Dirty Dems

The 2020 Election Was Stolen. The Only Question is Whether Trump Can Prove It

I found a great article in the Spectator, usually a pretty squishy outlet, about the laundry list of “puzzling” occurences in the 2020 election:

We are told that Biden won more votes nationally than any presidential candidate in history. But he won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008. Yet, Biden somehow outdid Obama in total votes.

Outdid him by almost 11 million votes.

He also supposedly received nearly 15 million more votes than Hillary did in 2016.

Readers of this site know I go to great efforts to try to present the opposing side’s arguments as honestly and accurately as possible. I prefer spirited and challenging debate to knocking down flimsy strawmen.

I go out of my way to expose myself to Democrat talking points and arguments, because how can we know our side is right if we don’t even really know what the other side is truly saying?

But even the left’s strongest arguments on why it’s perfectly believable that Joe Biden got 80 million votes do not pass the smell test. Suburban backlash to Trump? Not that much. Trump voter regret? If that’s the case then why did Trump get 10 million more votes than he got in 2016?

Only in media world could they believe that Trump was such a mortal threat to mankind that his unique awfulness compelled 15 million people who didn’t vote against him in 2016 to vote against him in 2020. In pushing these narratives that anti-Trump energy is far stronger in 2020 than it was in 2016, the media acts like these people didn’t know who Trump was in 2016. Do these media “journalists” not remember 2016? They were already at DEFCON-1 over Trump in 2016. They could not have been much more alarmist about him and biased against him than they were in 2016. They were already calling him a white supremacist and Literally Hitler and a mortal threat to mankind in 2016. They have had the hyperbole and hysteria over Trump cranked to 11 since basically the day he announced he was running for President.

For someone to believe that the anti-Trump movement only began in the past year or so, they’d have to believe that the media treated Trump in 2016 basically the same as it treated Mitt Romney and John McCain–which is to say, badly and unfairly, but merely due to partisan differences, and not because he was a Literal Genocidal Megalomaniac. But that’s not true at all: the media was far more hysterical about Trump in 2016 than they were Romney and McCain. And that’s no small feat.

The media’s anti-Trump hysteria was already pretty much maxed-out in 2016. If the media’s coverage of him in the 2016 campaign didn’t make you hate him, it’s likely that nothing since then really would or could. There are very, very few people who supported Trump in 2016 but turned on him in 2020. You can’t un-redpill someone.

Voting for Trump in 2016 was basically a last resort for tens of millions of Americans. It was an acknowledgement that the whole system in this country was deeply, overwhelmingly, thoroughly and hopelessly corrupt beyond all recognition, and that the only way to fix it would be to elect a complete outsider who would take a wrecking ball to the whole thing.

People who voted for Trump in 2016 were basically saying, “Look, I’m at the end of my rope here. We’ve gone from Democrat to Republican back to Democrat again and nothing ever changes, nothing ever gets better. The political class clearly could not possibly give any less of a fuck about us regular Americans. We have been sold-out and left behind. We have no voice. The system is completely broken and needs to be completely burned to the ground.”

You don’t just do a complete 180 on that position, even over a span of four years. Again, one cannot be un-redpilled. Once your eyes have been opened to the way things truly are in this country–the corruption, the cronyism, the fakeness of politics; the incestuousness of Washington, the media and all our major power centers; the complete lack of accountability for the elites–you cannot just go back to being blissfully unaware of it all and thinking things don’t need to change.

When you truly understand why someone would vote for Trump in 2016, it just doesn’t make sense that any meaningful number of 2016 Trump voters would say in 2020, “You know what? I’m voting for Biden. What we really need right now is the Establishment back in power. We need a man who’s been in Washington for 50 years.”

I’m not denying that there were some people out there who voted for Trump in 2016 but voted Biden in 2020. There are certainly a number of those people out there. But I’m confident it was a very small number, and that it was completely dwarfed by the number of people who got red-pilled after Trump became President. I would be willing to bet that the number of people who weren’t Trump supporters in 2016 but voted for him in 2020 is far, far greater than the number of people who voted for Trump in 2016 but abandoned him in 2020.

Again, Trump got 10 million more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016. That, to me, is way more believable than Joe Biden getting 15 million more votes than HIllary Clinton got in 2016.

You can say the media brainwashed a lot of people to hate Trump. And that’s true. But those people were already brainwashed in 2016. It did not happen after the 2016 election.

And, once again, Trump got 10 million more votes than he did in 2016.

You mean to tell me that 15 million people who sat out 2016–who on election day four years ago thought to themselves, “Yeah, I can’t really be bothered to vote”–were somehow motivated by Trump’s sheer Hitler-ness and awfulness and Fascist-ness to say, “I must vote this man out of office if it’s the last thing I do”?

I just don’t buy it.

At a time when barely 4 in 10 Americans say they trust the media, you mean to tell me the media was able to brainwash 15 million low-engagement voters to become rabid Trump haters in just four years?

I mean, there is a case to be made for this if you go by the ratings between 2016-2020:

But if your argument is that CNN and MSNBC have seen their primetime ratings more than double since 2016, the same can be said about Fox News (at least prior to Election Night, when Fox basically doused itself in gasoline and set itself on fire by pissing off its core audience). Throughout 2020, Fox was pulling in a larger primetime audience than both CNN and MSNBC combined. For the whole month of October in the run-up to the election Tucker Carlson was routinely pulling in over 5 million viewers a night. Those numbers are unheard of. He broke cable news records and became the highest-rated cable news show ever.

If CNN and MSNBC really did brainwash millions of people into hating Trump, then over the past four years we would expect to see their ratings to have shot higher while Fox’s ratings cratered.

If you didn’t already believe Trump was a mortal threat to mankind before the 2016 election, it’s unlikely you’d come to believe that since he took office. Most of the media’s negative coverage of him during his first term centered on the completely discredited Russian Collusion nonsense, and then the phony impeachment that most people knew was a political stunt.

Could Covid have turned people against Trump? I guess it’s possible, but as I wrote yesterday, there’s little real world evidence of and impact from Covid. Most Americans probably don’t even know a single person that has been hospitalized due to Covid, much less died from it. If anything, the Average American is more pissed about the lockdowns, which have had far more of an impact on his life than the virus itself has had. These people would be more likely to support Trump, not Biden, as Trump was the candidate against the lockdowns. The only people who voted based on Covid Fear are the people who sit in front of the TV all day mainlining fear porn and obsessing over the fake Covid death numbers–which is to say, brainwashed libs who have hated Trump since 2015.

George Floyd and BLM? I doubt that, too. There were plenty of race riots and civil unrest during Obama’s second term, and the end result of that was Trump winning. Plus, only the hardest-core of the hardcore Trump haters could do the mental gymnastics necessary to convince themselves that Donald Trump is the reason black people are killed by the police. That has been going on for decades now. Nobody in their right mind believes it’s Trump’s fault that George Floyd and Breonna Taylor were killed by the police.

And, if anything, the rioting and chaos turned more people into Trump supporters and against the Democrats.

I’m just not seeing how this surge of Biden support materialized. Even if we grant that Covid and George Floyd caused a lot of it, the opposite sides of those issues (anti-lockdowns and anti-riots) probably created as many Trump supporters as they created Biden supporters.

There’s just nothing that has happened over the past 4 years that you can point to and convince me that it was the reason Biden got 15 million more votes than Hillary did in 2016.

And all the things libs could point to have had equal (or greater) opposite reactions that pushed people to Trump:

  • Fear of Covid pushing people towards Biden? Hatred of the lockdowns pushes others to Trump.
  • Social unrest in the name of racial equality pushes people to Biden? Desire for law and order pushes others to Trump.
  • Media brainwashing turns people in to Trump haters? Observing blatant and obvious media bias and lying turns others into Trump supporters.
  • Covid-induced economic recession turns people against Trump? Others realize it wasn’t a Covid-caused recession but instead a lockdown-caused recession, and they resolve to vote against the party of the lockdowns.

See? Just about anything they can point to as an explanation for why Trump lost support, there’s another side of the coin that caused Trump to gain support.

Now, the final argument for why Biden’s 80 million vote total is legit is one we haven’t covered in this post yet: mass mail-in voting caused a massive spike in voter turnout.

The one argument I can actually believe is that Biden’s 15 million vote surge over Hillary came from low-engagement voters who normally don’t turn out to vote in normal election years, but given the ease and convenience of mail-in ballots enabling them to vote without even leaving the house, they voted this year and broke heavily for Biden.

But this also undermines the idea that Biden won support based on the issues. Low-engagement voters don’t really know or care about the issues. It’s why they don’t vote in the first place: they’re not politically engaged. I’m not going to say the statements “Biden won based off the issues,” and “Biden won because a lot of low-engagement voters voted this year due to the ease and convenience of mail-in balloting” are completely mutually exclusive, but they’re close to it.

Did these people vote because of the issues, or because they just happened to get a ballot in the mail which made voting easy and convenient? In my view it’s one or the other. If you can only be bothered to vote when it doesn’t require any real effort on your part, then you don’t really care about the issues all that much, do you? If you really did care about the issues, then nothing would stop you from voting.

So basically the argument is that Biden got 15 million more votes than Hillary did due to an unprecedented surge of the least politically engaged and low-motivation voters in the country, enabled by mass mail-in voting–which also happens to be the method of voting most vulnerable to vote fraud, but I’m sure that’s just a coincidence.


The one point I keep going back to is this: they say that Trump lost because of a tidal wave of anti-Trump outrage.

But if that’s the case, then how did he get 10 million more votes than he got in 2016?

This election was stolen. The only question is whether Trump can prove it.

Michigan Dem Doxxes Children of GOP Wayne County Board of Elections Canvasser

And of course, he plays the victim the whole time:

MICHIGAN.🚨 – WATCH as Democrat State Rep-Elect Abraham Aiyash threatens the children of Wayne County Board of Canvassers member Monica Palmer.

“I want you to think about what this means for your kids, who probably go to [redacted]”…


H/T @IWV & @correctthemedia.⬅️Both great follows!

Originally tweeted by Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) on November 18, 2020.

“A history of racism.”

“Continues to perpetuate the racist history of this country.”

This smug, Fake Smart fascist hits all the woke buzzwords. This is the way dumb 20-year-old Poli Sci majors talk.

Except he’s not just some anonymous college student. He’s an elected politician in the state of Michigan. He has power in this country.

But the worst part is when he casually mentions the school the GOP Wayne County Elections Canvasser’s children attend.

What reason could he have for doing this other than to give marching orders to Antifa & BLM?

This all happened because the Wayne County Board of canvassers initially refused to certify the county’s election results last night:

Then, three hours later, they reversed course:

Wonder if it could’ve had anything to do with certain members of the Board of Canvassers being publicly singled out and had their children potentially exposed to danger.

You know how I always say the Democratic Party is not a political organization but instead a massive organized crime syndicate? This is what I’m talking about. They are straight up mobsters.

This election is so legitimate and free of fraud that if you don’t just shut up and certify the results immediately then we’re coming after your kids.

And that’s how the Democrats ushered in a Return To Civility in America.

Fmr. IL Dem Governor Rod Blagojevich WHen Asked If Dems are Stealing Votes in Philly: “Is the Pope Catholic?”

If anyone would know about Big City Dems stealing elections, it’s this guy:

Partial transcript via Breitbart:

Blagojevich told Newsmax TV’s “John Bachman Now” that Democratic stronghold cities changing vote counts overnight, and controlling polling places is a “time-honored tradition.” He went on to say that Democrats “stealing the presidency” is “incredibly dangerous to our democracy.”

“If the question is are the Democrats stealing votes in Philadelphia, my answer is, ‘Is the Pope Catholic?’ It’s a time-honored tradition,” Blagojevich emphasized. “Big Democrat-controlled cities like Chicago, my hometown, Philadelphia, to do precisely what they’re doing now I’ve never seen such a magnitude because this I think is an indication of just how widespread it is, how deep it is. And I don’t think it’s just confined to Philadelphia. My instincts, again coming out of Chicago Democratic politics, my instincts tell me it’s going on in Atlanta, it’s going on in Detroit, it’s going on in Milwaukee, it’s going on in Las Vegas. It’s like what Justice Powell said about pornography: You can’t define it, but you know when you see it. And coming out of the Democratic Chicago political establishment, I know how they operate. They control polling places, they stop votes when their candidate’s behind, and then in the wee hours of the morning, in the dark of night, the stealing starts.”

He continued, “And we’ve seen that in big numbers, unprecedented numbers in this election in Michigan and Philadelphia. It’s outrageous, and the fact that they’re doing it with impunity they’re doing it with is because the media is simply looking the other way because they have their corrupt mainstream media that’s not interested in protecting our Constitution or the rule of law. They just want to beat Donald Trump at all costs, and they’re not just stealing from Donald Trump. It’s worse than that. They’re stealing from us — the American people.”

Yes, Blago might be biased because Trump recently pardoned him and got him out of prison six years early. He had been serving a 14-year sentence that began in 2012 after being convicted of corruption for trying to sell-off Barack Obama’s former Senate seat after Obama won the Presidency in 2008. (I’m sure Obama had nothing to do with that.)

So take Blago’s comments for what you will. Still, something tells me he knows a thing or two about how “vote counting” works in big cities like Chicago. This man was twice elected governor of Illinois and is undoubtedly highly familiar with urban machine politics.

AG William Barr Green-Lights Investigation of “substantial Allegations” of Voting Irregularities

Here we go:

Let’s hope this isn’t another Durham nothingburger. I feel like federal investigations are now more often federal cover-ups, so I’m not getting my hopes up here.

Ace of Spades explains why he’s bearish on the Barr investigation. It all hinges on the term “substantial”:

I fear this is misleading, and that Barr is tanking any possible investigation.

The Supreme Court ruled that the desegregation challenged in Brown vs. Board of Ed. must end “with all deliberate speed.” The lawyers challenging segration were initially thrilled — it sounded like the court was ordering desgregation at maximum speed. But then they looked up “deliberate” — which of course means “considered, careful, slow.” So what at first glance looked like a mandate to desegregate immediately actually meant “when caution and consideration permit.”

An order to investiage “substantial allegations” of voter fraud may sound bad-ass. But what is it really saying? Is it saying “investigate any allegation”?

No. It’s saying to only investigate the “substantial” allegations — which I take to mean the allegations which already, without any investigation, have substantial evidence to support them, and/or which are “substantial” in the sense that the allegation, if proven, would reverse the race. On its own.

So I see “substantial” as being a limitation on lawyers’ mandate to investigate. A double limitation — a Democrat DOJ lawyer (and almost all of the career attorneys are in fact Democrats) as far as both evidence already, pre-investigation, that exists, and as far as the allegations’ ability to overturn the election in and of itself, not considered in combination with other allegations.

So my fear is that Barr wrote a directive that will be used by Democrat DOJ lawyers to reject the need for any investigation into almost any — or maybe just any — allegation. They’ll say “Nope, can’t investigate this one, not a ‘substantial’ amount of evidence for it at the moment.”

Now, it’s up to investigators to find such evidence, but here it’s an out to not bother looking in the first place.

If I had ordered this — and if I wanted a real investigation — I might have said, “all plausible, nontrivial allegations of voter fraud.” I would limit the limitation — not expand the limitation.

I hope I’m wrong.

But I don’t think I am. I think this is quite deliberate, and the wording was selected to give the impression of a full investigation, while actually being crafted to insure almost no investigation at all.

I hope Ace is wrong. But I just have no faith whatsoever in the federal government. I think they’ve been planning on getting rid of Trump for the past 4 years, and now they are so close they can taste it. They’re going to power ahead. Barr will not come to our rescue.

We Need To Fix Our Voting System

As the votes continue being “counted” and Biden keeps getting the vast majority of them, it’s clear that this thing is headed for a recount and probably a final decision by the Supreme Court.

If you’re reading this site I’m sure you probably suspect there is some funny business going on in Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta, Milwaukee and Las Vegas. I’ve discussed this at length in prior posts, but in the past couple of days or so it has come out that lots of dead people voted in the major swing states.

Austin Fletcher, a pro-Trump YouTuber who goes by the name Fleccas, found numerous instances of dead people voting in Michigan:

William Bradley was born in 1902 and died in 1984. And yet he is registered to vote in Wayne County Michigan, applied for an absentee ballot in September 2020, and his vote was received on October 2, 2020. If you want to see the images and try it yourself, go to the link above the image and visit Fleccas’ Twitter page.

Fleccas put out a whole video going into the dead voters he was able to find:

Who knows how many dead people voted in the 2020 election?

The Public Interest Legal Foundation conducted a study this year and found that there are 349,773 dead people still on voter rolls nationwide. It’s unclear at this point how many have had ballots cast in their name in this election, but that number is large enough to swing this election.

How is this even possible in an advanced country in the information age? It has to be deliberate.

But dead voters are not the only thing that has been questionable about this election. There are a lot of results (thus far) that don’t make sense:

  • Early this morning, Biden pulled ahead in Georgia. He might also pull ahead in North Carolina, but we won’t know until the 12th because for some reason the state wants to wait until then to resume counting. I’m sure Biden will take the state somehow. However, Georgia and North Carolina going blue while Florida goes red just defies belief. There is no way Florida is redder than Georgia and North Carolina.
  • In 2012, Romney won Georgia and North Carolina while Obama won Florida. In 2008, Obama won Florida and North Carolina but lost Georgia to McCain. Bush carried all three states in both his elections, although Florida in 2000 was heavily disputed. And that just goes to my point: Georgia and NC were solidly for Bush, but Florida was decided by a razor-thin margin. In no election since 1992 has Florida ever been redder than either Georgia or North Carolina. 2020 is the first time that’s happened since 1992. I’m not saying it’s impossible for it to happen, but it’s odd and should raise some concerns.
  • In a similar vein, the Rust Belt states tend to vote together, too. It’s strange that Ohio, Indiana and Iowa would be solidly for Trump but Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania wouldn’t be. In 2016, PA/OH/MI/WI/IN/IA all voted Trump. In 2012, Obama won all of them but Indiana. In 2008, Obama won all six states. In 2004, Bush won Iowa, Ohio and Indiana but lost PA/MI/WI. In 2000 it was almost the same result except Iowa went for Gore. In 1996 and 1992, Clinton won all but Indiana. In 1988, Bush won all but Iowa and Wisconsin. Reagan swept all six states in both 1984 and 1980. So these states don’t always vote together in lockstep (Indiana is generally redder than the rest), but they are usually pretty close to one another in terms of voting trend.
  • Ohio and Pennsylvania have voted the same in the past three elections. Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin have voted the same in the past seven elections.
  • I could see the upper Midwest states flipping if Trump wasn’t on the ballot, but for them to change this radically between Trump’s first and second election is strange. Generally when a candidate wins the Presidency for the first time, he tends to hold on to most of the states he won. Trump is now projected to lose 6 states that he carried in 2016: PA, WI, MI, GA, NC, AZ. That’s irregular. Obama only lost two states between 2008 and 2012: Indiana and North Carolina. Bush lost one (NH) and gained 2 (IA, NM) between 2000 and 2004. Clinton lost CO, MT and GA from 1992 to 1996, while gaining FL and AZ. 6 state flips in a reelection fight is odd.
  • It’s not unprecedented, however. Bush Sr. lost lots of states between 1988 and 1992, although much of that had to do with Ross Perot being in the race. That’s why 1992 and 1996 are hard to use as comparisons. The point is, usually when a candidate wins, his coalition remains largely intact when it comes time for reelection. The number of flips we’re seeing in 2020 is not normal.
  • This is the first election since 1960 where the winner lost both Florida and Ohio. Florida and Ohio are bellwether states, meaning they almost always vote with the winner of the election overall. This is because they’re diverse states that reflect the overall makeup of the nation pretty well. Those two states, more than any others, are like microcosms of the whole nation. To put it another way, if you looked at the results of every election dating to 1960 and only knew the results of Florida and Ohio, you’d be able to reliably guess the winner for nearly every election. But this year is an exception.
  • The last time a candidate won the White House and lost Florida was Clinton in 1992, but Bush only won it by less than 2%. Plus Perot won nearly 20% of the vote there so that skewed things. Otherwise, you’d have to go all the way back to 1960 to find an election in which the winning candidate failed to carry both Florida and Ohio (and as we went over the other day, the 1960 was likely swung to Kennedy by way of fraud.) I’m not saying it’s impossible for a candidate to win without either Florida or Ohio, but it is very unusual.

Then we have the bellwether counties. Wikipedia has a list of them. Let’s take a look at how they shook out in 2020:

  • Biden will become the first president since 1952 to win despite losing Vigo County, Indiana, which is considered one of the most reliable bellwether counties in the nation. It had voted with the winner of the election all but twice since 1888, and in 15 straight elections. The only two times it missed were 1908 and 1952. And now 2020.
  • Valencia County, New Mexico. Perfect record of voting with the winner since 1952, Trump won it 54-44 this year. The perfect streak ends.
  • Westmoreland County, Virginia. Perfect since 1964, Trump won it this year 54-45. It has only missed twice since 1928: 1948 and 1960. And now 2020.
  • Ottowa County, Ohio. Hadn’t missed since 1960. Trump won 61-37 this year.
  • Wood County, Ohio. Only one miss since 1964 (1976). Voted Trump 53-45 this year.
  • Kent County, Delaware. Only two misses since 1928 (1948 & 1992). Biden won it this year 51-47, although given that Biden is from Delaware it might not be fair to include Kent as a bellwether county for this year.
  • Essex County, Vermont. Only miss since 1964 was 1976. This year it was the only county in Vermont Trump won, and it was by a margin of 54-43.
  • Juneau County, Wisconsin. Trump won it 64-34 this year. It has only had one miss since 1952 (1960). And now 2020.

I could keep going with the swing counties, but you get the point. Is it really believable that so many of these bellwether counties missed in the same election? It’s possible, but it’s fishy.

These unusual results only lend further credence to the idea that this election has been marred by vote fraud. Obviously none of those results I went over above are impossible, but they do raise questions.

We all now know the polls were wildly wrong, even if the current vote tallies are 100% accurate. The polls were literally the only thing indicating Biden would win, and so now that they’ve been discredited, that removes basically the only thing that suggested Biden was going to win this election. Trump had voter enthusiasm on his side. His rallies were way, way bigger than Biden’s. And he won the two bellwether states along with virtually all of the bellwether counties.

Trump should have won this election. It just doesn’t add up that he is now losing. In my view, the most plausible explanation for why he’s currently losing is vote fraud. We need manual recounts and vote audits in all of the disputed states.

However, while a recount/audit can and should uncover and discard all the votes from dead people, there are other categories of voter fraud that may not be so easy–or even possible at all–to root out. For instance, There is no way to tell if a person was bribed for their vote. With all the mail-in ballots, it’s entirely possible that party operatives and campaign workers went to people’s homes and either bribed or coerced them to vote a certain way. The ballot would then have been mailed in and there’s no way to know if it was the result of a bribe.

Additionally, how do you account for Trump ballots that were thrown out or destroyed? The recount cannot account for this at all. You can’t recount ballots that were never counted the first time around.

In 2012, long before mail-in voting became Good and Perfect and Unassailable and Essential To Our Democracy™, the New York Times raised significant concerns over “error and fraud as absentee voting rises,” saying:

Votes cast by mail are less likely to be counted, more likely to be compromised and more likely to be contested than those cast in a voting booth, statistics show. Election officials reject almost 2 percent of ballots cast by mail, double the rate for in-person voting.

There were over 92 million mail ballots requested for the 2020 election and over 65 million returned. 2% of 65 million is 1.3 million. That means 1.3 million mail-in ballots in the 2020 election might be invalid.

This is not a small number considering how many crucial swing states currently have margins in the thousands, and in Georgia right now Biden is only up like 650 votes.

But the failure rate of mail-in ballots is probably way higher than 2%:

In the [2008] presidential election, 35.5 million voters requested absentee ballots, but only 27.9 million absentee votes were counted, according to a study by Charles Stewart III, a political scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He calculated that 3.9 million ballots requested by voters never reached them; that another 2.9 million ballots received by voters did not make it back to election officials; and that election officials rejected 800,000 ballots. That suggests an overall failure rate of as much as 21 percent.

Some voters presumably decided not to vote after receiving ballots, but Mr. Stewart said many others most likely tried to vote and were thwarted. “If 20 percent, or even 10 percent, of voters who stood in line on Election Day were turned away,” he wrote in the study, published in The Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, “there would be national outrage.”

How were they thwarted? Maybe mishaps and/or funny business by the Postal Service, stolen mail, or the mail in ballots were simply tossed or destroyed by poll workers.

The Times discussed the increased potential for fraud with mail-in voting:

The trend will probably result in more uncounted votes, and it increases the potential for fraud. While fraud in voting by mail is far less common than innocent errors, it is vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention, election administrators say.

In Florida, absentee-ballot scandals seem to arrive like clockwork around election time. Before this year’s primary, for example, a woman in Hialeah was charged with forging an elderly voter’s signature, a felony, and possessing 31 completed absentee ballots, 29 more than allowed under a local law.

This is the kind of thing I was talking about above in regards to the recount: stuff like this is impossible to root out unless you catch the person with the ballots before they submit them. If that woman in Hialeah had submitted all those ballots, they would have appeared legit. There would have been no way to know they were fraudulent.


Election administrators have a shorthand name for a central weakness of voting by mail. They call it granny farming.

“The problem,” said Murray A. Greenberg, a former county attorney in Miami, “is really with the collection of absentee ballots at the senior citizen centers.” In Florida, people affiliated with political campaigns “help people vote absentee,” he said. “And help is in quotation marks.”

Voters in nursing homes can be subjected to subtle pressure, outright intimidation or fraud. The secrecy of their voting is easily compromised. And their ballots can be intercepted both coming and going.

The problem is not limited to the elderly, of course. Absentee ballots also make it much easier to buy and sell votes. In recent years, courts have invalidated mayoral elections in Illinois and Indiana because of fraudulent absentee ballots.

It’s just common sense that mail-in voting is rife with potential for fraud and skullduggery. Anyone with a functioning brain should be able to intuitively understand why.

And yet this year you have Twitter affixing this little disclaimer to every tweet that expresses any sort of doubt about mail-in voting:

This is pure gaslighting.

Mail-in voting is by far the easiest way to steal an election fraudulently, and it is not a coincidence that this year the Democrats went all-in on voting by mail.

France banned mail-in voting all the way back in 1975 due to massive fraud that occurred in Corsica (I didn’t even know until today that Corsica is ruled by France).

John R. Lott took a look at voting rules around the world specifically pertaining to mail-in voting, and this is what he found:

Liberals and progressives often try to model the U.S. on Western European countries, but you never hear them arguing that we should adopt their voting rules. There is a reason for that. Banning mail-in voting or requiring people to use photo IDs to obtain a mail-in ballot is quite common in developed countries, especially in Europe.

To study this, the Crime Prevention Research Center, of which I am the president, created a database on voting rules around the world

Here is what we found. Besides the United States, there are 36 member states in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Forty-seven percent ban mail-in voting unless the citizen is living abroad, and 30 percent require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Fourteen percent of the countries ban mail-in voting even for those living abroad.

Among the 27 countries in the European Union, 63 percent ban mail-in voting unless living abroad and another 22 percent require a photo ID to obtain a mail-in ballot. Twenty-two percent ban the practice even for those who live abroad.

Meanwhile in the US, mail in voting is more prevalent than ever before.

Look, I get that there’s a pandemic going on. But there are ways to account for that without resorting to mail-in ballots. The vast majority of this country is not at any risk at all of dying of this virus. There is no reason everyone should have been told to vote by mail. Maybe the elderly and people in nursing homes I understand. But for everyone else in the lower-risk age tiers, there is no reason they can’t vote in person. In-person early voting for multiple weeks leading up to the election would have been more than enough. If you have an early-voting period of 2-3 weeks then it gives people plenty of time and ensures the lines aren’t out of control.

We need to clamp down massively on voting by mail. The pandemic was not a valid excuse.

Plus, literally on Election Day, the CDC came out and said that even people who currently have Covid can break quarantine and go vote:

Covid can’t spread on election day. It’s #Science, people.

We have to massively cut down on voting by mail.

Yet even if we assume there was no mail-in voting fraud whatsoever, our election system is still horribly dysfunctional. It’s obviously a major assumption to say there was no fraud, and in my view one that defies common sense. But bear with me here: even if there was no voter fraud, it is unacceptable that the election has taken this long to be decided.

It should not take this long to know the results, especially when so many of the votes were cast prior to election day (early vote estimates were at least 100 million of the ~141 million total votes cast this year).

We should have a system where we know the results on election night. We need to ensure our voter rolls are accurate and up to date. We need nationwide voter ID.

Could blockchain voting work? I like the idea but it’s unlikely to ever be implemented for the same reason we still don’t have nationwide voter ID: because lots of powerful people want our election system vulnerable to fraud.

While we know what’s wrong with the election system, fixing it is a whole ‘nother thing. Democrats will obviously fight all the necessary reforms tooth and nail because vote fraud is their bread and butter.

But if our voting system doesn’t work, then we are no longer a democracy.

The Shenanigans Have Begun

Trump just got done speaking. It’s 1:30 in the morning for me here in Chicago. But it’s pretty clear what’s happening, and Trump said it: the election just “stopped.” And he’s going to the Supreme Court to put an end to the funny business.

Florida counted their votes in a timely fashion. Texas did. California has. Ohio did. Indiana did. Illinois did. Minnesota did. New Jersey did.

But very curiously, the crucial swing states that would put Trump over the top–Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan with their combined 76 electoral votes–just suddenly cannot be decided.

Couting has ceased.

All of those states but Michigan were called on election night in 2016 other than Michigan which took a few days to finally be settled. No problems there.

But now those states can’t be called on election night 2020.

It’s all very strange.

But we know what’s happening: corrupt machine Democrats in deep-blue cities like Milwaukee, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Detroit and Atlanta now know how far behind they are, and they are about to go to work “counting” enough “ballots” (aka fabricating them) in order to pull Biden into the lead in those states.

Notice how Fox News called Arizona for Biden even though there were something like 800-900k outstanding ballots left from election day which were expected to go 2:1 for Trump.

In states where Biden is in the lead, the election is called. Done. Finished. That’s a wrap. Trump loses the state.

In states where Trump is ahead, “Welllllll, Biden still has a chance here…”

North Carolina and Georgia should be called for Trump. They should’ve been called for him hours ago.

Trump is currently “behind” in the electoral votes 227-213 according to Decision Desk HQ. Add Georgia and NC to his total and he’s at 244. Add in Alaska, which will likely go his way, and he’s at 247. Then if you add in ME-2, which hasn’t been called yet but he’s leading and should win, he’s at 248.

At that point all he needs is 2 out of 3 of Wisconsin (10), Pennsylvania (20) and Michigan (16). Any combination of the three puts him over 270, regardless of what happens in Arizona and Nevada.

But wouldn’t you know, they’re just not ready to call PA, MI, WI, NC and GA.

Too much uncertainty!

It’s so obvious what’s happening. Democrats are scrounging up fake ballots that will hopefully pull them ahead in those states.

We all know it’s happening.

Precisely. They were each waiting to see how big Trump’s margin was in the rest of the state.

And look, Republicans: we have every right to be mad about this. Big City Democrats are the scum of the earth. They really are.

But this is who they are. It’s in their nature. How can we get mad at them for doing something we’ve been expecting them to do for months?

What we need to do is stop it instead of just complaining about it like helpless bystanders as they steal the Presidency.

Trump seems to be wise to what’s going on, which is reassuring. But there is so much corruption in this country–in the courts, in the Big Blue Cities.

We are not out of the woods here.

I’m wrapping up this article and it’s about 1:48am and right now here’s where we stand in the major states:

  • Pennsylvania: Trump up 14% with between 73%-87% of the vote counted (DDHQ for some reason can’t accurately specify how much of the vote is in so they provide a range–a pretty wide range at that). Trump’s lead is currently 719,270 votes in PA.
  • Michigan: Trump up 7.36% with between 68-80% of the vote in. Trump’s current lead: 276,707.
  • Wisconsin: Trump up 3.77% with between 87-99% of the vote in. Trump’s current lead: 110,839.
  • Georgia: Trump up 2.16% with >99% of the vote in. Trump’s current lead: 101,977.
  • North Carolina: Trump up 1.4% with >99% of the vote in. Trump’s current lead: 76,701.
  • Arizona: Trump is DOWN 4.95% with 81-97% of the vote in. Trump’s current DEFICIT: 130,665. However, Trump campaign insists that if they win at least 62% the election day ballots that are still yet to be counted, they will win the state.

That’s where we stand right now.

Those of you who have been around for long enough know how it usually goes: Republican lead tend to vanish, while Democratic leads are insurmountable. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a late swing from D to R in any state.

Trump needs to have lawyers and poll-watchers absolutely swarming places like Philadelphia, Phoenix, Milwaukee, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Atlanta and Charlotte.

They are going to steal these states from him if he doesn’t fight back here. I promise you that.

I’m sure you know it, too.

Dems are trying to say there’s “absentee” ballots from heavily D areas still outstanding in all these states.

This is bullshit. The mail-in ballots were the first to be counted. Because they came in prior to election day.

They already have these on hand. They’re just magically getting them in.

I said this earlier this year and it’s coming to fruition now: the Democrats were not prepared for Trump winning in 2016, so they weren’t prepared to steal the election on election night. They were completely blindsided. Up until like 2am they thought they could still win in 2016.

Afterwards, they resolved to be prepared for 2020: they were going to be ready. And you’re seeing that all play out right now.

James Rosen: FBI Has been Investigating Hunter Biden Since 2019

Do we really expect anything to come of this, though?

This person on Twitter brings up a great point:

This is why I don’t have high hopes for the Hunter investigation–or literally anything the FBI does.

When has any corrupt Democrat ever been brought to justice in this country? The answer is never.

The FBI is not going to bail us out. They are not going to bring the Democratic Crime Syndicate to justice. If anything they’re working on covering this up. What do you think is more likely: the FBI indicts the Bidens, or the FBI makes an announcement saying they’ve conducted a full investigation and cleared the Bidens of wrongdoing?

You know the answer.

The best we can do is vote and send the Bidens packing. The American people are the last line of defense.

Always have been, always will be.

Tucker’s Exclusive Interview With Tony Bobulinski

Here is the first 17 minutes. I strongly recommend watching:

Tony Bobulinski comes off as very credible, honest and genuinely upset about how Democrats are slandering him. Even though he’s clearly very frustrated, he maintains his composure and is not unhinged.

Adam Schiff had the gall to say, “This whole smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin.”

When Tony Bobulinski heard that remark, he gave a simple ultimatum to Rob Walker, a representative for the Biden family: retract that slanderous lie, or I will come forward and reveal everything I know.

And of course Schiff wouldn’t, so he did.

This was his response to Schiff’s malicious lie: “I held a top secret clearance from the NSA and the DOE. I served this county for four years in one of the elite environments in the world, naval nuclear power training command. To have a Congressman out there speaking out about ‘Russian disinformation,” or Joe Biden at a public debate referencing ‘Russian disinformation,’ when he knows he sat face-to-face with me, that I was traveling around the world with his son and his brother–to say that and associate that with my name is absolutely disgusting to me.”

Bobulinski even had a recording of the phone call with Rob Walker. It’s in the video.

Bobulinski: “If he doesn’t come out on record, I am providing the facts.”

Walker: “Tony. You’re just gonna bury all of us, man.”

That just about says it all. I recommend watching the whole video.

As usual with the Democrats, everything they accuse us of, they’re the ones guilty of that exact thing. Tony Bobulinski is not a traitor–the Democrats are traitors.

They are literally accusing him of treason because he’s revealing the Biden’s efforts to sell this country out in order to line their pockets–in other words, the Bidens’ treason.

UPDATE: this is a fair point👇

Still, Bobulinski wasn’t a politician. He was a private businessman. The Bidens are far more guilty than he is.

James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas uncovers Massive “Ballot Chasers” Voter Fraud Scheme In Texas

Now you see how mail-in vote fraud really works:

“We keep hearing voter fraud is a myth and anyone who challenges that notion is simply creating hysteria,” said James O’Keefe, the founder and CEO of Project Veritas. “I went to Texas to be part of the Project Veritas investigation into election fraud and to be on the ground here with our undercover journalists. Our journalists discovered a voter fraud system positioned to swing Texas in 2020.”

“These so-called ‘ballot chasers’ use a mix of gifts and coercion to work down their list of targeted voters and make sure they vote for their paymasters,” he said. “The actions violate both federal and state law and constitute a direct threat to the integrity of our election-based republic.”

One of the capos in this ballot racketeering operation is Raquel Rodriguez, nominally a political consultant for GOP House candidate Mauro E. Garza, the owner of the San Antonio’s Pegasus Nightclub, which is located on the Main Avenue Strip, he said.

Raquel Rodriguez: “I can honestly say I’m bringing at least at least 7,000 votes to the polls.”

Journalist: “Seven thousand—and that’s for San Antonio for this area too. It’s a lot.”

Rodriguez: “That’s a lot. It’s a lot, period. Just so you know–have an idea–so this is what I do.”

Rodriguez pressures voter to change her vote from Cornyn to Hegar

Rodriguez said she develops personal relationships with senior citizens when she harvests their ballots and then uses different post offices, so that the bundles do not draw suspicion.

“So, if ya’ll are my seniors, I’m literally picking you up. I’m going to your house, you’re doing your ballot,” she said. “I go throughout the entire city. If I have a bunch of them, what I do if I have a bunch of them, I’ll take 20 [ballots] here, 30 [ballots] here, 40 [ballots] here.”

At one point during the investigation, one Project Veritas journalist paid $500 to accompany Rodriguez on her rounds to collect ballots.

In an exchange recorded with a hidden camera by a Project Veritas journalist, Rodriguez literally examined a woman’s ballot and convinced her to change her vote from Cornyn to Hegar.

Raquel Rodriguez: “You can vote for whoever you want, but our conversation that we had, you said you were voting for Hegar, ‘cause you were going straight Democrat. You said you’re voting straight Democrat per our conversation, so that when you’re voting for the straight Dem – ‘cause that’s what you want to do, correct?”

In the video, Rodriguez shows the woman how to correct the ballot so it looks like an accident, by crossing out the line for Cornyn and putting her initials next to the line. “You’re going to, you’re going to dot that in—and the line goes like this, and then your initials are going to be right there, so, that way they know it was done accidentally.”

Journalist: “So, John Cornyn, she voted for John Cornyn and then you made her—”

Raquel Rodriguez: “That’s my job.”

After the voter “corrected” her ballot, Rodriguez presented her with a shawl as a gift.

Rodriguez said Garza gave her a gift budget of $2,500 for his campaign, and in addition to the shawls, she gives voters rosaries, diabetic socks and wallets.

One ballot chaser, 7,000 votes.

Just imagine how many there are out there, and how many votes they’re stealing.

I know they claim they’re trying to help seniors out, but this is not how voting is supposed to work. Not at all.

Was it actually a “correction” to the ballot, or did she bribe an old lady to vote for the Democrat after she (the old lady) chose the Republican initially?

This is why Democrats love mail-in voting: so they can prey on senior citizens and steal thousands upon thousands of votes. They are fully an organized crime outfit.

Also, this “ballot chaser” making sure seniors vote Democrat is listed as a political adviser to a Republican House candidate? What’s going on there?

You can read the whole article at the link above. But the section I have quoted here sheds light on just how the process of mail-in voter fraud goes down.