Bayer Executive: mRNA Shots are “Gene Therapy” Marketed to the Public as Vaccines

I missed this story, it’s from over a month ago, but I just saw it now:

BERLIN (LifeSiteNews) – The president of Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division told international “experts” during a globalist health conference that the mRNA COVID-19 shots are indeed “cell and gene therapy” marketed as “vaccines” to be palatable to the public.

Stefan Oelrich, president of Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division, made these comments at this year’s World Health Summit, which took place in Berlin from October 24-26 and hosted 6,000 people from 120 countries. Oelrich told his fellow international “experts” from academia, politics, and the private sector that the novel mRNA COVID “vaccines” are actually “cell and gene therapy” that would have otherwise been rejected by the public if not for a “pandemic” and favorable marketing.

My first thought was, whoa, why is this guy blowing the lid on the whole operation?

Well, he’s not. He’s proud of this, actually:

“We are really taking that leap [to drive innovation] – us as a company, Bayer – in cell and gene therapies … ultimately the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy. I always like to say: if we had surveyed two years ago in the public – ‘would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?’ – we probably would have had a 95% refusal rate,” stated Oelrich.

“Our successes over these 18 months [the duration of the COVID ‘pandemic’] should embolden us to fully focus much more closely on access, innovation and collaboration to unleash health for all, especially as we enter, on top of everything else that is happening, a new era of science – a lot of people talk about the Bio Revolution in this context,” continued the businessman.

This is scary talk. This is evil genius talk.

“Health for all”–what does that mean? I’m sure Big Pharma has a very different concept of “health for all” than you and I do.

This “new era of science” he speaks of; I don’t much care for that kind of talk, either.

This is Bond villain talk.

According to the McKinsey Global Institute, the “Bio Revolution” is “a confluence of advances in biological science and accelerating development of computing, automation, and artificial intelligence [that] is fueling a new wave of innovation. This Bio Revolution could have significant impact on economies and our lives, from health and agriculture to consumer goods, and energy and materials.”

Did anyone vote on this stuff? Were we, the voters, ever asked if we were in favor of this “Bio Revolution”? I don’t recall it ever being on the ballot.

And I would even say that if this Vaccine™ were marketed from the beginning as “cell therapy” or “gene therapy,” I doubt it would have anywhere close to the same level of public acceptance as it has had–even in the midst of the Covid pandemic and media-caused hysteria.

Sure, a lot of idiots would’ve still gladly lined up and taken it, but there’s no way it would’ve had the same acceptance rate if it were marketed as “gene therapy” instead of a regular old vaccine.

I don’t know what gene therapy is. It might be a good thing in the grand scheme of things. It might end up being a medical technology that provides immense benefits to mankind over the long run.

But I also know that it’s a relatively new technology, only invented about 30-40 years ago tops. And why do we need gene therapy to combat a simple respiratory virus?

As Stefan Oelrich basically said, we really don’t. The Covid pandemic was the excuse to start pushing gene therapy on people.

They scared people in order to trick them into taking something that they otherwise wouldn’t have taken.

Even if these gene therapy vaccines were perfectly innocuous and there were no nefarious ulterior motives behind them, the fact that the elites had to use mass psychological abuse and, let’s call a spade a spade here, brainwashing, in order to get people to take them–it’s immoral.

Even if the vaccines are an unambiguous good for mankind, using dishonest means to sell them to people taints the whole process.

It means we should be skeptical of them, and distrust the people who produce them.

Leave a Reply