Chelsea Handler on 50 Cent voting for Trump: “I had to remind him he’s a black person so he can’t vote for Trump.”
She “had to remind him he’s black, so he can’t vote for Trump.”
She had to.
What an amazingly blunt thing to say.
Liberal white women have this insatiable need to boss people around. They think they Know Better than everyone else and are determined to save the poor, oppressed minorities–even from themselves, if need be.
Chelsea Handler has just revealed in no uncertain terms how white liberals view minorities: as dumb, sub-human creatures lacking agency and completely incapable of critical thought. Basically, pets.
“I had to remind him he’s black, so he can’t vote for Trump.”
Got that? If you’re black, you’re not allowed to vote for Trump.
Because liberal white women said so.
Isn’t that oppressive and racist?
No, because liberal white women are only doing it for your own good. So they’re allowed to patronize and really just be straight-up racist.
This is “liberal fascism” in a nutshell: they can do and say anything, because they’re on the Right Side of History. They’re the good guys.
I’m telling you, they’re no more than a few years away from saying, “We need to start rounding up Republicans and putting them in camps, because Republicans are Nazis.”
Honestly, depending on how this election goes, it might even be less than a few years from getting to that point.
This isn’t even comedy. She’s clearly just angry as hell and fully political. These celebrities have totally forgotten why they’re celebrities in the first place: because they used to entertain us.
Now they’re just angry liberals. That’s it.
So many celebrities have completely diminished their statures by revealing themselves to be no different than the random liberals you see on shrieking on social media.
They were always going to play this card no matter what happened in the debate. It’s why they invented the term “mansplaining” in the first place:
So this “man” that Andre Mitchell claims to know really believes that Kamala Harris’ finest moment in the debate was when she scolded Pence like child? She won the debate by being a nagging Karen?
There was literally nothing Mike Pence could’ve done or said during that debate that wouldn’t have been characterized as “mansplaining” by the media. This was the plan all along.
The Vice President is probably the most calm, even-keeled, polite and inoffensive person in national politics. And yet the media is still trying to portray him as a barking, domineering, sexist pig.
Look out everybody, we got a confirmed Woman Respecter over here!
Because all women in this country are battered down and muzzled and are never allowed to speak at all, and men just dominate them 24/7.
Does anyone who has ever met a woman believe this?
They act like it’s 1920 and anytime a woman talks out of turn she catches a backhand.
As with every narrative the left pushes, the whole “Women Aren’t Even Allowed to Speak in America” stuff couldn’t be further from the truth. Lots of women–especially the liberal ones on TV–do nothing but talk. And scold. And lecture. And complain. And above all, try to get people they dislike silenced.
It’s amazing how Kamala Harris can flip the switch from Strong, Independent, Cackling Shrew to timid, meek, battered Amish spouse.
Must be nice to be a Democratic Woman: any time a man disagrees with you his argument is invalidated on grounds that he’s “mansplaining” by “allies” like Karen Stephanopolous:
Lots of women these days consider themselves progressive, virtuous, dignified and Classy™️. They consider themselves paragons of morality and righteousness because they stand against Racism and the Evil Patriarchy.
But that all goes out the window the moment they meet a guy that’s good looking online.
A Redditor conducted an experiment on Tinder to see just how many “flaws” (“flaws” being a massive understatement) women would overlook just to get with a good-looking guy. The answer: they’ll overlook just about anything. Including child rape.
I’m not kidding. Here’s the fake profile the Redditor set up. He pretended to be an aspiring model named Ray who admits point-blank in his Tinder bio that he’s a convicted child rapist:
“Aspiring model. Watch out for me in GQ in a couple years 😉
You should know I’ve had trouble with the law my whole life. Convicted three times for rape of a child (ROAC) and once for sexual activity with a child but tbf she turned 16 like a week later so it was super unfair but whatever.
I’m on tinder cause maybe if I fuck some of you sluts I’ll stop wanting to be with kids (unlikely lmao, they’re way tighter than your beef curtain cunts). I hope you can therefore forgive me for my past crimes.”
Holy shit. This is some truly messed up stuff. “I’m on tinder because maybe if I fuck some of you sluts I’ll stop wanting to be with kids.”
You’d think this appalling bio would be too much to overcome and Ray, handsome as he may be, would be deemed unforgivable for his past transgressions.
But forgive him these women did:
“Hey, every criminal has the chance to be forgiven but then again there’s very attractive about a bad boy”
A bad boy? A bad boy is the kid in high school who ditches class to smoke cigarettes. Or the guy who rides a motorcycle and gets into bar brawls. Not a convicted child rapist. That’s not even on the spectrum.
This chick is not only willing to forgive him for CHILD RAPE, but she actually considers it a major turn-on. It makes him a “bad boy.”
It doesn’t get any better. Amber says “I can absolve you of your sins tonight ;)”:
Girls are throwing themselves at him at this point, many of them making light of the child rape convictions. Keep in mind this guy’s bio makes it clear he’s a totally unapologetic child rapist.
This one, Molly, might be the worst of the bunch:
She’s equating stealing a gumball as a child with child rape just so she can have something in common with Ray.
Molly even realizes how awful of a person she is for saying that but like whateverrrr he’s super hot:
She then double-texts him and gives him her number without him even asking, so desperate is she to hook up with the convicted (yet highly attractive) child rapist:
Molly’s cute little “we’re both criminals LOL” false equivalence was a common pick-up line that other girls tried to use on Ray:
Here’s Ema, who before even getting a response is already worried she’s going to fall in love with Ray the child rapist:
They clearly read the profile stating he was a child molester. They clearly don’t care.
Most young modern women are fully caught-up in the manufactured hysteria over “rape culture” and believe the false stat that 1 in 4 women in college are raped. They’re irate about this because Rape Is Unacceptable.
Unless you’re a Hot Guy™ on Tinder who’s also a convicted child rapist. Then rape is like totally hilarious and not a big deal.
Another Redditor conducted an almost identical experiment. His handsome convicted child rapist was named Chad, and again this guy puts it all in the bio:
“Sup I’m Chad u don’t like me 2 bad… things u should know bout me cus you’ll see the ankle monitor. I’m a convicted child rapist/molestor. Its in my past…made some mistakes but workin each day to fix em… lookin for fun, longer stuff is cool… but can’t be around in a month cause I have to go back to jail for a stupid thing between me n my ex. She is overreacting about a few slaps I gave her a year ago. hmu. ain’t that bad seriously.”
So not only is Chad a convicted child rapist like Ray, Chad is also going to jail in a month for beating his ex-girlfriend. He’s also illiterate and pretty clearly a dumbass.
We all know that domestic violence is UNACCEPTABLE and that women will not tolerate any man who lays hands on his girlfriend or wife. Women stand aligned in solidarity against any and all forms of domestic violence.
“Chad” has a match. She messages first, and “Chad” makes sure this girl has read his bio so she is fully aware of what she’s getting herself into. She asks “was that a joke” as if anyone in their right mind would joke about that. She’s probably hoping it’s a joke because she’s already decided that she desperately wants this guy no matter what, and if it’s a joke she doesn’t have to hate herself as much when she inevitably sleeps with him.
He responds that no, it’s not a joke, and elaborates further that he molested an 8-year-old boy but it’s no big deal because it “felt consensual.”
This chick doesn’t care. It’s “cool” that he’s being honest about raping an 8-year-old boy.
She then just glosses over the whole “he raped an 8-year-old boy” thing and wants to move things forward.
The next girl was a little more hung-up on the child rape thing–this time he says it was a freaking 2-year-old–but she ultimately doesn’t care. In fact she eagerly double-texts him when he doesn’t respond. She just wants to move on to another topic:
Her: “Honestly would just rather stop talking about [him raping a 2 year old]”
*he doesn’t respond*
Her: “I didn’t say I was done talking to you about other stuff.”
This chick is mortified she just let the handsome child molester slip through her fingers. Better quickly change the subject before the convicted child rapist loses interest!
Here’s another desperate chick trying everything in her power to keep Chad’s interest:
By now the guy running the experiment has lost all faith in humanity. He makes sure she has read the profile bio and then basically just waits for her to admit she doesn’t care he’s a convicted child rapist and domestic abuser. By this point the guy is just appalled and barely even pretend to be Chad anymore. When she says, “Can we move on now,” he replies straight-up as himself, not Chad: “and there it is. ffs.” She clearly has no idea what’s going on, she still thinks she’s talking to Chad.
This is another chick who’s determined to not let the conversation die no matter how little Chad gives her to work with. She tries to pretend-deny him by acting like she won’t just let him tell her what to do, he bails, then she basically goes, “Wait come back!!!”
Not only are these chicks okay with Chad being a convicted child rapist, they’re tripping over themselves to hold his attention no matter how little he gives them to work with.
Here’s more of the same, last one for Chad:
“We all make mistakes.” = yet another girl casually brushing off his admission that he raped a 6-year-old.
This guy is barely even trying to make conversation and the chick is still totally into it–on top of all the child rapist stuff. She’s like “I’m cooking dinner right now what are you up to?” And he just replies, “horny af.”
Not interested in your small talk. He’s gone full caveman. Me Chad. Me want sex. Now.
And she’s still all about it.
So take that for what you will, Pick-up Artist Community.
I’m not saying “Game” is total bullshit, but the best possible “game” to have is being jacked and handsome, and nothing else even comes close.
The third and final experiment is a bit different from the past two which featured handsome child rapists who still nonetheless had women throwing themselves at them. This one is a good-looking guy with a Swastika tattooed on his arm and clearly visible in his profile picture. Not only that but he makes abundantly clear to the women he matches with that he is a neo-Nazi:
His bio is apparently a Hitler quote in German, which translated into English basically says Jews are evil personified.
Despite the swastika tattoo displayed on his arm, he matched with 363 girls in a week, according to the guy who made the profile.
This chick named Vang says, “Please tell me that’s drawn on with a marker” in response to the swastika tattoo. But she really doesn’t care:
This next chick has no problem at all with the swastika tattoo:
Within five messages it’s in the bag.
This is the modern Western woman exposed for all to see.
Women on Tinder will throw themselves at guys who admit to being unapologetic child molesters and who are proud Nazis so long as the guys are handsome.
No matter what they might say publicly about their morals or their values, women will forget it all if the guy they’re after has model-good looks.
“OMG what Trump is doing to those poor migrant children at the border is EVIL! Anyone who supports Trump and his inhumane policies is evil, too! Also, this hot guy I matched with on Tinder is a convicted child rapist. I’m meeting up with him tonight ;)”
“Trump is LITERALLY HITLER. Punch Nazis; this country is infested with white supremacists ever since Trump came around. I literally hate white supremacists so much!!! Ooh, a hot guy with a swastika tattoo on his arm matched with me on Tinder?! Heyyyyy what are you doing tonight?”
The same chicks who complain that there’s no good guys out there are also the ones saying: “Yeah he’s a convicted child rapist but he’s changed, he’s a good guy now! I can overlook his flaws and his questionable past because I believe in second chances.”
Virtually everything they say is nonsense. They profess strict adherence to mainstream political consensus purely to virtue signal and fit in.
“When Ted Bundy, the notorious serial killer who raped and murdered more than 30 women, was put on trial in 1979, women from all over the world sent him fan mail. Many of these letters included nude pictures, and some of them even contained marriage proposals, according to Stephen Michaud, co-author of Ted Bundy: Conversations with a Killer.
During Bundy’s trial, women (referred to as “groupies”) would show up to the courtroom wearing their hair parted down the middle and hoop earrings, on the assumption that this style matched his victims. Some of them even dyed their hair brown to match the hair color of the women he murdered. In 1980, while still on trial, Bundy married one of his admirers. He was executed for his crimes in 1989.”
One of these crazy women even married the guy.
“While Bundy’s scenario may be the most famous case of serial killers who garner female fans, it’s a pattern seen over and over again throughout history: murderous men winning over legions of female fans. Jeffrey Dahmer, who committed the murders and postmortem mutilations of 17 young men and boys, received love letters and gifts from women after he was imprisoned. Richard Ramirez, a serial killer, dubbed “the Night Stalker,” who raped and tortured over 25 victims and killed at least 13 others, married one of his many female admirers in 1996 while he was in prison.More recently, Anders Breivik, the terrorist who murdered 77 people in Norway in 2011, mainly children, was reported to have received “love letters” from girls as young as 16.”
That’s modern Western women for you: totally and utterly depraved.
Not all of them, but enough of them. Just look around.
And yet it is women today whose opinions are valued most, always given the benefit of the doubt and held up by mainstream culture (just watch basically any TV commercial) as the morally superior sex. Men are derided as the root of all evil, misery and oppression in this world, while women are perpetual victims forced to live under the brutal Patriarchy.
Listen fellas: It’s time to #RespectWomen. We must step aside and let women fix this world that we’ve broken. And they will do that, just as soon as they’re done trying to have sex with serial killers, child rapists and Nazis.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider becoming a monthly supporter of this site at SubscribeStar via the link below:
American women are so empowered in 2019 that they can admit to drugging and robbing men and nothing will happen to them.
And still they enjoy preferential treatment due to the widespread perception that they are “oppressed victims of the patriarchy.”
After a video surfaced of Cardi B admitting to robbing and drugging men, the singer is explaining herself.
In the clip from an Instagram Live recorded three years ago, the rapper said, “I had to go strip, I had to go, ‘Oh yeah, you want to f–k me? Yeah, yeah, yeah, let’s go back to this hotel,’ and I drugged n—–s up, and I robbed them. That’s what I used to do,” (via Hip Hop Ratchet) she explained.
After horrified social media users responded to the 26-year-old star’s confession with the hashtag #SurvivingCardiB (in reference to the R. Kelly documentary “Surviving R. Kelly”) Cardi took to Instagram to explain her actions.”
Yeah, I don’t give a shit about her “explanation” of her actions. She can go fuck herself.
And there’s more, too. As she was drugging and robbing unsuspecting guys, she also tricked them into having sex with trannies while they were completely blacked out on a combination of alcohol and drugs:
“You know me. I meet a guy, I’m gonna take him out, I’m gonna get him all perc’d up [the opiate drug Percocet] and everything, then bring a bitch around, we’re gonna have a threesome, and when he wakes up he’ll be like, ‘What the fuck?’ Yeah because the bitch was a tranny.”
By the way, this happens all the time. Women do this stuff all the time, especially hookers. Lots of guys have had it happen to them, I know a few personally.
One guy I know here in Chicago had this happen to him while in a car, and afterwards, he was dropped off in the hood at like 3am without a phone, wallet or keys.
But I guess women are #Oppressed #Victims so they’re allowed to do this. Whatevs!
This is “female empowerment” for you, right here.
And to further underscore the double standard women are held to in this country, we all know Cardi B will not be dropped by her record label. The celebrity class will not ostracize her. The radio will not stop playing her songs.
This will all blow over in a week with no lasting damage to her career.
If a male rapper bragged about drugging, raping and robbing unsuspecting women, not only would his career be over, he would go to jail for a very long time.
Gotta love Male Privilege!
I say it almost every day: any group the media portrays as “victims” are in reality the oppressors, and any group the media portrays as “oppressors” are actually the victims.
Do not for one second entertain any of this garbage about “Male Privilege.”
Anyone who has used Google today knows it’s International Women’s Day:
Today we all come together to acknowledge that women are, like, super brave and, like, totally #Oppressed.
It is damn near impossible to be a woman these days. I mean, a TSA agent literally asked Brie Larson for her literal phone number–that’s literally how #Oppressed women literally are in this country:
Women have it so tough today. Larson probably lacks the self-awareness to realize it, but her tweet is actually the perfect encapsulation of modern feminism: entirely lacking in self-awareness and historical perspective, wildly narcissistic, and hopelessly trivial.
Her serious tweet could just as easily be an Onion spoof headline meant to convey the fact that women today face no real problems or oppression.
Larson has no idea that her tweet makes an utter mockery of modern feminism far better than any #MisogynistMale ever could. The fact that she thinks a guy asking her out is an “issue” in need of redress, and evidence that women are #Oppressed in this country, is all the proof we need that modern feminism is a joke.
Woman in 1919: “I’m not allowed to vote, and I can’t leave the kitchen. I’m oppressed.”
Woman in 2019: “I’m a multimillionaire celebrity who is constantly applauded by the media and my fellow celebrities for my feminist lecturing, and a guy who thought I was pretty asked for my phone number. I’m oppressed.”
How has this country made so little progress in Women’s Rights?! Damn you, Patriarchy!
I guess we’ll have to make our own sandwiches today to atone for the grave injustice of Brie Larson being asked out by a guy. This country still has so far to go. *sigh*
So to all the Women of the world, please accept my heartfelt congratulations on having a vagina. What an accomplishment.
To commemorate International Women’s Day, Marvel released its forced feminist propaganda piece “Captain Marvel” starring that Brave Feminist Martyr Brie Larson.
The movie was supposed to cement Larson as the new face of the Marvel Cinematic Universe going forward, but predictably, audiences saw right through the mediocre film and are rejecting Marvel’s hard feminist turn. Now that the movie has been released to the public and Regular People are allowed to review it, the movie now sports an embarrassing 6.6 score on IMDB:
And that’s barely 15 hours after the film’s wide release. That number will probably go lower.
On Rotten Tomatoes, audiences have given the movie a disastrously-bad 36%:
Feminist defenders of the movie, who only care about it because of what it represents to them politically, will say the movie’s ratings are so low because it’s being “review brigaded” by Angry Incels. Review Brigading is defined as “massively coordinated online voting designed to decrease, or increase, a product’s score artificially.”
But while the feminists believe in some Grand Incel Conspiracy to tank the score of the movie, it can just as easily be claimed that prominent, Media-Approved™ “Mainstream” movie reviewers are colluding to artificially boost the movie’s review scores.
It has been pointed out that many of the “positive” reviews actually contain a lot of criticism of the film, but the Establishment-Approved Reviewers still give Captain Marvel a good score despite acknowledging that it’s an objectively crappy movie. The point is to give the movie an artificially high aggregate Critic Score. Here’s an example from Slate:
“Captain Marvel is mediocre, but that’s a triumph.”
Even these lackluster scores are themselves inflated.People know they’re Not Allowed to not like Captain Marvel, so you see a lot of supposedly “positive” reviews which sound a lot more mixed than positive reviews usually read.
They did the same thing with the Fake Ghostbusters. SJW reviewers bent over backwards to claim in their headline and concluding line that that abortion was a “a blast” and a “fun, lighthearted romp” or whatever bullshit they were required by their studio minders and ideological hygiene officers to claim, but then in between the headline and last sentence, they used a lot of words explaining how much of it didn’t work.”
This is why Rotten Tomatoes has the movie at an 81% score on “Critics’ Consensus.”
Not only this, but Rotten Tomatoes is actively going through and removing “fake” bad reviews of the movie, which are said to be wrongly pushing the movie’s score down.
But they don’t do this with the fake good reviews of the movie, and there are plenty, even if the feminists won’t admit it.
Do you still believe we’re not living in a propaganda-dominated society in which the public is endlessly deceived and brainwashed in every conceivable way?
It’s not just the political media that has become propaganda. You’re not even allowed to review movies honestly anymore. Even movie reviews now must strictly adhere to the Party Line. The average Blue Pilled NPC will either open up the newspaper or go to one of the Mainstream Movie Review Sites and have no idea the supposedly positive review he’s reading is pure bullshit.
Maybe the movie’s low scores are partially a result of it being review brigaded by an Angry Incel Conspiracy. But the movie’s high scores are also a result of review brigading by Corporate Establishment Approved shills.
On International Women’s Day, we must all solemnly reflect on the fact that women in this country are so #SystemicallyOppressed that their bad movies are artificially propped up and given positive coverage by the Mainstream entertainment media for the sole purpose of pushing the feminist agenda.
From the initial trailers, the movie looked weak. You could already tell Captain Marvel was going to be a flawless Mary Sue, like most female leads in action movies these days, and that appears to be the case.
Furthermore, the alien bad guys look generic and forgettable, and the whole movie is a CGI overload.
Here’s a shot of the “Skrulls,” the alien bad guys:
So damn generic.
Now with Captain Marvel officially being screened for critics, and with the movie hitting theaters on Thursday night, reviews are coming in. And they’re not great.
“The first Captain Marvel review lands online as the movie has been released in France, and it is not good for Disney, Marvel Studios, Kevin Feige, Brie Larson or the future of the MCU.
The French website Avoir Alire has posted their Captain Marvel review giving it one out of five stars noting (translated via Bing), “A monolithic heroine whose feminist struggle seems to be the only reason to exist. The result, without emotion, is closer to the silliness of a shortcut in time than a traditional Avenger.”
The review (again translated) goes on to mention how the titular character makes it clear she doesn’t need the help of men, with Brie Larson’s acting said to be cold and compared to that of an android. It’s said Larson doesn’t manage the slightest of an iconic pose, and that she is not sexy in the costume: “since the game of seduction is sexist and therefore irrelevant in the film.”
It’s also said Captain Marvel’s big “Superman” moment when she first flies is lacking and that Brie Larson and her powers “leave us totally cold.”
Brie Larson is an iceberg, so this makes perfect sense.
“Two years ago, Wonder Woman proved a female-led superhero movie could reach the highest levels of the genre, with Gal Gadot proving robust and redoubtable, yet also charming and feminine. I spent Captain Marvel waiting for Gadot. What I got was Brie Larson: charmless, humorless, a character so without texture that she might as well be made out of aluminum.”
This seems to be a running theme: Brie Larson totally wooden.
“Just to be completely, unerringly, let’s-bubble-wrap-the-universe safe, Boden and Fleck decided to make [Carol] Danvers stronger than strong, fiercer than fierce, braver than brave. Larson spends the entire movie being insouciant, kicking butt, delivering her lines in an I-got-this monotone and staring down everything with a Blue Steel gaze of supreme confidence. Superheroes are defined by their limitations — Superman’s Kryptonite, Batman’s mortality — but Captain Marvel is just an invincible bore. The screenplay by Boden, Fleck, and Geneva Robertson-Dworet, with a story by the three of them plus Nicole Perlman and Meg LeFauve, presents us with Brie Larson’s Carol being amazingly strong and resilient at the beginning, middle, and end. This isn’t an arc, it’s a straight line.”
“Larson, who became a star in 21 Jump Street seven years ago and has not done anything better since (especially not her Oscar-winning turn in the appalling film Room), has quickly become one of Hollywood’s most humorless and insufferable actresses, and her personality rubbed off on the character. There isn’t an ounce of self-deprecation in her.”
That’s how these feminist bitches are.
And of course the movie continues this ridiculous trend of the Kick Ass Female trope, where 5-5, 125 pound women implausibly kick the living shit out of armies of male bad guys Because GIRL POWER!
“The trap the filmmakers set for themselves is this: They set out to make a girl-power statement — but feared acknowledging any differences between men and women. Despite Larson’s sylphlike build, there is no suggestion at any point that she might be overmatched by a guy who is 80 or 100 pounds larger, like Djimon Hounsou. If being female is defined as “exactly like a male, only more resilient,” how interesting is that?”
Not interesting at all.
Jeremy Jahns, a popular movie reviewer on YouTube with over 1.5 million subscribers, goes out of his way to avoid the “culture war” aspect of the movie and judges it simply on whether it was entertaining. The answer is no:
Boring, bad pacing, no flow–and definitely not as good a movie as Wonder Woman.
Jahns says the movie is obviously a “feminist movie” but that isn’t enough to carry a movie–it still has to be good. And Captain Marvel isn’t.
Captain Marvel is mediocre and the universal bogeymen White Males are not to blame.
What’s with this nonsense that white men sabotage all movies with strong female leads?
I don’t remember any Fragile White Men sabotaging Wonder Woman? That movie was widely praised by men and women alike.
And what’s with this ridiculous revisionist history that somehow Captain Marvel is some landmark achievement for women, as if it’s the first time in American history that this has ever happened. Please.
For one, there’s “Wonder Woman.”
“Max Max: Fury Road”
And Star Wars now has a woman, Rey, as its main character.
The “Hunger Games” trilogy.
Motherfucking “Kill Bill”
Didn’t Halle Berry play Catwoman in the early 2000s?
There’s the Tomb Raider movies–the Angelina Jolie ones–which I enjoyed.
Does the name “Sarah Conner” ring a bell?
“Silence of the Lambs”
And last but not least, the original: “Alien,” which came out in 1979.
I guess if you exclude all those movies, then Brie Larson’s “Captain Marvel” is a landmark cultural achievement for women.
You may be wondering why Captain Marvel is a relevant topic on a political blog, and the answer to that is the entertainment industry has become politicized, meaning Captain Marvel is more than just a superhero movie: it’s the latest flash point in the American culture wars.
The latest edition of Entertainment Weekly lays it out clearly; sexism is a major theme in the upcoming movie:
“Intergalactic odd couple Brie Larson and Samuel L. Jackson return to 1995 to fight aliens, sexism.”
Great. Already we know this movie will push the Female Victimhood Myth and more.
Larson has even said the movie will be “her form of activism” which is just wonderful:
Wonderful. Lord knows we could use more female celebrities lecturing us about feminism and toxic masculinity!
However, despite the blitz from Disney and the feminists, it appears as of now the good guys are winning. The movie’s roll out has been pretty disastrous thus far.
First there was Larson complaining that her press days were filled with too many white male journalists:
“Ahead of the upcoming release of “Captain Marvel,” actress and star Brie Larson reportedly chose a female journalist who has cerebral palsy to interview her after coming to the realization that her previous press tours had a tendency “to be overwhelmingly white male.”
Journalist Keah Brown, who sat down with Larson, described herself in Thursday’s Marie Claire UK piece as being someone who writes “about pop culture, disability (I have cerebral palsy), blackness and womanhood.”
Brown acknowledged in the article that Larson had “requested” her to conduct the interview, which she said was “game-changing” and “the biggest opportunity I’ve had.” After asking why she was selected, the actress discussed a trend that she’d noticed.
“About a year ago, I started paying attention to what my press days looked like and the critics reviewing movies, and noticed it appeared to be overwhelmingly white male,” Larson said. “So, I spoke to Dr. Stacy Smith at the USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative, who put together a study to confirm that.”
Brie, I’m gonna let you in on a little-known fact: superhero fans are overwhelmingly white men. Please take a moment to process this bombshell news.
When you think “comic book nerds,” you think of pasty white guys, right? You think of these guys:
But evidently Brie Larson is disappointed they don’t look like this:
Brie Larson’s dilemma is that she can’t stand white men, but also wants to make a lot of money shoving feminist propaganda down their throats. In typical authoritarian leftist fashion, she reviles the people she simultaneously wants to rule over.
“In her Crystal Award for Excellence in Film acceptance speech at the Crystal + Lucy Awards Wednesday night, actress Brie Larson cited USC Annenberg’s “Critic’s Choice” study in a call for diversity in entertainment coverage.
She disclosed how, “of the 100 highest-grossing movies in 2017, less than a quarter of the critics were white women, less than ten percent were underrepresented men, and only 2.5 percent were women of color.”
Recognizing that “reviews change lives” and the impact which films are considered for awards season, Larson called for more inclusive representation in the industry. “Am I saying I hate white dudes?” the Oscar-winner asked the room at the Beverly Hilton. “No, I’m not,” she replied.
No, but. . .
“I don’t want to hear what a white man has to say about ‘A Wrinkle in Time.’ I want to hear what a woman of color, a biracial woman has to say about the film. I want to hear what teenagers think about the film.”
“I’m not saying I hate white dudes, but white dudes need to shut the fuck up.”
I’m sure her handlers have tried explaining to her it’s not smart to disparage the very demographic that makes or breaks superhero movies, and yet Captain Basic Bitch still cannot restrain herself from excoriating white males.
In addition to her comments about white men, movie review site Rotten Tomatoes removed the “Want to See/Don’t Want to See” voting poll for Captain Marvel after its “Want to See” score was voted down to just 27%.
In typical leftwing fashion, they buried their heads even further in the sand and claimed Captain Marvel’s low score was a result of “internet trolling” and “fragile masculinity”. They basically tried to claim the 27% score was illegitimate. I guess if you exclude and ignore the input of people who don’t like the movie, that makes it all go away!
“Rotten Tomatoes says the changes were due to a general “uptick in non-constructive input, sometimes bordering on trolling, which we believe is a disservice to our general readership.”
LA LA LA LA LA I CAN’T HEAR YOU! I CAN’T HEAR YOU! GIRL POWERRR!!
Rotten Tomatoes has spoken: negative opinions about Captain Marvel and Brie Larson’s annoying feminism are automatically presumed to be in bad faith and not welcome.
Of course they’ll never be able to reckon with the fact that the movie is already reviled because of its decision to push feminist propaganda and because of its star’s transparent hatred for white males (who also happen to be the core audience for the superhero movie genre.)
Finally, Captain Marvel herself Brie Larson is just an unpleasant woman. There’s the stuff she said about white males above, and then there’s also this:
This chick has some serious issues.
And we haven’t even gotten to her acting. Have you noticed that in almost every shot of the movie, she has the same wooden expression on her face?
I went through the trailer and took a screenshot of her face in each scene:
Wait, here’s a smirk!
Back to normal:
Even when she’s in her full superpower mode, she’s still dour and wooden:
You can see pretty clearly why many men have instinctively rejected this movie: Captain Marvel looks like your bitchy ex-girlfriend. She’s a total iceberg.
Men simply react negatively on a visceral level to women with Resting Bitch Face.
With the Avengers series concluding in April after the release of Endgame, Marvel is moving on to the next generation (or “Phase 4” as the studio calls it). Captain America, Iron Man, Thor, Hulk and the original Avengers are passing the torch on and a new group of superheroes will be carrying the Marvel franchise into the 2020s. Captain Marvel is supposed to be the linchpin of Phase 4 of the Marvel Universe, because apparently she’s the most powerful superhero of all. Go figure.
It would really suck if Marvel’s Phase 4 turns into a big leftwing/diversity circle jerk with Captain Feminism as the face of the franchise, but from what we’ve seen of Captain Marvel, that appears to be the case.
The only way we can stop this is by rejecting these movies financially.
We have a patriotic duty to ensure Captain Marvel bombs at the box office so Hollywood learns its lesson: stop fucking ruining movies by turning them into garbage leftwing propaganda pieces.
The entertainment industry needs to start entertaining again. Stop the indoctrination.
The only way they’ll get the message is if we hit them where it hurts: their bottom line.
Money talks. And it seems to be talking already: the original projections for Captain Marvel were $180 million on opening weekend, but that number has been revised lower to about $100 million and possibly as low as $80 million.
When your entire political movement is based on treating gender and skin color as virtues in and of themselves, you will unavoidably get images like these Congressbroads cheering for themselves simply because they’re women–as if being a woman itself is something to be proud of, an achievement deserving recognition.
Observe Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and her Pussyhat Caucus during the State of the Union. These hags sat around for two hours scowling with their arms folded while Trump talked about arresting human traffickers, putting drug cartels out of business and creating jobs for women and minorities, and the only time they actually stood and applauded was when Trump gave them a shout out for being elected to Congress despite being Super Oppressed as Women:
Look at us in our white outfits! We stand out! LOOK AT US! WE HAVE VAGINAS!
Their whole mantra is ORANGE MAN BAD, ORANGE MAN = PATRIARCHY, ORANGE MAN OPPRESS US so they sat stone-faced and angry as Trump recognized war heroes, astronauts and children with cancer, yet they couldn’t resist standing and cheering for themselves when Trump pointed out they are the least oppressed generation of women in United States history.
The underlying assumption, of course, is that Women Are #Oppressed and that they beat the odds in getting elected to Congress in our horrible, cruel Patriarchal society.
Forget the war heroes, cancer survivors and astronauts: these women are the real heroes.
Get the fuck outta here.
The very fact that this new Congress has the most women ever is proof that women in America have never been less oppressed.
And yet these clueless women really do believe they’ve Beaten The Odds. They may not know what the hell they’re talking about, but they’ve sure got a lot of strong opinions and #feelingz and they’re gonna make sure everyone hears them.
A universal rule of thumb in today’s America is that any group that is widely viewed to be #Oppressed is in fact the exact opposite of #Oppressed. In fact, that group is probably the one doing the oppressing.
We all know there’s a word for being hateful and prejudiced towards women–“misogyny”. But what’s the word for being hateful and prejudiced towards men? Nobody knows it.
Single mothers are glorified as #Strong and #Heroic in popular culture, but does anybody say a word about single fathers?
Where is all the Body Positivity for men? Where are the male plus-sized models? Why aren’t we told that overweight men with receding hairlines are BEAUTIFUL and STRONG? It’s only ugly women who we have to pretend are attractive.
Men in movies, television shows and commercials are generally portrayed as dumb oafs, brutes, criminals and dangerous overall. I just finally watched Mad Max: Fury Road (I know, it’s been out for a while) and while it was a pretty good movie, it ultimately boiled down to a simple narrative of “MEN BAD, WOMEN GOOD.” All the bad gangs were men, and the one good gang roaming the wasteland was all-female.
Gavin McInnes put together a nice compilation of commercials where the women are empowered and strong and the men are hapless, useless morons:
The examples are endless. This video (made by a woman, no less) is excellent:
I got more where that came from:
Here’s another video compilation specifically dedicated to examples of the “dumb dad” commercial archetype:
It’s almost as if men’s #feelingz don’t matter at all.
Who is automatically believed in sexual assault/misconduct allegations? The man, or the woman? The woman. When the legal justice system inherently gives you the benefit of the doubt, and is even willing to convict men based on false accusations made by you, this is the polar opposite of being oppressed. We’re just a few months removed from the pussyhats nearly stopping a Supreme Court nomination due to completely fabricated charges of sexual assault.
Men work almost all the dirty and dangerous jobs and are 10x more likely to be killed at work than women. You don’t ever hear anyone shrieking about closing the workplace death gap, do you?
And about that mythical “gender pay gap”: if you think about it for more than a second, it’s obviously nonsense. If women really did get paid 20% less (or whatever the exact number is) for the same work as men, then the gender pay gap would disappear almost immediately. My basement just flooded and we’re in the process of demo and rebuild–it’s an expensive affair. If you told me a team of women could do the same exact job for a price 20% lower than we’re paying, I would hire them immediately without a second thought. Please, point me in the direction of these cheap female laborers.
The “gender pay gap” is so absurd even the Bezos Washington Post’s resident “fact checker” debunked it.
Furthermore, women outnumber men 56% to 44% in college enrollment, and the number is only going higher. We know people with college degrees make more money, so this only further dismantles the myth of the “gender pay gap.”
85% of child support payments are made by men. Not only this, but of the over $14 billion in unpaid child support payments, women were more likely than men to be deadbeats. Men are more likely to be negatively affected by unpaid court-ordered child support payments.
Men are routinely screwed over royally in divorce court because the presumption is always that the man is the scumbag and the woman is the #Victim.
What more do these women want?
Enough with this nonsense. You’re not #Oppressed. In fact, you’re the very opposite of oppressed.
If anything, it’s men who regularly get the short end of the stick in America 2019.
The header photo is of NY Governor Andrew Cuomo signing the bill into law that would allow abortions up until birth. Cuomo is beaming, and surrounded by triumphant Democrats who simply Love Abortion and want everyone to know.
This is yet another position that the left has revealed its true, radical colors on.
Since then Democrats have pretended to only favor early-term abortions.
They always try to move the conversation to make us look like the extremists by asking, “Well would you support an abortion in the case of rape, incest or threat to the mother’s life?” But cases like this are so rare they’re hardly even worth discussing.
In 2019, they have let the mask slip: they’ll kill the baby as its being born. They don’t give a fuck. A woman’s Constitutional Right to Consequence-Free Sex must be preserved.
Keep in mind that, while rare, there have been cases of babies being born at only 21 weeks of pregnancy. It happened in 2014 in Texas, and the child is still alive today.
This is what babies look like early in pregnancy:
They’re very small at this point, no larger than the palm of your hand, but there’s no doubt whatsoever that that is a human life. And Democrats don’t care.
Democrats do not have “#SCIENCE” on their side on abortion. Not even close.
Consider this: if a single-celled bacteria were found on Mars tomorrow, all the newspapers would have “LIFE ON MARS!” as the front-page headline.
And yet the self-described Party of Science here in America is trying to tell us that a 40-week-old baby in a mother’s womb about to be born is not actually a human life.
“Science” cannot rationalize killing a child. Democrats are just trying to avoid the guilt that would inevitably come from admitting the truth.
If they admit that a child in a mother’s womb is a living human being, then they also have to admit that they support murder-for-convenience.
The right to be a whore shall not be infringed.
imagine being a semi-conscious fetus floating in oblivion when a needle comes out of nowhere and headshots you for the insta-kill because your mother would rather make PowerPoints for $60K/y than raise you pic.twitter.com/OFbHoMewkR