“A jury in Dallas, Texas has ruled against Jeffrey Younger, the father who is trying to protect his seven-year-old son, James, from chemical castration via a gender “transition.” This means James’ mother, Dr. Anne Georgulas, will be able to continue “transitioning” him into “Luna,” and now has full authority to start him on puberty blockers and eventually cross-sex hormones.
The jury’s decision likely means that Mr. Younger will be required to “affirm” James as a girl, despite his religious and moral objections, and will also be forced to take a class on transgenderism.”
This is pure humiliation for the dad. As if he is the one who needs to be enlightened about Transgenderism. He’s just an angry, ignorant white male conservative who’s stuck in the past and afraid of all this wonderful Change and Progress.
“With a consensus of 11 of the 12 jurors, the jury decided not to grant Mr. Younger Sole Managing Conservatorship over his twin boys. They voted that the current Joint Managing Conservatorship should be replaced by a Sole Managing Conservatorship, but that Mr. Younger should not be that person.
Mr. Younger and Dr. Georgulas were in court last week fighting over custody and decision-making abilities for James and his twin, Jude. Mr. Younger argues his ex-wife is “transitioning” James against the boy’s will.”
This man’s insane liberal wife wants to make their son transgender so she can be like the Cool Celebrities and their #trendy transgender kids. The insane liberal wife also refers to James as “Luna,” a Hispanic name for the virtue signaling double-whammy, because apparently you get double the Woke Points for being both transgender and trans-racial. And white names are just so boring, aren’t they?
She does not care that she is already doing serious psychological damage to the boy by telling him he’s a girl. And that’s to say nothing of the serious physical damage she’s about to inflict on this poor boy by forcing him to take medications that will turn him into a female. The human body was not designed to literally change its sex, and any attempt to do so is unnatural, in addition to being immoral, and will inevitably lead to serious medical and psychological problems.
But the Affluent Female Liberal need to virtue signal trumps all of this. Poor James’ mother WILL have a transgender child at any cost.
I remember not so long ago there was a time in this country where Affluent Women’s status seeking could be satisfied with a nice car and an expensive purse, maybe some breast implants. Now in 2019 they’re giving their 7-year-old sons hormone blockers to turn them into girls.
The term “child abuse” is appropriate here, but in my opinion it is not strong enough to fully convey the wickedness of what this woman is attempting to do to poor James. It’s more like child torture.
We are truly living in upside-down clown world when a jury decides a custody battle in favor of the parent that wants to torture the child.
Just four years after gay marriage was legalized, we now officially have state-enforced transgenderism.
Still, the fact that this almost happened is worrying because it shows just how bad the state of this country is when a jury of a man’s peers rules that he has to allow his insane ex-wife to chemically castrate his son.
The fact that it was a jury of everyday people making that decision is evidence that degenerate liberal propaganda and brainwashing has been devastatingly effective.
From outlandish rightwing conspiracy theory to confirmed by the New York Times:
But they obviously try to put a spin on it by saying it’s just Honest Public SERVANTS who are trying to save us from Trump.
They’re doing this for your own good, you ungrateful peasants! (Even though the header picture they chose for the article clearly has a dark and shadowy vibe to it.)
The most annoying part of this–besides them attempting to gang-rape 250 years of American democracy–is them trying to act like they’re the Good Guys the whole time.
I’m sorry but you cannot have it both ways. You can’t be executing an obvious anti-democratic coup to destroy a duly-elected President while also being the good guys.
Just own it, you slimy bastards. Own the fact that you are the bad guy, the tyrants, the sinister cabal.
Now, people might nitpick here and say that this is the opinion section of the New York Times, but come on: we all know the opinion section is just where they put the material they can’t publish in the “news” section because it’s too obviously partisan.
The Opinion section has the blessing of the Editors one way or another. We all know how this works.
The New York Times has confirmed the existence of the Deep State as well as the fact that it is actively trying to undo the result of the 2016 election–and, presumably, rig the result of the 2020 election.
She’s shaking with rage. She can barely contain herself. This pampered, rich, elitist Washingtonian is irate at the prospect of American soldiers no longer having to fight and die in Syria. And you’re a “feckless coward” if you disagree with her.
Got that? She’s the brave one–sitting there in a television studio shaking her fist with rage demanding a neverending war in Syria which she personally will never be negatively affected by in any way–and you’re the feckless coward for questioning her.
Lindsey Graham, who never saw a conflict he didn’t want America to get involved in, calls this “a disaster in the making”:
You can tell where Ben Shapiro got his marching orders from, because he said basically the exact same thing:
You know Mitt had to chime in as well:
The Kurds, the Kurds, the Kurds.
We need to remain in Syria to ensure that our allies, the Kurds, aren’t attacked by Turkey–which is a NATO member country, meaning ostensibly our ally.
But wait. Why would our allies want to bomb our other allies?
If Turkey truly is our ally, then why wouldn’t we support its crusade against the Kurds? Or perhaps the Turks are not really our allies, yet nevertheless they’re in NATO?
Do these war shills truly grasp that in expressing concern about the Turks massacring the Kurds, they expose the rotten truth about our whole complex web of “allies,” which is that many of our ostensible allies–countries that we send billions of dollars in aid money to each year, and have pledged to go to war to support–are not actually our allies at all?
And if the Neocons are truly as concerned about the safety of the Kurds as they say they are, then why aren’t they itching to go to war with Turkey? The Neocons are real tough when it comes for agitating for easily-winnable wars, but when it comes to a formidable country like Turkey, where is all that bravado then?
If you don’t actually want to go to war with Turkey to save the Kurds, then I’m going to assume all your Concerned Rhetoric regarding the Kurds is B.S. Because the logical conclusion to all this talk about “saving the Kurds” is that we should go to war with Turkey because Turkey wants to kill the Kurds.
But I don’t hear anyone demanding we go to war with Turkey. Guess they don’t really care about the Kurds that much, huh?
It’s almost as if “MUH THE KURDS!!!!” is a flimsy excuse to justify a neverending military presence in Syria, one which benefits virtually no Americans outside of card-carrying members of the Military Industrial Complex and the Deep State.
Trevor Noah, a guy who claims to be Just A Comedian, took time to lecture his viewers on just how vitally important it is that we not abandon the Kurds, who were so incredibly crucial to our efforts to stamp out ISIS:
And CNN had corrupt former intelligence community boss James Clapper on to explain why Orange Man Bad and Forever War Good:
With cratering viewership and zero traces of credibility remaining, the sole reason now for CNN’s continued existence is to serve as a platform for ex-intelligence community operatives and officials to advance the Deep State’s agenda. CNN is the official home of the Deep State Coup (est. 2016).
Actually, scratch that: basically all of cable news is now a platform to allow the Deep State to continue its efforts to undo the result of the 2016 election:
Tune in to CNN to hear from former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper! Flip over to ABC to hear from former National Security Adviser Susan Rice. Virtually all of cable news is now Deep State propaganda. What an era we’re living in.
There was plenty more neoconnery, but by now I’m sure you get the idea: despite seemingly differing party affiliations, they all seem to be on the same side here. The Uniparty is real:
The Permanent Warfare Shills never actually get around to telling us just how long we should be staying to ensure all of our hard work doesn’t go to waste.
For example, if Trump says, “We should get out of Syria right now,” an honest opponent who actually has a legitimate counter-proposal would say, “No, we need to be there for another year or two, and then it will be OK to leave.”
But they don’t say that. They don’t have legitimate counter-proposals. They don’t have a proposed alternative withdrawal date. They’re not honest.
Instead, their response to Trump is, “NO! We can’t leave!”
So the choice is between leaving now and staying indefinitely, with no timetable or clearly defined (and realistically achievable) objectives.
They never get around to telling us what, exactly, it will take to make it “safe” for us to leave a given country that we’ve occupied. Kurt Schilchter explained it well:
In reality, our Sisyphean attempts to fix the Middle East will never, ever succeed. We’re over there trying to snuff out terrorist insurgencies which we probably funded at some point way back when. Why did we fund them way back when? Because at the time they were portrayed as “moderates” who could help us defeat some other terrorist insurgency–one which we probably funded even longer ago under the rationale that they, too, were “moderate rebels” who could help us take out some other dangerous group (that we probably at one point in time also funded.)
See the neverending futility of it all?
The only way to break the cycle is to pull out forever.
But we can’t do that! Because that would endanger our latest pet jihadis-in-training, who are suddenly the most important group of people on the planet the moment the subject of withdrawing from the Middle East comes up.
All of the sudden, the Washington elite set erupts in rage about the danger our withdrawal will put the Kurds in, so vitally important are the Kurds.
It’s funny: today they’re all shrieking about how much they love the Kurds, but I don’t recall any of them ever mentioning the importance of the Kurds prior to today.
If they cared about the Kurds as much as they’re now claiming they do, then why are they only now mentioning them?
“The only point that everyone here can agree on is that the interests of foreigners are way more important than our own interests. “It is immoral,” they are telling us, “to look out for own people. But it is virtuous to suffer for others–particularly for those who hate us.”
Hundreds of thousands of Americans die from drugs manufactured from our enemies abroad, Mexico and China. How do our leaders respond? They shrug. They couldn’t care less. They do nothing.
But then Turkey threatens to invade northern Syria–a place not one in a thousand Americans could find on a map–and guess what that is? It’s a historic crisis, and Lindsey Graham won’t stand for it!
What you’re looking at is a set of priorities so mindless, and so perverse, there is in fact no fixing them. In the end, the only solution may be the obvious one: relocate the Kurds to Youngstown, Ohio. Only then will Washington finally care.”
Immaculate. This guy is a national hero.
But he won’t get any credit for it because he’s going against the Establishment Current.
That’s how this whole thing works:
It’s noteworthy that Republican politicians are only considered “brave” and “courageous” when they agree with the media. Wow, how commendable it is to agree with the media, Hollywood, academia, Fortune 500, the Military Industrial Complex, and the intelligence community! So much at risk, so brave!
And then, of course, Republicans are called “cowards” who “won’t stand up to Trump” when they do something that is unanimiously condemned by the corporate media, the intelligence community, big business, Hollywood, the Military Industrial Complex and academia. Disagree with the media and they’ll slander your name with negative and outright dishonest coverage. They’ll even try to destroy your career and livelihood. And for the unluckiest of the bunch, the media will work with Congressional Democrats to attempt to frame you for sexual assault if you get on their bad side.
But sure: it’s the people who agree with the media who are the brave ones.
Do leftists realize there is literally nothing brave at all about being a leftist? You cannot possibly be taking a bold, brave stance when the entire Western power Establishment agrees with you.
Taking a courageous stance means–and stay with me here–actually going against the crowd. It means being in the minority. It could even mean losing friends, or even your job.
Don’t like it? Nobody said it was gonna be easy.
You can fit in and be on the same side as the Celebrities and Cable News Media, or you can speak the truth.
But not both.
At some point in the future, there will for every last one of us come a time for choosing: stand for what’s right, or fit in with the cool crowd. It sounds like a corny Dad Lecture from an 80s family sitcom, but it’s the truth.
I hope that readers of this site (and myself!) will ponder the matter and truly understand what all this entails. You will be hated, mocked, scorned and abandoned by fake friends for speaking the truth and standing for what’s right.
It’s not the easy path in life. In fact, your life and career path would be a lot easier if you simply decided it wasn’t worth it to stand up to the warmongers, the abortionists, the secularists, the multinational corporations, your radical college professors, the government bureaucrats, the social justice warriors, the globalists.
But it’s worth it. If this country is ever going to turn around and return to its former glory, it will be due to regular people like you and I making the conscious decision to stand for what’s right and speak the truth rather than fitting in.
It requires an acceptance of the hard truth that you will be forever at odds with–and hated by–Hollywood Celebrities, Blue Checks, People On TV, and in all likelihood some of your friends. People will talk shit about you behind your back and even outright refuse to associate with you, but just know that it’s not because you’re wrong–it’s because they’re wrong. Either they have chosen the cowardly path and prioritized fitting in with the crowd, or their heads have been filled with lies. It’s probably a bit of both.
But never lose heart. Even when it seems like you’re surrounded by brainwashed NPCs and the fight is futile, know that there are plenty of us out there on the right side. The Silent Majority–or, more accurately, the Silenced Majority–remains just that: the majority. Speak up and you’ll be surprised at how many people you know actually agree with you, but are too afraid to let it be known outside of the privacy of the voting booth.
We’re trying to retake a country that has been stolen from us by terrible people. We’re fighting for our posterity, so that they won’t have to live under the rule of these devious occupiers and usurpers.
The odds seem stacked against us, but we have the truth on our side, which means all the lies, propaganda, coercion and dirty tricks don’t stand a chance. All we need is the courage to tell the truth.
You didn’t think they’d just give up after their Russian Collusion story went down in flames, did you?
Of course not. Anti-Trump (or more accurately, Anti-You) bureaucrats in the federal government, particularly the intelligence community, are still persisting in their efforts to overturn the result of the 2016 election nearly three years after the fact.
The latest attempt, which I discussed last week, has to do with Trump and a phone conversation he had with the President of Ukraine in late July.
Well, the real, actual scandal has to do with Joe Biden’s dealings in Ukraine, but the Democrats are focused on Trump’s attempts to investigate and expose Joe Biden’s corrupt dealings in Ukraine, and so that, rather than Biden’s blatant corruption, is what everyone’s talking about.
In other words, the Democrats are trying to impeach Trump for making efforts to expose a crime and then elect the guy who committed the crime itself.
Yeah, I know.
As ridiculous and obviously made-up as this whole “story” may seem to you and I, the media’s obsessive coverage of it has helped it blow up to the point where a lot of “normies” out there are buzzing about “impeachment.” In my experiences over the past week or so, people whom I’ve never heard talk about politics prior to this were talking about “impeachment.” They have absolutely no idea why Trump is supposedly about to be run out of office, but they’re aware of the impeachment talk.
But while the conversation is mostly centered on Democrats’ calls for impeachment, it’s important to detail just how this fiasco came together, because it wasn’t an accident.
The media coverage, and Democrat Politicians’ public grandstanding, are only the end results of a deeper and very deliberate process that begins with the intelligence community, which remains vital in tee’ing up Democrat politicians’ calls for impeachment in the Trump Era. Just as with the intelligence community’s dirty tricks in concocting the Russiagate story.
Here’s the general outline: Intelligence community operatives feed phony stories about Trump to the media, the media amplifies the phony stories and dishonestly frames them to reflect as negatively as possible on Trump, and then the Democratic politicians take it from there.
The Ukraine story, for example, originated from a “whistleblower” in the CIA. A John Brennan acolyte, no doubt.
“In the complaint are all the now-familiar tell-tale signs of pseudo-exactness, in the form of Mueller-report-like footnotes and page references to liberal media outlets such as Bloomberg, ABC, and theNew York Times. There is the accustomed Steele-dossier scare bullet points. We see again Comey-memo-like disputes over classification status with capital lettersUNCLASSIFIEDstamped as headers and footers andTOP SECRET lined out.
Scary references abound to the supposed laws that the legal-eagle whistleblower believes were violated. In sum, there is all the usual evidence of an administrative-state bureaucrat, likely to be some third-tier Brennan or Clapper-like intelligence operative, who is canvassing disgruntled White House staffers, writing a report that imitates intelligence-department formats, combing the Internet, in “dream-team” and “all-star” footnote fashion, for scare quotes and anti-Trump stories, and then likely having it dressed up in legalese by an activist lawyer. Take all that away, and one is left with “I heard.”
Personally, I have no interest in dissecting and analyzing the “complaint” form because to do so would only lend it legitimacy and solidify the perception that it ought to be taken seriously. If you want to read more about the nitty gritty details of the complaint, by all means check out other honest and MAGA-aligned sites as I’m sure there’s no shortage of high-quality point-by-point analyses and rebuttals. But in my view it’s completely unnecessary to do so with a story that should be dismissed out of hand and not taken seriously at all.
Because what, exactly, are we talking about here? What’s the crux of the issue?
It’s that Trump wants to investigate Biden’s corruption in the Ukraine, and Democrats are desperate to prevent that from happening. Biden’s crackhead son was somehow making $50k a month from a Ukrainian oil company, and when a government prosecutor there tried to investigate the obvious corruption going on, Vice President Biden himself personally intervened and threatened to withhold $1 billion of aid money to Ukraine until the prosecutor going after his son’s company was fired–which he was.
Do not be distracted by these ridiculous claims about Trump’s “abuse of power.” Investigating real, actual crimes is not an abuse of power, even if the crimes were committed by Democrats.
Beyond that, though, the origin of this “whistleblower report” is all the information you need to know not to believe a single word of it.
After all, this story comes from the CIA, an organization which specializes in overthrowing governments, spreading disinformation and conducting horrible human experiments like MK-Ultra. What, you think they wouldn’t do that stuff to us? Of course they would. John Brennan has made it perfectly clear that the CIA despises not only Donald Trump but the people who made Trump president. You think the CIA has any loyalty at all to the American people? Not a chance.
I’ve said it before but it bears repeating: the entire intelligence community–not just the leadership but also the “rank and file” we’re constantly told is comprised of patriotic Americans who are sadly given a bad name by their corrupt superiors–is out of control. The IC–thousands of government bureaucrats whose names we’ve largely never heard and whom we never voted into power–decided nearly three years ago that America made the wrong choice in the 2016 election, and so they have been working tirelessly since then to overturn it.
When Chuck Schumer famously warned Trump in late 2016 that the IC has “six ways from Sunday to get back at you,” this Ukraine whistleblower story is exactly what he was talking about. As was the whole Russian Collusion Hoax we were caught up in for two-and-a-half years.
And so this is why in my view the simple fact that this “whistleblower” is from the CIA is more than enough reason to believe this whole story is fraudulent and malicious. Just scroll through former CIA Director John Brennan’s insane Twitter ravings and you’ll see why the CIA is never again to be trusted. That madman has wrecked the credibility of the whole department for a generation minimum. Comey has done the same for the FBI.
This “whistleblower” is the new Peter Strzok, or Christopher Steele, or Andrew McCabe–take your pick. The Ukraine “whistleblower” is the latest in a long line of formerly anonymous IC officials who are trying to overthrow the duly-elected President. When the identity of this “whistleblower” is finally revealed, his name will go down along with all the rest as another Deep State co-conspirator.
But here’s the best part of it all, the smoking gun which confims all this to be a giant scam: just last month, the intelligence community changed the rules regarding whistleblowers, removing the requirement that they have first-hand witnessing of wrongdoing. Sean Davis of The Federalist just reported this on Friday, and its significance can’t be overstated:
“Between May 2018 and August 2019, the intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings. This raises questions about the intelligence community’s behavior regarding the August submission of a whistleblower complaint against President Donald Trump. The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.
The brand new version of the whistleblower complaint form, which was not made public until after the transcript of Trump’s July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and the complaint addressed to Congress were made public, eliminates the first-hand knowledge requirement and allows employees to file whistleblower complaints even if they have zero direct knowledge of underlying evidence and only “heard about [wrongdoing] from others.”
And then, lo and behold, a whistleblower without first-hand evidence, brings this completely fake Ukraine story to light.
Why suddenly change the rules so that anyone in government who so much as heads a rumor can be a “whistleblower” now, if not to make it easier to fabricate stories like this?
This anonymous CIA operative now considered a “whistleblower” wouldn’t have been able to qualify for that title a few months ago.
Seems awfully convenient. But of course the media will try to keep this quiet. The whistleblower’s credibility isn’t supposed to be the story, damnit!
As I wrote last week about the Ukraine story, this isn’t only the latest in a long line of desperate, impulsive attempts to Get The Orange Man–there’s more to it than that. A major part of it is ass-covering for Joe Biden: the political establishment must not allow Trump to investigate Biden’s crimes in Ukraine.