white privilege

Another Liberal White Woman Caught Pretending to be Black

First there was Rachel Dolezal.

Then there was Jessica Krug:

Now, say hello to Satchuel Cole:

What is with all these white ladies voluntarily renouncing their White Privilege and trying to pass as black? Why would they want to subject themselves to all the oppression and mistreatment black people are subject to in this country? It just doesn’t make any sense!

Does Cannon Hinnant’s Life Matter?

Many of you have probably seen this by now:


I first saw this story on social media several days ago, and I sort of ignored it because it was so horrible in every conceivable way. I didn’t want to think about it and dwell on it. A five-year-old white boy shot and killed by a 25-year-old black man, who happened to be his neighbor, in an apparent random act of violence. The motive is unknown, but honestly, who would be surprised if it was a deranged “Justice for George Floyd” situation that the media just refuses to acknowledge due to the fact that the media caused it? Maybe it could have been a disagreement with the father. Nothing, obviously excuses it or makes it any less shocking.

The total media blackout of the story, though, was almost as soul-crushing as the murder itself: the fact that such an unspeakably horrible thing can happen to a white family and the media in this country will completely ignore it. So much for white privilege. If “white privilege” were a real thing, the media would be obsessed with this story for weeks on end. There would be rioting and looting coast-to-coast for months.

The media’s silence is complicity. They don’t care when white people are killed by black people, and we should assume it’s because they think White Lives Don’t Matter.

And unlike the George Floyd death, which the media pretended was part of a larger epidemic, the Cannon Hinnant murder is one of many such cases:


In 2018, the most recent year we have crime data available, there were 514 black-on-white homicides compared to 234 white-on-black homicides. This despite the fact that there there are far more white people in the country.

There were more than 2x as many black-on-white homicides in 2018 than there were white-on-black homicides, despite the fact that there are 4.6x more white people than black people in the country.

Does anyone doubt that the media’s continual stoking of black rage and anti-white resentment through lies and propaganda is not a major driver behind this? If the media responded to black-on-white homicides with even a tenth of the outrage they respond to white-on-black, maybe the former wouldn’t be so prevalent.

Compare the prevalence of black-on-white homicide to the alleged “epidemic” that the media chooses to focus on, unarmed black people killed by the police: since 2015, there have been 55 unarmed, non-fleeing black people killed by police.


More than 10x more white people were killed by black people in 2018 alone than there were unarmed, non-fleeing black people killed by the police over the past five-plus years.

And yet the media forces the “police brutality” narrative down our throats.

Matt Walsh has more on the media’s complete refusal to cover this story:

“It will be argued that this crime wasn’t racially motivated, which is supposed to make it less relevant to the general public. But even if I agreed with the premise that non-racially motivated crimes aren’t as relevant (and I don’t) and even if it’s true that Cannon’s murder wasn’t motivated by race (we don’t know at this point), this argument still doesn’t wash because Michael Brown wasn’t a racially motivated killing. Neither was Freddie Gray. Or Eric Garner. Or George Floyd. Or, really, any of the famous homicide or alleged homicide cases from the last decade or so. None of them have had any proven link to racism. Yet these victims are also household names.”

They were automatically presumed to be linked to racism. And the media presented them as such without explicitly saying so. But with Cannon Hinnant, we could only say the media downplayed the racial aspect of it if the media had actually covered it at all.

“As a last ditch attempt at obfuscation, it will be said that this crime isn’t on video, thus making it less sensational and giving it less viral potential. It is sad if murder is looked at this way these days — as mere content to be consumed — but I concede that this is in fact how the media views the subject. But there was no video of Trayvon Martin. There was no video of Freddie Gray. And on the other side, I can think of plenty of sensational murders that were caught on video yet received very little coverage. Daniel Shaver, the white Arizona man killed by cops while on his knees begging for his life. Or how about Brittany Hill, the black Chicago mother gunned down by gang members while holding her baby? That is one of the most shocking crimes ever to be caught on camera, and yet the national media has said little about it. 

There simply is no explanation for the way these various incidents are treated, other than the most disgraceful and infuriating one — the national media is specifically interested in fueling a certain racial narrative, and they will make the intentional editorial decision to blacklist or downplay any story that interferes with it.”

Yep. This is why the media is the enemy of the people. There is no way this story could help Joe Biden get elected, so it’s ignored. In fact, if this story was widely publicized in the media, it would probably help Trump get elected, so it’s more than ignored: it’s buried.

But beyond that, the media’s policy of White Lives Don’t Matter directly results in white people being slaughtered. The media not only excuses but encourages anti-white racism. That’s why Cannon Hinnant was murdered.

So Much White Privilege in America: Black Man Rapes White College Girl in NYC “Because of Slavery”

“Us minorities have been through slavery,” the man said:

She deserved it. Because of slavery.

This story broke on the 18th, two days ago.

Are you seeing it all over the news? Is it getting wall to wall coverage on CNN?


Because the exact opposite of white privilege exists in this country.

People in this country are led to believe that white people can get away with anything, but a black man can rape a white woman and claim it was “because slavery” and the media’s reaction is: 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️.

Further, what would compel a black man in 2019 to seek justice for slavery, which ended in 1865?

He was never a slave, the woman he raped was never a slave-owner. So why would he do this?

This is another example of the media and mainstream American culture radicalizing people and the real-life consequences of that indoctrination. No one ever calls the media out for its “inflammatory rhetoric,” or for inciting violence.

It’s always President Trump who is accused of inciting hate crimes–even though most of those hate crimes end up being hoaxes.

The media is never held to account for all the violence it instigates.

So. Much. White. Privilege.

Being white in America puts you at such an advantage that ethnic minorities are desperate to avoid being counted as white on the next census for fear of missing out on all the great benefits of diversity quotas:

“Certain ethnic groups are opposing their classification as “white” on the upcoming 2020 Census because they say the diversity quotas of corporations and universities will hurt their educational and job opportunities.

Wasn’t there a time in America where people were denied jobs and opportunities due to the color of their skin? I think they had a name for it, but it’s not coming to me. . .

“Arab and Persian residents in the United States told the Los Angeles Times that while they plan to participate in the 2020 Census, they fear they will be lumped in with the racial category of “white” Americans.

The U.S. is home to about three million southwest Asian, North African, and Middle Eastern residents, according to an analysis by the Times. The vast majority, about 80 percent, have called themselves “white” on previous census surveys.

The ethnic groups, though, fear declaring themselves “white” will give them a disadvantage in the education system and job market, as universities and corporations have favored diversity quotas.”

Drop an alien in from outer space and tell him that in a nation of whites and nonwhites, nonwhites get preferential treatment in applying for jobs and colleges, as well as in school funding–oh, and they’re also allowed to be racist and even encouraged to advance racially supremacist ideas and policies. Then ask the alien which group, white or nonwhite, is “privileged.”

The answer is obvious.

Back in the 1960s and 1970s, the Civil Rights movement convinced the ruling political class that, yes, minorities (at that time just black people) really were second-class citizens and that the situation had to rectified. We refer to the period of black oppression preceding the Civil Rights Era as “Jim Crow.”

So the Great Society and Affirmative Action programs of the Johnson and Nixon administrations (yes, even that supposed racist right-winger Nixon was all about affirmative action and big government programs) essentially created a system where, in order to eliminate white privilege, the system would attempt to “make up” for a century of oppression and begin favoring nonwhites over whites.

It was seen as the only way to eventually bring about equality between blacks and whites in America: if the system had for centuries favored whites and oppressed blacks, then it was time for blacks to be favored and whites to more or less take a back seat. In time, due to the preferential treatment, blacks would eventually “catch up” to whites and then we could transition to a system where all the races were treated equally.

That was the idea.

But here’s the thing: the government-enforced preferential treatment and welfare for nonwhites a. backfired disastrously and did not actually improve conditions minority communities, and b. still continues to this day, with no end in sight.

There was no timetable for the affirmative action system; it was just implemented and left in place indefinitely. And so we’ve had a system that favors nonwhites and disfavors whites for over five decades now.


If America is still racist and oppressive to nonwhites, then here’s the question: why is it universally agreed that Jim Crow ended in the mid-1960s?

If America is still extremely racist and oppressive to nonwhites, then what is the present period (1965-present) called? Why don’t we continue to use the term Jim Crow to describe this present-day supposed nightmare for nonwhites?

🚨White Privilege Alert: All Charges Against Jussie Smollett Dropped

Who could have seen this coming:

Screen Shot 2019-03-26 at 11.40.57 AM.png

But Muhh White Privilege!!!

Take your pick: black privilege? Gay privilege? Democrat privilege? Celebrity privilege?

You knew there there was no way in hell Smollett was in any real legal jeopardy.

We’re always told about “good old boys networks” that have historically benefitted white males, but it seems the real “good old boys networks” of 2019 work a bit differently.

We live in a corrupted, unjust country where certain people are completely immune from the law.

TMZ has the details:

“Jussie Smollett will not be prosecuted for allegedly faking a racial attack, because all charges have been dropped. Jussie and his lawyers will address the media at 8:45 AM PT. We will live stream.

Jussie and his lawyers ran to court Tuesday morning in Chicago, where he was facing 16 felony counts of lying to police in the alleged racial and homophobic attack.  

Jussie will surrender his $10,000 bond. But, that’s it. The case is over.

We’re told the State’s Attorney, Kim Foxx, told Chicago police she was dropping the case because Jussie would have only gotten community service if convicted and she said he has already performed community service so there is no point in prosecuting him. We could not find any record of Smollett doing community service.”

Other than, y’know, to dissuade people from faking hate crimes, but then again, the Powers That Be have a vested interest in encouraging more and more minorities to fake white hate crimes.

We’re told Chicago police are “furious” and feel something untoward is going on with Kim Foxx.”

Undoubtedly. She’s a Chicago Democrat after all. Hello.

If you can bear to read the rest, Jussie is now officially the Victim:

“Jussie’s lawyers say, “Today, all criminal charges against Jussie Smollett were dropped and his record has been wiped clean of the filing of this tragic complaint against him. Jussie was attacked by two people he was unable to identify on January 29th. He was a victim who was vilified and made to appear as a perpetrator as a result of false and inappropriate remarks made to the public, causing an inappropriate rush to judgment.”

So if Smollett is complete exonerated and innocent, why did he have to forfeit $10k and do community service?

They’re so corrupt they can’t even get their story straight, and it’s because they know it doesn’t matter–nobody’s gonna do shit to them.

They don’t even care who knows they’re corrupt.

Besides, even if Smollett wasn’t actually the victim of a hate crime, just the reality of living as a gay black man in America makes him a victim all the same.

His heart was in the right place. He was just trying to raise awareness of how dangerous life is for minorities in Trump’s America™.

To borrow a term the “media” has grown fond of, Smollett’s claims rang true, even if they weren’t actually true.

And hey, after 300 years of slavery and 100 years of Jim Crow, a black man in America is ENTITLED to making a mockery of the justice system! Sheesh.

“A source close to Jussie says the prosecution’s case “disintegrated.” As we reported, there were issues with the $3,500 check the 2 brothers, Ola and Abel Osundairo, received from Jussie. The Police Superintendent had said the money was payment for the fake attack, but it appears it was actually for physical training.”


Apparently this Kim Foxx lady interfered in the Smollett case on the orders of Michelle Obama’s former Chief of Staff:

“Just days after Jussie Smollett told Chicago police he had fought off a pair of attackers who targeted him in an apparent hate crime, Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx tried to persuade Police Supt. Eddie Johnson to turn the investigation over to the FBI.

Foxx’s call to Johnson came after an influential supporter of the “Empire” actor reached out to Foxx personally: Tina Tchen, a Chicago attorney and former chief of staff for former First Lady Michelle Obama, according to emails and text messages provided by Foxx to the Chicago Sun-Times in response to a public records request.”

The Obamas personally intervened to rig this case.

But why would they want the FBI taking over the case? At first glance, it would appear an FBI investigation is the exact opposite of what you’d want if you were hoping to pull strings and get someone let off the hook.

Well, as we learned over the past two years with Comey and Parkland and the Russia Hoax, the FBI is completely corrupt from top to bottom, and the fact that Democrats now demand FBI investigations left and right is all the proof you need, because the Democrats are corrupt top-to-bottom. They view the FBI as their fixer and secret police force, covering up their own crimes while terrorizing their enemies.

The Obamas wanted the Jussie case in the “right hands.” And those hands were the FBI’s. That should tell you all you need to know about the FBI.

In America 2019, there are some people exempt from the law, and some people whose lives are ruined for no reason other than their political affiliation:


I never want to hear the term “White privilege” again.

🚨 White Privilege Alert! Black Pro Boxer Goes on Anti-Gay Rant, Media Mum

Imagine if a white guy did this:



“If any fag, punk-ass n*gga come up on me, tryin’ to touch me, or all that gay shit, I’m letting you know right now: if I ain’t got my gun on me, I’m knockin’ you the fuck out. If I got my gun, I’m shooting you in the face. I’m not playin’ around. That’s on God. I don’t like gay shit.”

Media headline if he was white: “Gun-toting redneck threatens to punch and SHOOT gay people in his presence.”

If a white guy threatened to shoot any gay people in his presence, he would be under immediate FBI investigation and his career would be over.

This would be all over the news and we’d be subject to endless panel discussions about how gays in America are under assault by white people.

But yeah, we need to worry about white privilege in this country.

White people can get away with anything, man.

In completely unrelated news, I have a new favorite boxer.