NY Times Tells Readers To Stop Being Pussies About Covid

First and foremost, we must normalize the use of the word “pussy.” It is so effective and useful.

You should be allowed to use the word “pussy” on TV to describe a person’s behavior. If a person’s being a pussy, or if a bunch of people are being pussies, then you should be able to call them pussies.

Words like “coward,” “wimp,” and “baby” simply do not cut it. We’re not allowed to call people the other f-word anymore, so we have to be able to call people pussies.

Okay, with that off my chest, let’s move on to this surprising editorial that was seen in the New York Times. It was written by the paper’s entire editorial board, which is kind of a rare thing:

You can also find the article online here, and it’s not behind a paywall.

Nearly two years into the pandemic, it is clear that the coronavirus is not going to disappear anytime soon. Surges will happen, variants of concern will pop up and mitigation strategies will need to evolve. Yet too many Americans are still paralyzed with doubt and fear over each new uncertainty, as trust in government and other institutions to manage the virus ranges from shaky to nonexistent.

Translation: stop being pussies.

It is past time to ask ourselves, as another Covid winter begins, if we have to keep living like this: Anxious over the unknown, worried about large indoor gatherings, tense at every bit of virus news and frustrated and at times contemptuous of fellow Americans who have a dramatically different sense of acceptable risk.

Translation: stop being pussies.

Because progress has been made this year. Vaccines that protect against serious illness and death are taking ever greater hold in the United States and are beginning to make their way to the world’s most vulnerable regions; drugs that work against the virus are coming through the pipeline; and, despite a recent uptick in cases, schools and businesses remain open.

Americans should pause a moment and let this progress sink in. The virus will continue to surprise us, and even when scientists manage to predict its worst turns, officials will not necessarily be able to prevent those turns from coming. But what if leaders at all levels made choices so that we don’t have to exhaust ourselves with stress over every curve ball? To help us all live more normally with this virus, rather than let it control us?

That would be great! But what’s in it for our elected leaders? How would that help them amass ever more power?

That exhaustion has characterized so much of the past two years, as parents, teachers, frontline workers and small business owners wade through what can feel like an unending morass. Is it safe to celebrate the holidays? Will schools shut down again? When will young children finally be eligible for vaccines? And why are we still having to ask ourselves these questions?

It’s too soon to say how long the current surge will last, or how it might be shaped by the Omicron variant. But even amid that uncertainty, we should push for a more pragmatic path from our decision makers that will help us protect ourselves and live more normal lives, even as the virus continues to evolve.

They’re basically saying it’s time to start ignoring Covid; it’s time to end the fear porn.

Of course, the NYT has been one of the biggest pushers of fear porn over the past two years, but if they’re going to change their position, that is great news nonetheless.

The media is the key. So many people in this country do and think exactly what the media tells them. This is a big deal. The Karens and Covidiots will listen to the New York Times and start changing their behavior. “Well, if the New York Times says I should stop being such a gigantic pussy about Covid, then maybe I should.”

Here’s the part where they start making suggestions. I’m a little worried about this part:

Make coronavirus testing as fast, easy and inexpensive as possible.Ubiquitous testing could help schools stay open and make gatherings of every kind safer. With more than 1,000 people still dying of Covid-19 every day in the United States, it’s past time to make this basic tool as readily available as it is in other countries like South Korea or Britain. President Biden’s latest plan — which would require people with private health insurance to submit a claim for reimbursement and people without insurance or private coverage to hunt down free tests at community health centers — does not do nearly enough to achieve that goal. Instead, the administration should do what other countries have done, and what the United States did so successfully with vaccines: Work directly with companies to get more tests approved and on the market quickly, use advanced purchasing agreements to ensure a steady supply of those tests and create federal subsidies for clinics and pharmacies to provide them free or very cheap to consumers who want them.

Okay, I guess that’s fine. So far, so good.

Aim to make the 2021-2022 school year the last dominated by Covid. The Biden administration should have enough testing free and available — and push to have a critical mass of students vaccinated — by September.

Oh boy. Here we go. They’re coming after your kids. They want to inject your kids with Big Pharma’s vaccine.

You knew it was coming.

I guess it’s good that they didn’t use the word “mandate,” or “require.”

Quarantine and isolation policies will also need an upgrade. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention still advises people to isolate for 10 days after experiencing symptoms or testing positive, regardless of their vaccination status. Many schools still require anyone who’s been in contact with an infected person to quarantine for several days, at least. As breakthrough infections become more common, even among those who have received their boosters, it makes sense to allow workers and students to avoid confinement, or test their way out of it much more quickly.

Okay, that’s cool with me. People should not have to mandatory quarantine for 10 days if they’re no longer symptomatic and they’re testing negative. This is common-sense.

Masking in schools is uniquely challenging. No one wants to force young children to wear masks for several hours a day indefinitely, but it would also be foolish to abandon the practice completely. A happy medium may be to require masks for students during surges or when new variants of concern are detected and vaccine escape is still being measured. The rest of the time, evidence so far suggests the requirement could be lifted. Nevada has successfully tied its school masking mandates to community transmission rates, and experts say it’s worth trying the same in other states.

None of this is based on science at all (given that children are at almost no risk and that Covid primarily threatens the elderly). Kids don’t need to wear masks. If a Karen/Covidiot parent wants their kid to wear a mask in school, then the kid should wear a mask in school. If the parents don’t want their kids masked, that should be allowed, too.

Because if masks actually work, then what’s the issue here?

We are masking an entire new generation of kids, and I don’t like it. I feel bad for these kids. This is scarring them for life. We’re going to raise a generation of pussies.

Prepare for surges. No scientist or health official has managed to predict, or even explain after the fact, what constellation of forces causes the pandemic to ebb and flow around the globe the way it does. But it’s clear that there will continue to be periods of substantial uptick in coronavirus cases, and there should be sensible, significantly better policies in place for dealing with them.

Well, Alex Berenson’s seasonal theory appears pretty sound (the virus spreads during seasons when people spend more time indoors). And it’s probably the case the vaccines are causing the virus to mutate.

Of course, all the DEBUNKERS claim to have DEBUNKED the idea that vaccines cause variants, back in February NPR interviewed a scientist who said pretty clearly that Vaccines Could Drive the Evolution of More Covid-19 Mutants (that, of course, was before Delta variant and the subsequent 180 in Scientific™ consensus).

But sure, No One Knows Why Covid Ebbs And Flows And Mutates.

Country-specific travel bans are futile: By the time a variant like Omicron is detected in one country, it’s already spread halfway around the globe. Penalizing countries that report new variants — as South Africa did, with Omicron — will only discourage them from sharing that kind of information in the future. Blanket policies — like requiring everyone entering the United States to test negative or possibly quarantine — would be tougher and more expensive to carry out.

It would also have a better chance of actually working. If federal officials are serious about using border control to slow the spread of dangerous pathogens, they will need to establish clear, enforceable test and quarantine protocols, not to mention adequate quarantine facilities, at ports of entry.

I agree with the Times on this. Banning travel from one country or a select number of countries is pointless. The only way travel bans would’ve worked is if we had totally banned all international travel to and from the United States back in like early January 2020. But that’s not feasible either, obviously.

Do away with Covid theater. The coronavirus is airborne, and any money spent on deep cleaning would be better put toward improved building ventilation. But instead of upgrading their HVAC systems, too many schools and businesses are still relying on things that won’t work nearly as well. The plastic barriers that have become common in restaurants, nail salons and offices, for example, can actually impede airflow and exacerbate viral spread. Lawmakers and local officials should make a concerted effort to change that. Not only would improved ventilation help thwart coronavirus, but it would also curb the spread of other airborne pathogens, including the flu and those that cause the common cold.

Now we’re talking. I wonder if anyone at the New York Times has ever considered applying this same logic to masks. Probably not.

Unfortunately this is where things go off the rails:

Keep going on vaccines. Public health powers were once a common feature of American life. When cholera and yellow fever routinely stalked the nation’s major cities, citizens accepted and expected their health departments to issue mandates, quarantine orders and travel restrictions. It’s crucial for officials to shore up those powers now, because scientists say that epidemics and pandemics will become only more common in the years ahead. Mr. Biden’s vaccine mandates have been bold and effective — and administration officials should stay the course no matter how many legal battles they encounter.

What a disgusting and evil paragraph. Covid is not cholera or yellow fever.

According to the cholera Wikipedia page: “The risk of death among those affected is usually less than 5% but may be as high as 50%.” In other words, significantly more deadly than Covid.

According to the yellow fever Wikipedia page:

Yellow fever begins after an incubation period of three to six days.[12] Most cases cause only a mild infection with fever, headache, chills, back pain, fatigue, loss of appetite, muscle pain, nausea, and vomiting.[13] In these cases, the infection lasts only three to six days.[14]

But in 15% of cases, people enter a second, toxic phase of the disease characterized by recurring fever, this time accompanied by jaundice due to liver damage, as well as abdominal pain.[15] Bleeding in the mouth, nose, the eyes, and the gastrointestinal tract cause vomit containing blood, hence the Spanish name for yellow fever, vómito negro (“black vomit”).[16] There may also be kidney failure, hiccups, and delirium.[17][18]

Among those who develop jaundice, the fatality rate is 20 to 50%, while the overall fatality rate is about 3 to 7.5%.[19] Severe cases may have a mortality greater than 50%

In other words, yellow fever is also significantly more deadly than Covid.

This is an awful and dishonest false equivalence made by the NYT.

And also, what the hell is this sentence: “Mr. Biden’s vaccine mandates have been bold and effective — and administration officials should stay the course no matter how many legal battles they encounter.”

Just push ahead with the mandates even if they’re illegal? When the courts say you’re being too tyrannical, the proper response is to be even more tyrannical? Despicable. Absolutely vile.

The New York Times just destroyed all the credibility they had built up over the first 85% of this article.

In the meantime, government officials and private businesses would do well to stand firm on some basics: Covid vaccines should be required for public employees and in large companies, for health care workers, in schools (for staff as well as students for whom the shots are authorized) and for a range of indoor activities including dining in restaurants and attending concerts. Masks should be worn again in indoor public settings anytime transmission rates are high, vaccination rates are low or new variants of concern are circulating.

How about: no, fuck you, burn in hell, suck a bag of dicks, you rotten fascist cunts.

Even as we remain vigilant against the coronavirus, we need not remain in a state of paralyzing hypervigilance. Returning to the sound basics of public health, continuing the progress of medical innovation and ratcheting back the societal anxiety around the pandemic could make us all a lot healthier.

How does advocating a policy of “get vaccinated or else you can’t have a job, go to a restaurant or get an education” not constitute “paralyzing hypervigilance”?

I’m sorry but if you favor vaccine mandates for Covid, you are evil. You are the enemy of all that is good. I don’t care how much else I agree with you on, if you support vaccine mandates for Covid, you are the enemy.

I thought the New York Times was finally taking a stand for sanity here.

Guess not.

Leave a Reply