This is an obviously good idea that makes perfect logical sense. If someone is leaving their home country and seeking asylum somewhere else, there is no reason for them to pass through multiple countries before settling down again.
There is no reason someone from El Salvador or Honduras needs to come through Mexico to America and only America in search of asylum.
Unless the claim of “asylum” is just an excuse to be allowed into the United States.
If it’s really about asylum, then any country other than their home country will suffice. Mexico, for instance, should suffice for someone seeking asylum from Guatemala or Honduras.
Logically, people forfeit their claims to be seeking asylum when they pass through one or more countries en route to their end destination of America.
If you go through one or more other countries to come here, you clearly aren’t just seeking to escape your home country. If that was the case you would have stopped seeking asylum the moment you got out of your home country.
But obviously we’re not stupid; we realize that these “asylum” claims are mostly BS excuses to get into America and get healthcare and welfare. So now Trump has removed part of that incentive for people from any country that does not border the U.S., which is to say every country in the world but two.
I say “part” of the incentive because we still give healthcare and welfare benefits to illegals, and prospective illegal immigrants in other countries know this and still want to come to America because of it. Until we stop giving handouts to illegals, they will never stop wanting to come here.
Now, while Trump’s decision is a good one that should in theory discourage and ultimately greatly reduce false asylum claims at the border, there are a couple problems that still remain.
First, people will still keep trying to come across the border illegally. They want to get into America to enjoy our generous welfare system by any means possible.
Second, they should know that while Trump is against illegal immigration and wants to crack down on it, the rest of the American political class is not. Phony asylum seekers should know by now that Democrats will let them in and give them free healthcare and government benefits. Prospective migrants from poor countries have lots of friends in high places here in the US, and that just because Trump issued this rule does not mean it will stand.
We all know this rule is going to be immediately challenged by liberal open borders groups, brought before liberal open borders judges, and struck down as “Unconstitutional” because everyone knows the Founding Fathers were liberal open borders progressives who envisioned a day when America would be overrun by poor third-worlders. After all, we have to base our entire immigration system on the poem on the Statue of Liberty because it’s basically a part of the Constitution.
Thus far in his Presidency, the federal courts have, just to give a sampling:
On seven different occasions ruled that the administration cannot deny funding to Sanctuary Cities, because everyone knows the Founding Fathers instituted the concept of Federalism so deep-blue urban areas could openly flout national immigration laws.
Ruled that Trump is not allowed to block his critics on Twitter. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez has blocked plenty of people on Twitter but as of now, no federal court has ruled that she can’t.
Overturned the Trump White House’s decision to revoke CNN Propagandist Jim Acosta’s White House press pass, which he routinely abuses in order to narcissistically grandstand, spout off Democratic Party talking points and build a celebrity profile for himself instead of reporting the news.
Barred the administration from asking the citizenship question on the 2020 Census in order to ensure Democratic states rife with illegals are able to continue inflating their populations in order to get more Electoral Votes and more seats in the House of Representatives.
And that’s not nearly everything. But it just gives you an idea of how corrupt the federal court system is, and how dead-set it is on making sure nothing ever gets in the way of this country being endlessly flooded by poor third-worlders.
It’s not because, as Bezos Post wants you to believe, Trump is trampling on the Constitution left and right. It’s because the corrupt courts have taken for themselves both legislative and executive powers.
Virtually none of this is on the up-and-up.
How can you tell? Because, conveniently, it just so happens that any and all opposition to liberal policies is Unconstitutional. Imagine that. According to federal judges, the Founding Fathers didn’t want a border, saw no distinction between American citizens and illegals, supported the idea of Sanctuary Cities, and hated the idea of honest, legitimate journalism. And everyone knows the Founding Fathers wanted trannies in the military.
Wow, how fortunate for the left that the Racist, Sexist, Slave-owning Founding Fathers also happened to agree with the Democratic Party of 2019 on literally everything.
The Impartial and Unbiased courts whom no one must ever question or criticize said so!
This how our country is run now. Uniparty judges appointed by Obama, Bush and Clinton are the real government. They alone decide which policies stand and which are struck down.
And there’s nothing you can do about it because they’re appointed for life. The President you voted for has been overruled by judges you didn’t vote for, and that’s how this country works now.
You are not allowed to vote against open borders. That’s one government policy the American people don’t get a say in.
Immigration restrictions are no longer on the menu.
How ’bout a nice, fat helping of open borders instead?
The media and the Establishment Republicans will lose their minds over this, but the fact is most regular Americans agree: if you don’t love America, then leave.
Ilhan Omar and the rest denounce America as evil and racist on an almost daily basis, so why don’t they leave?
Why would they stay in a country they obviously hate?
Because they’re only here for the economic benefits. It’s safer and way more advanced than their home countries (for Omar its Somalia) and America has a generous welfare state. That’s all America means to them.
They come here to extract financial benefits from our welfare system while retaining a strong sense of national pride and identity with their original countries.
Immigrants who come here only to benefit from the American system and not to leave their old countries behind and become Americans are destroying this country.
This is what separates post-1965 immigrants from turn of the century immigrants: the Europeans who came here a hundred years ago were not seeking a generous welfare state to leech off of. They were leaving their old countries behind and integrating into American culture.
The fact that in the late 19th/early 20th century there was no expansive and easily-bilked welfare state for turn of the century immigrants to benefit from in America is all the proof you need that they came here for far nobler reasons than people like Ilhan Omar.
No matter how much the media shrieks “Racism” about Trump’s tweets, it doesn’t make him wrong. He’s dead-right about these ungrateful freeloaders.
She has really strong #feeeeeelingzzz about the family separation policy but that’s about it. When she confronted former ICE Director James Homan on the matter–she of course armed with nothing more than misbegotten righteous indignation, Homan armed with decades of first-hand experience–she was clearly out of her league. Homan embarrassed her by simply pointing out that anyone period, illegal immigrant or American citizen, that commits a crime and goes to jail is separated from their families.
That’s what happens when you break the law. You go to jail. Your kids don’t go to jail with you. It’s a little more complicated at the border since they’re far away from their homes, but why should illegals be entitled to lenient, preferential treatment?
You break the law, you get locked up. Bottom line.
Ocasio tried to counter that illegal immigrants didn’t really commit any crimes because she feeeeeeeels that “asylum seeking” isn’t a crime, but Homan recited the precise section and line of the US Code that says, yes, illegally entering the United States is indeed a crime no matter how much real-life Hermoine Granger feeeeeeeels like it shouldn’t be.
Of course it was totally predictable that the College feminist turned bartender turned Member of Congress was no match for a trained, experienced career law enforcement official. That’s what happens when a clueless, inexperienced millennial gets elected to Congress based largely on the support of other clueless, feeeeeeelingz-driven millennials: they get their asses handed to them by actual adults who base their decisions and viewpoints on reality and experience instead of feeeeeelingz.
I was totally overthinking it when in past articles I theorized that perhaps Ocasio, as an ostensible anti-Establishment populist, may ultimately end up being something resembling an ally for our side in the struggle against the Uniparty Elite, but I now know that to be nonsense.
She clearly has no idea what she’s talking about. She’s 100% feelings. Just like any college feminist, she got indoctrinated with the leftwing Oppression/White Devil Narrative, is convinced she knows everything there is to know about the world, and has decided that anyone who disagrees with her is evil.
There’s really nothing more to her than that. Occasionally she may stumble onto good ideas that dovetail with what we’re trying to achieve–for instance, lifetime bans on lobbying for former members of Congress–but those moments are few and far between. On the most important question–the immigration question–she is 100% in favor of the destruction of the United States of America by way of flooding it with poor foreigners, and because of that, no matter what other marginal-by-comparison issues she actually has good ideas on, she can never be an ally of ours.
In my previous post on Epstein I ended on a question: who facilitated and funded Epstein’s rapid rise from high school calculus teacher to billionaire hedge-fund manager for the ultra wealthy?
It seems likely there was some elite person or group that Epstein was doing his blackmailing on behalf of. Certainly Epstein himself benefitted from his blackmailing schemes to the tune of billions of dollars and access to the most powerful people in the world, but it’s hard to believe that was all there was to it.
During his vetting interviews for Labor Secretary with the Trump Transition team in early 2017, Alex Acosta was asked about the Epstein case from 2008 and this was his answer on why he let Epstein off with such a light punishment:
“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,”he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta.
Very powerful people intervened in the 2008 Epstein case to make sure he was let off with minimal punishment.
So the question is, who were/are those very powerful people?
“Epstein according to both the girls accounts, he wanted them to have sex with powerful men, come back to him and report on it, describe what they wanted what their fetishes were and he had cameras throughout the house so this is obviously for blackmailing purposes,” said Coulter.
“It just seems to me something much bigger is behind this — perhaps a state sponsor — powerful enough people … it just seems to me there’s something a very powerful force behind what’s going on here and I am still nervous about this not coming to a conclusion, somehow this getting compromised,” she added.
It makes sense. One doesn’t just mysteriously become an untouchable billionaire like Epstein without government support or at least permission.
So which state was sponsoring Epstein?
There are strong indications that he might have been connected to Israeli intelligence, the Mossad. The possible Epstein-Mossad connection centers on Epstein’s former girlfriend and later procurer of young girls, Ghislaine Maxwell. Ghislaine Maxwell’s father was Robert Maxwell, a British media magnate and former Member of Parliament who died under mysterious circumstances in 1991:
“Ian Robert Maxwell (10 June 1923 – 5 November 1991), born Ján Ludvík Hyman Binyamin Hoch, was a British media proprietor and Member of Parliament (MP). Originally from Czechoslovakia, Maxwell rose from poverty to build an extensive publishing empire. After his death, huge discrepancies in his companies’ finances were revealed, including his fraudulent misappropriation of the Mirror Group pension fund.
Early in his life, Maxwell escaped from Nazi occupation, joined the Czechoslovak Army in exile in World War II and was decorated after active service in the British Army. In subsequent years he worked in publishing, building up Pergamon Press to a major publishing house. After six years as an MP during the 1960s, he again put all his energy into business, successively buying the British Printing Corporation, Mirror Group Newspapers and Macmillan Publishers, among other publishing companies.
Maxwell had a flamboyant lifestyle, living in Headington Hill Hall in Oxford, from which he often flew in his helicopter, and sailing in his luxury yacht, the Lady Ghislaine. He was notably litigious and often embroiled in controversy, including about his support for Israel at the time of the 1948 Palestine war. In 1989, he had to sell successful businesses, including Pergamon Press, to cover some of his debts. In 1991, his body was discovered floating in the Atlantic Ocean, having fallen overboard from his yacht. He was buried in Jerusalem.”
He fell overboard? Come on.
“On 5 November 1991, Maxwell was last in contact with the crew of his yacht, the Lady Ghislaine, at 4:25 a.m. local time, but was found to be missing later in the morning. Maxwell was presumed to have fallen overboard from the vessel, which was cruising off the Canary Islands, and his naked body was subsequently recovered from the Atlantic Ocean.The official ruling at an inquest held in December 1991 was death by a heart attack combined with accidental drowning, although three pathologists had been unable to agree on the cause of his death at the inquest; he had been found to have been suffering from serious heart and lung conditions. Murder was ruled out by the judge and, in effect, so was suicide.He was buried on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem.”
This is quite difficult to believe. He had a heart attack and then fell overboard?
And why was he buried on sacred ground in Jerusalem? He must have had a special connection to Israel:
“A hint of Maxwell’s service to the Israeli state was provided by John Loftus and Mark Aarons, who described Maxwell’s contacts with Czechoslovak anti-Stalinist Communist leaders in 1948 as crucial to the Czechoslovak decision to arm Israel in the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. Czechoslovak military assistance was both unique and crucial for the fledgling state as it battled for its existence. It was Maxwell’s covert help in smuggling aircraft parts into Israel that led to the country having air supremacy during their 1948 War of Independence.”
More on the Mossad angle, which came from none other than Seymour Hersh, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist for the New Yorker:
“Shortly before Maxwell’s death, a former employee of Israel’s Military Intelligence Directorate, Ari Ben-Menashe, approached a number of news organisations in Britain and the U.S. with the allegation that Maxwell and the Daily Mirror‘s foreign editor, Nicholas Davies, were both long-time agents for Mossad. Ben-Menashe also claimed that in 1986, Maxwell had told the Israeli Embassy in London that Mordechai Vanunu had given information about Israel’s nuclear capability to The Sunday Times, then to the Daily Mirror. Vanunu was subsequently kidnapped by Mossad and smuggled to Israel, convicted of treason and imprisoned for eighteen years.
I’m sure Maxwell’s mysterious death had nothing to do with this at all.
“Ben-Menashe’s story was ignored at first, but eventually The New Yorker journalist Seymour Hersh repeated some of the allegations during a press conference in Londonheld to publicise “The Samson Option,” Hersh’s book about Israel’s nuclear weapons. On 21 October 1991, two MPs, Labour’s George Galloway and the Conservative Rupert Allason (also known as espionage author Nigel West), agreed to raise the issue in the House of Commons under Parliamentary Privilege protection, which in turn allowed British newspapers to report events without fear of libel suits. Maxwell called the claims “ludicrous, a total invention” and sacked Davies. A year later, in Galloway’s libel settlement against Mirror Group Newspapers (in which he received “substantial” damages), Galloway’s counsel announced that the MP accepted that the group’s staff had not been involved in Vanunu’s abduction. Galloway himself, however, referred to Maxwell as “one of the worst criminals of the century.”
This is all very complicated and hard to follow stuff, but the bottom line is that Robert Maxwell was involved with the Mossad. He was, after all, buried in Jerusalem following his death despite being a naturalized British citizen.
“Her father named his luxury yacht, the Lady Ghislaine in her honour, and it was near the yacht in the Canary Islands in 1991 that his body was found floating in the sea.Though a verdict of death by accidental drowning was recorded, Maxwell has since stated that she believes her father was murdered, commenting in 1997 that “He did not commit suicide. That was just not consistent with his character. I think he was murdered.” After his death, Robert Maxwell was found to have fraudulently appropriated the pension assets of his Mirror Group Newspapers to support its share price and was disgraced.
Maxwell moved to the United States after her father’s death, and has since become a prominent socialite in New York City.”
British Authors Gordon Thomas and Martin Dillion agree with Ghislaine that her father was murdered. The two wrote a book in 2003 called “The Assassination of Robert Maxwell: Israel’s Superspy.” In the book, they essentially argue that Maxwell was indeed an Israeli agent who eventually had a falling-out with the Mossad (over Maxwell’s attempts to blackmail the Mossad for money to prop up his crumbling media empire), which resulted in him being murdered by Mossad agents on his yacht in late 1991.
The Epstein connection:
“After moving to America, Maxwell and the billionaire American financier Jeffrey Epstein had a romantic relationship, and Maxwell remained close to him after their break-up. Maxwell has attracted press coverage for her friendship with Prince Andrew, Duke of York, the second son of Queen Elizabeth II, who attended social functions with her in New York. Maxwell introduced Epstein to Prince Andrew and the three often socialized together. She and her partner, Jeffrey Epstein are also close friends of Bill Clinton, who flew over 26 times on Epstein’s private jet, referred to as the Lolita Express.
In 2008, Epstein was convicted of soliciting a minor for prostitution and served 13 months of an 18-month jail sentence. Details of a civil lawsuit made public in January 2015 contained a deposition from a woman, identified as ‘Jane Doe 3’, accusing Maxwell of having recruited her in 1999, when she was a minor, to have sex with Epstein. A 2018 expose by the Miami Herald revealed Jane Doe 3 to be Virginia Roberts, who in 1999 was Virginia Giuffre. Roberts asserted that she was introduced by Maxwell to Epstein and then “groomed by the two for his pleasure, including lessons in Epstein’s preferences during oral sex.”
Maxwell has repeatedly denied any involvement in Epstein’s crimes. In a 2015 statement, Maxwell rejected allegations that she has acted as a “madame for Epstein” and “facilitated Prince Andrew’s acts of sexual abuse.” Maxwell’s spokesperson said that “the allegations made against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue” and that she “strongly denies allegations of an unsavoury nature, which have appeared in the British press and elsewhere and reserves her right to seek redress at the repetition of such old defamatory claims.”
According to the Miami Herald, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, one of Epstein’s victims, sued Maxwell in federal court in the Southern District of New York in 2015. Giuffre asserted that Maxwell and Epstein trafficked her and other underage girls, often at sex parties that Epstein hosted at his homes in New York, New Mexico, Palm Beach, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Maxwell called her a liar. Giuffre sued for defamation. While details of the settlement were not made public, the case was settled in Giuffre’s favour, with Maxwell paying Giuffre “millions.”
On 16 April 2019, a new accuser, Maria Farmer, went public and filed a sworn affidavit in federal court in New York, saying that she was sexually assaulted and her then-15-year-old sister was molested by Epstein and his companion, Ghislaine Maxwell, in 1996.”
Ghislaine Maxwell is the possible Mossad link to Epstein, via her late father Robert who was likely a Mossad agent.
This gives a whole new perspective to Alex Acosta’s remark that Epstein “belonged to intelligence.”
“On July 6, 2019, Jeffery Epstein was arrested at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey on sex trafficking charges. According to witnesses and sources, about a dozen FBI agents broke down the door to Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse, the Herbert N. Straus House, with search warrants.
Two days later, prosecutors with the Public Corruption Unit of the Southern District of New York charged him with sex trafficking and conspiracy to traffic minors for sex. Court documents allege that at least 40 underage girls were brought into Epstein’s mansion for sexual encounters.
Judge Kenneth Marra is currently deciding whether the non-prosecution agreement that protected Epstein from the more serious charges should still stand.”
Epstein is linked to some very big names. That’s what makes this potentially the story of the decade. It’s not merely the fact that Epstein himself was busted, but the possibility that Epstein might be the tip of the iceberg.
But who is Jeffery Epstein, billionaire pedophile?
You probably already know Epstein’s name from his connections to Bill Clinton, which surfaced in early 2015 after it was revealed that the former US President flew on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” plane numerous times, with Clinton on multiple occasions dismissing his Secret Service detail without explanation before hopping on-board. Gawker, 1/22/2015:
“Bill Clinton took repeated trips on the ” Lolita Express“—the private passenger jet owned by billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein—with an actress in softcore porn movies whose name appears in Epstein’s address book under an entry for “massages,” according to flight logbooks obtained by Gawker and published today for the first time. The logs also show that Clinton shared more than a dozen flights with a woman who federal prosecutors believe procured underage girls to sexually service Epstein and his friends and acted as a “potential co-conspirator” in his crimes.”
Clinton, for his part, just released a statement claiming that he only took four trips on Epstein’s plane, knows nothing about any of the sex crimes Epstein has been charged with, and has not spoken to Epstein in “well over a decade”:
And the Clintons were tight with Epstein and his inner circle within the past decade. Here’s a photo of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s ex-girlfriend and rumored procurer of underage girls, at Chelsea Clinton’s wedding in 2010:
Here’s Ghislaine Maxwell, by many accounts Jeffrey Epstein’s “pimp” and “groomer of girls” at Chelsea Clinton’s wedding. pic.twitter.com/leBUwqoWnT
Of course, we all know Bill Clinton would never lie, especially not about sex.
But outside of Epstein’s connections to Bill Clinton, who is Epstein? He’s often referred to as a “billionaire and convicted sex-offender.”
Conservative news outlets moreso than “mainstream media” ones will also refer to the fact that Epstein is a major Democratic donor who has given more than $145,000 to prominent Democrats like Bill Clinton and John Kerry.
But little about the 66-year-old Epstein’s past, i.e. his career, is well-documented. This is all Wikipedia has under the “career” section on his page:
“Epstein taught calculus and physics at the Dalton School in Manhattan from 1973 to 1975. In 1976, Epstein started work as an options trader at Bear Stearns, where he worked in the special products division, advising high-net-worth clients on tax strategies. Proving successful in his financial career, Epstein became a limited partner at Bear Stearns in 1980.
In 1982, Epstein founded his own financial management firm, J. Epstein & Co., managing the assets of clients with more than US$1 billion in net worth. In 1996, Epstein changed the name of his firm to the Financial Trust Company and, for tax advantages, based it on the island of St. Thomas in the U.S. Virgin Islands.”
Epstein was a math teacher at a high school in New York City (I know what you’re thinking and you’re probably right), then somehow became an options trader, then somehow by 1982 he had enough money to open his own billion-dollar hedge fund for ultra high net-worth individuals. No details on how he made his billions.
What’s become apparent in the past few days is that nobody really knows how Epstein even became a billionaire in the first place. From Bloomberg, July 8:
“For all [Epstein’s] infamy, there are scant details of how he made his money. While he’s frequently been called a billionaire, his net worth is hard to ascertain. He ran a money management firm catering to the ultra-rich, primarily for Victoria’s Secret mogul Les Wexner, but its assets were never made public and few on Wall Street have dealt with him as a financier or money manager.”
Hmmm. Normally we know more about famous billionaire hedge-fund managers, for example guys like Carl Icahn, Ray Dalio, Bill Ackman, Dan Loeb, etc. Look up any of those guys on Wikipedia and there is detailed information on exactly how they made their money and progressed through their careers. But that’s not the case with Epstein:
“According to his lawyers more than a decade ago, he had a net worth in excess of nine figures. Today, so little is known about Epstein’s current business or clients that the only things that can be valued with any certainty are his properties. The Manhattan mansion is estimated to be worth at least $77 million, according to a federal document submitted in advance of Epstein’s bail hearing.
He also has properties in New Mexico, Paris and the U.S. Virgin Islands, where he has a private island, and a Palm Beach estate with an assessed value of more than $12 million. He shuttles between them by private jet and has at least 15 cars, including seven Chevrolet Suburbans, according to federal authorities.”
Epstein’s wealth is mostly shrouded in mystery.
From reading his Wikipedia page, you come away with the assumption that he made a lot of money as a successful trader for Bear Stearns and used that money, along with the connections he’d gained, to open his hedge fund. But apparently he was fired by Bear Stearns in the early 80s. This is from a recent Daily Beast article written by Vicky Ward, a journalist who published a profile of Epstein back in 2003:
“Epstein, a mysterious Gatsby-esque financier whom I’d been assigned to write about by my then-boss Graydon Carter, the editor of Vanity Fair, had first caught the attention of the press when he had flown Bill Clinton on his jet to Africa. No one knew who he was or understood how he’d made his money.
. . .My investigation began to take on unexpected twists. After a bit of digging I found myself not in some plush office setting but going through the metal detectors inside the Federal Medical Center at Devens prison in Massachusetts, where I met with one Steve Hoffenberg, a fraudster who’d been convicted of bilking investors of more than $450 million in one of the largest pre-Madoff Ponzi schemes in history. He was sentenced to 20 years in prison.
Hoffenberg told me that he’d met Epstein shortly after Epstein had been kicked out of Bear Stearns in 1981 for “getting into trouble” and that Hoffenberg had seen charm and talent in him —“he has a way of getting under your skin”—and had hired him as a “consultant” to work with.
Hoffenberg, officially, ran Towers Financial, a collection agency that was supposed to buy debts that people owed to hospitals, banks, and phone companies, but instead the funds paid off earlier investors and subsidized his own lavish lifestyle. Hoffenberg told me had he had been Epstein’s mentor and that Epstein had made a terrible mistake in doing something so high-profile as flying Bill Clinton, since that would only draw a spotlight to his business dealings. “I always told him to stay below the radar,” he said.
Aware that I was listening to a convicted felon who had lied under oath—he was, after all, sitting before me in an orange jumpsuit—I left the jail determined to get more concrete proof about the source of Epstein’s finances. Slowly, I got there.
It took many meetings of the type you see in the movies. There I was, with my growing belly, in the backs of people’s chauffeured-driven cars, in out-of-the way hotel bars—and finally, in my sixth month, when my doctor had begun to look dismayed and told me to take it easy, a train ride to a law firm in Philadelphia, where I and a research assistant were shown a room full of boxes with legal files, and the man who brought us there whispered, “Good luck!”
Luck did shine upon me that day. I opened the first box, and there was Epstein’s deposition in a civil case explaining in his own testimony that he had indeed been guilty of a “reg d violation” while at Bear Stearns and that he’d been asked to leave the investment firm; it was the nail in the coffin I needed.
I had discovered many other concrete, irrefutable examples of strange business practices by Epstein, and while I still couldn’t tell you exactly what he did do to subsidize his lifestyle, my piece would certainly show that he was definitely not what he claimed to be. . .”
Epstein’s money probably didn’t come from Bear Stearns. He was fired there in 1981 for a “reg D violation,” which is a law put in place to limit the number of money transfers one can make out of savings or money market accounts.
What we do know is that Epstein was very close to Leslie Wexner, a billionaire clothing magnate who owns Victoria’s Secret. Epstein “managed” Wexner’s money, and eventually in 1998, Wexner gave–not sold–the $77 million Manhattan mansion to Epstein. Back to the Bloomberg piece:
“[Epstein’s] main client was Wexner, the founder of underwear maker L Brands. Epstein started managing his money in the 1980s and a 2003 Vanity Fair profile noted the pair had a close relationship, close enough for Epstein to acquire the Manhattan mansion from Wexner.
Wexner had purchased the property from the Birch Wathen School, a Manhattan prep school in 1989, according to city records. He sold it in 1998 to a Virgin Islands entity called NES LLC, according to a person familiar with the matter. Epstein is affiliated with NES, public records show.
There are no New York property records documenting a transfer until 2011, when the company that Wexner used to purchase the townhouse transferred it to Epstein’s Virgin Islands-based Maple Inc. for $0. Epstein signed for both sides of the transaction.”
I’m no expert on the matter, but it would appear that somehow, Epstein more or less forced Wexner to give him the mansion. People–even billionaires–don’t just give away $77 million dollar Upper East Side mansions. That’s not a normal thing.
The picture beginning to emerge is that Epstein is not, as he’s often described, a hedge fund manager but instead a professional blackmailer. He invites the rich and powerful to his big parties, gets them drunk, has them seduced by underage women, secretly films the sexual encounters, and then uses the tapes to blackmail his powerful “friends” for money and influence.
When federal agents raided Epstein’s NYC mansion late Saturday night, this is what they found:
“Finally, despite having been previously convicted of a sex offense involving an underage victim, the defendant has continued to maintain a vast trove of lewd photographs of young-looking women or girls in his Manhattan mansion. In a search of the New York Residence on the night of his arrest, July 6-7 2019, pursuant to judicially-authorized warrants, law enforcement officers discovered not only specific evidence consistent with victim recollections of the inside of the mansion, further strengthening the evidence of the conduct charged in the Indictment, but also at least hundreds–and perhaps thousands–of sexually suggestive photographs of fully or partially -nude females. While these items were only seized this weekend and are still being reviewed, some of the nude photographs appear to be of underage girls. . .”
This is the kicker:
“Additionally, some of the photographs referenced herein were discovered in a locked safe, in which law enforcement officers also found CDs with hand-written labels including the following: “Young [name] + [name],” Misc nudes 1,” and “girl pics nude.”
Why were some nude photos in a locked safe and some not? The obvious guess is that the most valuable blackmail tapes were in the locked safe. The blackmail is implied by the CDs labeled “Young [name] + [name],” indicating that Epstein kept photo and/or video evidence of young women performing sexual acts on other people. For example, “Young [girl’s name] + Bill Clinton.”
Who else might Epstein have been blackmailing? It’s anyone’s guess, but we already know he’s a got a history with names as big as Bill Clinton, meaning there are likely very big names on those CDs. The New York Times reported that inside of Epstein’s Manhattan mansion are photographs of him with Clinton, Woody Allen and Crown Prince Mohamed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia. Is it a stretch to say any or all of those names might appear on the CDs recovered from Epstein’s locked vault?
Law enforcement already has these CDs in their possession. They already know the names on all of Epstein’s CDs. Hopefully all the names will be public soon.
This is why I said the Epstein arrest has the potential to be the story of the decade. This is not just hyperbole. Epstein may well be the key to uncovering an elite ring of pedophiles from around the world. Whatever dirt Epstein has on the global elite, law enforcement now has. This could be the start of something very big.
Now, of course, prosecutors have a very long and difficult battle ahead of them. The Globalist Elite will not simply stand there and allow this to unfold naturally.
There will be pressure on prosecutors from very high places, and at every step of the way, to bury this case and let Epstein skate to ensure he doesn’t rat out all the other Elite Pedophiles and bring the whole system down with him.
The likelihood of the whole Elite Pedophile Ring being brought down and exposed is very low, and that’s because corruption is very high.
We already see Wikipedia on the case to bring its site into alignment with Bill Clinton’s Official Story On The Matter™, scrubbing away all Clinton connections to Epstein while making it seem as if President Trump is a close friend of Epstein’s:
Seems Wikipedia has altered Epstein’s bio already. First screenshot of Epstein’s bio was at 8:27 a.m. The 2nd was at 10:30 a.m. omitting Bill Clinton & Spacy yet leaving Trump! That is frightening. Same exact bio of Epstein, different times. https://t.co/T6lUHD8TrOpic.twitter.com/5QrjuovwHB
The original Wikipedia entry noted that Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s private jet 26 times. The “updated” version deletes all mention of Bill Clinton entirely, while mentioning that “Epstein has attended parties with numerous celebrities including Donald Trump. . .”
“President Donald Trump reacted Tuesday to the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein, stating he is “not a fan” of the hedge fund manager after a “falling out” 15 years ago.
“I know him, just like everybody in Palm Beach knew him,” President Trump told reporters in the Oval Office with the Qatari Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani. “People in Palm Beach knew him. He was a fixture in Palm Beach.”
“I had a falling out with him a long time ago,” he added. “I don’t think I’ve spoken to him in 15 years. I was not a fan. I was not a fan of his. That I can tell you. I was not a fan.”
President Trump’s remarks come one day after the Southern District of New York unveiled sex trafficking and conspiracy charges against Epstein, who federal prosecutors alleged engaged in sexual acts with dozens of underage girls — some as young as 14 years old — at his residences in New York City, Florida, New Mexico, and his private Carribean island. Prosecutors said the incidents occurred between 2002 and 2005.
In 2002, President Trump had kind words for Epstein, calling him a “terrific guy” and “fun to be with.” The years-old quote has been repeatedly circulated by corporate media in an attempt to tie the president to Epstein’s alleged criminal behavior without any evidence.
Buried amid these efforts to link the two men, however, an attorney who represents numerous Epstein accusers has said President Trump assisted authorities in building a civil lawsuit against the well-connected investor.
“The only thing that I can say about President Trump is that he is the only person who, in 2009 when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people, or at least gave notice to some pretty connected people, that I want to talk to them, is the only person who picked up the phone and said, let’s just talk,” Lawyer Bradley Edwards told New York magazine. “I’ll give you as much time as you want. I’ll tell you what you need to know, and was very helpful, in the information that he gave, and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information. That checked out and that helped us and we didn’t have to take a deposition of him in 2009.”
Edwards has also said President Trump barred Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago resort “because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club,” according to court documents.”
So Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago precisely because Epstein was a known pedophile. This was back in 2007.
The Trump connection, however, is said to be through Trump’s current Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, who was apparently extremely lenient on Epstein in 2008 while Acosta was the Bush Administration’s top federal prosecutor in South Florida. Via Sharyl Attkisson:
“The story starts in October of 2007 with a meeting between Epstein attorney Jay Lefkowitz and Miami’s top federal prosecutor at the time: Alexander Acosta.
Not only would Epstein serve just 13 months in the county jail, but the deal — called a non-prosecution agreement— essentially shut down an ongoing FBI probe into whether there were more victims and other powerful people who took part in Epstein’s sex crimes, according to a Miami Herald examination of thousands of emails, court documents and FBI records.
The pact required Epstein to plead guilty to two prostitution charges in state court. Epstein and four of his accomplices named in the agreement received immunity from all federal criminal charges. But even more unusual, the deal included wording that granted immunity to “any potential co-conspirators’’ who were also involved in Epstein’s crimes. These accomplices or participants were not identified in the agreement, leaving it open to interpretation whether it possibly referred to other influential people who were having sex with underage girls at Epstein’s various homes or on his plane.
As part of the arrangement, Acosta agreed, despite a federal law to the contrary, that the deal would be kept from the victims. As a result, the non-prosecution agreement was sealed until after it was approved by the judge, thereby averting any chance that the girls — or anyone else — might show up in court and try to derail it…”
Was Acosta directly blackmailed into letting Epstein skate? Or was Acosta merely pressured into doing so from high-powered people above him who were blackmailed by Epstein?
It’s impossible to say at the moment, but I do hope we get to the bottom of the matter regarding why Acosta was so lenient with Epstein despite having him dead to rights.
But it’s quite ridiculous to say Trump’s appointment of Acosta to the Labor Secretary position had anything to do with Acosta’s questionable deal with Epstein. Remember, Trump’s original choice for Labor Secretary back in January 2017 was Andrew Pudzer, the former CEO of Hardee’s. Trump only nominated Acosta after Pudzer withdrew his nomination in the face of Senate opposition.
I’m fairly certain Donald Trump did not know much about Alex Acosta until the Establishment Republicans that had already infiltrated his White House–and those ostensible Republican allies in the Senate who were no doubt “advising” him on his Cabinet nominations–suggested Acosta to him following Pudzer’s withdrawal.
I bring up this point all the time but it’s quite obvious that many of Trump’s appointees and nominees for various White House jobs, Cabinet spots and judicial nominations were not chosen by Trump but by the career Swamp Rats Trump often has no choice but to defer to when it comes to staffing his administration. Trump is a total political outsider, which means unfortunately he often has to defer to the careerists when it comes to filling out the dozens of positions and offices that make up the government. Remember, many of these nominees have to be confirmed by the Senate, and that means Trump is not free to fill his administration up with people who think like he does.
I’ve said it before but it bears repeating: Trump himself could not be confirmed by the Senate to a Cabinet post. Not even a Republican-controlled Senate. But much to the Swamp’s dismay, it ultimately had no say in whether Trump was able to obtain power–that decision was made by the American people. However, the Swamp knows that if it can’t keep Trump out of government power (and we all know it has certainly tried), it can at least surround him with Swamp rats who will undermine his agenda.
Outside of a select few, don’t think of Trump’s Cabinet secretaries and top officials as “his people” that he would have chosen no matter what. Many of them were appointed because Trump either had defer to the “expertise” of Washington careerists to fill a position that as an outsider he knew little about, or he had to compromise to get someone approved by the Uniparty Establishment-controlled Senate. There are over 1,200 government positions that require Presidential nomination or appointment.
Think about if you were elected President and on Day One your aides come to you and say, “Mr. President, who are you going to choose to be the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment?” Out of necessity, you’re going to defer to the Washington careerists who have been around and know the agencies inside and out.
Just because Trump does not have a name in mind for all 1,200 positions he must fill does not make him “unqualified.” It means the government is too big.
No president in modern history has fully staffed his government single-handedly. They’ve all had to defer to others. The difference with Trump is that the people he has to defer to hate him and are spending every waking moment trying to undermine Trump’s agenda. Bush and Obama didn’t have to deal with that because they were on the same page as the Uniparty bureaucrats who worked for them.
Anyway, the point is, Trump probably did not even know who Alex Acosta was before he appointed him as Labor Secretary. Trump probably merely signed off on Acosta’s nomination after he was recommended by one of his various aides or careerist White House staffers such as his then-Chief of Staff Reince Priebus. Again, Acosta was not Trump’s first choice for Labor Secretary. After Pudzer withdrew, Priebus probably came to Trump and said, “Mr. President, Alex Acosta would be a good pick for Labor Secretary. He’ll be able to get through the Senate.”
It’s utterly ridiculous to believe Trump chose Acosta because Acosta let Epstein skate. If anything, the fact that Trump nominated Acosta in the first place indicates Trump didn’t really know who Acosta was in 2017. By the time Acosta made his dirty deal with Epstein in 2008, Trump had already banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago. Had Trump known Acosta was the guy who let Epstein off the hook, Trump probably wouldn’t have nominated Acosta at all.
“Strangely, the media have suddenly taken an intense interest in the case of pedophile and major Democratic donor Jeffrey Epstein.
In 2005, the Palm Beach police were told by the mother of a young girl in West Palm Beach that her daughter had been brought to the Democratic donor’s mansion and asked to have sex with him for money. This kicked off an intensive, one-year undercover investigation.
The police sifted through Epstein’s garbage and interviewed 17 witnesses, including the housemen, who told of sex toys and dildos left behind after the underage girls left. One of Epstein’s procurers, a 20-year-old local woman named Haley Robson, who was paid $200 for every teenaged girl she brought to Jeffrey, was cooperating with police, telling them she was like “Heidi Fleiss.” They obtained statements from five of Epstein’s young victims, who said they’d been paid $200 to $300 to engage in various sex acts with him. Police raided Epstein’s home, finding explicit photographs of teenaged girls, incriminating phone records — and one girl’s high school transcript.
But when the police chief brought this mountain of evidence to Palm Beach County’s Democratic prosecutor Barry Krischer, he punted, charging the Democrat child molester with only one count of soliciting prostitution — yes, the child victims were labeled “prostitutes” — and offered Epstein probation.
Perhaps Krischer was exhausted, having just spent three years hounding Rush Limbaugh for abusing back pain medication.
Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter exploded in rage. (Meanwhile, Epstein claimed to be the victim of an anti-Semitic conspiracy on Palm Beach.) Chief Reiter wrote an open letter to Krischer asking the Democrat to remove himself from the case. Then he turned to the Bush administration to seek justice against a Democratic donor/accused child rapist.
This is where Acosta comes in:
“Thanks to Chief Reiter, President Bush’s U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Alex Acosta, did take the case, despite the fact that only Epstein’s child rapes on his plane, on his private island, or with girls brought across state lines would make it a federal case.”
So Acosta was from the get-go limited in how aggressively he could go after Epstein.
“As a result of the (Republican-led) federal investigation, Epstein was finally required to plead guilty to two state felony charges, accept a sentence of two years in prison, register as a sex offender, and pay restitution to his victims.
Inasmuch as Epstein was pleading guilty to a state charge, the matter of his confinement was out of the U.S. attorney’s hands. It was Democratic county prison officials — not the feds — who placed Epstein in a private wing of the county jail and allowed him to spend 12 hours a day, six days a week at his Palm Beach mansion throughout his 13-month “imprisonment.”
“Epstein’s name, I was told, had been raised by the Trump transition team when Alexander Acosta, the former U.S. attorney in Miami who’d infamously cut Epstein a non-prosecution plea deal back in 2007, was being interviewed for the job of labor secretary. The plea deal put a hard stop to a separate federal investigation of alleged sex crimes with minors and trafficking.
“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,”he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)”
So the Trump transition team did ask Acosta about the Epstein case, and Acosta told them that higher-ups told him to “back off” of Epstein.
This is how our government truly operates. We’re beginning to learn the ugly truth as the curtain is slowly pulled back. The depth of the corruption becomes more apparent by the day.
Epstein may have only just become a household name in recent days, but it’s becoming quite apparent that Epstein has been a very big deal in elite circles for a long time.
The question is, who helped Jeffrey Epstein become the Jeffrey Epstein we know today? He didn’t just go from high school math teacher to highly connected billionaire “wealth manager” overnight by himself. He had some assistance on the way up.
Les Wexner? That’s a dead-end. Why would a clothing magnate fund and support the rise of a professional blackmailer. Why would a billionaire clothing magnate need a blackmailer to gain leverage over the global elite?
No, it’s more likely is that Wexner was being blackmailed by Epstein, not that Wexner was the man behind Epstein’s rise to power and fortune. Wexner was probably a victim of Epstein’s, not his puppet-master.
Hoffenberg? It’s possible, but Hoffenberg, who served 20 years in prison for various fraud schemes, comes off as more of a small-time player. In other words, he doesn’t seem like the man behind the scenes for Epstein. Epstein went on to become way bigger than Hoffenberg ever was.
Who are Epstein’s puppet-masters, then?
That’s the big question. Who does Epstein work for?
Another equally important question: why Epstein specifically? It’s self-evident why Epstein’s masters would want a professional blackmailer to extort the rich and powerful, but what’s not self-evident is why Epstein specifically?
We can guess at the general profile of Epstein’s masters: very rich and very powerful people who have an interest in blackmailing and controlling elite government officials in not only the US but around the world.
We’re talking about the most powerful people on earth.
What are their names? I have no idea. We can only hope they’re revealed eventually as investigators dig into Epstein’s life.
Lots of women these days consider themselves progressive, virtuous, dignified and Classy™️. They consider themselves paragons of morality and righteousness because they stand against Racism and the Evil Patriarchy.
But that all goes out the window the moment they meet a guy that’s good looking online.
A Redditor conducted an experiment on Tinder to see just how many “flaws” (“flaws” being a massive understatement) women would overlook just to get with a good-looking guy. The answer: they’ll overlook just about anything. Including child rape.
I’m not kidding. Here’s the fake profile the Redditor set up. He pretended to be an aspiring model named Ray who admits point-blank in his Tinder bio that he’s a convicted child rapist:
“Aspiring model. Watch out for me in GQ in a couple years 😉
You should know I’ve had trouble with the law my whole life. Convicted three times for rape of a child (ROAC) and once for sexual activity with a child but tbf she turned 16 like a week later so it was super unfair but whatever.
I’m on tinder cause maybe if I fuck some of you sluts I’ll stop wanting to be with kids (unlikely lmao, they’re way tighter than your beef curtain cunts). I hope you can therefore forgive me for my past crimes.”
Holy shit. This is some truly messed up stuff. “I’m on tinder because maybe if I fuck some of you sluts I’ll stop wanting to be with kids.”
You’d think this appalling bio would be too much to overcome and Ray, handsome as he may be, would be deemed unforgivable for his past transgressions.
But forgive him these women did:
“Hey, every criminal has the chance to be forgiven but then again there’s very attractive about a bad boy”
A bad boy? A bad boy is the kid in high school who ditches class to smoke cigarettes. Or the guy who rides a motorcycle and gets into bar brawls. Not a convicted child rapist. That’s not even on the spectrum.
This chick is not only willing to forgive him for CHILD RAPE, but she actually considers it a major turn-on. It makes him a “bad boy.”
It doesn’t get any better. Amber says “I can absolve you of your sins tonight ;)”:
Girls are throwing themselves at him at this point, many of them making light of the child rape convictions. Keep in mind this guy’s bio makes it clear he’s a totally unapologetic child rapist.
This one, Molly, might be the worst of the bunch:
She’s equating stealing a gumball as a child with child rape just so she can have something in common with Ray.
Molly even realizes how awful of a person she is for saying that but like whateverrrr he’s super hot:
She then double-texts him and gives him her number without him even asking, so desperate is she to hook up with the convicted (yet highly attractive) child rapist:
Molly’s cute little “we’re both criminals LOL” false equivalence was a common pick-up line that other girls tried to use on Ray:
Here’s Ema, who before even getting a response is already worried she’s going to fall in love with Ray the child rapist:
They clearly read the profile stating he was a child molester. They clearly don’t care.
Most young modern women are fully caught-up in the manufactured hysteria over “rape culture” and believe the false stat that 1 in 4 women in college are raped. They’re irate about this because Rape Is Unacceptable.
Unless you’re a Hot Guy™ on Tinder who’s also a convicted child rapist. Then rape is like totally hilarious and not a big deal.
Another Redditor conducted an almost identical experiment. His handsome convicted child rapist was named Chad, and again this guy puts it all in the bio:
“Sup I’m Chad u don’t like me 2 bad… things u should know bout me cus you’ll see the ankle monitor. I’m a convicted child rapist/molestor. Its in my past…made some mistakes but workin each day to fix em… lookin for fun, longer stuff is cool… but can’t be around in a month cause I have to go back to jail for a stupid thing between me n my ex. She is overreacting about a few slaps I gave her a year ago. hmu. ain’t that bad seriously.”
So not only is Chad a convicted child rapist like Ray, Chad is also going to jail in a month for beating his ex-girlfriend. He’s also illiterate and pretty clearly a dumbass.
We all know that domestic violence is UNACCEPTABLE and that women will not tolerate any man who lays hands on his girlfriend or wife. Women stand aligned in solidarity against any and all forms of domestic violence.
“Chad” has a match. She messages first, and “Chad” makes sure this girl has read his bio so she is fully aware of what she’s getting herself into. She asks “was that a joke” as if anyone in their right mind would joke about that. She’s probably hoping it’s a joke because she’s already decided that she desperately wants this guy no matter what, and if it’s a joke she doesn’t have to hate herself as much when she inevitably sleeps with him.
He responds that no, it’s not a joke, and elaborates further that he molested an 8-year-old boy but it’s no big deal because it “felt consensual.”
This chick doesn’t care. It’s “cool” that he’s being honest about raping an 8-year-old boy.
She then just glosses over the whole “he raped an 8-year-old boy” thing and wants to move things forward.
The next girl was a little more hung-up on the child rape thing–this time he says it was a freaking 2-year-old–but she ultimately doesn’t care. In fact she eagerly double-texts him when he doesn’t respond. She just wants to move on to another topic:
Her: “Honestly would just rather stop talking about [him raping a 2 year old]”
*he doesn’t respond*
Her: “I didn’t say I was done talking to you about other stuff.”
This chick is mortified she just let the handsome child molester slip through her fingers. Better quickly change the subject before the convicted child rapist loses interest!
Here’s another desperate chick trying everything in her power to keep Chad’s interest:
By now the guy running the experiment has lost all faith in humanity. He makes sure she has read the profile bio and then basically just waits for her to admit she doesn’t care he’s a convicted child rapist and domestic abuser. By this point the guy is just appalled and barely even pretend to be Chad anymore. When she says, “Can we move on now,” he replies straight-up as himself, not Chad: “and there it is. ffs.” She clearly has no idea what’s going on, she still thinks she’s talking to Chad.
This is another chick who’s determined to not let the conversation die no matter how little Chad gives her to work with. She tries to pretend-deny him by acting like she won’t just let him tell her what to do, he bails, then she basically goes, “Wait come back!!!”
Not only are these chicks okay with Chad being a convicted child rapist, they’re tripping over themselves to hold his attention no matter how little he gives them to work with.
Here’s more of the same, last one for Chad:
“We all make mistakes.” = yet another girl casually brushing off his admission that he raped a 6-year-old.
This guy is barely even trying to make conversation and the chick is still totally into it–on top of all the child rapist stuff. She’s like “I’m cooking dinner right now what are you up to?” And he just replies, “horny af.”
Not interested in your small talk. He’s gone full caveman. Me Chad. Me want sex. Now.
And she’s still all about it.
So take that for what you will, Pick-up Artist Community.
I’m not saying “Game” is total bullshit, but the best possible “game” to have is being jacked and handsome, and nothing else even comes close.
The third and final experiment is a bit different from the past two which featured handsome child rapists who still nonetheless had women throwing themselves at them. This one is a good-looking guy with a Swastika tattooed on his arm and clearly visible in his profile picture. Not only that but he makes abundantly clear to the women he matches with that he is a neo-Nazi:
His bio is apparently a Hitler quote in German, which translated into English basically says Jews are evil personified.
Despite the swastika tattoo displayed on his arm, he matched with 363 girls in a week, according to the guy who made the profile.
This chick named Vang says, “Please tell me that’s drawn on with a marker” in response to the swastika tattoo. But she really doesn’t care:
This next chick has no problem at all with the swastika tattoo:
Within five messages it’s in the bag.
This is the modern Western woman exposed for all to see.
Women on Tinder will throw themselves at guys who admit to being unapologetic child molesters and who are proud Nazis so long as the guys are handsome.
No matter what they might say publicly about their morals or their values, women will forget it all if the guy they’re after has model-good looks.
“OMG what Trump is doing to those poor migrant children at the border is EVIL! Anyone who supports Trump and his inhumane policies is evil, too! Also, this hot guy I matched with on Tinder is a convicted child rapist. I’m meeting up with him tonight ;)”
“Trump is LITERALLY HITLER. Punch Nazis; this country is infested with white supremacists ever since Trump came around. I literally hate white supremacists so much!!! Ooh, a hot guy with a swastika tattoo on his arm matched with me on Tinder?! Heyyyyy what are you doing tonight?”
The same chicks who complain that there’s no good guys out there are also the ones saying: “Yeah he’s a convicted child rapist but he’s changed, he’s a good guy now! I can overlook his flaws and his questionable past because I believe in second chances.”
Virtually everything they say is nonsense. They profess strict adherence to mainstream political consensus purely to virtue signal and fit in.
“When Ted Bundy, the notorious serial killer who raped and murdered more than 30 women, was put on trial in 1979, women from all over the world sent him fan mail. Many of these letters included nude pictures, and some of them even contained marriage proposals, according to Stephen Michaud, co-author of Ted Bundy: Conversations with a Killer.
During Bundy’s trial, women (referred to as “groupies”) would show up to the courtroom wearing their hair parted down the middle and hoop earrings, on the assumption that this style matched his victims. Some of them even dyed their hair brown to match the hair color of the women he murdered. In 1980, while still on trial, Bundy married one of his admirers. He was executed for his crimes in 1989.”
One of these crazy women even married the guy.
“While Bundy’s scenario may be the most famous case of serial killers who garner female fans, it’s a pattern seen over and over again throughout history: murderous men winning over legions of female fans. Jeffrey Dahmer, who committed the murders and postmortem mutilations of 17 young men and boys, received love letters and gifts from women after he was imprisoned. Richard Ramirez, a serial killer, dubbed “the Night Stalker,” who raped and tortured over 25 victims and killed at least 13 others, married one of his many female admirers in 1996 while he was in prison.More recently, Anders Breivik, the terrorist who murdered 77 people in Norway in 2011, mainly children, was reported to have received “love letters” from girls as young as 16.”
That’s modern Western women for you: totally and utterly depraved.
Not all of them, but enough of them. Just look around.
And yet it is women today whose opinions are valued most, always given the benefit of the doubt and held up by mainstream culture (just watch basically any TV commercial) as the morally superior sex. Men are derided as the root of all evil, misery and oppression in this world, while women are perpetual victims forced to live under the brutal Patriarchy.
Listen fellas: It’s time to #RespectWomen. We must step aside and let women fix this world that we’ve broken. And they will do that, just as soon as they’re done trying to have sex with serial killers, child rapists and Nazis.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider becoming a monthly supporter of this site at SubscribeStar via the link below:
“An Arctic fox walked more than 3,500 kilometres to go from northern Norway to Canada’s North in four months, Norwegian researchers said.
The Norwegian Polar Institute reported the young female fox left her birthplace on Norway’s Svalbard archipelago in March 2018, and reached Canada’s Ellesmere Island by way of Greenland by July.
The ground the small fox cumulatively covered over those four months was among the most ever recorded for an Arctic fox seeking a place to settle down and breed, the institute said in a research article subtitled “One female’s long run across sea ice.”
Here’s a map of where this fox walked:
Wow. That’s a lot of frozen ice.
Here’s a more zoomed out map:
So that’s how the whole “global warming” thing is going.
Al Gore in 2009: “Some of the models suggest that there is a 75 percent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during some of the summer months, could be completely ice-free within the next five to seven years.”
2018, during “some of the summer months”: a fox walks across 2,000 miles of ice that was supposed to be melted away by 2016.
Looks like we don’t need Global Communism to save the world from a climate catastrophe. The globalists will have to invent another reason to enslave the world under a single communist regime.
Via Curt Mills of the Spectator (US), there is “well-placed chatter” in Washington that Trump is considering replacing Vice President Mike Pence on the 2020 Presidential ticket with none other than Fox New’s Tucker Carlson:
“Will President Trump switch up his ticket in 2020? The Wall Street Journal editorial page, bastion of the establishment right, certainly hopes so. A little over a week ago, it called for former ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley to replace the dutiful Mike Pence as vice president. But there’s well-placed chatter in Washington that suggests the president will take a different route. Trump does indeed feel he needs VP change, but it is not Nikki Haley he is considering. It is Fox News host Tucker Carlson.”
Trump must resist the urge to appoint Nikki Haley as VP. He beat Hillary without a woman on the ticket and he can beat whoever the Democrats throw at him in 2020 without a woman on the ticket again. Resist the urge to virtue signal and play the Democrats’ identity politics game. You will never win.
They will never stop calling you a sexist or a misogynist because you appoint a woman as your VP. In fact they’ll just start calling Haley herself a sexist. They don’t care.
Republicans tend to play this ridiculous game where they decry identity politics at every opportunity, yet turn around and want credit for going out of their way to base hiring decisions on little more than a candidate’s identity (i.e., race, gender, sexual orientation).
Republicans: “Identity politics is terrible for our country and wrong! The job should go to the best available candidate, period, regardless of their identity!”
Also Republicans: “Give me credit for hiring this woman solely because she’s a woman!”
Republicans both decry and play the identity politics game simultaneously. Stop trying to play a game that is designed by the left specifically for you to lose.
Let Democrats be the party that takes only race, gender and sexual orientation into consideration for hiring decisions. Let them be the ones who consider someone a good candidate merely because they’re black, or Hispanic, or female, or gay.
We’re supposed to be the ones who don’t think gender or race or sexual orientation alone qualify someone for office.
We have no obligation to play by their rules. They will never give us credit even if we do.
“Carlson, who just turned 50, was with the president on his trip to the Korean demilitarized zone over the weekend. His interview with 45 will air Monday night. This all while Trump’s national security adviser and fierce Carlson foe, John R. Bolton, was exiled, literally, to outer Mongolia. In some ways, Trump has already made the move, ex officio.”
I’ll link the Trump-Carlson talk at the bottom, but I didn’t know Trump sent Bolton off to Mongolia while he visited North Korea with Tucker. It’s true, though. Hopefully it’s a sign that Tucker is in and the neocons are out.
“Here’s why it would make sense for the president to just go all the way— and name Carlson his running mate.
First, Tucker gets Trump. The duo have personal chemistry far exceeding the rapport that Pence or Haley enjoy. Haley bitterly opposed Trump during the 2016 primary and a former senior administration official has long informed me that her hiring during the transition was a ‘keep your enemies closer’ affair. In Carlson, Trump would get to anoint an heir apparent he actually likes.”
Yes yes yes. Trump owes Nikki Haley nothing. She opposed him in 2016, and I’m sure I’m not the only Trump supporter who still to this day questions her loyalty and motives.
Where Tucker would bolster the MAGA agenda, Nikki Haley would undermine it.
“Second, Tucker gets Trumpism, and Trumpism gets Tucker. He is eminence grise of a new intellectual right befitting the Trump era, and appeals to people who have started to become disgruntled in President Trump.
It’s been speculated before that Carlson might enter a 2024 race, but Trump might want to bring him into his fold sooner than that. Trump often complains of ideological clashes with his own officials. That’s partly why he already relies on a shadow cabinet, anchored by Carlson, as proved by last week’s called-off strikes on Iran.”
No more “shadow cabinet.” Make it official with Tucker.
“Trump in his first term has had to appoint Bush-era officials who have no idea what drives Trump’s movement. Carlson knows Trumpworld far better.”
Not only does Tucker know “Trumpworld” very well, he’s a part of it. He’s the real deal. He actually believes in MAGA and America First. The guy just gets it.
“Third, it would work. As evidenced by his conquering of Bill O’Reilly’s time slot on Fox, Carlson is a fearsome debater and fearless operator. Far from being ‘just a talk show host,’ as he often says of himself, Carlson is becoming a political force. Close friends of his say his recent bestselling book, Ship of Fools, represented a fairly comprehensive political platform: ‘a manifesto, of sorts,’ says one.”
Tucker would kill it on the campaign trail. He’d be unstoppable in debates. And apparently he’s already been thinking about how to turn his views and ideas into a real political platform, meaning he’s ready to make the jump from commentator to politician.
“Pressed on the matter of presidential politics before, Carlson, like any savvy pol, has not explicitly ruled it out. Inside Fox News, those close to Carlson insist he’s unlikely to ever pull the trigger. But in the apparatus of devotees in Washington he’s cultivated, Carlson commands the respect of infantrymen waiting for a returning general. ‘He’s the guy,’ a prominent conservative close to Carlson told me.”
Great analogy. The MAGA movement is begging him to take up the mantle and lead, like General Washington in the American Revolution.
“Carlson would refocus a Trump campaign that’s straying in a quixotic direction: one which has decided it wants to win over the Sun Belt states, never mind the Rust Belt that delivered the presidency.
More than anything: it’d be fun — which shouldn’t be dismissed. It would drive CNN and MSNBC and left-liberal America completely wild.
It would put a rogue element back into Trump’s otherwise professional-yet-plodding 2020 campaign. It would provide precisely the wild energy that won Trump the presidency in 2016. Carlson could give Trump his mojo back.
If Trump is going to continue to get flak for making Carlson his peacetime consigliere, he may as well formalize the arrangement.”
This would be great for a number of reasons. I fully endorse this idea:
Tucker is now the voice, and arguably the soul, of the MAGA movement. While Sean Hannity beats the drums for war with Iran, Tucker Carlson has for two years been calling out the neocon chicanery trying to push Trump to war. Tucker was skeptical from the start of the supposed Assad chemical weapons incident, and he has been one of the strongest voices against war with Iran. Tucker is firmly in-tune with the American people. He knows the last thing the American people want is another war, but the Political Establishment does and it’s trying to push Trump into one. Trump has been doing a great job resisting the neocons around him, but Tucker as VP would make it even more unlikely we end up in any Swamp-orchestrated wars.
It’s no secret that Trump has been seriously isolated in Washington since taking office. This is because there are very few true MAGA Nationalists who could get confirmed to high-level government jobs. I’ve remarked in the past that Trump himself could only get into government by running for President, in other words by the American people themselves putting him there. He couldn’t get confirmed to a Cabinet post by the Senate. In order to get genuine MAGA Nationalists into government, we need to take the decision out of the Swamp’s hands and put it directly to the American people at the ballot box. The Senate would never allow a true MAGA Man like Tucker Carlson to be appointed to a high-level government post, meaning the only way to get him into government is by putting him there ourselves at the ballot box.
Tucker would steer Trump in the right direction. While Trump’s White House is filled with globalists and neocons and Establishment parasites because they’re the only ones “qualified” for those top jobs, Tucker would be the voice of the MAGA movement in Trump’s ear at virtually all times. He would be able to steer Trump in the correct direction whenever the Neocons and Globalists come to the President with one of their new schemes. The Swamp has been trying (and in many ways succeeding) to commandeer the Trump presidency. Tucker would bring an end to that quickly.
Tucker has his priorities in line: he knows what Trump’s base wants and he will be able to effectively steer Trump towards those ends. Currently, Trump is surrounded by Swamp Creatures who are trying to steer him away from his base. Outside of war with Iran, another major–major–issue Tucker would push Trump in the right direction on is Big Tech censorship. Lately Trump seems to be paying more attention to the fact that his supporters are being silenced and deplatformed online, but Tucker Carlson would make that issue front-and-center for the President. Tucker would be Trump’s direct line to the millions of Americans who rallied to him in 2016, something Trump has been sorely missing since taking office.
Naming Tucker as his running mate for 2020 would not only be of immense benefit to Trump in terms of implementing his political agenda and staying on the right track, it would also rally his base immeasurably. This move would make a major splash, in a good way. Excitement levels on our side would go through the roof. Trump-Tucker 2020 would be the MAGA Dream Ticket. It would be like pairing LeBron James with Kawhi Leonard.
For those of you who don’t believe this is possible because Tucker Carlson is just a cable news personality with no experience in government: hello? Did you forget where Donald Trump himself came from?
Trump needs a true ally by his side for the long fight ahead–for both the 2020 election and his second term. Trump cannot do it alone. There is no better person than Tucker Carlson for this role. We need Tucker, representing the MAGA movement and the American patriots who put Trump in the White House, to be installed as President Trump’s right-hand-man ASAP.
Plus, as mentioned in the article, this would obviously set Tucker up beautifully for a run at the Presidency in 2024.
But that’s a long way off. We still have to focus on 2020.
Now, all that said, do I think it’s likely Trump will make this move? No, not particularly.
To my knowledge it’s never been done in modern American history. In 1972, Democratic nominee George McGovern originally chose Thomas Eagleton to be his running mate, but reports came out that Eagleton underwent electroshock therapy to treat his depression earlier in life, and eventually the controversy caused McGovern to replace him with Sargent Shriver. Today is a different situation because it would not be a scandal forcing Pence off the ticket, but rather a straight-up political decision in favor of a better running mate.
I think the only time a President ever replaced his Vice President was Lincoln ditching his first-term VP Hannibal Hamlin for Andrew Johnson in 1864. This would be a similar type of situation, of course minus the Civil War backdrop.
So it’s a really big deal for a President to switch running mates–with or without scandal. It would be more or less unprecedented.
That’s why I’m skeptical that Trump will actually go through with this.
However, if there was any presidential candidate with the balls to make a move like this, it’s Donald Trump. So don’t count it out entirely. Just because it’s unprecedented doesn’t mean it can’t happen. There’s a first time for everything.