war on men

All-Female Terminator Reboot Fails Spectacularly at Box Office, Projected to Lose $120 Million

I don’t really pay attention to Hollywood anymore because nearly every movie they’ve churned out over the past half-decade has been awful, so I don’t know much about this new “Terminator” movie other than that it’s supposed to be an all-female “reboot” of the franchise. Once I heard that was the case I was even less interested in the movie than I otherwise would’ve been for any other new Hollywood release–which is to say already very uninterested.

Apparently Ahhnuld is in the movie, but he’s not the main hero of the story. The heroes of the story are a trio of #Empowered and #Badass women.

However, in a development that anyone with a functioning brain could see coming, this all-female Terminator movie completely bombed at the box office and is now projected to lose Paramount Studios $120 million:

“Sorry for fans of the Terminator franchise, but it may not be back again for a long time. “

Okay, but this is not “the Terminator franchise” anymore. It’s just a film that happens to share the name of the once-proud franchise.

Terminator: Dark Fate opened at the U.S. box office this weekend and the results were nothing shy of abysmal for a massive budget blockbuster. The movie is guaranteed to be a big flop at this point. The only real question is, just how bad is it going to flop? Based on some new industry estimates, the sci-fi sequel could lose $120 million or more during its theatrical run.

According to a new report, Skydance Media, Paramount Pictures and 20th Century Fox stand to lose around $120 million in total, given the long-term prospects of Terminator: Dark Fate bombing at the box office. The movie, directed by Tim Miller (Deadpool) and produced by franchise creator James Cameron, made just $29 million in its domestic debut, which was far below industry estimates, which had it taking in around $40 million. Even that number wasn’t great, but it gave Sarah Connor and the gang a fighting chance.”

Now, will this financial disaster cause Hollywood to stop making all-female “reboots” of popular action franchises?

Of course not. Because the point wasn’t really to make money: the broader goal is to culturally disenfranchise men (specifically white men) by replacing them with with women wherever possible. And I’m not just talking about in movies–I’m talking about in politics, in the boardroom–in basically every high-profile position of power and every high-paying job. (They’re most certainly not trying to move men out of “dirty jobs” like garbage collecting, construction and logging. Only the well-paying white collar jobs.)

The point is to culturally appropriate all male-dominated sectors of society and shift them over to women. Hollywood is doing its part by taking popular movies that in the past starred male actors and “rebooting” them with all-female casts. The Ghostbusters movie (which also bombed), and “Oceans 8” are more examples. You’ve also got Disney shoehorning Captain Marvel in as the Most Badassest and Most Powerful Avenger.

The fact that these all-female “reboots” consistently lose money and yet Hollywood consistently keeps making them should tell you that making money is a secondary concern behind culturally disenfranchising men and re-shaping traditional gender roles in America.

Still, it’s nice to see that Americans are rejecting Hollywood’s forced cultural revolution by not going to see these terrible movies. Thankfully there remains a wide disconnect between the values of the degenerate elite and everyday Americans.

Feminists Accuse Google of Underpaying Women, Google’s Internal Study Discovers it Underpays *Men*

We need to close the wage gap now:

“Google is the subject of both a Labor Department investigation into gender pay inequality, and a potential class-action lawsuit covering roughly 8,300 current and former female employees who say the company pays women less than men who do similar work.

When Google conducted a study recently to determine whether the company was underpaying women and members of minority groups, it found that more men than women were receiving less money for doing similar work.

In response to the finding, Google gave $9.7 million in additional compensation to 10,677 employees for this year. Men account for about 69 percent of the company’s work force, but they received a disproportionately higher percentage of the money.

That last paragraph is kind of confusing in the way it is written. It means that Google gave out compensation pay to over 10,000 employees who were wrongly paid too little, and the majority of the recipients of that compensation pay were male.

Somebody tell Brie Larson.

I have been trying to say this for a while: whatever the “conventional wisdom” says about our society, the opposite is more likely than not to be true.

It’s not women who are mistreated, it’s men.

Society is not racist against minorities, it’s racist against white people.

We do not live in a Christian Country, we live in an aggressively atheist country that disparages and ridicules Christians at every opportunity while glorifying Muslims.

Get Woke, Go Broke: Gillette Edition

Gillette Razors: Men (Mainly the White Ones) Fucking Suck and Need to Stop Sucking So Much. So buy our overpriced razors and Shave Off All That Toxic Masculinity, or something.

Brilliant marketing strategy by Gillette.

The company literally exists to sell razors to men. Their motto used to be, “The Best A Man Can Get.”

And now they’re like, “Actually, fuck men.”

I’m sure that’s going to work out tremendously.

Here’s the new video they put out:

Be sure to go to the actual YouTube page and give it a downvote. Right now it’s sitting at a beautiful ratio of 270k upvotes to 653k downvotes. We can do better than that.

By far the worst conclusion to be opportunistically drawn from the #MeToo movement by the cultural elite was that sexual assault wasn’t just a Hollywood problem, but in fact a general male problem.

Harvey Weinstein wasn’t a product of a corrupt movie industry which has a long and dark history of preying on and discarding beautiful young women like objects–no, Harvey Weinstein was proof that men in general are the problem.

Harvey Weinstein is a sexual predator because he’s a man, and there’s a Harvey Weinstein side to all men.

That’s the message this Gillette commercial is pushing. Michael Walsh elaborates on this:

“The Me Too movement didn’t “change” anything for most of us. It is obviously insulting, not to mention absurd, to suggest that men, as a whole, experienced some sort of great awakening when Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, and Kevin Spacey got in trouble. We already knew that it’s wrong to rape. We were already well aware that harassment is not okay. There is not a single man on Earth who watched a news report about Weinstein, slapped his forehead, and said, “Oh! So we’re not supposed to do that? Alright then! My mistake!” Even the men who do those things already knew they weren’t supposed to do them. They do the things anyway because they are evil, and that’s what evil people do.

But the vast majority of men are not rapists or harassers and were, prior to this past year, already staunchly opposed to both activities. There was nothing epiphanic or revolutionary about Me Too for us.”

The only thing #MeToo taught us–well, confirmed to those of us whose lives don’t revolve around Celebrity Culture–was that Hollywood is a depraved cesspit full of heinous perverts and predators.

We normal guys already knew rape was bad. Because we were raised by good parents in Christian homes.

We didn’t learn that Rape Is Bad only after a bunch of Democrats got exposed.

We’ve always known. Democrats in Hollywood were the ones who didn’t. Quit grouping us in with them.

But there’s another message in the video beyond just Gillette’s shameless piggybacking off of the #MeToo movement.

Gillette, of course, is not condemning all men in their video. Only certain ones. If you watch the video, you can see they were clearly focusing on a specific subset of men.

All the bad guys are white. I’m sure this is just a huge coincidence and not due to Gillette trying to push a political message that WHITE MEN BAD, BROWN MEN GOOD. The rapey Businessman boss placing his hand uncomfortably on a female employee’s shoulder: white. All those outrageous white dudes barbecuin’ and getting their Dead Animal Smoke everywhere: white. The TV actor pretending to grope the black woman character: white.

Virtually all the good guys are nonwhite. I’m sure this is a huge coincidence, too. You’ve got popular Hollywood actor Terry Crews saying “men need to hold other men accountable.” Bravo. Then you’ve got the black guy at the party who steps in to save those women from the douchey white guy hitting on them. Then another black guy stops a white guy from aggressively going after a hot chick on the street. A black father is seen being loving and encouraging with his young daughter. The last good guy is a white dad who stops a kid from hitting another. They threw him in there to make it less obvious what they were trying to do.

A Reddit user made a tally: “43 males exhibit “undesirable” behavior, 42 white, 1 black. 7 males exhibit “desirable” behavior, 5 black, 2 white.”

I’d like to be able to ignore the fact that Gillette went out of its way to portray white men as particularly evil, and simply focus on the fact that Gillette went out of its way to insult its core market of men in general, but I can’t.

Just like it’s not telling the whole story to say Gillette’s ad attacks men in general, it’s also not telling the whole story to say there’s a greater cultural war against men in general.

There’s a war on white men, specifically.

Most people bashing the Gillette ad are too afraid of being called “alt-right” or “white nationalist” or “white supremacist” to point out this rather obvious fact, but it’s true. Call me what you want; I’m only pointing out an objective truth.

The narrator of the commercial never used the word “white” and was speaking about men in general, but the images Gillette used made it abundantly clear who they were really going after.

Of course, none of Gillette’s “White Men Are The Problem” nonsense is actually borne out by reality. According to the FBI, in 2016, there were over 18 million arrests made for rape. Of those arrests, 67% were white, 29% black. However, the “white” category also includes Hispanics. Hispanics are considered as “white” in terms of race, but a separate “ethnicity,” and the share of rape arrests by Hispanics is 27%.

So: 40% non-Hispanic white, 29% black, 27% Hispanic. Of course, America overall is 61% non-Hispanic white, 13% black and 16% Hispanic, meaning whites are far less likely to rape than blacks or Hispanics, according to FBI statistics.

I hate that I have to bring up these stats and compare the races to see which is the “rapiest,” but I didn’t start this fight.

Gillette and the Uniparty Establishment it represents started it.

They’re the ones who singled white men out as uniquely dangerous, even though the statistics don’t bear that out.

But of course, the statistics (i.e. reality) don’t matter to Gillette: White men are the enemy because they don’t vote Democrat.

Fuck you, Gillette.


Men defeated the Nazis, went to the moon, built the railroads and the interstates, brought the world out of darkness with electricity, connected it with the internet and the telephone, and police the streets to keep you safe at night. We carry people out of burning buildings; raise, harvest, slaughter and deliver your food; extract your oil from the earth, and make sure your homes are warm in the winter.

Without “toxic masculinity,” the man-hating feminists and soyboy betas would all be dead in a week.

Gillette is owned by Procter & Gamble, so be sure to boycott not only Gillette razors but these other brands as well:


Get woke, go broke.

PS: Boys will be boys, alright.


There is No War on Masculinity, Move Along

Wherever would you get the idea that masculinity is going through an existential crisis in the West? I mean, that’s just totally absurd!

The Daily Mail reports that Britain is becoming the cuckoldry capital of the West:

“Sales of ‘secret’ paternity tests are surging, according to suppliers of DIY home kits.

The DNA tests, which can be carried out with simple cheek swabs, are leading to growing numbers of men discovering they are not the biological father of children they had been led to believe were theirs.

AlphaBiolabs, the leading British home test supplier, says up to 30,000 paternity tests are being performed in this country every year – and that the figures are rising by ten per cent per year.

‘Of these, around 20 per cent of men will learn they are not the father of the child they are testing,’ says the company’s director, David Thomas. He added that in some regions the figure is higher, including the North East, where it is 30 per cent.”

If there’s not a war on men and masculinity, then explain this.

The only reason men get cucked is because they are weak and cannot satisfy their women. That’s the only reason.

Weak men get cucked by stronger men.

Western men are now as weak as they have ever been, while Western women now have more options–socially, professionally, sexually–than they ever have.

This is not a good mixture.

If we are to have #Strong #Independent women, then men have to be stronger than ever as well. But they’re not. In fact, they’re weaker than ever.

No matter what women say, the reality is they want strong, assertive men. They are hardwired to be attracted to alpha males. It’s biology.

At some point in the past few decades, women said they no longer wanted strong men and instead preferred weak men who are “in touch with their feelings.” Plus, traditional masculinity was deemed “toxic” and incompatible with modern society, and oppressive to women to boot.

So lots of Western men got “in touch with their feelings” and grew weak. And they felt bad about oppressing women with their “Toxic Masculinity” and mansplaining and manspreading on the subway.

Part of this isn’t entirely the men’s fault. Part of it is they’ve been brainwashed by popular culture to want to become Weak Beta Males:


And, on top of this, a record number of boys are being raised in feminine environments, between the disastrously-high number of single-parent households and the female dominance of public education:


It’s no wonder there’s such an abundance of weak men.

But the bottom line is, women never actually wanted weak, submissive beta males.

They just wanted less competition for high-paying jobs.

Now, our #Strong #Independent Western women resent their weak beta male boyfriends and husbands, and so they have affairs and get impregnated by strong alpha males behind their beta men’s backs.

On top of this, they get their beta men to unknowingly raise their alpha lovers’ children.

This will ruin us if we don’t turn it around.