The Uniparty

Bernie Sanders: Sellout

2015: Bernie Sanders calls open borders a “Koch Brothers proposal.”

Bernie Sanders: “Open Borders? That’s a Koch Brothers proposal. Open borders is a right-wing proposal which says, essentially, that there is no United States.”

Ezra Klein: “–But it would make a lot of the global poor richer.”

Sanders: “Yes, but it would make everyone in America poorer. You’re doing away with the nation-state.”

Even if he is a socialist, at least he’s got some common sense.

Right?

Well, apparently he lost that common sense at some point over the past five years.

(Side note: why do so many “men” these days talk like Ezra Klein? That nerdy, effeminate voice. Why is that such a common trait of guys who work in the media?)

2020: Bernie Sanders wants open borders and government benefits for everyone who takes advantage of the open borders:

What happened to the guy from 2015?

***

My opposition to Bernie stems mostly from the fact that he appears to have been almost entirely co-opted by the Beast: he’s not the populist he once was. He’s now saying the federal government should begin (more like continue) showering illegal immigrants with All The Benefits and gibs.

He used to be unique on the left in that he rejected the idea that America could have a generous welfare state and open borders at the same time.

But now he’s fallen in line with the rest of them: open borders and free stuff for everyone.

If Bernie was still Insurgent Bernie, railing against illegal immigration because it’s bad for the American worker, I might actually be able to passively endorse his supposed hostile takeover of the Democratic Party. It’s not a bad thing for the sole existing anti-immigration Democrat politician to take over the party.

If Bernie truly was the insurgent outsider he’s portrayed as in the media, that would be great news for everyone. Even if he’s a leftist, the enemy of the Establishment is a friend of ours, albeit not a very strong one.

But Bernie Sanders has been compromised. He’s basically a generic mainstream Dem. He capitulated to the Establishment. He’s one of them now.

In other words, Bernie isn’t bad because he’s a Radical Leftwing Populist whose views are unprecedented in American history, but because he’s become a mainstream Establishment Democrat.

The way to beat Bernie is to point out that he’s a sellout. Open Borders Bernie wants to flood the country with illegals and shower them with free stuff.

The Thought Police Have Arrived, so it’s Time to Leave the Corporate Dystopia Behind

Potential employers are now judging you based on not only the tweets you send, but the tweets of others that you like:

Be careful what you like on social media, because potential future employers are now basing hiring decisions on it. It’s not enough now to just watch what you say and post on social media–they’re looking deeper than that.

You can learn a lot about a man by what he likes on social media. Because there’s a lot he won’t say, but which he will reveal through his likes and retweets. That’s where people truly show themselves, and Corporate America knows this.

Your ability to provide for yourself is now determined by whether you think Good Things, or Bad Things. Maybe you’ve never tweeted anything racist yourself, but that tweet you liked about FBI Crime Statistics by Race? Red flag for potential employers. An off-color joke? It could mean you lose out on a job.

They’re sending you a loud and clear message: just conform, buddy. Give it up. It’s not worth it. Stop thinking the things we don’t want you to think and start thinking the things we want you to think.

It’s impossible to hide now. They know everything about you. They know what tweets you’ve liked. They know your Google search history. They know more about you than your family and closest friends do.

It’s over. Your mind is an open book for them. And they’re basing their decision of whether or not to give you the means to provide for yourself on the thoughts in your head. If you want a roof over your head, you’d better get with the program.

I hope it’s clear by now that Corporate America is every bit as bad as the government.

Where the government cannot oppress you, Corporate America will. They work together. They’re different limbs of the same beast.

They are determined to police your thoughts and they will not be constrained by the Constitution. They have simply found a way around it. The government has outsourced its oppression of you to Corporate America.

The government may not be able to control what you say, but Facebook, Google and Twitter can.

This is why you need to be making plans to become self-sufficient. One day Corporate America will present you with a choice: your salary or your beliefs. At that point you will be owned–if you do not have the ability to provide for yourself.

I support Trump, I think illegal immigration is destroying this country, and I’m not ashamed about being white. But damnit, I need a salary. So I guess Orange Man Bad, white people are evil, Diversity is Our Strength, and Caitlyn Jenner is stunning and brave.”

At some point in the near future, having the Approved political and cultural views will be a prerequisite for employment. It could well get to the point where even McDonald’s is vetting applicants’ thoughts extensively.

So it’s imperative to prepare for yourself a future that does not rely on Corporate America for survival. Make plans to sever ties with Corporate America, or else you will be their slave. Their goal is to control the thoughts in your head, and they will achieve that goal if you do not become self-sufficient.

Banks and payment processors are already refusing to provide their services to people who don’t get in line with The Consensus. Why do you think they want us living in a cashless society? It’s all about control.

They want to turn us all into cattle–dumb, docile and under control. This is no longer the America any of us grew up in. It is not a free country anymore, and it’s getting less free by the day.

If you do not wish to be treated like cattle, you had better become independent. I really don’t see a way forward for political and cultural dissidents in 21st century America that does not entail moving out to the country and becoming a self-sufficient farmer.

The corporations have decided that your ability to put a roof over your family’s head will be determined by whether or not you hold Mainstream political and cultural views.

So it’s time to think about an exit strategy. It’s time to think about how you can reduce the amount of leverage Corporate America has on you.

The best revolution for us will not be a violent one. It will not entail war or terrorism or becoming the V for Vendetta guy. It will simply be us leaving Their World behind. Just move out to the country and start raising goats.

You can be free without having to shed blood. You still have a choice.

Figure out a way to be either self-employed or self-sufficient. Preferably both. But right now, chances are Corporate America has you by the balls.

You can’t quit your job because you have bills to pay. You don’t want to lose your healthcare. These are valid reasons; we’re all in the same boat. But while it’s possible to get out of the spider’s web, nobody ever said it was going to be easy. Only worth it.

You’ll have to figure it out for yourself. I can’t tell you how to do it because I’m still trying to figure out my own escape plan. But it is possible–and not only that, necessary.

Fortunately for us there is an opt-out in the contract. The terms of the deal are that you’re going to get a salary and be able to afford Nice Things so long as you passively endorse your rulers as they flood the country with cheap foreign labor, and start foreign wars that benefit no one besides Israel and the big defense contractors.

As a good citizen of 21st century America, your end of the bargain is that you will go to work and when you come home you will watch Netflix and then drink yourself stupid on the weekend. That’s your life if you accept the deal. You can do what you like with your free time as long as it’s not questioning your rulers and what they are doing to your country.

But again: this is all part of a deal that you have accepted. And the good news is you can opt-out. You simply have to forgo–for some amount of time–the security and comfort and stability that come from being employed by Corporate America.

But you don’t have to send your kids to Drag Queen Story Hour, or have your 2nd grader indoctrinated with LGBT propaganda. You can simply homeschool your kids.

You don’t have to eat fast food that literally poisons you, and drink water full of atrazine.

All of it is optional. Most people just don’t know they have a choice.

The hardest part is simply accepting the simple life of a farmer. Give up on your dream of one day becoming a rich movie star or a celebrity or a Business Executive, because that–even more than having bills to pay–is why most people are willing to play by Corporate America’s rules.

Lots of people today have this belief that they are destined for superstardom, and that’s why they accept Corporate America’s deal. They want to climb the Corporate Ladder so they partake in the rat race willingly. Or they figure their Corporate America job is just a temporary thing until they Make It Big.

Stop chasing fame and riches. I promise you they will not bring you fulfillment. Even if you do beat the odds and become a Hollywood celebrity or a rock superstar, there are strings attached. Hollywood is an exclusive club and you will pay a very steep price to get in. Hollywood is full of pedophiles, degenerates and even murderers. Look into the strange phenomenon of celebrities who have had family members murdered. Those aren’t just tragic coincidences. Becoming a celebrity requires literally selling your soul to the devil.

Being rich and famous is not going to bring you fulfillment and meaning in your life. Owning an exotic car is overrated: they’re expensive as hell to maintain and insure. Owning a yacht is overrated as well: there’s a reason they say the two best days of a boat-owner’s life is the day he buys it and the day he sells it.

The only things that will bring you fulfillment is faith, family and meaningful work, whatever that may be to you. It is not owning a Ferrari and a house in Beverly Hills.

So long as you prioritize money and material possessions over all else, They have got you by the balls. You’ll be running on their hamster wheel forever.

***

Now, will the rulers start to get pissed if more and more people start rejecting their deal of submission for comfort? Maybe–once it starts hurting their profits. But they’ll just import even more foreign labor if that happens. But they were always going to do that anyway.

And there’s always the chance they will go full Ruby Ridge on you, so obey the law and pay your taxes. Get all your guns registered and legitimately. If you’re going to rebel against the government, be prepared for them to treat you like a rebel.

What I’m suggesting here is a “third way,” which does not entail taking up arms against the government and does not entail submission to the Global Homogeneity agenda.

Right now you still have the choice to leave their system behind and be free. And when I say you “have the choice,” don’t take it as if I’m saying one day the government is going to make it illegal to move to the countryside and raise goats. That’s not what I’m saying. What I mean is, things will get worse and worse in the cities for wage earners that they will be effectively forced to flee. The choice will be made for you.

There will come a day where you will not be allowed to earn a wage from a corporation while also not wanting to have insane pedophiles dressed like literal demons reading stories to your children. In the near future, holding the Wrong Political Views will doom you in the labor market.

So start preparing now. Give yourself options. A man with options in his life is more powerful and more free than a man whose life would fall apart if he lost his job.

And notice that not once have I brought up the prospect of total societal breakdown or the a full-scale economic collapse. I am not saying society is going to turn in to Mad Max or some overtly-totalitarian 1984-style dystopia.

For one, our rulers know better than to make their tyranny visually obvious to us. A lot of people are tricked into thinking everything’s fine because society doesn’t look like their idea of a totalitarian dystopia. But people: they’re not suddenly going to put up menacing posters of Big Brother all over the cities and paint everything gray. They don’t want you to feel like you’re living under a tyrannical regime. It will not look like Hollywood’s presentation of dystopia. It will not look like 1984. In fact, this might be the fatal flaw of Orwell’s classic book: leading people to believe that when tyranny arrives, it will be obvious–that there is a certain, unmistakable “look” to a totalitarian society.

America will not suddenly look like this one day:

external-content.duckduckgo-1.jpg

What will happen is that your freedoms will be taken away from you one-by-one.

Life will still be in color.

You just won’t be free.

The Russian Collusion Hoax Should Be a Lesson: Don’t Trust the Elites

The collapse of the Russian Collusion Conspiracy theory is a stark lesson for a whole new generation that the media and supposed authorities in this country are complete and utter liars.

Watch as the media spends nearly two years boldly proclaiming that “the end” was near for Trump, that the walls were closing in and that Trump was finished due to a Russian Collusion “scandal” that the media made up:

https://twitter.com/doranimated/status/1154086058918916097?s=21

Today, the left’s last best hope to impeach Trump after all else had failed, Robert Mueller, was summoned before Congress by Desperate Democrats because apparently they believed Mueller had more to say about Trump’s supposed criminality than he wrote in his office’s 448-page report, released several months ago.

I really have no idea what the Democrats thought today would achieve for them. Mueller has long since released his office’s report and it concluded there was no collusion, no obstruction and no reason to impeach Trump. Did they think Mueller was holding out? Or were they looking for some soundbite they could, through their dishonest accomplices in the media, misconstrue and manipulate into a justification for impeachment. It’s probably the latter.

But unfortunately for them, their champion Mueller looked like a doddering, senile old man who was used mainly as a legitimacy-granting figurehead for the Special Counsel investigation, which was staffed up and carried out by hardcore partisan Democrats.

The old man was completely lost during today’s hearing. At one point he apparently claimed (or admitted, your choice) that he did not know what Fusion GPS was. Fusion GPS was the origin of the Steele Dossier, which itself was the basis for the entire Russiagate conspiracy theory and subsequent investigation:

He was either lying or telling the truth and I’m not sure which is worse.

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), who is turning into a real superstar, took Mueller to task over Mueller having hired Peter Strzok and an unnamed FBI agent who said “Vive La Resistance!” to the Special Counsel investigation. This exchange between Gaetz and Mueller was really indicative of how the whole thing went:

Just brutal. I almost felt bad for Mueller. He was left stuttering.

Gaetz had more highlights as well:

The whole thing was just an embarrassment for Democrats.

So Russiagate is now officially over, dead and buried. Of course Democrats are going to keep trying to dig it up and breathe life into it endlessly–I’m sure they’ll want to summon other members of the Mueller team to Capitol Hill after Mueller himself didn’t give them what they wanted. But the verdict in the court of public opinion is in: this whole thing was bullshit.

I hope most Americans realize today that they were lied to about Trump and Russia for nearly three years by the media, the entertainment industry and the political establishment. It was all lies.

I also hope most Americans, having realized that the elites lied to them about Russiagate, now start to wonder what else the elites have been lying about. Russian Collusion was not the first lie, nor will it be the last.

In conversations over the course of the two-plus year Russian Collusion Witch Hunt, people asked me if it’s really true that Trump colluded with the Russians. I said all along absolutely not. It’s all been made up.

People had a hard time believing that when I would tell them. They just couldn’t believe that the big cable news channels, the major newspapers, Hollywood and the late night talks shows were all lying.

Yet they were.

Most people in my generation are too young to remember the WMD fiasco during the Iraq War, but now we have our own version of it in the Russiagate Hoax.

The mainstream media should be forever discredited now that the conspiracy theory they bombarded the nation with for two years has gone down in flames. No one should ever again trust CNN, NYT, Bezos Post and all the rest given the absolute certainty with which they promoted Russiagate. Tune them out forever.

And then ask yourself, “If they lied about Russiagate, what else are they lying about? How far back does the lying go?” Because that’s the real rabbit hole.

Who Really Governs This Country?

You may have read recently about President Trump’s welcome decision to change legal asylum rules:

This is an obviously good idea that makes perfect logical sense. If someone is leaving their home country and seeking asylum somewhere else, there is no reason for them to pass through multiple countries before settling down again.

There is no reason someone from El Salvador or Honduras needs to come through Mexico to America and only America in search of asylum.

Unless the claim of “asylum” is just an excuse to be allowed into the United States.

If it’s really about asylum, then any country other than their home country will suffice. Mexico, for instance, should suffice for someone seeking asylum from Guatemala or Honduras.

Logically, people forfeit their claims to be seeking asylum when they pass through one or more countries en route to their end destination of America.

If you go through one or more other countries to come here, you clearly aren’t just seeking to escape your home country. If that was the case you would have stopped seeking asylum the moment you got out of your home country.

But obviously we’re not stupid; we realize that these “asylum” claims are mostly BS excuses to get into America and get healthcare and welfare. So now Trump has removed part of that incentive for people from any country that does not border the U.S., which is to say every country in the world but two.

I say “part” of the incentive because we still give healthcare and welfare benefits to illegals, and prospective illegal immigrants in other countries know this and still want to come to America because of it. Until we stop giving handouts to illegals, they will never stop wanting to come here.

Now, while Trump’s decision is a good one that should in theory discourage and ultimately greatly reduce false asylum claims at the border, there are a couple problems that still remain.

First, people will still keep trying to come across the border illegally. They want to get into America to enjoy our generous welfare system by any means possible.

Second, they should know that while Trump is against illegal immigration and wants to crack down on it, the rest of the American political class is not. Phony asylum seekers should know by now that Democrats will let them in and give them free healthcare and government benefits. Prospective migrants from poor countries have lots of friends in high places here in the US, and that just because Trump issued this rule does not mean it will stand.

We all know this rule is going to be immediately challenged by liberal open borders groups, brought before liberal open borders judges, and struck down as “Unconstitutional” because everyone knows the Founding Fathers were liberal open borders progressives who envisioned a day when America would be overrun by poor third-worlders. After all, we have to base our entire immigration system on the poem on the Statue of Liberty because it’s basically a part of the Constitution.

Thus far in his Presidency, the federal courts have, just to give a sampling:

  • Frozen Pentagon money Trump directed to be used on the border wall.
  • On seven different occasions ruled that the administration cannot deny funding to Sanctuary Cities, because everyone knows the Founding Fathers instituted the concept of Federalism so deep-blue urban areas could openly flout national immigration laws.
  • Ruled that Trump is not allowed to block his critics on Twitter. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez has blocked plenty of people on Twitter but as of now, no federal court has ruled that she can’t.
  • Overturned the Trump White House’s decision to revoke CNN Propagandist Jim Acosta’s White House press pass, which he routinely abuses in order to narcissistically grandstand, spout off Democratic Party talking points and build a celebrity profile for himself instead of reporting the news.
  • Barred the administration from asking the citizenship question on the 2020 Census in order to ensure Democratic states rife with illegals are able to continue inflating their populations in order to get more Electoral Votes and more seats in the House of Representatives.

And that’s not nearly everything. But it just gives you an idea of how corrupt the federal court system is, and how dead-set it is on making sure nothing ever gets in the way of this country being endlessly flooded by poor third-worlders.

All in all, federal courts have ruled against the administration 70 times in two and a half years, according to the Bezos Post, which proudly trumpets this number as if it reflects poorly on Trump rather than the courts themselves:

It’s not because, as Bezos Post wants you to believe, Trump is trampling on the Constitution left and right. It’s because the corrupt courts have taken for themselves both legislative and executive powers.

Virtually none of this is on the up-and-up.

How can you tell? Because, conveniently, it just so happens that any and all opposition to liberal policies is Unconstitutional. Imagine that. According to federal judges, the Founding Fathers didn’t want a border, saw no distinction between American citizens and illegals, supported the idea of Sanctuary Cities, and hated the idea of honest, legitimate journalism. And everyone knows the Founding Fathers wanted trannies in the military.

Wow, how fortunate for the left that the Racist, Sexist, Slave-owning Founding Fathers also happened to agree with the Democratic Party of 2019 on literally everything.

The Impartial and Unbiased courts whom no one must ever question or criticize said so!

This how our country is run now. Uniparty judges appointed by Obama, Bush and Clinton are the real government. They alone decide which policies stand and which are struck down.

And there’s nothing you can do about it because they’re appointed for life. The President you voted for has been overruled by judges you didn’t vote for, and that’s how this country works now.

You are not allowed to vote against open borders. That’s one government policy the American people don’t get a say in.

Immigration restrictions are no longer on the menu.

How ’bout a nice, fat helping of open borders instead?

Ted Cruz & Ocasio-Cortez Unite to Take on the Uniparty. Is it For Real?

Recently I’ve been saying the Uniparty Establishment is the true enemy and that partisan politics is one of its tricks to keep Americans divided and fighting one another instead of the Uniparty itself.

When the American people finally DO turn against the Uniparty, it will first require Republicans and Democrats to put aside many of their differences in recognition of the fact that the Uniparty, not the other side, is responsible for all they decry and lament about America.

For the most part, I’m not talking about the politicians because most politicians are the Uniparty. I’m mainly talking about the voters, the masses, but also the handful of rogue politicians out there that aren’t under the thumb/in the pocket of the Uniparty.

In order to actually overthrow the Uniparty it will require grassroots Republicans and grassroots Democrats to recognize that there is far worse out there than each other.

So what would that look like? What would it look like for the grassroots right and the grassroots left to come together, put aside their differences and focus on the major points of agreement rather than differences? By major points of agreement, I mean on genuinely consequential issues: it doesn’t count as bipartisanship if it’s some silly thing like passing a resolution saying “We Hate Cancer.”

And it also has to be an issue that is genuinely in the interest of the American people. If the Establishment wings of both parties come together and pass a horrendous omnibus bill that guts border security and further opens the border, that doesn’t count. In fact that’s simply the Uniparty doing its thing. That’s business as usual. Also something that doesn’t count: the Establishment wings of both parties coming together to start a foreign war.

So here we have a genuine Republican populist, Ted Cruz, coming together with a seemingly (more on this later) genuine Democratic populist, Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, on an issue that is truly in the interest of the American people: putting an end to the Congress-to-K-Street-Pipeline.

For those who don’t know, K-Street is the street in D.C. where most of the lobbying firms are located, and so when someone says “K-Street,” they’re referring to the Washington lobbying industry. In 2015, the Washington Free Beacon reported that since 1998, a total of 427 former Members of Congress went into lobbying after leaving Congress. It’s such a common tradition that it’s come to be known as the Revolving Door, or the Congress-to-K-Street-Pipeline. With 427 former Members of Congress in the lobbying business, that means there are nearly as many former Members of Congress lobbying Congress as there are Members in Congress.

This was how the bipartisanship began:

Screen Shot 2019-05-30 at 10.02.25 PM.png

The tweet Ocasio-Cortez is reacting to is a report that nearly 60% of the former Members that left Congress in January of this year went into lobbying. Cortez said it should be illegal for former Members of Congress to go into lobbying. Ted Cruz saw her tweet and agreed:

Screen Shot 2019-05-30 at 10.02.39 PM.png

Ocasio-Cortez was more than receptive–she was all-in:

Screen Shot 2019-05-30 at 10.02.59 PM.png

This is so much more encouraging and gratifying than the constant OWNING and DESTROYING one another we’ve grown accustomed to when it comes to partisan politics.

Usually, it would be something like this: Ocasio-Cortez says something on Twitter, then a Republican quote tweets her and says something to the effect of, “WHAT A F*CKING IDIOT” and gets 50k likes. Or vice versa.

This bare-knuckle brawling and dunking on one another is definitely popular with us partisans, because we’ve all grown so accustomed to seeing the other side as the Great Satan above all others.

But doesn’t this just feel better? Doesn’t this make you more optimistic about the future of our country, to see two politicians who are seemingly bitter opposites coming together to take action against the real enemy?

When we see Politician We Like 💯🔥ABSOLUTELY OWN💯🔥 Politician We Don’t Like, it doesn’t actually make us feel good. It just indulges our partisan hatred. It confirms the views we already hold. And that isn’t inherently bad, because a lot of times the libs do deserve to be OWNED, but it doesn’t actually get us anywhere as a country.

The real enemy–the Uniparty–loves the partisan mudslinging more than any of us because it means we’re not focused on the Uniparty, which is the true source of misery and evil in the country.

What the Uniparty hates, on the other hand, is when politicians it doesn’t control, like Ted Cruz and Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez (maybe–again, more on her later) come together, seemingly against all odds, and propose something that is bad for the Uniparty and, by definition, good for the American people.

There is no good reason for former Members of Congress to go into lobbying. It doesn’t benefit the American people; it benefits the special interests. It’s taking someone who knows the legislative process from the inside and tasking them with manipulating the legislative process and their former colleagues in order to give the upper hand to the special interests, from Big Pharma to the Military Industrial Complex and beyond. Think about it: a former Member of Congress makes the perfect lobbyist.

This unholy marriage of Big Business and Big Government is the very essence of the Uniparty. It’s how the two have basically merged and become one.

And so while banning former Members of Congress from going into lobbying would certainly not bring the whole corrupt Uniparty system to its knees, it would nonetheless be a victory for the American people.

Of course, this could all be a Uniparty psyop meant to give the people false hope before crushing it in order to demoralize. That’s possible. The Uniparty does this all the time.

If this is the case it would mean both Cruz and Ocasio-Cortez are faux-populists who exist to give the American people the impression that Congress is not 100% dominated by the Uniparty. Again, this is possible.

But here’s the thing: I actually trust Ted Cruz. I trust his anti-Establishment bonafides. I trust that he’s on our side. Why? All the other Uniparty Establishment Senators hate him. He’s gotta be doing something right.

Remember in the 2016 GOP primary, the final two candidates were Trump and Ted Cruz and the GOP Establishment was already moaning that no matter who won, it was screwed. Whether the voters ultimately chose Trump or Cruz, the Establishment knew neither was Their Guy.

The GOP Establishment hated Ted Cruz nearly as much as it hated Trump. In fact Trump was the only candidate the Establishment despised more than Cruz.

Cruz obviously is not as big of an outsider as Trump, but he’s an outsider alright. Cruz has pissed off the Establishment at every step since he first began running for Senate back in 2011. Remember, he was the Tea Party insurgent candidate who defeated the Establishment Careerist David Dewhurst in the Republican Senate Primary in 2012. Like Trump in 2016, the Establishment in 2012 said that Cruz winning the primary was a disaster because he was too conservative to win the general election.

So I trust Ted Cruz. He’s one of the few politicians I can say that about with a reasonable degree of confidence, but the reason I trust him is because all the right people hate him and have tried to stop him at every step of the way.

The real question is, do we trust Ocasio Cortez? Is she really as much of a populist, anti-Establishment rabble-rouser as she claims to be?

I’m kind of torn on that question. On one hand I think she could be the genuine article—a genuine populist, anti-Establishment, Bernie Sanders-like figure who really and truly represents a threat to Uniparty rule—but on the other hand I think the Uniparty may well have already gotten to her and flipped her.

The reason I say Ocasio-Cortez may already have been flipped to the Uniparty is because of all the positive Uniparty media coverage she gets. She’s become a national celebrity, and these days you generally don’t get to become a popular national celebrity who is covered positively by the Uniparty media unless you are one of them.

When you have CNN, FiveThirtyEight, New Yorker and Wired all saying positive things about you, it definitely calls into question your Outsider Credentials.

afdsafdsfdsaf.PNG

And yet, on the other hand, Nancy Pelosi seems to really despise Ocasio-Cortez, which is a major boost to her anti-Uniparty bonafides:

adsfdsafdsaf.PNG

gdhfghfghsfghsf.PNG

And Ocasio-Cortez, like Cruz, like Trump, was a genuine outsider candidate who upset an establishment politician in her primary race.

So is Ocasio-Cortez a genuine populist who will ultimately be an ally against the Uniparty, or have they already gotten to her and turned her into a puppet?

We’ll find out before long.

Partisan Politics is a Trick Used by the Uniparty Establishment to Divide and Conquer the People

The greatest trick the Establishment ever pulled was dividing the electorate into fiercely competitive and adversarial factions. The end result is that the people are fighting each other instead of their true enemy. Divide and conquer.

The main theme of traditional Left vs. Right American Politics has been Democrats having their fury trained on Big Businesses and how evil the Private sector is, while Republicans are fixated on the evils of big government.

Each side sees the other as the puppet of their great Satan: Democrats see Republicans as in thrall to big business, Republicans see the Democrats as the party of big government.

And here’s the thing: they’re both right.

But both sides miss the real problem: big business and big government are two sides of the same coin: the Uniparty.

The Uniparty is the unholy alliance of big business and big government.

As long as you’re missing the bigger picture and only focusing on one side, the Uniparty wins.

The great trick is to keep Democrats and Republicans divided and attacking one another instead of the Uniparty.

“But there’s lots of genuinely evil people on the left! We need to fight them!”

That’s true. I’m not saying there aren’t anti-white racists on the left. I’m not saying the abortion lovers aren’t out there and in need of thwarting. I’m not saying Antifa isn’t out there. There are indeed lots of genuinely bad people on the left, and it’s perfectly fine to oppose them and their agenda.

But they’re the minority. The vast majority of Democrats are decent people, albeit deeply misled. They’re all not the nutty, unrepentant lunatics we see on Twitter and on Fox News. Most Democrats aren’t going to bark at you about proper gender pronouns.

Democrats also need to realize Republicans aren’t all Evil Racist Nazis hellbent on killing everyone who isn’t a white Christian. Republicans aren’t all gun-toting inbred hicks.

The real enemy is the Uniparty Machine. It’s the big corporations and the politicians they control. Big business and big government have become one, and that’s the true enemy.

They’re the ones flooding our country with poor immigrants. They’re the ones shipping all the jobs overseas. They’re the ones causing housing bubbles. They’re the ones killing us with opioids and poisonous pharmaceutical drugs. They’re the ones who have decimated black families and inner cities.

Keep your eyes on the prize: the only way we will ever actually defeat and dislodge the corrupt Uniparty is when Americans finally realize who the true enemy is.

As long as we’re fighting each other, we’re not fighting the Uniparty.

The New York Times Goes Full-Blown 1984-level Propaganda: “Pregnancy Kills. Abortion Saves Lives.”

Please excuse me while I pick my jaw up off the floor:

Please read that again: “Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

“Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

“Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

“Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

“Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

They really just don’t give a fuck anymore, huh?

They’re like, “We’re telling massive lies straight to your faces and we don’t even care who knows it lol.” They want you to know that there’s nothing you can do to stop them.

Uniparty propaganda is now so shameless that they’re straight-up saying “Pregnancy kills, abortion saves lives.”

The end-goal of their propaganda is now more obvious than ever: depopulation.

The Uniparty elites support abortion because the elites support depopulation. Smaller populations are more easily controlled.

Of course they’ve convinced the useful idiots in the streets that abortion is about a “woman’s right to choose,” but it’s not. It’s about depopulation and eugenics.

Haven’t you noticed just how many of their policy initiatives result in depopulation?

Do you think the elites are unaware of the fact that the US has aborted over 61 million babies since 1973? And that over 1.5 billion babies have been aborted worldwide since 1980?

Virtually nothing happens that they don’t want and plan to happen. You cannot seriously believe that the Uniparty elite doesn’t know exactly what the score is.

What’s the end-goal of “environmentalism”? It’s not Saving The World–the world doesn’t need saving.

The end-goal is you not having kids:

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 4.54.58 PM.png

If you want to Save The Planet™, do your part by not having children!

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 4.55.15 PM.png

Because A Study™ said so!

What’s the point of so-called “Female Empowerment”?

Depopulation. If women are working into their 30s and beyond, they’re having fewer kids. Working women are great the for the Uniparty: first of all, they’re an untapped supply of labor, which in turn drives down the price of labor. Second of all, working women aren’t having children, leading a declining birthrate, which in turn the Uniparty’s propaganda outlets will use to say, “We are in a population crisis! The only way to solve it is with millions of more poor, third-world immigrants!”

Why does the elite celebrate and promote homosexuality? Because it’s sterile. The elite wants more and more gay people because that means fewer births.

I already know what you’re going to say: “But you’re born gay! How can the elite create more gay people?!”

First of all, you are not born gay. There is no evidence of any “gay gene” existing, and that’s according to a 143-page John’s Hopkins study from 2016:

“Studies of the brains of homosexuals and heterosexuals have found some differences, but have not demonstrated that these differences are inborn rather than the result of environmental factors that influenced both psychological and neurobiological traits,” the report explained. “One environmental factor that appears to be correlated with non-heterosexuality is child sexual abuse victimization, which may also contribute to the higher rates.”

The study was unable to conclude specifically why people are gay, but it was clear in stating that there is not anywhere near sufficient evidence to prove people are born gay.

It’s one of those things people just believe because, well, that’s what Good People believe. Plus they’ve heard it repeated a bunch of times on TV, in movies, on the news, etc.

This goes to show you that repeating something enough times does, in fact, make it “true”–at least in people’s minds.

But “Born This Way” has never been proven by actual science.

Which means sexuality is either a conscious choice, or it’s a product of external/environmental influences. What might those external influences be? Well, like the study said, being sexually abused as a child is a big one. Other non-sexual forms of emotional trauma are another. Then there’s the influence of viewing pornography starting at an early age. And then finally there’s the cultural/social angle of it, meaning propaganda and indoctrination.

How else do you explain the fact that Millennials are “the gayest generation“?

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.33.46 PM.png

Millennials are also the generation that has been most bombarded with pro-gay propaganda. Big coincidence, I’m sure!

In 2017, NBC News reported the results of a survey that showed 20% of millennials identified as LGBT.

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.35.29 PM.png

Gay people have historically been around 2-4% of the population, and now all the sudden we have a generation that’s 20% gay–meaning 5-10x gayer than previous ones?

You’re telling me that’s not a product of cultural brainwashing and propaganda?

If being gay was entirely biological and natural, we would expect the gay proportion of the population to remain static or at least fluctuate very little over time. If one’s sexuality has nothing to do with external factors, we would expect the gay percentage of the population to be the same today as it was in 1919, 1519 and even 2019 B.C. But it’s not. All of the sudden it’s skyrocketing.

So that means either people today are being brainwashed to be gay or the Uniparty is putting something in the water to turn people gay.

Could be both, honestly.

It’s pretty simple: Pro-gay propaganda makes it socially desirable to be gay. More people than ever nowadays are claiming to be gay. It’s obvious what’s going on.

Folks, there are no accidents in politics. This is not all just a coincidence.

Today’s ruling Uniparty elite is every bit as obsessed with eugenics as the Nazis were. They just go about it in less-obvious ways.

The Uniparty Elite may not have death camps (at least that we know about) but 61 million aborted babies in the US since 1973 speaks for itself.

And the above whopper by the New York Times claiming that pregnancy kills and abortion saves lives is not the first time America’s supposed “paper of record” has gone to bat for the Depopulation Agenda:

Screen Shot 2019-03-26 at 12.06.44 PM.png

Parenting is so hard these days. Better to just avoid it altogether.

“But,” you may ask, “if the Elite want depopulation, then why do they want more immigrants to solve the supposed population crisis?”

Because poor immigrants from the third world are easily controlled. Just give them Free Shit from the government and they’re yours.

The goal is to depopulate America of Americans and repopulate it with “New Americans” who will be subservient to the Uniparty Agenda.

If you haven’t noticed, the Democratic Party’s dominance of national elections is based entirely on foreign-born voters:

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.17.31 PM.png

No wonder Republicans have only won the popular vote once since 1988.

The goal is to sever our connection to 1776 because of what America As Founded represents: individual liberty, freedom of speech, self-determination, actual human empowerment, self-government, the right to bear arms, etc.

All of those things are Problematic for the Uniparty. And so this is why they want to depopulate America of Americans and repopulate it with poor foreigners who don’t really understand what it means to be free, and who have no connection to 1776.

Are you getting it now?

The Uniparty elite wants all the statues and monuments to the past erased and removed. That’s all part of the plan. Don’t you understand how it works by now? First they come for the stuff that nobody will defend, like the Confederate Statues, then they’ll come for the George Washingtons and Thomas Jeffersons–because they owned slaves!

And, oh, wouldja lookit that? Mayor Pete Buttwhatever is now calling for the erasure of Thomas Jefferson’s name from American society.

They come after the indefensible targets first, then they go for their real targets. That’s why they banned Alex Jones and Milo first. Then they’ll come for the “more reasonable” dissidents like Paul Joseph Watson and Steven Crowder, etc.

They want this country to completely start over–without any of that bullshit the original Founding Fathers came up with, like the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence.

They want an America where the people don’t know what it means to be free. And they’re gonna get it, too.

Depopulation is the means; power and control are the ends.

 

The Latest Media Fairytale: It’s Finally Joe Biden’s “Turn” to be President

The Uniparty Establishment would like you to forget everything you know and dislike about Joe Biden, because it’s time for the Media propagandists to put lipstick on a pig in a pathetic attempt to repackage him and sell him to you as fresh and attractive.

Wow, it’s finally Joe Biden’s time.”

No, it’s not. Please stop.

After nearly five decades of Public Service™️, America’s Lovable Uncle, Joe Biden, might finally get his turn in the White House. What a storybook moment.”

Come on.

Biden deserves this after patiently waiting his turn and serving our country so honorably for so long.”

Oh for the love of God. . .

They tried this same shit with Hillary: “It’s finally her turn.”

They preferred you not mention the fact that Hillary was rejected by the voters in 2008 when she originally sought the Presidency. That was supposed to be “her turn,” but she lost embarrassingly to a guy who had only been in the Senate for two years before he ran for President.

She didn’t “wait her turn” at all. She tried to run in 2008 and lost!

The Uniparty is trying to hype these career politicians’ multi-decade campaigns for the White House as sentimental, storybook and inspiring. Get the hell outta here.

No one is mentioning that Joe Biden first ran for President in 1988, or 31 years ago (pictured above). He had to drop out of the race before the first primary vote because he was caught plagiarizing.

2020 is not the culmination of a life of government service for Biden. He hasn’t patiently wait his turn at all; he lost.

But 1988 was not the end of Joe Biden’s presidential ambitions. He tried to run for President again in 2008, this time actually making it to the Iowa Caucus, only to come in a distant 5th place with under 1% of the vote. He promptly dropped out of the race.

Joe Biden 2020, like Hillary 2016, is an absolute fairytale. The only thing different about Joe Biden now from his last failed bid for the White House is his association in liberal/Establishment minds with Obama. And if Obama can’t run, Obama’s former Vice President must be the Next Best Thing, right?

That was basically the thought process for Hillary, too: “Well, if we can’t get Bill again, Hillary’s gotta be the Next Best Thing, right?” The only thing that changed about Hillary between 1992 and 2008 was that her husband was President. Bill’s presidency enabled everything Hillary has done in her political career since 2000, when she was basically handed a Senate seat in New York because of her husband.

Joe Biden is the male Hillary Clinton, the only difference being that Biden got elected to the Senate on his own and not due to who his spouse was. But like Hillary’s perceived legitimacy as a presidential candidate was only due to who her husband was, Biden’s perceived legitimacy for the presidency is 100% a product of the fact that he was Obama’s VP.

Biden: the Next Best Thing nostalgia candidate.

The media narrative on Biden is massively detached from reality.

The thought of Joe Biden finally getting the job he deserves after decades of Public Service™️ doesn’t warm anyone’s heart.

Biden is trying to make it seem like after two terms as Vice President, he was happy to ride off into the sunset of old age as a Dignified Elder Statesman™️ (also a total fairytale given what a loutish, boneheaded creep we all know him to be). But, according to the Uniparty Fairytale, the stoic and revered Biden could not sit idly by while his country was ruled by a Fascist Nazi Usurper, so Biden, reluctantly, decided to run for President in order to save the nation from Trump.

Makes you want to puke, no?

Keep in mind that while Uniparty Propaganda is now trying to depict Biden as a dignified and respected Elder Statesman, this is a man the Onion lampooned for years as a national joke–the Obama Administration’s comic relief; the kooky (77-year-old) uncle who talks out of his ass and gets a little too handsy with younger girls.

It all started in 2009:

Basically the Onion portrayed Biden as a burnout stoner stuck in 1986. This became a running joke on the site for the duration of the Obama Presidency:

The Onion articles were funny because they were kinda believable; that’s what makes a good parody. The underlying idea was that Biden was not to be taken seriously.

But now the Uniparty Media is trying to pretend Biden is this revered and accomplished Public Icon.

It seems like we’ve forgotten almost overnight exactly who Joe Biden truly is.

Hello? This is still the same Joe Biden, people.

Remember when his hairplugs were a running joke? Remember when he himself was a running joke?

It’s the same Joe Biden as ever.

Don’t believe a word of this Biden Fairytale. The reality is he’s the only viable Uniparty Establishment candidate out there, and so he must be brought out of retirement to oust the Outsider in the White House and return things to the Globalist Uniparty Status Quo.

Biden is pure Uniparty Establishment.

The Uniparty is Real: McCain Family to Formally Endorse Joe Biden for President

From Establishment Republicans to Establishment Democrats, just like *that*:

“The late Sen. John McCain’s family plans to support former Vice President Joe Biden’s White House bid, backing the Democrat not only in his party’s crowded primary race but also in a general election matchup with President Trump, the Washington Examiner has learned.”

It may seem like ancient history now, but keep in mind: McCain lost to Obama-Biden in the 2008 Presidential election. And now McCain’s family is endorsing the guy who was part of the ticket that denied him the presidency.

That is some serious, serious cuckoldry right there.

Or at least, it would be some serious cuckoldry for a man to die and then, just a few months later, we see his wife and daughter endorsing the guy who beat him in a prior presidential election. But I’m sure the late Senator totally approves of his family formally supporting a Democrat for President.

“A former McCain campaign official with close ties to the family said support for Biden was a given, but they needed to calculate how they could best help the former vice president.”

This is how the Uniparty Establishment rolls. There are no “principles” at all among these Establishment-types. They will happily support a Democrat for President–even a Democrat who was part of a ticket that beat their late father in a prior Presidential election–and not think twice.

The only “principle” they have is taking and retaining power. And right now, power is in the wrong hands–Trump’s. The McCains will support Biden to bring power back into the right hands.

You’d be hard-pressed to find a better example of the Uniparty Ruling Class at work than the McCain family happily supporting Democrat Joe Biden for President in 2020.

Oligopolies Run Our Lives

To truly understand what The Uniparty is, you must understand its corporate side. The Uniparty is not just Washington: it is every center of power in this country, as they are all connected and on the same page. They’re all just divisions of the same omnipotent Uniparty.

Multinational megacorporations have consolidated market share and power to an alarming degree over the past four decades and the end result is that they exert ever greater control over our lives. The fewer options we have, the more power the companies have over us.

A consistent theme in most major industries today is that they are dominated by just a handful of multinational megacorporations.

TV is just a few companies: Disney, Comcast, Time Warner, Viacom, CBS and Newscorp.

Screen Shot 2019-04-11 at 2.53.00 PM.png

In 1983, 90% of US media was divided up by 50 companies. Today six companies own 90%. Everything you see on TV comes from one of six major Uniparty corporations.

On top of this, CBS and Viacom are working on a merger, and Time Warner was just bought out by AT&T, meaning a cable provider (AT&T) now owns the content company. Another cable provider, Comcast, already owns a considerable slice of the television market, and now it will be joined by another cable provider in the Big Six (soon to be Big Five).

Entertainment: There used to be the Big Six Studios of Hollywood—Disney, 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros., Paramount, Universal and Sony—but now Disney is taking over 20th Century Fox, so there’s five. Plus, Universal is owned by NBC, which is owned by Comcast.

big-six1-1024x768.png

So Disney is one of the Big Five of television, and also one of the Big Five of Hollywood. Ditto goes for Comcast, Warner Brothers (owned by Time Warner) and Paramount Pictures (owned by Viacom). Only Sony Pictures is not owned by a TV giant.

When I refer to “the entertainment industry” I’m referring to this five-headed oligopoly that owns virtually all of TV and Hollywood. Over the past 40 years, due to mergers and acquisitions, the entire entertainment industry has been consolidated into just five multinational megacorporations.

The point is to concentrate the power of the entertainment industry into as few hands as possible, so as to control the messaging and content closely.

It’s easier than ever to get blackballed in Hollywood today because there are so few places for aspiring actors, directors, writers and producers to go.

In case you were wondering about the music industry, there are now three major record labels: Universal Music Group (owned by French media conglomerate Vivendi), Sony Music, and Warner Music Group (which was spun off by Time Warner in 2011 and is now owned by private conglomerate called Access Industries).

Advertising: four companies, plus one Japanese form, run the advertising/marketing industry.

Screen Shot 2019-04-11 at 2.50.23 PM.png

Why do you think all commercials are basically the same? They’re all about pushing diversity, glorifying feminism, hitting all over whites, and trashing men.

This is because four companies control the advertising and marketing industry.

Internet and Social Media: Google, Facebook, Amazon and maybe Twitter, but only because Twitter is an important site with a lot of visitors, not because Twitter is actually big. Twitter’s market cap is $26 billion, meaning any of the Big Three could buy Twitter and barely even notice.

Online commerce is monopolized by Amazon. Search is monopolized by Google, as well as online video. Facebook owns social networking. Amazon now wields the power of making or breaking an author’s career.

The Silicon Valley oligopoly is probably the most well-known, and that’s because it is the newest and most glamorous. Seemingly overnight these companies went from quirky startups to global behemoths, and they now have more direct power over individual behavior than perhaps any companies in history.

If you run a blog or a page or a YouTube channel that the Uniparty feels is a threat, you will disappear from the internet without a trace. The internet oligopoly can ensure that. Never forget that we can only say what they permit us to say.

Groceries:

Screen Shot 2019-04-11 at 2.57.15 PM.png

Ten companies produce virtually every product you will find in your local supermarket.

You want to boycott Gillette razors? Sure, you can go buy razors from a company owned by Unilever. That’ll show ’em. Just make sure not to shoot yourself in the foot by supporting any other brands owned by Procter & Gamble, Gillette’s parent company, including: Tide, Gain, Dawn, Duracell, OralB, Crest, Pantene, Head & Shoulders, Old Spice, Bounty, Mr. Clean and Febreeze. Stick it to ’em!

Retail Banks: Chances are you bank with one of the four major banks.

Chances are, either JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Citigroup has your money.

Chase is now shutting down the accounts of political dissidents. The other three are likely to follow suit, which means you will soon be out of banking options if your political views don’t align with the Uniparty’s.

Back in the old days, banks used to be more local and smaller. Think about it: if you lived in Indiana, how could you store your money in a bank based in San Francisco? The rise of the internet has allowed megabanks to go nationwide. And so the local banks died out and gave way to the banking giant oligopoly.

Big Pharma: How could we forget this one? Perhaps the most insidious of all the major oligopolies in America, Big Pharma is literally poisoning America and making money hand-over-fist in the process.

Big Pharma is global, comprising not just American companies but European ones including Novartis (Swedish), Bayer (German), Roche (Swiss), Teva (Israeli) and GlaxoSmithKline (British). The biggest of all is Johnson & Johnson, an American giant which you’ll recall was also part of the supermarket oligopoly:

top10pharmas.png

All in all, there are 22 pharmaceutical companies worldwide with revenues greater than $10 billion. A recent article explains why Big Pharma exists:

“The pharmaceutical industry is becoming an oligopoly due to the staggering costs of developing and marketing new drugs and because of patents that protect new products from competitors. It can cost more than $1 billion to develop a new drug, get it approved by the Food and Drug Administration and bring it to market, according to “Forbes” magazine. With those kind of upfront costs, only a handful of companies including Pfizer, Merck and Novartis, can afford to create and sell new products. The government grants those companies extended patents on their drugs, and these patents protect drug developers from competitors for many years.”

One billion dollars to develop a new drug? Years of patent protection granted by the government in order to monopolize your market? That type of cost doesn’t exactly lend itself to robust competition, does it?

This is all by design: costs are so high because of the need to comply with government regulations, which were in turn written by Big Pharma lobbyists in order to discourage and prevent competition.

After all, if the government wasn’t writing the rules to make things more favorable for the Big Pharma oligopoly, then the $4 billion the industry has spent on lobbying over the past two decades has been a tremendous waste. No other industry spends more on lobbying than Big Pharma.

Insurance: Coming in second to Big Pharma in lobbying spending over the past two decades at $2.7 billion is the insurance industry, specifically healthcare. Already a highly-concentrated industry prior to 2010, the Obamacare law made it an oligopoly:

“Health insurance is a highly regulated industry with a number of government mandates at the state and federal level. The 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requires insurers to accept more high risk patients as customers and to provide comprehensive coverage to all their customers. Such constraints favor a handful of established companies, such as Humana, Cigna, Aetna and WellPoint. Some observers suspect that companies capable of surviving new legal mandates will evolve into an oligopoly.”

Again, it’s important to note that it’s not just Obamacare that is the problem in health insurance. The industry was already considered “highly concentrated” before 2010.

Today, there are only three states in the US where the top two largest health insurance providers hold less than a 50% market share:

popup_22map.gif

And as you can see, many states’ health insurance markets are outright monopolized–for example in Alabama, Blue Cross Blue Shield has an 83% market share.

“Free market conservatives” think the problem with insurance companies is that they’re too heavily regulated and this drives costs up. But why are they so highly regulated in the first place? Because they lobbied for those regulations to get rid of competition. Who do you think primarily wrote the Obamacare law?

***

The common theme is further and further concentration of power, in all industries. Fewer players means fewer moving parts, meaning things are easier to control.

Bloomberg shows that the number of public companies has been cut in half over the past 20 years:

Screen Shot 2019-04-20 at 2.39.28 AM.png

Fewer options for the consumer can be a good thing in certain cases–take computer and phone operating systems, for instance–but overall the lack of options usually means consumers are at the mercy of big corporations.

The whole point is power: the more options consumers have, the less power companies have. The fewer options consumers have, the more power the companies have. And right now, the scales are tipped heavily towards the corporations.

This is all by design.

Trump–as a genuine outsider who won the Presidency despite having virtually all the Uniparty’s corporate, media and political interests aligned vehemently against him–must realize that as a billionaire not in thrall to the multinational megacorporations, he is in a unique place to become the great trust-buster of the 21st century.

Trump doesn’t need the corporations to bankroll him. He doesn’t have to be their bitch the way virtually every other politician does. Most politicians go into politics to become rich, but Trump was the other way around, which is why the Uniparty was so opposed to him: they knew they couldn’t bribe and control him. That’s why he was so scary for them. And this puts Trump in a unique position where he can go after these major corporations with little fear of retaliation.

It appears to be the case that in a robust capitalist economy like ours, every century or so the major players reach a point where they attain too much power, and their influence over government regulation (i.e. writing their own rules) means that the economy is no longer functionally capitalist. It happened around the turn of the 20th century with the Robber Barrons, and it’s happening again now.

The problem with capitalism is that in theory it promotes competition, but in reality the companies that comprise the capitalist economy are inherently threatened by competition, and so they seek to crush or absorb their competitors whenever and wherever possible.

Not only that, but companies also seek to influence the government in order to obtain subsidies, favorable regulations and tax breaks. This is the process whereby Big Business and Big Government become one. It wasn’t just Amazon that paid no taxes last year: IBM, General Motors, Netflix, Chevron and US Steel, among dozens more large corporations, also paid no taxes. If you think that’s simply “the free market at work” you have been flat-out brainwashed.

The natural tendency of the capitalist system is toward oligopoly and monopoly, and so every hundred years or so, after most of the industries have become consolidated and oligopolized, and the government fully corrupted by corporate interests, it becomes necessary for some President from outside the corrupt system to come in and break up the party, effectively “resetting” the system back to its original, genuine “free market” state (or as close to it as possible.)

That should be Donald Trump.

But Trump seems to be obsessed with propelling the stock market higher and higher. I don’t know that he’s even considered the idea of becoming a trust-buster. He seems to be hanging his hat on higher corporate profits and higher stock prices. He does not seem to be concerned with the corrosive, oppressive influence of mutinational megacorporations on the American people.

It would be a terrible missed opportunity if Trump does not warm to trust-busting, because right now it’s a major talking point on the Democratic side with Bernie Sanders (the front-runner and, as it stands, likely Democratic nominee) and Elizabeth Warren.

Trust-busting needs to happen one way or another. The problem is that the Democrats who want to do it bring with them so many other problems that are equally as destructive to this country as corporate domination–namely open borders (which the major corporations all want because it equals cheap labor), toxic feminism (which the major corporations also all want because it promotes women in the workforce), nonwhite supremacism, and massive government welfare programs, among many other things.

So it has to be Trump. I hope he senses the stakes of this moment today and fulfills his potential as the 21st century’s great Trust Buster.