Globalists

The Coronavirus Shows Why it’s Time to Become Self-Sufficient

Mainstream public “intellectual” Steven Pinker might well have said one of the dumbest things of 2020:

The thought never even crossed Steven Pinker’s head that globalization is a choice, and that there is an alternative.

“Viruses don’t care about borders.” Yeah, assuming you continue allowing people to cross those borders.

Assuming you continue the system of global trade and reliance on dozens of other countries around the world for your supply chains.

It’s all by choice. It’s all so the global economy can be structured like this:

“Intellectuals” like Steven Pinker cannot conceive of any other way for the world to work. To him, modern globalization is and always has been.

To him, there is no conceivable alternative to a world where one break in the supply chain leads to cascading problems all around the world.

Bizarrely, he cites a global pandemic as the reason why “neo-nationalism” (gotta throw in that word association with Neo Nazis) doesn’t work. But this is a vulnerability of globalism, not nationalism.

Nationalism would be closing the borders so we’re not susceptible to a virus that originated in China. Globalism means someone in Argentina can catch a virus that started in China. What on earth is Steven Pinker saying?

Is he trying to claim that nationalism is simply a political ideology that nevertheless still accepts a globalized world? This guy doesn’t know the first thing about nationalism.

“Nationalist politics is rising all over the world, so an international virus outbreak made possible and exacerbated by the still-dominant globalist world order proves nationalism is futile and stupid.” This has got to be one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read.

If we actually lived in a world of independent nations rather than an interdependent network of “economies,” virus outbreaks in one country would be better contained and pose far less of a risk to other countries.

Globalism is why basically all of Northern Italy is under quarantine due to a virus that began in China:

“Italy reported a huge jump in deaths from the coronavirus on Sunday, a surge of more than 50 percent from the day before, as it ordered an unprecedented peacetime lockdown of its wealthiest region in a sweeping effort to fight the epidemic.

The extraordinary measure restricted movement for a quarter of the country’s population.

“We are facing an emergency, a national emergency,” Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte said in announcing the government decree in a news conference after 2 a.m.

The move is tantamount to sacrificing the Italian economy in the short term to save it from the ravages of the virus in the long term. The measures will turn stretches of Italy’s wealthy north — including the economic and cultural capital of Milan and landmark tourist destinations such as Venice — into quarantined red zones until at least April 3.

They will prevent the free movement of roughly 16 million people.

Funerals and cultural events are banned. The decree requires that people keep a distance of at least one meter from one another at sporting events, bars, churches and supermarkets.

The Italian outbreak — the worst outside Asia — has inflicted serious damage on one of Europe’s most fragile economies and prompted the closing of Italy’s schools. The country’s cases nearly tripled from about 2,500 infections on Wednesday to more than 7,375 on Sunday. Deaths rose to 366.”

Globalism is why the stock market is plunging, and we’re only at 500 cases nationwide here in the US:

In New York, 103 nationwide cases of Coronavirus caused a flood of shoppers to descend upon local supermarkets and empty the shelves:

Britain, too:

This is how quickly it happens. That’s all it takes to set off a panic and make people rush into the supermarkets to empty the shelves. Imagine if it was something worse, like a war or an invasion or an even deadlier virus.

This is one of the many rarely-mentioned downsides of globalization.

So what should you be doing?

Well, short term, if you have some extra cash lying around, I’d invest it in the stock market. There’s been a decent-sized dip in the market as I’m sure you’re aware. Might be a good time to buy. Of course, stocks are still highly overvalued in a big-picture sense, having fallen just 10-15% from all-time, human history highs. But they’ll likely resume heading upwards as this blows over. We’re not going into a recession or a cyclical downturn right now so I’m thinking the market should bounce back.

When is the right time to buy? I’d say now. Stocks were killed all last week and are getting slaughtered again today (down over 5% as of 11am c.t.) That’s a 19% drop from the market’s all-time high it hit last month. So I’d say the market has fallen about enough to warrant hitting the Buy button. It could fall even further, so I would gradually buy. Don’t spend all your money in one day, wait it out a bit and buy over the course of a few days in case it goes lower tomorrow. The strategy is called “Dollar Cost Averaging,” look it up if you want to learn more about it.

But the bottom line is that I believe the market gotten cheap enough to become attractive for bargain hunters. It might go down another 5-10%, but that would just be an even better opportunity to buy.

This tweet sums up the market panic nicely:

It’s funny but it’s accurate. Markets are in free fall because of the prospect that economic activity will likely slow down for a couple of weeks tops.

If you are considering buying stocks but are fearful given all the scary news headlines, ask yourself if we are witnessing the collapse of the US economy, or if this is just a temporary panic. If it’s the latter, I’d say this looks like a good time to buy. Look at some of the big name stocks that have fallen and start buying shares.

Again, the market still could go lower. The worst may not be over yet. But we’re pretty close to the turning point right now. Ease into the market and don’t spend all your money at once.

Big picture, however, you need to be making plans to become self-sufficient. Coronavirus has shown just how fragile our global system is to unforeseen events. You have seen how quickly the supermarket shelves empty out, and it should scare you. Most Americans only have a week or two of food in their houses at best, and the coronavirus should make us realize how vulnerable we really are.

We don’t think about this when the shelves are full, only when they’re already empty.

It’s time to get out of the cities and become self-sufficient. Global pandemics will affect the cities the worst. City-dwellers are dependent on the supermarkets for food. They’re tightly packed and live in close proximity to tons of other people, meaning it’ll spread fastest in cities. So get out.

When the shit really does hit the fan in the future, the city-dwellers will be the first victims. They won’t stand a chance.

Just as nations should start taking steps to become more independent and self-sufficient, so should individuals.

***

I don’t want jump the gun but it appears the Coronavirus has already long since peaked in China, meaning that although it will continue to spread around the world and peak later in different countries due to distance from the epicenter, it’s basically over. It’s no longer spreading uncontrollably:

“China is the origin of the virus and still accounts for over 80 percent of cases and deaths. But its cases peaked and began ­declining more than a month ago, according to data presented by the Canadian epidemiologist who spearheaded the World Health Organization’s coronavirus mission to China. Fewer than 200 new cases are reported daily, down from a peak of 4,000.

Subsequent countries will follow this same pattern, in what’s called Farr’s Law. First formulated in 1840 and ignored in ­every epidemic hysteria since, the law states that epidemics tend to rise and fall in a roughly symmetrical pattern or bell-shaped curve. AIDS, SARS, Ebola — they all followed that pattern. So does seasonal flu each year.

This is why I’m writing about it as if it has already blown over. Of course, China may well be lying about its figures, but I think it’s safe to say the virus has already long since peaked there.

Again, the worst is still to come here in America due to the fact that the epicenter is halfway around the world and there’s a lag because of it. But this is not going to be a global catastrophe of historical proportions. Society is not going to collapse. We’re going to be okay. Things should largely go back to normal in a month, two months at most.

But don’t let that be an excuse not to take any lessons from the Coronavirus. I hope it has made you keenly aware of just how vulnerable you are to mass panics. You should be taking steps to make yourself less reliant on full supermarket shelves.

Another Former “Conspiracy Theory” Turns Out to be True: Merkel Creating an EU Army

The bureaucratic superstate gets teeth:

And you’re telling me they’re not trying to override the sovereignty of the individual European states?

I’m not going to get into the ridiculous Nazi comparisons. That gets us nowhere. Plus everything and everyone gets compared to the Nazis these days.

What the EU Army is is a step towards the erasure of national borders and eventually nationalities altogether.

It’s a step towards global government even though we’ve always been told that’s a ludicrous conspiracy theory.

Funny how that works.

Who Was Epstein Working For?

In my previous post on Epstein I ended on a question: who facilitated and funded Epstein’s rapid rise from high school calculus teacher to billionaire hedge-fund manager for the ultra wealthy?

It seems likely there was some elite person or group that Epstein was doing his blackmailing on behalf of. Certainly Epstein himself benefitted from his blackmailing schemes to the tune of billions of dollars and access to the most powerful people in the world, but it’s hard to believe that was all there was to it.

During his vetting interviews for Labor Secretary with the Trump Transition team in early 2017, Alex Acosta was asked about the Epstein case from 2008 and this was his answer on why he let Epstein off with such a light punishment:

“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta.

Very powerful people intervened in the 2008 Epstein case to make sure he was let off with minimal punishment.

So the question is, who were/are those very powerful people?

Ann Coulter thinks Epstein was state-sponsored, meaning working on behalf of a foreign government:

“Epstein according to both the girls accounts, he wanted them to have sex with powerful men, come back to him and report on it, describe what they wanted what their fetishes were and he had cameras throughout the house so this is obviously for blackmailing purposes,” said Coulter.

“It just seems to me something much bigger is behind this — perhaps a state sponsor — powerful enough people … it just seems to me there’s something a very powerful force behind what’s going on here and I am still nervous about this not coming to a conclusion, somehow this getting compromised,” she added.

It makes sense. One doesn’t just mysteriously become an untouchable billionaire like Epstein without government support or at least permission.

So which state was sponsoring Epstein?

There are strong indications that he might have been connected to Israeli intelligence, the Mossad. The possible Epstein-Mossad connection centers on Epstein’s former girlfriend and later procurer of young girls, Ghislaine Maxwell. Ghislaine Maxwell’s father was Robert Maxwell, a British media magnate and former Member of Parliament who died under mysterious circumstances in 1991:

“Ian Robert Maxwell (10 June 1923 – 5 November 1991), born Ján Ludvík Hyman Binyamin Hoch, was a British media proprietor and Member of Parliament (MP). Originally from Czechoslovakia, Maxwell rose from poverty to build an extensive publishing empire. After his death, huge discrepancies in his companies’ finances were revealed, including his fraudulent misappropriation of the Mirror Group pension fund.

Early in his life, Maxwell escaped from Nazi occupation, joined the Czechoslovak Army in exile in World War II and was decorated after active service in the British Army. In subsequent years he worked in publishing, building up Pergamon Press to a major publishing house. After six years as an MP during the 1960s, he again put all his energy into business, successively buying the British Printing Corporation, Mirror Group Newspapers and Macmillan Publishers, among other publishing companies.

Maxwell had a flamboyant lifestyle, living in Headington Hill Hall in Oxford, from which he often flew in his helicopter, and sailing in his luxury yacht, the Lady Ghislaine. He was notably litigious and often embroiled in controversy, including about his support for Israel at the time of the 1948 Palestine war. In 1989, he had to sell successful businesses, including Pergamon Press, to cover some of his debts. In 1991, his body was discovered floating in the Atlantic Ocean, having fallen overboard from his yacht. He was buried in Jerusalem.”

He fell overboard? Come on.

“On 5 November 1991, Maxwell was last in contact with the crew of his yacht, the Lady Ghislaine, at 4:25 a.m. local time, but was found to be missing later in the morning. Maxwell was presumed to have fallen overboard from the vessel, which was cruising off the Canary Islands, and his naked body was subsequently recovered from the Atlantic Ocean. The official ruling at an inquest held in December 1991 was death by a heart attack combined with accidental drowning, although three pathologists had been unable to agree on the cause of his death at the inquest; he had been found to have been suffering from serious heart and lung conditions. Murder was ruled out by the judge and, in effect, so was suicide. He was buried on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem.”

This is quite difficult to believe. He had a heart attack and then fell overboard?

And why was he buried on sacred ground in Jerusalem? He must have had a special connection to Israel:

“A hint of Maxwell’s service to the Israeli state was provided by John Loftus and Mark Aarons, who described Maxwell’s contacts with Czechoslovak anti-Stalinist Communist leaders in 1948 as crucial to the Czechoslovak decision to arm Israel in the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. Czechoslovak military assistance was both unique and crucial for the fledgling state as it battled for its existence. It was Maxwell’s covert help in smuggling aircraft parts into Israel that led to the country having air supremacy during their 1948 War of Independence.”

More on the Mossad angle, which came from none other than Seymour Hersh, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist for the New Yorker:

Shortly before Maxwell’s death, a former employee of Israel’s Military Intelligence Directorate, Ari Ben-Menashe, approached a number of news organisations in Britain and the U.S. with the allegation that Maxwell and the Daily Mirrors foreign editor, Nicholas Davies, were both long-time agents for Mossad. Ben-Menashe also claimed that in 1986, Maxwell had told the Israeli Embassy in London that Mordechai Vanunu had given information about Israel’s nuclear capability to The Sunday Times, then to the Daily Mirror. Vanunu was subsequently kidnapped by Mossad and smuggled to Israel, convicted of treason and imprisoned for eighteen years.

I’m sure Maxwell’s mysterious death had nothing to do with this at all.

“Ben-Menashe’s story was ignored at first, but eventually The New Yorker journalist Seymour Hersh repeated some of the allegations during a press conference in Londonheld to publicise “The Samson Option,” Hersh’s book about Israel’s nuclear weapons. On 21 October 1991, two MPs, Labour’s George Galloway and the Conservative Rupert Allason (also known as espionage author Nigel West), agreed to raise the issue in the House of Commons under Parliamentary Privilege protection, which in turn allowed British newspapers to report events without fear of libel suits. Maxwell called the claims “ludicrous, a total invention” and sacked Davies. A year later, in Galloway’s libel settlement against Mirror Group Newspapers (in which he received “substantial” damages), Galloway’s counsel announced that the MP accepted that the group’s staff had not been involved in Vanunu’s abduction. Galloway himself, however, referred to Maxwell as “one of the worst criminals of the century.”

This is all very complicated and hard to follow stuff, but the bottom line is that Robert Maxwell was involved with the Mossad. He was, after all, buried in Jerusalem following his death despite being a naturalized British citizen.

So the connection from Epstein to Robert Maxwell is through Maxwell’s daugher Ghislaine. Ghislaine believes her father was murdered:

“Her father named his luxury yacht, the Lady Ghislaine in her honour, and it was near the yacht in the Canary Islands in 1991 that his body was found floating in the sea. Though a verdict of death by accidental drowning was recorded, Maxwell has since stated that she believes her father was murdered, commenting in 1997 that “He did not commit suicide. That was just not consistent with his character. I think he was murdered.” After his death, Robert Maxwell was found to have fraudulently appropriated the pension assets of his Mirror Group Newspapers to support its share price and was disgraced.

Maxwell moved to the United States after her father’s death, and has since become a prominent socialite in New York City.”

British Authors Gordon Thomas and Martin Dillion agree with Ghislaine that her father was murdered. The two wrote a book in 2003 called “The Assassination of Robert Maxwell: Israel’s Superspy.” In the book, they essentially argue that Maxwell was indeed an Israeli agent who eventually had a falling-out with the Mossad (over Maxwell’s attempts to blackmail the Mossad for money to prop up his crumbling media empire), which resulted in him being murdered by Mossad agents on his yacht in late 1991.

The Epstein connection:

“After moving to America, Maxwell and the billionaire American financier Jeffrey Epstein had a romantic relationship, and Maxwell remained close to him after their break-up. Maxwell has attracted press coverage for her friendship with Prince Andrew, Duke of York, the second son of Queen Elizabeth II, who attended social functions with her in New York. Maxwell introduced Epstein to Prince Andrew and the three often socialized together. She and her partner, Jeffrey Epstein are also close friends of Bill Clinton, who flew over 26 times on Epstein’s private jet, referred to as the Lolita Express.

In 2008, Epstein was convicted of soliciting a minor for prostitution and served 13 months of an 18-month jail sentence. Details of a civil lawsuit made public in January 2015 contained a deposition from a woman, identified as ‘Jane Doe 3’, accusing Maxwell of having recruited her in 1999, when she was a minor, to have sex with Epstein. A 2018 expose by the Miami Herald revealed Jane Doe 3 to be Virginia Roberts, who in 1999 was Virginia Giuffre. Roberts asserted that she was introduced by Maxwell to Epstein and then “groomed by the two for his pleasure, including lessons in Epstein’s preferences during oral sex.”

Maxwell has repeatedly denied any involvement in Epstein’s crimes. In a 2015 statement, Maxwell rejected allegations that she has acted as a “madame for Epstein” and “facilitated Prince Andrew’s acts of sexual abuse.” Maxwell’s spokesperson said that “the allegations made against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue” and that she “strongly denies allegations of an unsavoury nature, which have appeared in the British press and elsewhere and reserves her right to seek redress at the repetition of such old defamatory claims.”

According to the Miami Herald, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, one of Epstein’s victims, sued Maxwell in federal court in the Southern District of New York in 2015. Giuffre asserted that Maxwell and Epstein trafficked her and other underage girls, often at sex parties that Epstein hosted at his homes in New York, New Mexico, Palm Beach, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Maxwell called her a liar. Giuffre sued for defamation. While details of the settlement were not made public, the case was settled in Giuffre’s favour, with Maxwell paying Giuffre “millions.”

On 16 April 2019, a new accuser, Maria Farmer, went public and filed a sworn affidavit in federal court in New York, saying that she was sexually assaulted and her then-15-year-old sister was molested by Epstein and his companion, Ghislaine Maxwell, in 1996.”

Ghislaine Maxwell is the possible Mossad link to Epstein, via her late father Robert who was likely a Mossad agent.

This gives a whole new perspective to Alex Acosta’s remark that Epstein “belonged to intelligence.”

Whose intelligence? Our’s our Israel’s?

Here’s the upshot of it all:

You want to talk about foreign influence in American politics? Here you go.

It’s Time for Britain to Go Full Yellow Vest

Democracy is not self-maintaining. Elites will not simply honors the voters’ decisions when they go against the elite’s wishes because That’s What The Rules say.

Without vigilance and accountability, democracies are doomed. Having blind faith that the politicians will do what you want them to is suicidal.

Right now in Britain, Parliament just voted to take the “No Deal Brexit” off the table. “No deal” was basically Britain’s only leverage in negotiating the terms of Brexit with the EU, and now that’s gone.

They are currently trying to delay Brexit from March 29 to June. The strategy is “delay and eventually derail.” If they can’t stop Brexit now, they’ll delay it to give themselves more time to hatch a new scheme.

Look at this clusterfuck:

“LONDON (AP) — British lawmakers were voting Thursday on whether to scuttle the already dwindling chances the U.K. will leave the European Union this month as scheduled, but EU officials warned they would only allow a delay if the country made a fundamental shift in its approach to Brexit.

“Allow.” That right there is why Brexit is a necessity.

Prime Minister Theresa May grudgingly granted the vote after Parliament twice rejected her EU divorce deal and also ruled out leaving the EU without an agreement. Withdrawing from the EU without a deal could mean major disruptions for businesses and people in the U.K. and the 27 remaining countries.

Yeah yeah yeah. That’s a bunch of bullshit. It’s a scare-tactic by the elite to screw the whole Brexit process into oblivion. “Major disruptions for businesses!” That’s what they said about the Brexit vote, and it never came to pass.

That was from AP, a Uniparty Globalist Propaganda outlet.

Here’s the actual story from Breitbart:

“Brexiteers have reacted with anger after the House of Commons voted to stop the UK leaving the EU without a deal, whilst the Tory Party is in disarray after Prime Minister Theresa May lost control of her own motion.

Veteran Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage said immediately after the vote, “A total disgrace, Parliament no longer represents the people,” adding, “This is a Parliament of outright liars. We will have to fight them again. And mark my words — we will beat them once more.”

Mr Farage later penned a piece for The Telegraph, where he confirmed what he had written in 2017 that “The great Brexit betrayal has begun,” noting, “Well, although it pains me to say it, the vote in Parliament to take no deal off the table proves that, 20 months ago, I was right.”

Now, above, when I said the Globalist Uniparty’s strategy is “delay and eventually derail,” here’s what I’m talking about:

“Donald Tusk today revealed he will urge EU leaders to agree a ‘long extension’ to Article 50 – delaying Brexit by up to two years to give the UK time to ‘rethink’ – if Theresa May‘s deal is voted down a third time next week. 

The President of the European Council’s intervention on Twitter this morning will bolster claims that the UK would not leave the EU until 2021 unless Mrs May can persuade the DUP and Brexiteers to back her divorce deal – because some in the EU want to play ‘hardball’ and push for a delay of two years. 

Ireland’s Foreign Minister Simon Coveney also said today the EU is likely to offer Britain a 21-month delay to Brexit while Taoiseach Leo Varadkar added that if the UK changes its mind it would be welcomed back ‘like the prodigal son’.

The PM’s deal will be put to another vote next week, just 15 days before the country is due to leave the EU on 29 March, after MPs including a ‘gang of four’ rebellious Cabinet members helped to vote to permanently rule out No Deal Brexit. 

May told the Commons that if she loses a third time she will forced to ask Brussels for a long delay to Britain’s departure from the EU at a summit on Thursday.”

They’ve had nearly three years to negotiate and formalize Brexit, and now they want another two years?

This is totally rotten.

It’s becoming clear that democracy is no longer in existence in Britain. The people voted for Brexit, but the politicians are resolved to deny them Brexit.

When this happens, the only solution is to take to the streets like the Yellow Vests of France–that, of course, or surrendering and admitting to be ruled by an antidemocratic oligarchy of globalists who care nothing for the well-being of the citizens of their respective nations.

 

Democrats: Our Houses Must Be Protected by Walls, but the Country Itself Must Not Be

“Walls don’t work,” they tell us from behind the walls of their palatial estates.

Meanwhile, Benny Johnson of the Daily Caller went to the Obamas’ D.C. neighborhood–Kalorama Heights, one of the whitest and richest in the country–to see if the Obamas believe in walls or not. The answer will SHOCK you.

No, just kidding:

Screen-Shot-2019-01-04-at-1.38.13-PM.png

So the street is blocked off by police barricades. The house itself is surrounded by walls.

Johnson brought a tape measure to see if Obama’s house was actually surrounded by a ten foot wall, but it turned out that there were numerous other barricades and walls around the house that prevented him from even getting up close to the main wall around the house.

I’ve been by Obama’s original house on the South Side of Chicago, too. You can’t get anywhere near it. The whole street is permanently blocked off by police barricades. It’s under 24/7 security.

Whether it’s an actual wall or heavy security and police barricades, it’s pretty obvious that our most pro-open borders politicians insist on living behind walls.

But when it comes to putting a wall around America, you will never see them fight against anything with more passion and ferocity.

They want you to live in the multicultural hellhole. Not themselves.

They just want the votes and cheap labor.

You must live with the everyday reality of their “multicultural” dystopia.

Opposition to Immigration is Emphatically NOT a Product of White Racism

The idea that predominantly white western nations are uniquely “xenophobic” (quotation marks because it’s a BS term invented not to diagnose an actual pathology but merely to stigmatize, slander and pathologize the rejection of open borders) is a crock.

Opposition to immigration isn’t simply white racism against brown people. Numerous predominantly brown/nonwhite countries are not only opposed to more immigration but far more opposed to it than we supposedly RAAACIST white Westerners are:

“Much has been written about anti-immigrant sentiments in the West in recent years. Brexit, Trump’s election, and the moderate success of political movements hostile to immigration in countries like Italy, Germany and Sweden have provoked much admonishment of Western societies by various intellectuals and commentators, usually of leftist leanings. What has not received much attention are contemporary attitudes to immigration in countries outside the Western hemisphere. What do Nigerians, Indians, Turks and Mexicans think about migrants coming to their countries? This we don’t hear much about.”

That’s by design.

“Two recent surveys on the issue provide interesting results. Pew Research queried respondents in 27 nations across six continents, asking whether they felt their countries should let in more immigrants, fewer, or about the same as they do at present. In European nations like Greece and Italy that have had huge influxes of migrants in recent years, the numbers wanting fewer or no more immigrants were high—82 and 71 percent respectively. But in several other Western countries, including some perceived as being hostile to immigration, people are more sympathetic to immigration than in other parts of the world.

The percentage of people wanting fewer or no more immigrants coming to their country was higher in South Africa (65 percent), Argentina (61 percent), Kenya (60 percent), Nigeria (50 percent), India (45 percent), and Mexico (44 percent) than it was in Australia (38 percent), the U.K. (37 percent) or the U.S. (29 percent).

Wow, I didn’t realize so many nonwhite countries could be so RAAACIST against nonwhite immigrants!

The article has more numbers. But you’ll never hear about them from the Uniparty Propaganda Department because its primary goal is to shame white Westerners into accepting mass immigration. It wants us to believe we’re uniquely guilty of racism and “xenophobia” and that we alone need to get with the program and accept open borders.

Keep in mind that Western attitudes have been shaped by a decades-long media/cultural and political misinformation campaign to promote the ideas of multiculturalism, the “melting pot,” “Diversity is our strength,” “America is a nation of immigrants,” and globalization. The objective has been nothing less than rewiring our brains to be biased against our own kind and towards the other, the foreigner.

The Uniparty knows that people are naturally skeptical of immigration, and so they’ve put on a full-court cultural press to get people to suppress their natural inclinations against immigration and multiculturalism. They have brainwashed a significant portion of the West by repeating the same phrases over and over again: “Diversity is our strength.” “Immigrants do the jobs you won’t.” “America is a nation of immigrants.” “We have a moral obligation to let them in; they’re fleeing misery.”

They call illegal immigrants simply “migrants,” or when they’re truly feeling audacious, simply “refugees” even when they’re nothing of the sort. This is to erase the distinction between legal and illegal immigration.

All of this is to get you to accept open borders and, with them, the wholesale transformation (i.e. destruction) of your country. It’s a domestic psyop of epic proportions, and you–you evil, white RAAACIST, you–are the target.

Don’t fall for it. You’re not a RAAACIST for opposing open borders. There are many nonwhite countries around the world that are far more opposed to immigration than you are, and one of them is even Mexico.

It’s a Conspiracy Theory to Suggest George Soros Funds the Radical Left!

I mean, it’s absolutely baseless. You’d have to be nuts (and totally anti-Semitic!) to believe George Soros funds the Mob Left:

“The left-wing activist group that accosted Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi at a movie theater in June received half a million dollars in 2017 from an organization funded by left-wing billionaire George Soros, documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation reveal.

Organize Florida, the group that hounded Bondi from a Florida movie theater, received $500,000 last year from the Open Society Policy Center (OSPC), according to OSPC’s most recent tax forms.

OSPC is the advocacy arm of Soros’s Open Society Foundations, which the billionaire uses to advance his left-wing worldview around the globe.”

Ok, but that’s it. George Soros fund NO OTHER LEFTWING ACTIVITIES AT ALL. 

Got that?

White Liberal Elites: Tolerance and Diversity for YOU, But Not For US

White leftists are known for their long-winded lectures on how Americans are stuck in the past and need to change their views to be more tolerant and open-minded about alternative lifestyles and changing cultural and demographic trends.

“Stop being such a Christian fundamentalist on homosexuality. You’re a dinosaur. It’s [current year]. Get with the program; there’s nothing wrong with being gay. For Pete’s sake, it’s [current year].”

You all need to be more open-minded, modern and progressive when it comes to gays, immigrants and minorities, they tell us.

Just know that they don’t really mean any of it. Not a word.

Look at how Mika Brzezinski tried to criticize Mike Pompeo:

Wait. Haven’t Mika and the rest of the white liberal elite been berating us regular Americans for our supposed insensitivity towards gays, and lecturing us that there’s Nothing Wrong With Being Gay? And then Mika says this?

The elites are not more accepting of homosexuality than the rest of us. They just pretend to be. In fact, they’re probably less accepting of it.

If an average American said what Mika said, it would be considered a “gay slur.” If they said something like this while at work, HR would be all over them. They’d be subject to mandatory sensitivity training at minimum, or more likely just fired.

If someone on Fox News said about Obama’s Secretary of State what Mika said about Trump’s, it would be a national media firestorm with wall-to-wall coverage, and the Fox person would certainly lose his or her job.

But here’s the thing: a Fox News conservative wouldn’t say something like Mika said. Because most prominent conservative commentators have been re-educated on the matter of homosexuality, among many other matters which we’ll get to shortly.

When a prominent conservative like Ben Shapiro says something like, “I’m colorblind when it comes to race,” or “I have no problem with homosexuality,” they probably genuinely mean it. Because they have actually taken the liberal elite’s lecturing to heart.

Over the past decade or so, most conservatives have come to believe that they really do need to “get with the program” and that they really were intolerant and bigoted.

Yes, in the back of their minds, they may still have their reservations about homosexuality, but they’ve repressed those reservations for long enough that for all intents and purposes, they not only tolerate homosexuality but often go out of their way to show how approving they are of it. As it pertains to most mainstream conservative pundits, if they truly don’t like gays, you’ll never know it because they’ll never say it out loud. It’s a prejudice that is confined entirely to their own private minds. As Steve Sailer once said, “What goes unsaid eventually goes unthought.”

In contrast, white liberal elites like Mika, who love to call regular Americans homophobes, don’t care who knows what they really think about homosexuality. All that stuff they say about how using “gay” as an insult hurts and oppresses the gay community? Yeah, all of it went out the window the moment Mika called Mike Pompeo “butt boy.”

The supposedly enlightened and progressive white liberal elites constantly lecturing us don’t actually believe a word of what they say. And it’s not just about gays.

You think the white liberal elite is excited about America becoming a majority-minority nation? Maybe for you they are. But for Dem politicians, it’s only because they’ll benefit electorally. And for rich liberals, it’s only because they’ll get cheap gardeners and janitors. Remember when Kelly Osborne tried to argue against Trump’s immigration policies by saying “If you kick every Latino out of this country, then who is going to be cleaning your toilet?” That’s how they view immigration: more Latinos equals cleaner toilets and more Mexican food options!

Hispanic immigrants, to white liberal elites, are little more than a permanent underclass of servants.

The white liberal elite does not want minorities and immigrants living in their gated, mostly-white communities–they just want them living in your communities. As Victor Davis Hanson put it earlier this year:

“For those who live at the nexus of illegal immigration, life is lived quite differently than in the past, from the trivial to the existential. A few examples suffice. Last night I was awakened by automatic gunfire on the road at 2 a.m.; the shots came from a long-ago-sold farmhouse of one who was a friend and neighbor for 50 years, but whose house is now rented out to gang members, many from Mexico. No worry, within an hour, the shrieks of resumed cockfighting returned as usual.

[. . .] The logic of illegal immigration is that the guilty host must accommodate the uninvited but more virtuous guest, not vice versa. When I find a dumped rotten canine carcass with a rope still around its skeletonized neck or a tossed disemboweled chicken, I surely must not privilege my own culture and think that dog- or cockfighting is barbaric. Perhaps the pile of used hypodermic needles dumped by my barn were left by accident? Today I pick up sacks of wet garbage with the owner’s name and address on several bills: Does one redeliver back to the dumper, and if so, armed or not? Or does one find it not cost-effective to do so? (Do not suggest “call the authorities” — that is a complete waste of time.) These are the small, mostly trite decisions that a person at the nexus of illegal immigration makes every day.

When Jerry Brown or Nancy Pelosi lectures the state on its illiberality, or on the immigration sins of Donald Trump, or the advantages of nullification and a sanctuary state, we assume that these are just the penultimate chest poundings and virtue signals of rich septuagenarians about to go into apartheid retirements in Napa or Grass Valley.”

The white liberal elite lectures us about being more tolerant and inclusive while our communities are destroyed, yet they all live in gated white communities.

If you ask them, they’re doing us a favor by making our communities more “diverse.” We should be thanking them, because we all know Diversity Is Our Strength. It’s what they’ve been drilling into our heads over and over for years.

But when they say “Diversity Is Our Strength,” they don’t mean their strength. Turns out they’re not huge fans of diversity when it pertains to themselves.

White leftists in California want more more more more more immigration, but they don’t want their kids in the same schools as the children of those immigrants:

“Why not cease the current stampede to private academies that has left the public schools of the greater coastal corridor non-diverse and near apartheid?

The huge Los Angeles Unified School District is now over 70 percent Latino, as whites and Asians have fled the arrival of immigrant children. It’s much the same in Silicon Valley, where private prep schools are expanding enrollments to meet the demand from affluent members of the tech industry.”

Private, mostly-white schools for the white liberal elite; public, integrated schools for your children.

But I thought Diversity is a universal and unquestioned Good Thing? I thought we could all benefit a little Diversity in our boring, plain white lives? Apparently they were only talking about us, not themselves. They don’t need any Diversity, they’re perfect the way they are. It’s us plebes who need to see the light.

Prior to leaving office, President Obama mandated that America’s suburbs get more “diverse” by taking aim at restrictions against low income housing in traditionally wealthier, whiter neighborhoods.

However, upon leaving office, Barack and Michelle then moved into a multi-million dollar mansion in Kalorama Heights, one of the whitest, wealthiest and most exclusive neighborhoods in D.C. The Obamas’ neighborhood is described as “diplomat-studded” and their neighbors include current and former Cabinet Secretaries, Supreme Court Justices and the world’s richest man, Jeff Bezos.

For some reason, I don’t think Obama was talking about Kalorama Heights when he said the suburbs need to be more “diverse.”

This is how they roll.

But you? You’ve taken to heart all their accusations of your intolerance and benightedness.

The average American has listened to what the elites said about his outdated thinking on gays and is now more accepting of homosexuality than the elite.

The average American is more open to living next door to someone of a different race than are the elite.

The average American is more willing to allow immigrants into his community than are the leftwing elite.

You can tell this is the case from slip-ups like Mika’s. At the end of the day, homosexuality is still an insult in her mind. Her go-to insult for Mike Pompeo is “butt boy.”

Steve Colbert tried to “burn” Trump by saying, “The only thing Donald Trump’s mouth is good for is being Putin’s cock holster.” And the left loved it. “Ohhh! Snap! SICK BURN, Colbert! Trump, you just got owned! FAG! YOU’RE GAY, TRUMP! HA HA HA HA”

When you say it, it’s a “gay slur.” When they say it, it’s a SICK BURN.

These are the same people that piously call us bigots at every opportunity.

For decades leftwing elites have browbeaten us normal Americans for our supposed bigotry, intolerance and lack of open minds–to the point where in an amazingly short period of time, the leftwing elite has basically retrained tens of millions of Americans into genuinely accepting things which were almost universally rejected for decades.

Did you know that in 2004, only 31% of Americans supported gay marriage, while in 2018 the number has doubled to 62%. That’s a remarkable shift in attitudes nationwide and it was mostly driven by sanctimonious lecturing from leftwing elites like Mika Brzezinski and Steven Colbert.

For most of our history, the average American has basically gone off of his natural human instincts: disapproving of homosexuality because it’s a deviation from the norm; skeptical of other races because people innately prefer to live among those who are the same as they are; worried about the demographic transformation of their nation and communities because that’s the way human beings have been hard-wired for millennia.

Yet the white liberal elites told us we were not only misguided for going by our natural human instincts, but terrible people as well. We’re bigots, racists, homophobes, transphobes, Islamophobes. This constant shaming and lecturing from white liberal elites has actually had the effect of profoundly changing American attitudes towards gays, trannies, racial minorities and immigrants. It’s kind of unprecedented.

As far as tolerance of gays goes, we’re probably the most “progressive” society since at least the ancient Greeks, perhaps the Romans (things got pretty gay towards the end of Rome, as Richard Nixon noted when he remarked “the last six Roman emperors were fags.”)

Racially? Come on. No other country on earth has all the races living together. Name me one other country that has significant numbers of whites, blacks, Hispanics, East Asians, South Asians and Middle Easterners. It’s no contest. America is the most racially inclusive and harmonious society the world has ever known. Furthermore, virtually every white American goes out of their way to avoid doing anything that could get them labeled a “racist.” Most white Americans live in a state of constant fear of being labeled “racist” because it could result in losing one’s job, friends and social status. Daily life in white America is now basically a continual (and ultimately futile) struggle to prove that one is Not Racist–just like the white liberal elites want.

Immigration? Gallup polls show that, worldwide, over 700 million people desire to emigrate from their home countries. Most of them currently live in Africa or Latin America. And guess where they want to move? America. 21% name America as their preferred destination, far and away the top choice. The next highest country on the list of most desired locations for immigrants is Germany with 6%. Then on the list come Canada, the UK, France and Australia. (Wow! Would you look at that! All predominantly white countries ruled by liberals who constantly criticize the native populations for being racist.) If America is intolerant towards immigrants, then why do so many hundreds of millions still desperately want to come here?

These elite white liberals are completely full of it. Even by their own twisted standards, which are designed to constrain and oppress you, you are infinitely more virtuous, tolerant and open-minded than they are. Do not ever let them lecture you on your own backwardness again. They can’t tell you shit.

The Elites Are Making Violence Inevitable

The Yellow Vest uprising in France has taught us that there is only one way to defeat the Western political establishment: violent revolt.

That might sound extreme and shocking, but consider that the cancelation of the gas tax is probably the first time in decades the globalists have actually lost on a political issue.

Seriously.

Every single major issue has gone their way for decades: immigration, trade, healthcare, taxes. Everything. Brexit has gone their way. Trump’s presidency has even gone their way, largely: we all got tax cuts, and that’s great, but the tax cuts primarily benefitted those at the top.

But the gas tax did not go the globalists’ way. They didn’t get their way on that.

And do you know why? It was because they felt fear. Real, physical fear.

I challenge you to name a single policy since the end of the Cold War implemented in Western Civilization (America, Western Europe) that has been either restrictionist on immigration, good for the middle class economically (don’t say Cheap Chinese Crap), pro-national sovereignty, pro-peace, or pro-traditional values.

There’s nothing.

Virtually everything has been pro-open borders, pro-mass immigration, pro-job outsourcing, anti-manufacturing, anti-Christian, anti-middle class, pro-welfare state (i.e. government dependency), pro-globalist, pro-foreign war, pro-regime change and pro-domestic culture of depravity.

Everything.

Except the gas tax.

The French people got the first policy win over the Western globalist elite in decades.

And it was because they turned to violence. It was because they threatened to topple Macron and burn Paris to the ground.

You think this has gone unnoticed? This past weekend, Yellow Vest-style protests spread to Belgium and the Netherlands, as well as Germany.

Why? Because the Yellow Vests protests are working.

For the first time in decades, the forgotten, discontented masses of Western Civilization are actually seeing encouraging results, and it’s through protests and riots.

***

Back when Obama was President, I used to scoff at Democrats’ claims that our political system was broken. They were just complaining because we were using our minority powers granted under the constitution to stymie their agenda, I thought. We on the right smugly lectured them that the system was working just as it was intended to, and that the Founders wanted us to obstruct our balls off.

But now that they’re obstructing us on everything, I see they had a point.

What’s going to happen to our political system? Is it going to be endless obstruction? Some people are fine with this but consider that without any major legislative changes America will be transformed into a third world nation by way of mass immigration. It will happen barring a major change in immigration policy, a change which can only come through Congress.

Are we fated to simply take turns obstructing one another until demographics win out and give Democrats a permanent supermajority in this country? Because that’s what it seems like.

Eventually it will reach a breaking point.

Eventually people will get sick of never getting what they voted for.

And if you think the violence can only come from the right, you are fooling yourself. The media has been fomenting racial resentments for the better part of this decade and has convinced the now mostly-nonwhite left that they live in a viciously racist country where white supremacism runs rampant and oppresses minorities in every conceivable way.

Doesn’t matter if it’s not true: people believe it’s true. Millions of people. And because of it, they are full of righteous anger.

You saw what happened after Ferguson. Antifa and Black Lives Matter show that the left is increasingly seeing violence as the answer.

But overall here, I’m talking from a right-wing populist point of view. The media always derides us as angry, and eventually we’ll say, “You know what? We are angry. And we’re going to take it out on you and your kind.”

Trump’s election in America has not changed much. We still don’t have a wall, illegal immigration is at a record high, and the media still covers for Deep State criminals who have not faced any accountability for what they did in 2016 pertaining to the Steele Dossier and their abuse of government power to destroy Donald Trump. Nobody answered for Benghazi, nobody answered for Obama’s IRS harassing conservatives. The middle class is eroding and America is turning into a economically stratified nation of rich and poor with little in between.

In Britain, the Brexit vote changed nothing. Somehow, the EU is still in control. In fact, the European Court of “Justice” just ruled that Brexit can be reversed.

So what’s the takeaway? You can’t vote the globalists out of power. It just doesn’t work that way. Even when we win the elections, they still ultimately win. Nothing changes.

“We voted for the Wall.”

“Well, you still can’t have the Wall.”

“We voted for Brexit.”

“Well, you still can’t have Brexit.”

Yeah, it’s a huge mystery why people are taking to the streets.

I see a choice in the coming years between violent uprising and passive submission, and as history shows us, submission won’t happen.

No rotten, corrupt system can go on forever. Sooner or later, discontent boils over.

Again, as I keep saying, I do not prefer violence.

I wish we could get what we want democratically and peacefully. That’s the social compact that this country was founded on. But today’s elites do not believe in democracy. In fact they are actively anti-democratic.

They are not upholding their end of the social compact which states that we do not have to resort to violence and war so long as the results of democratic elections are honored.

It’s pretty simple.

They’ll cynically and disingenuously say that talking like this is undemocratic, but what else are we supposed to do when voting accomplishes nothing?

Worst of all, we increasingly can’t even voice our disapproval with the elite. Silicon Valley is making sure of that.

We sit patiently and wait for Republicans in Congress to do something about the fact that Big Tech is waging a digital genocide on right wing voices on social media, and yet nothing is done.

Hearing after hearing after hearing and not a damn thing happens. More right wing voices are banned with each passing day. Gavin McInnes is now banned from every major social media platform as of yesterday.

House Republicans dragged Google CEO Sundar Pichai before a committee today and the first thing out of his mouth was that Google is not biased against conservatives:

Are House Republicans just hoping some Big Tech CEO comes out and admits it?

What if that never happens, even thought we all know it to be true?

What is the plan then? Do we just accept it as a fact of life that we’re eventually going to be run off of social media, and that Republicans aren’t going to do shit about it?

The Hitler Youth site Vox is openly encouraging Big Tech to delete right wing voices from digital existence:

https://twitter.com/rooshv/status/1072543567653031936

So what are we supposed to do?

If we don’t stop this, we are finished. Pretty soon the only “right wing” voices permitted to remain online will be the Establishment-approved NeverTrump pussies who represent zero threat to the globalist status quo.

They’ll let us have Ben Shapiro, and that’s about it.

Big Tech will let us have YouTube clips of Shapiro using FACTS and LOGIC to OWN 20-year-old college liberals, and that’s it. They figure that’ll be enough to keep us sated.

But it won’t. Eventually they’ll push us to a breaking point. I don’t know when, but it will happen eventually.

The only way you can defeat the globalists that are destroying Western civilization is to do what they’re doing in France: revolt.

I wish it didn’t have to be like this, but people are not going to simply surrender as their beautiful countries are transformed into vastly-unequal third-world hellholes via mass immigration and job outsourcing by multinational corporations, and while their voices are silenced on social media for daring to express opposition to it all.

***

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is its natural manure.” -Thomas Jefferson, 1787

Theresa May Is About to Kill Brexit–and Democracy in Britain Altogether

And there it is:

Screen Shot 2018-12-07 at 1.05.30 PM.png

“We deliberately fucked-up the Brexit that you voted for. Wanna reconsider?”

The vote already happened. A second vote is not only unncessary but unacceptable.

If the people who ruled Britain believed in democracy, they would have all stepped aside in the wake of the Brexit vote–which they rightfully lost despite their campaign of fear and lies–and allowed genuine Brexiteers to take things from there.

They would have said, “The people have spoken, and rejected our vision for Britain. We will step aside and allow their vision to be carried out by those who actually supported it and believ in it.” In fact, that’s what their last Prime Minister, David Cameron, did. He was a Remainer, and when Remain lost, he stepped down because he knew he could not carry out the Brexit process in good faith.

At least he was honest about where he stood. His replacement, Theresa May, who was supposed to be the one suited to completing the Brexit deal, was in reality a closet Remainer who #Resisted the will of people and sabotaged the Brexit negotiations.

The people voted for Brexit, but the politicians have overruled them.

Thanks for playing.

The elites are killing democracy by brazenly overruling the will of the voters.

Do they see what’s going on in France? Doesn’t that give them at least a little pause?

They’re going to get themselves overthrown, and they’ll completely deserve it.