. It wasn’t a robbery gone wrong, it was a hit. And yet “polite society” brands you an unhinged conspiracy theorist if you question the “official story” on Seth Rich.

The reality is most people are desperate to virtue signal by publicly proclaiming their acceptance of the “Official Story” and their emphatic rejection of Conspiracy Theories. Most people are more than eager to eat up what the Establishment feeds them–even when the Establishment Media feeds them literal conspiracies like the one that claimed Trump colluded with Vladimir Putin to steal the 2016 election.

Mainstream, blue-pilled Americans loved Obama because the media and all their favorite celebrities loved Obama–and all the while they consider themselves the rebels, the underdogs, the oppressed.

These are the same people who HATE NAZIS SO MUCH and want to PUNCH EVERY NAZI, yet if they were alive in 1930s Germany they would have been the most loyal and devoted Nazis, probably ratting out Jews to the SS because they believed all the Nazi propaganda they were fed, just as they believe all the Uniparty propaganda they’re fed today. The same people trying to get right-wingers and Trump supporters banned from social media today are the people who would have been Nazi Party Loyalists in 1930s Germany. For sure.

They believe in their hearts they wouldn’t have been, but the truth is, if you’re loyal to the Establishment today, you probably would have been loyal to the Nazi Establishment in 1930s Germany.

So does our government already have black sites and gulags for political dissidents? I’d say no. Not yet. They’re not necessary yet.

But give it time.

And when they do exist, most of us will have no idea.


This recent uptick in social media banning and shadowbanning is why the blue checkmark has become almost a negative indicator: instead of denoting someone who is a “credible source,” it really just denotes someone who is Silicon Valley Approved. The tech oligarchs have determined that that person’s voice is Safe For Public Consumption.

You can’t really be that much of a threat to the Uniparty Oligarchy if they’ve given you a blue checkmark on social media.

The ultimate sign of credibility and truth online is, of course, being banned, but this is an imperfect metric because psychos get banned along with the most powerful truth-speaking dissidents.

Not only this but being banned is a dead-end: yes, you’ve proven that you are a significant enough threat to the Uniparty Establishment that they felt the need to silence you, but now what?

Invader Congresswoman Ilhan Omar: “This is Not Going to be the Country of White People”

Western compassion for the poor, destitute and downtrodden for the world is rewarded with this:

“Asserting that America “was founded on the history of Native American genocide, on the backs of black slaves,” she went on to brazenly state, “This is not going to be the country of white people.”

Imagine if a white Republican had made a speech in which he or she asserted, “This is not going to be the country of black people.”

Their political career would be finished and their reputation would be tainted for the rest of their life.

But since the last acceptable form of racism is racism against white people, Omar’s statement is a mere footnote.”

We opened up our country to ungrateful invaders who hate us. Not only do they hate us, they are actively working to facilitate the downfall of the white race. They are openly celebrating the fact that with each passing year, the white share of the population in America decreases.

This is how our kindness and compassion is rewarded. We open our doors to people who live in shithole countries, and this is how they repay us.

Imagine moving to China and boldly proclaiming that “this is not going to be the country of Asian people.”

Or moving to the Congo and stating, “This is not going to be the country of black people.”

That’s what Ilhan Omar did.

She is literally an invader. She is an enemy of the American people, and working to facilitate the downfall of America as it has existed since the Founding.

Why is she allowed to say these things? I thought we lived in a white supremacist country that brutally oppressed minorities?

If that was the case, Ilhan Omar would not only have never gotten away with saying that, she would have never even sniffed the halls of the US Congress in the first place.

Of course the idea that America is a white supremacist country is utter nonsense.

The reason Ilhan Omar is allowed to openly celebrate the fact that America will no longer be a white country in a couple short decades is that those who run this country endorse her views. The Globalist Uniparty Elite also eagerly anticipates the day white Americans lose their majority status.

Why? Why is there such an open obsession with eliminating the white race?

Because America as founded is (was) too hard for the Globalist Elite to exploit and subjugate. For most of the past two and a half centuries, Americans–and much of Western Europe–were born into freedom. They had the right to free speech, the right to bear arms–they were free from government tyranny.

In this regard, America and Western Europe were unique in the world: they were full of free Christian people and governed by mostly competent and mostly upstanding leaders. Their institutions were mostly moral, patriotic and rooted in traditional values.

All this made them exceedingly difficult for the Globalist Elite–which emerged in the past half-century, perhaps even as early as the end of World War II–to bring to heel and exploit. Free people who know nothing but freedom are nearly impossible for Corporate/Government Overlords to exploit and subjugate. They won’t allow it. So the solution became clear to the globalist elite: overrun and replace the free westerners.

Because America and Western Europe are historically white nations, in order for the global elite to subjugate them, the global elite had to replace their native populations with foreigners who are easier to rule and exploit. Demographic replacement erases the history, values and soul of a nation, and that’s exactly what’s going on.

The elites are obsessed with demographically replacing white people in America because white people represent the link to America as it was founded–free and Christian.



Eric Swalwell Agonizes Over Constitution Not Using Word “Woman,” Doesn’t Realize Constitution Never Even Uses Word “Man”

This might be the cringiest thing you see all day:


Eric Swalwell wants everyone to know that he’s so pissed off that the Constitution doesn’t include the word “woman.”

This is him thinking about the the Constitution not including the word “woman”:


Because he just cares about women so much–and wants everyone to know it.

Please support his campaign for President with a recurring donation of $50 each month. Because he Supports Women.

Wait a sec. I’m getting word that not only is Eric Swalwell a phony virtue signaling douchebag, but he’s also a complete moron as well:

The Constitution uses the word “woman” zero times and Eric Swalwell is despondent.

But the Constitution also uses the word “man” zero times.

No word from Eric Swalwell on whether that, too, is “unacceptable.”