2020 election

Is Trump Going to Get Blown Out in November?

Going into 2020, it seemed like Trump was on course to roll to an easy reelection victory over whomever the Democrats eventually chose as their nominee. Even once it became clear that Biden had locked up the nomination, his obvious mental decline combined with the lack of genuine enthusiasm for his candidacy made it feel like Trump was the prohibitive favorite to win in November.

But that was months ago, before anybody knew what 2020 had in store. Everything has changed, apparently. Polls now show Biden destroying Trump both nationally and in all the major battleground states:

Screen Shot 2020-06-29 at 3.00.44 PM.png

Is Biden really 9 points ahead of Trump nationally? There was even an NY Times poll that came out a week ago that showed Trump down 14 points to Biden nationally.

Is Trump really that unpopular? Is Biden really that popular?

If you go by the news media and social media, absolutely. Social media is all about Black Lives Matter and putting Trump out of his misery.

But something just doesn’t feel right about those poll numbers.

I’ve got some pro-Trump theories on the main factors that will decide the 2020 election:

  • The Silent Majority: we’ll get into this more later but the basic idea is that as the country burns and the corporations publicly swear their fealty to BLM, the silent majority of Americans have steeled their resolve to take their country back in the fall. So many people have been red-pilled over the past month or two. Many have been black-pilled (it’s hard not to be with a nonstop feed of America burning on social media). For every clout-chasing white girl on social media posting BLM support, there’s way more people out there who have been Mega Redpilled, and maybe even turned into full-blown racists. They’re just not publicizing it. This is the Silent Majority factor that is working against Biden.
  • Virtue Signaling White Women: Are they really going to swing hard towards Biden? The Democrats’ win in the 2018 midterms was widely attributed to suburban moms who were disgusted by Trump’s Twitter account and his “lack of decency”. But the problem with that theory was always this: they didn’t vote for Trump in 2016 in the first place. And it’s not like they didn’t know about Trump’s “lack of decency” in 2016. The “grab ’em by the pussy” tape leaked before the 2016 election. All the angry “pussyhat” ladies were marching and Letting Their Voices Be Heard basically the day after the 2016 election. It’s not as if all the Women’s March participants were Trump supporters who swung hard against him between election day 2016 and inauguration day 2017. Trump lost white female college grads 51-44 to Clinton in 2016. It’s not like they left him for the Democrats in 2018, because they weren’t with him to begin with. In 2018, Republicans lost white college women 59-39, but that was with Trump not on the ballot.
  • This leads to the next point: You can’t just assume the 2018 electorate is the same as the 2020 electorate. Republicans won huge in the 2010 midterms and still lost handily in the 2012 election. Democrats’ victory in 2018 does not in any way guarantee a smashing victory for them this fall. Having the President on the ticket is a massive game-changer no matter how you slice it.
  • 2016 redux? There were multiple times in 2016 when it felt like the final nail had been pounded into Trump’s coffin. There were even times in 2016 when it was hard to tell if Trump actually wanted to win the election at all. Maybe there is a method to Trump’s madness. He seems to just be sitting on his ass while the country burns, not bothering to do anything but tweet like he’s a bystander instead of President of the United States. Maybe he’s under more significant quarantine than we’re led to believe. Maybe he’s being sequestered in a basement just like Biden is. I don’t know. Whatever it is, it seems like he’s lost control of the country. And yet, we’ve been here before in 2016 when it seemed like he completely lost control of his campaign and had even given up. Yet he still ended up winning. So I won’t count this guy out.

Now for a (potentially) pro-Biden theory:

  • Urban black voters: the anti-Trump energy in the cities will outweigh the “Return to Normalcy” energy outside of the cities. The Elite’s main goal in provoking the race riots is to juice up black voter enthusiasm for Biden. It’s why they chose Biden in the first place: because he’s popular with black voters. A big reason Hillary lost in 2016 was because she did not get the same black voter turnout in the big cities that Obama got. It’s probably why she lost Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin–because Democrats in those states rely on black voters in Philadelphia, Detroit and Milwaukee, and they just didn’t show up for Hillary the way they did for Obama. So the goal for 2020 is to get black voters motivated to vote for Biden. Will the race riots do the trick? It’s tough to say now, but I think the real question is: will the gain in black voters be more than Biden’s loss in white voters? Because the Democrats have pushed a lot of voters–and not just white voters, but voters of all colors–into Trump’s arms. Most people–black, white, Hispanic, Asian, whatever–prefer stability to chaos, normalcy to abnormality.
  • And the thing is, Biden was actually set up to do fairly well with white voters–at least better than Hillary did. Biden appeals to blue collar workers, especially in the upper midwest. That is precisely the area that flipped from Obama to Trump and put Trump in the White House: Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Iowa. When Biden was Obama’s VP, his main job was to campaign in the Rust Belt and appeal to blue collar whites. But now it might be a moot point because Biden is inexorably associated with the inner-city race riots.

Regardless of what the polls say, I just don’t think there’s been that much of a backlash against Trump. Trump has definitely irritated a lot of his base supporters by not doing much in the face of these riots, and not being more aggressive in re-opening the country. But it’s not like those people are going to vote for Biden. That just makes no sense.

But still: the polls! It’s hard to just completely ignore the polls. But what if the polls truly are bullshit. The elite is pulling out all the stops to try to defeat Trump. So why wouldn’t they rig the polls? They started race riots and carried out a Plannedemic in order to swing the 2020 election. What makes you think they’d balk at rigging the polls?

It’s easy to see why they’d rig the polls. Lots of Trump supporters on social media are despondent, basically resigned to the fact that Trump is going to get wiped out in the fall. They talk a big game about not believing the polls, but I don’t think many of them truly believe the polls are fake and can be disregarded entirely.

But if you view it from the perspective that the Elite is doing everything in their power to steal this election from Trump–months of quarantine, race riots, mail-in voting, social media censorship and purges–then it really wouldn’t be much of a stretch to believe they’re trying to turn the election into a self-fulfilling prophecy by showing poll after poll after poll of Trump getting slaughtered. Eventually even the most ardent Trump supporters start to believe it.

The point is, I just don’t see how Trump can be so far behind. Something feels “off” seeing him down 9+ points in a poll. It just doesn’t accurately reflect the mood I’ve observed in this country in talking to people over the past few months. Yes, that’s all anecdotal. But I’ve been to multiple different states across the country over the past few months and the general consensus is that people want to return to normalcy. People do not like what is happening in this country right now.

Also, I don’t think I’ve met a single Biden supporter. As in, a person who is genuinely excited about voting for Joe Biden. Instead, it feels like the people who have always despised Trump just despise him more obnoxiously than ever now.

Honestly, I feel like the events of the past month have turned more people into Trump supporters, albeit secret Trump supporters. They’re all afraid to admit it.

The idea that Trump is now losing big because he’s lost white support in the suburbs, I just don’t know if I buy that. All the BLM riots and protests of the past month–CHAZ included–that’s all associated with the Democratic Party.

By this point I think most people realize that a vote for Biden is a vote for this:

external-content.duckduckgo

I really can’t see suburban whites voting for that. I can’t see non-college whites endorsing that with a vote for Biden.

Maybe people are lying to the pollsters. Maybe, like 2016, people are scared to admit they support Trump. I would say today’s social climate is even more hostile to Trump supporters than 2016’s was. 2016 honestly feels like child’s play compared to 2020. It could be that simple of an explanation.

Or the polls could be flat-out rigged. I don’t know.

But whatever it is, the polls just feel wrong. Despite what you see on the news and on social media, Americans are not happy about what is happening right now. They want this country to go back to normal. Guns are flying off the shelves. First-time gun-buyers are a common sight. There are millions of Americans who now for the first time in their lives feel unsafe in this country, and it has shaken them to their cores.

That is not an atmosphere conducive to a Biden win.

As I see it, the only place Biden is winning is in the polls and on social media. It could be that I have completely misread the country and don’t know how people are really feeling. But I think I’ve got it right. Social media and the news are not an accurate portrayal of America.

If Trump is going to lose, it’ll be because his supporters stayed home (not likely, because most realize the stakes of this election) and because the Democrats rigged the election with all their mail-in voting (which may have been the motivation behind the Plannedemic all along).

It feels like now more than ever, the polls exist not as a gauge of the political climate, but as yet another way to manipulate and direct the political climate.

Bernie Sanders is a Pussy

Joe Biden’s Body is now the presumptive Democratic nominee after winning a handful of primaries last night. Biden won Michigan, Missouri, Mississippi and Idaho. He’s going to lose to Bernie in North Dakota but that’s inconsequential. And the two so close in Washington state, even if Bernie wins the vote count, Biden will still win the same number of delegates as Bernie.

It’s over. Biden is going to be the Democratic nominee. There was a rumor going around on Twitter last night that Bernie was planning to drop out on Wednesday, but his campaign shot that down.

It doesn’t really matter, though. Joe Biden’s Body is going to take this thing.

But before I get to Joe Biden’s Body becoming the presumptive Democratic nominee, let me just mention Bernie Sanders and sum up his campaign in a few words: Bernie Sanders is a pussy.

There’s not much more to it.

Bernie is a pussy.

I apologize for using that word, I know it’s vulgar, but there is no better way to describe Bernie Sanders. That’s what he is.

The man has been wronged by the Dem Party Establishment at every turn since 2015 and yet he still will not stick up for himself.

Last night, Tucker had a segment in which he called Bernie Sanders the “lamest revolutionary ever,” and that’s exactly right. In this clip Tucker runs down all of the reasons why Bernie Sanders is a pussy–although of course Tucker is not allowed to use that word.

You should watch Tucker’s segment in full, but the bottom line is that Bernie Sanders is a pussy.

If Trump were in his shoes (and he will be in a couple months time), Trump would be raising hell. He wouldn’t shut up. He wouldn’t back down. He would not sit there and take it.

“Believe me, folks: Joe Biden should be in a retirement home. They’re calling him Senile Joe. Can you believe that? Bad stuff, folks. You really have to feel bad for this guy, Joe Biden. He can’t even tell you what state he’s in and they’re making him run for President. Did you see the other night he thought his sister was his wife? Unbelievable. He was talking about letting all the little kids rub his hairy legs. Disgusting. Just disgusting. What’s the matter with this guy?”

“So all my rivals dropped out right before Super Tuesday and they’re all going to endorse Biden. They’re trying to rig this election against me. Nasty people. I’ll bet Biden’s people cut a deal with all of them. They don’t want me to win. You know that, right? Well, we’re going to win. We’re going to win big. There’s nothing they can do about it, that I can tell you.”

If Trump were in Bernie’s shoes right now, he’d be going scorched-earth on the Democrat Establishment. Zero punches pulled. He’d be calling out all the dirty tricks even though it’s considered “taboo” to point out that an election that is obviously being rigged, is being rigged. He doesn’t care whose feathers he ruffles, or if he breaks with the “decorum” of Official Washington. In fact, he enjoys doing that stuff. He relishes being the party crasher, the bane of the Establishment’s existence.

Bernie, on the other hand, doesn’t want to fight. When push came to shove, Bernie folded like a cheap suit. He cucked. He sat on his hands while Joe Biden’s Body ran away with the nomination.

Bernie knows he’s sharper than Biden. Bernie knows he could pummel Biden in a debate. Biden has tons of weaknesses that Bernie could’ve exploited. But he didn’t do any of that. He fought with both hands tied behind his back, voluntarily.

He sat there and allowed his clearly undeserving and unfit opponent to run him over. Bernie allowed himself to be humiliated. He allowed himself to be cuckolded by Joe Biden’s Body.

Because of that, Bernie Sanders deserved to lose.

ESymmt1UYAAXSwS.jpg

Now, there was certainly more support for Joe Biden than most observers realized. You can say us political junkies were duped into conflating Bernie’s popularity on Twitter with his popularity in real life. This is a valid point. Most Biden voters aren’t on Twitter 24/7, while Bernie’s are everywhere on Twitter. So it was easy to fall into the belief that Bernie was the frontrunner and Biden had no support.

But this primary was about more than just the false reality of Twitter misleading a great many political observers. This was also one of the most blatant oligarchal interventions in an American political race, perhaps ever.

First, you had Pete the Cheat stealing Iowa from Bernie, which turned out to be a fakeout. At the time, I thought the Democratic Establishment had left Biden for dead and thrown its weight behind Buttigieg. But then Buttigieg quickly flamed out. He “won” Iowa thanks to help from that “malfunctioning” vote-counting app, but did nothing after that. Now it seems more like the Democratic Establishment simply wanted to blunt Sanders’ momentum any way they could, and since Biden was polling badly in Iowa, they rigged the race for the next closest non-Bernie candidate, which happened to be Mayor Pete. But once Pete had served his purpose, he was no longer useful to the Dem Party Establishment. So he fizzled out quickly.

And then there was Super Coupsday, where most of the field dropped out the day before and endorsed Biden in an effort to stop Bernie.

This is to say nothing of how badly they rigged it against Bernie in 2016, either. Bernie got screwed big time, twice.

But I still think he could’ve won if he would’ve fought for it–both in 2016 and 2020. Calling out a rigged system may evoke gasps and outrage and finger-wagging from the media, but it’s actually quite popular with voters. Shocking, I know. Had Bernie actually stood up for himself and gone nuclear on the Democratic Party Establishment, he could’ve won this thing–handily, too. But he didn’t. And we all know why.

The Big Club (as George Carlin brilliantly put it) wanted Biden, the Big Club got Biden. They muscled him through the primary.

What we’re witnessing right now is actually quite remarkable: there is no substance at all to the Joe Biden campaign, and yet he’s going to win the Democratic nomination. First it was Fake News, now we have a Fake Candidate.

What’s Biden’s rallying cry, his campaign’s raison d’être? There is none.

Do you know a single one of his policy proposals? Can you name one thing (besides cognitive decline) that is synonymous with Joe Biden 2020 in the way the Wall was for Trump in 2016, or Hope and Change was for Obama in 2008?

When Joe Biden first announced his candidacy in April 2019, he was asked what his campaign’s motto is, and this was his answer:

“In an interview with Robin Roberts of ABC’s Good Morning America, Biden was asked if he had his own motto for his 2020 run.

He said: “Make America moral again. Make America return to the essence of who we are, the dignity of the country, the dignity of people, treating our people with dignity… End this God-awful deliberate division that is being taken in order… separating people to aggrandize his own power.”

What on earth is he talking about? It sounds like he made that up on the spot. It’s incoherent word salad.

On top of this, no one actually believes Joe Biden is the man to “make America moral again.” Since when has anyone ever associated Joe Biden with morality? This is a guy who as Vice President set his crackhead son up with an $83,000 per month no-show job in Ukraine, and then threatened to withhold US military aid money to Ukraine unless the prosecutor investigating his son was fired.

And just yesterday, Biden was caught on video berating a factory worker who asked him a legitimate question about his stated plans to trample the Second Amendment. Biden told the factory worker he was “full of shit,” then commanded the woman next to him to “shush,” and then after some back and forth, asked the factory worker if he wanted to “go outside” with him, meaning fight.

The guy who’s trying to brawl with random American citizens that dare ask him questions he doesn’t like is going to Make America Moral Again?

Uh, what?

external-content.duckduckgo.gif

I went to his official website to try and figure out what the point of Joe Biden’s campaign was, and I didn’t find much. First, I clicked on the “Joe’s Vision” tab, and there you’ll find a whole bunch of policy proposals he didn’t write, that no one will ever read. That section was labeled “Bold Ideas.” Great, but not what we’re looking for. Then there’s some generic campaign boilerplate waxing eloquently about “the idea” of America. Still not what we’re looking for. If you scroll down further, you will find what I would guess are the three main ideas of the Biden campaign. Here they are:

  • “Rebuild the middle class” (Apparently the Obama Administration didn’t adequately do this. Or he’s trying to claim Trump has destroyed the middle class in four years, which no one believes.)
  • “Demonstrate respected leadership on the world stage” (Translation: more foreign wars.)
  • “We’ve got to make sure our democracy includes everyone” (Translation: illegal immigrants voting.)

It’s just vague claptrap. There’s no real core message to his campaign. You cannot sum up the main thing Joe Biden wants to do for America.

Joe’s just running for President, and that’s it. There is nothing for people to sink their teeth into. There is no heart and soul of his campaign.

It’s just him running for President. He’s running for President to become President. That’s it. Trump ran for President in 2016 to Make America Great Again, Joe Biden is running for President in 2020 to become President.

Hillary’s campaign in 2016 was a clear and obvious power grab, but at least she attempted to vaguely make it about “WAMMEN!” and the “glass ceiling” or whatever. At least she made some effort to not make it so obvious that she just wanted power.

With Biden, there’s none of that. It’s just, “I’m Joe Biden and I’m runnin’ for President.”

The only thing I can think of that might give Democrat voters reason to be excited about Joe Biden is Obama nostalgia. Obama is still far and away the most popular Democrat out there, and I guess some Democrat voters view Joe Biden as the closest thing they can get to a third Obama term.

But that’s really all I can think of in terms of the natural allure of Joe Biden’s candidacy.

Outside of the fading memories of Obama, there is nothing there but Joe Biden himself, and Joe Biden is not even really there anymore.

The guy is so far gone mentally he doesn’t even know what day of the week it is half the time, and yet right before Super Tuesday, all of his rivals dutifully dropped out and threw their support behind him.

I don’t think we’ve ever seen such an obviously propped-up candidate for President in U.S. history. Everyone can see that Joe Biden’s campaign isn’t for Joe Biden. He’s not running for President: they’re running him for President.

The Big Club sees Joe Biden as their best shot at retaking the White House, and once Biden gets in, the Big Club will be calling the shots. Completely. Joe Biden will be living in the White House, and that’s about it.

And the VP spot on his ticket will be the most coveted job in Washington.

Does anyone actually see this guy making it to 2025, much less 2029? Is there even a snowball’s chance in hell Joe Biden will be President until the end of this decade, which only began a couple months ago?

No way.

The jockeying to get the nod to be Biden’s running mate will be spectacular, because whoever ends up locking it down will, should Biden win in November, have great odds at taking over as President sometime in the next few years.

They may even be calling the shots from Day One of a Biden presidency given how obviously unfit for office Joe currently is.

There will not be one single decision a President Biden’s Body makes that will be his. They’re not going to let him.

And that’s the point I’m trying to make here: there has never been a more obvious figurehead candidate than Joe Biden in 2020. Never. All the reasons we regular people look at him and think, “there’s no way this guy has the mental capacity to be President” are the same reasons the Big Club threw its support behind him.

“But Joe Biden doesn’t even really have a campaign platform at all!”

Yeah, that’s the point.

Obama was an obvious figurehead, but at least he could play the part. At least Obama could fool a lot of Americans into believing he was actually his own man and calling all the shots.

Joe Biden can’t even play the part. It is so obvious what they’re doing running him for President.

So I think we should take a moment and recognize this watershed moment in American politics for what it is: today was the moment the Big Club stopped trying to hide it. In the past, they put up figurehead candidates for President, and then people whose names you don’t know and who you didn’t vote for would call the shots behind the scenes.

With a clearly-gone Joe Biden becoming the presumptive Democratic nominee today, they’re not even trying to pretend he’s an actual, legitimate candidate. They haven’t even given us a fake slogan to believe in, or a signature policy proposal we can vainly hope will improve our lives. Joe Biden is nothing more than a vehicle for the Big Club to regain power.

The whole point of Joe Biden’s campaign is simply to get Trump out of office and return power to the exiled Establishment. Biden recently cut an ad that closed with him literally saying “I will not let this man [Trump] be reelected president of the United States of America.” They view Trump as the Usurper and Biden as the restoration of the old globalist monarchy. If Biden wins this fall, the history books will refer to the years 2017-2021 as the interregnum, a brief disturbance of the status quo that was quickly rectified.

Joe Biden isn’t just the Big Club’s Candidate–he is the Big Club. He is its stand-in. He’s not just going to do their bidding if he’s elected; they will do it directly.

The Democratic Presidential Nomination Race is Being Rigged Before Our Eyes

Democracy is dying in darkness, but since there’s no way to blame Donald Trump for it, the media is uninterested.

As you probably know, Monday night’s Iowa Caucus (which kicked off the presidential primary season) was anything but ordinary. Usually on election night, early returns start coming in as early as 7-8pm CST. But not Monday night. On Iowa Caucus night, the nation waited and waited for the results to begin trickling out, but there was nothing. By 9pm and 0% of the vote reported, it was clear something was amiss in Iowa.

Then came the announcement at around 9:05pm:

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 12.22.51 AM.png

“Out of an abundance of caution,” the Iowa State Democratic Party was undertaking “quality control” measures and would not be releasing the caucus results anytime soon. No time frame was given for when the results would be released to the public.

Immediately people began pointing out the obvious: they’re rigging it against Bernie, again.

The comments began pouring in in response to the MSNBC tweet:

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 12.49.51 AM.png

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 12.50.01 AM.png

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 12.50.11 AM.png

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 12.50.27 AM.png

By Tuesday morning, the #2 trending hashtag on Twitter was “#PeteTheCheat,” in reference to Pete Buttigieg, who bizarrely delivered a victory speech late Monday night despite 0% of the results having been reported:

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 12.57.57 AM.png

Things had taken a turn: it wasn’t Biden for whom the Iowa Caucus was being rigged–it was Pete Buttigieg. How would he know to deliver a victory speech on Monday night despite 0% of the vote having been reported?

Well, that’s because there’s a strong possibility “Mayor Pete” was part of the reason the voting results weren’t available on Monday night. What made the 2020 Iowa Caucus different from all previous Iowa Caucuses was that this year, the Iowa State Democratic Party decided to use an app called “Shadow” to coordinate and calculate all the vote totals. It was this app “Shadow” that “failed” (many would say it succeeded, depending on your perspective) and threw everything into chaos.

It turns out that Buttigieg’s campaign gave thousands of dollars to Shadow:

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 1.04.56 AM.png

I just want to add: why did they give the app such an obviously sinister name like “Shadow”? A movie villain wouldn’t even be this blatant about it.

At around 4pm on Tuesday afternoon, the Democratic Party announced that it had 62% of the votes counted and finally released the partial results. They showed Bernie and Buttigieg neck and neck for the lead, with Joe Biden a distant fourth behind those two and Elizabeth Warren.

Finally, on Thursday night, the full results of the 2020 Iowa Democratic Caucus were released:

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 1.32.15 AM.png

The final results showed Buttigieg with a 0.1% margin of victory over Bernie Sanders. Keep in mind this result shows the percentage of delegates won. As far as the final popular vote went, Bernie was ahead of Buttigieg by several thousand. But it’s the delegates that actually matter.

This was quite a remarkable turn of events for Mayor Pete given that the final polls from Iowa in the run up to Caucus Day showed him far behind Bernie. The RCP average had him at around 16, with Bernie in the lead at 23%:

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 12.13.11 AM.png

Only one polling outlet had Buttigieg in the lead prior to the vote, while the rest showed either big Bernie leads or decent Biden leads:

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 12.14.10 AM.png

The fact that Buttigieg managed to make up so much ground over the course of a couple days is a testament to the scrappiness of his campaign and its exceptional get-out-the-vote efforts. And absolutely nothing else, okay?

Not only did Mayor Pete overcome what was by most accounts a sizable polling deficit just days before the Caucus vote took place, but last night he just so happened to be on-air at CNN when the news broke that he won on Thursday evening:

EQJJUVfWsAAh0dF.jpg

That Pete Buttigieg is one lucky fella, huh? It’s almost as if. . .

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 1.22.18 AM.png

Buttigieg’s surprising victory in Iowa has unsurprisingly boosted his polling numbers in New Hampshire, where he’s now in a virtual tie with Bernie for the lead according to freshly-released polling data:

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 2.24.18 AM.png

The damage has been done. Bernie supporters are furious, and now Buttigieg is surging in the polls due to the momentum from winning Iowa. People like a winner, and so it should be no surprise that more and more people are climbing aboard the bandwagon.

Monday’s Iowa Caucus is now ancient history, despite some serious red flags being raised about its results–beyond just the Buttigieg-Shadow connection:

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 1.29.47 AM.png

Even the New York Times admits that there are enough “errors” in the numbers that, given the slim margin of victory for Buttigieg, the results of the Iowa Caucus probably aren’t even accurate. There were dirty tricks aplenty:

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 1.30.09 AM.png

But these cries will fall on deaf ears, because though the voting tallies may have been wrong (meaning fraudulent), the Right Candidate won. So it’s on to New Hampshire.

Keep in mind, however, that winning the Iowa Caucus does not automatically make you the favorite to win the party nomination:

  • In 2016, Ted Cruz won Iowa on the Republican side. Hillary won Iowa on the Democratic side, but we all know the 2016 Dem primary was rigged (more on this in a bit).
  • In 2012, Rick Santorum beat out Mitt Romney by a mere 34 votes to win Iowa.
  • In 2008, Barack Obama famously won Iowa and gained a ton of momentum in the primary fight against Hillary. But on the Republican side, Mike Huckabee won Iowa with 34% of the vote while John McCain finished a distant fourth with just 13% of the vote.
  • In 2004, John Kerry won Iowa.
  • In 2000, George W. Bush won Iowa, as did Al Gore.

So in the five elections since and including 2000, between both parties, five times has the candidate that won Iowa gone on to win their party’s nomination: Hillary 2016, Obama 2008, Kerry 2004, and both Bush and Gore in 2000. Three times we’ve seen a party nominee fail to win Iowa: Trump 2016, Romney 2012 and McCain in 2008.

Actually, now that I look at it, it’s clear that winning Iowa is far more important on the Democratic side than it is on the Republican side. Every Democratic nominee since 2000 first won in Iowa, while only one Republican nominee since 2000 won Iowa (George W. Bush in 2000).

Why is this? I have no idea. Maybe it’s because the Democrats rig their primaries. Maybe it’s simply because the best candidate tends to win the most states, Iowa included. It could be any number of reasons.

But clearly the Democratic Party feels Iowa is important, as evidenced by the fact that they blatantly rigged the election against Bernie and in favor of Buttigieg.

My question is this: why has the Democratic Party Establishment kicked Joe Biden to the curb in favor of the 38-year-old homosexual mayor of the fourth-largest city in Indiana? Is he really their best hope of defeating Trump?

The obvious answer would be that Biden is unfit to run for President given his obviously deteriorated mental facilities. The guy is falling apart; half the time he doesn’t even know what day of the week it is. It’s not a stretch to say this is the reason the Democratic Party Establishment–which he himself is a part of, or perhaps was a part of–is bailing on him.

Speaking of Biden, his media hype has officially collided reality. For a while I’ve suspected his candidacy was not nearly as popular with the voters as the polling suggested. I think his polling success was based mainly on a combination of his name recognition relative to the other candidates, as well as outright rigging of the polls by the media outlets conducting them because Biden is the Establishment’s Choice.

I’ve never felt like Biden was the true front-runner in the Democratic race, either he was a placeholder or the pre-determined nominee. But he’s no longer the front-runner. Polling in New Hampshire–the next primary on the calendar–shows Biden projected for another fourth-place finish. He’ll probably win in South Carolina, but even that could be in doubt now. It would appear Biden is cooked.

The only reason I want to talk about Biden is in relation to Buttigieg, specifically how Buttigieg replaced Biden as the apparent Chosen One in the eyes of the Party Establishment.

There are rumors that Buttigieg is CIA: somehow, this small-town mayor from Indiana received the endorsement of over 200 “foreign policy and national security professionals,” including former CIA Deputy Director David Cohen among many other CIA, State Department, Pentagon and NSC officials from the Obama-era That’s odd.

And how did Buttigieg become so popular in the first place? Why is no one talking about how unprecedented it is that the mayor of a town in Indiana has suddenly built a national profile for himself and has become one of the front-runners to win the Democratic nomination for President? You don’t just do that all on your own; it can only be done by having friends in high places.

There’s something up with Buttigieg. I don’t know exactly what it is, but for some reason his candidacy has the blessing of people high up the chain. He would not be where he is today without the permission of high-ranking officials and their mouthpieces in the media. Buttigieg is backed by powerful forces.  He’s like an iceberg in that 90% of him is shrouded in mystery.

Something’s up.

***

Keep in mind that it is an indisputable fact that the DNC rigged the 2016 primary for Hillary Clinton and cheated Bernie Sanders out of the nomination. Yes, it is a fact. A federal judge reviewing the case even admitted so in 2017:

“In June 2016, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and former DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz for violating the DNC Charter by rigging the Democratic presidential primaries for Hillary Clinton against Bernie Sanders. Even former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid admitted in July 2016, “I knew—everybody knew—that this was not a fair deal.” He added that Debbie Wasserman Schultz should have resigned much sooner than she did. The lawsuit was filed to push the DNC to admit their wrongdoing and provide Bernie Sanders supporters, who supported him financially with millions of dollars in campaign contributions, with restitution for being cheated.

On August 25, 2017, Federal Judge William Zloch, dismissed the lawsuit after several months of litigation during which DNC attorneys argued that the DNC would be well within their rights to select their own candidate. “In evaluating Plaintiffs’ claims at this stage, the Court assumes their allegations are true—that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Clinton and sought to propel her ahead of her Democratic opponent,” the court order dismissing the lawsuit stated. This assumption of a plaintiff’s allegation is the general legal standard in the motion to dismiss stage of any lawsuit. The allegations contained in the complaint must be taken as true unless they are merely conclusory allegations or are invalid on their face.

The order then explained why the lawsuit would be dismissed. “The Court must now decide whether Plaintiffs have suffered a concrete injury particularized to them, or one certainly impending, that is traceable to the DNC and its former chair’s conduct—the keys to entering federal court. The Court holds that they have not.” The Court added that it did not consider this within its jurisdiction. “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, possessing ‘only that power authorized by Constitution and statute.’”

The Court continued, “For their part, the DNC and Wasserman Schultz have characterized the DNC charter’s promise of ‘impartiality and evenhandedness’ as a mere political promise—political rhetoric that is not enforceable in federal courts. The Court does not accept this trivialization of the DNC’s governing principles. While it may be true in the abstract that the DNC has the right to have its delegates ‘go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way,’ the DNC, through its charter, has committed itself to a higher principle.”

But ultimately, it is only the DNC itself that can choose (or choose not) to hold itself to those “higher principles.” The Court cannot make the DNC be “impartial and evenhanded.” Thus you have the Court conceding that the DNC is entirely within its rights to rig its party primary for its favored candidate.

Basically you had the DNC’s lawyers arguing that the voting and the primary process itself is just for show. They’ll only let the voters’ votes count if they vote for the candidate the DNC wants to get the nomination. If the voters go off-script, well, tough: the DNC is under no obligation to honor their wishes. The DNC can simply pick its own nominee.

It’s an extraordinary admission for the DNC to make, but their backs were against the wall: the primary was rigged against Sanders and everybody knew it, and so the DNC was facing the prospect of having to repay millions and millions of dollars of objectively wasted campaign donations that went to Bernie. Their only option was to admit that yes, they had rigged the campaign, but hey: it’s our Party, we can rig our primary if we want. 

Of course, this incredible admission by the DNC was hardly reported in the mainstream media–the media was far too obsessed with propagating the Trump Russia Collusion Hoax. But the Federal Court ruling gave the DNC the green-light to rig every future election henceforth.

On Monday night, when the “quality control” news broke, it became clear that the Democratic Party was never again going to allow its elections to be decided by the voters. Every Democratic Party election from 2016 on will be rigged, and this is why Monday night unfolded as it did.

When Will Republicans Wake Up and Realize that Demographics Are Destiny?

Lee Kwan Yew, founder of Singapore:

In multiracial societies, you don’t vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion.

He couldn’t be more right.

This explains why inner cities consistently vote over 90% Democrat even though the Democrats have done nothing to improve the inner cities over six decades.

When I was younger, I used to think it was all about ideology. I was obsessed with conservative ideology and comparing socialism vs capitalism and stuff like that. I thought that was what drives people’s voting decisions.

And so I could never wrap my head around this idea that someday Texas is going to start voting Democrat.

What? Are you crazy? Texans are the most conservative people around. They’re not just going to change their whole worldview and become liberals? Never!

No, Texans as we picture them are not going to become liberals. It’s not going to be an ideological shift within an existing, static population.

What’s going to happen is that Texans as we traditionally know them are going to become the demographic minority in the state. The combination of mass foreign immigration and liberal white transplants from other states (like California) is outnumbering Texas’ traditional white conservative majority. No longer is the state full of Hank Hills. The Hank Hills are in the process of being outnumbered. That is why Texas will probably turn blue in the next 4-8 years.

Hank Hill is not becoming a liberal over time. That’s ridiculous.

What will happen is that the state’s demographics will change.

And so this leads me to the Republican Party nationally, which still insists that it’s not against all immigration, only illegal immigration. In fact the GOP loves legal immigrants and tells you every chance it gets–even Trump:

“We want to allow millions of people to come in [legally] because we need them. We have companies pouring in from Japan, all over Europe, all over the world, they’re opening up companies here, they need people to work.”

Trump, just like the Chamber of Commerce and the big businesses that have traditionally controlled the GOP, wants “millions” of cheap foreign workers pouring into this country.

But does he realize that it’s legal immigration that will be the end of the Republican party one day soon if not massively reduced?

I’ve never seen a political movement actively campaign for its own demise, and pursue policies that will ensure its extinction in the near future. This is what Republicans are doing in celebrating legal immigration: ensuring their own doom.

It’s not illegal immigrants that have tipped so many states toward Democrats. Although many illegals do in fact vote, and Democrats today want to make it so all the illegals in this country (some 30 million of them, not the 11 million lie that has been repeated since the mid-2000s as if not a single illegal has entered this country since then) can vote, the real issue for Republicans is the legal immigrants who are already voting for Democrats in large numbers:

Screen Shot 2019-08-13 at 9.34.49 PM.png

There is a fair amount of ideological diversity among white voters. This is a remnant of pre-Diversity America when elections really were about issues rather than race. This is why you see the white vote split like 60-40 these days.

But there isn’t ideological diversity among nonwhite groups. They all vote heavily Democrat because they believe it’s in their racial interest to do so. They would feel like race traitors voting Republican because they see it as the White Man’s Party. In 2016 Trump carried the white vote 57-37 over Hillary. But Hillary carried the non-white vote by a margin of 74-21.

Screen Shot 2019-08-13 at 9.37.17 PM.png

Minorities vote Democrat almost monolithically. It’s not really about the issues, it’s about racial identity. This is the payoff for Democrats’ identity politics obsession, i.e. tying voting behavior to race.

Do you remember in 2016 seeing those signs “Latinos for Hillary”?

proxy.duckduckgo-1.jpg

We’ve grown used to seeing this type of thing but have you ever stopped and thought about what “Latinos for Hillary” truly means? It is a frank admission that race drives voting decisions. “Latinos for Hillary” completely ignores the fact that there are male Latinos, female Latinos, young Latinos, middle-aged Latinos, old Latinos, rich Latinos, poor Latinos, middle class Latinos, etc. This is a total refutation of the idea that people vote primarily based on their economic interests. Otherwise, we’d see middle-class Latinos (and middle-class blacks and Asians) voting the same way as middle-class whites. “Latinos for Hillary” is the acknowledgment that race transcends everything and that voting for Hillary will benefit all Latinos no matter their gender, age and income status.

The only people who don’t see this are white conservatives. Well, some see it, but for whatever reason they ignore it or pretend they can change it.

Someone focused on ideology alone will never be able to understand American politics in the coming years. They will wonder why Texas, Georgia, Arizona and other states are flipping blue despite being ideologically conservative for decades. “Why are people in those states suddenly becoming liberals??? It does not make any sense!!” They’ll wonder.

But just because you’re ideological doesn’t mean other people are. Just because you don’t vote based on race doesn’t mean other people don’t.

People need to start realizing what’s going on and why.

Whoa: Might Trump Ditch VP Mike Pence for. . . Tucker Carlson? (!)

Via Curt Mills of the Spectator (US), there is “well-placed chatter” in Washington that Trump is considering replacing Vice President Mike Pence on the 2020 Presidential ticket with none other than Fox New’s Tucker Carlson:

“Will President Trump switch up his ticket in 2020? The Wall Street Journal editorial page, bastion of the establishment right, certainly hopes so. A little over a week ago, it called for former ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley to replace the dutiful Mike Pence as vice president. But there’s well-placed chatter in Washington that suggests the president will take a different route. Trump does indeed feel he needs VP change, but it is not Nikki Haley he is considering. It is Fox News host Tucker Carlson.”

Trump must resist the urge to appoint Nikki Haley as VP. He beat Hillary without a woman on the ticket and he can beat whoever the Democrats throw at him in 2020 without a woman on the ticket again. Resist the urge to virtue signal and play the Democrats’ identity politics game. You will never win.

They will never stop calling you a sexist or a misogynist because you appoint a woman as your VP. In fact they’ll just start calling Haley herself a sexist. They don’t care.

Republicans tend to play this ridiculous game where they decry identity politics at every opportunity, yet turn around and want credit for going out of their way to base hiring decisions on little more than a candidate’s identity (i.e., race, gender, sexual orientation).

Republicans: “Identity politics is terrible for our country and wrong! The job should go to the best available candidate, period, regardless of their identity!”

Also Republicans: “Give me credit for hiring this woman solely because she’s a woman!”

Republicans both decry and play the identity politics game simultaneously. Stop trying to play a game that is designed by the left specifically for you to lose.

Let Democrats be the party that takes only race, gender and sexual orientation into consideration for hiring decisions. Let them be the ones who consider someone a good candidate merely because they’re black, or Hispanic, or female, or gay.

We’re supposed to be the ones who don’t think gender or race or sexual orientation alone qualify someone for office.

We have no obligation to play by their rules. They will never give us credit even if we do.

“Carlson, who just turned 50, was with the president on his trip to the Korean demilitarized zone over the weekend. His interview with 45 will air Monday night. This all while Trump’s national security adviser and fierce Carlson foe, John R. Bolton, was exiled, literally, to outer Mongolia. In some ways, Trump has already made the move, ex officio.”

I’ll link the Trump-Carlson talk at the bottom, but I didn’t know Trump sent Bolton off to Mongolia while he visited North Korea with Tucker. It’s true, though. Hopefully it’s a sign that Tucker is in and the neocons are out.

“Here’s why it would make sense for the president to just go all the way— and name Carlson his running mate.

First, Tucker gets Trump. The duo have personal chemistry far exceeding the rapport that Pence or Haley enjoy. Haley bitterly opposed Trump during the 2016 primary and a former senior administration official has long informed me that her hiring during the transition was a ‘keep your enemies closer’ affair. In Carlson, Trump would get to anoint an heir apparent he actually likes.”

Yes yes yes. Trump owes Nikki Haley nothing. She opposed him in 2016, and I’m sure I’m not the only Trump supporter who still to this day questions her loyalty and motives.

Where Tucker would bolster the MAGA agenda, Nikki Haley would undermine it.

“Second, Tucker gets Trumpism, and Trumpism gets Tucker. He is eminence grise of a new intellectual right befitting the Trump era, and appeals to people who have started to become disgruntled in President Trump.

It’s been speculated before that Carlson might enter a 2024 race, but Trump might want to bring him into his fold sooner than that. Trump often complains of ideological clashes with his own officials. That’s partly why he already relies on a shadow cabinet, anchored by Carlson, as proved by last week’s called-off strikes on Iran.”

No more “shadow cabinet.” Make it official with Tucker.

“Trump in his first term has had to appoint Bush-era officials who have no idea what drives Trump’s movement. Carlson knows Trumpworld far better.”

Not only does Tucker know “Trumpworld” very well, he’s a part of it. He’s the real deal. He actually believes in MAGA and America First. The guy just gets it.

“Third, it would work. As evidenced by his conquering of Bill O’Reilly’s time slot on Fox, Carlson is a fearsome debater and fearless operator. Far from being ‘just a talk show host,’ as he often says of himself, Carlson is becoming a political force. Close friends of his say his recent bestselling book, Ship of Fools, represented a fairly comprehensive political platform: ‘a manifesto, of sorts,’ says one.”

Tucker would kill it on the campaign trail. He’d be unstoppable in debates. And apparently he’s already been thinking about how to turn his views and ideas into a real political platform, meaning he’s ready to make the jump from commentator to politician.

“Pressed on the matter of presidential politics before, Carlson, like any savvy pol, has not explicitly ruled it out. Inside Fox News, those close to Carlson insist he’s unlikely to ever pull the trigger. But in the apparatus of devotees in Washington he’s cultivated, Carlson commands the respect of infantrymen waiting for a returning general. ‘He’s the guy,’ a prominent conservative close to Carlson told me.”

Great analogy. The MAGA movement is begging him to take up the mantle and lead, like General Washington in the American Revolution.

“Carlson would refocus a Trump campaign that’s straying in a quixotic direction: one which has decided it wants to win over the Sun Belt states, never mind the Rust Belt that delivered the presidency.

More than anything: it’d be fun — which shouldn’t be dismissed. It would drive CNN and MSNBC and left-liberal America completely wild.

It would put a rogue element back into Trump’s otherwise professional-yet-plodding 2020 campaign. It would provide precisely the wild energy that won Trump the presidency in 2016. Carlson could give Trump his mojo back.

If Trump is going to continue to get flak for making Carlson his peacetime consigliere, he may as well formalize the arrangement.”

This would be great for a number of reasons. I fully endorse this idea:

  1. Tucker is now the voice, and arguably the soul, of the MAGA movement. While Sean Hannity beats the drums for war with Iran, Tucker Carlson has for two years been calling out the neocon chicanery trying to push Trump to war. Tucker was skeptical from the start of the supposed Assad chemical weapons incident, and he has been one of the strongest voices against war with Iran. Tucker is firmly in-tune with the American people. He knows the last thing the American people want is another war, but the Political Establishment does and it’s trying to push Trump into one. Trump has been doing a great job resisting the neocons around him, but Tucker as VP would make it even more unlikely we end up in any Swamp-orchestrated wars.
  2. It’s no secret that Trump has been seriously isolated in Washington since taking office. This is because there are very few true MAGA Nationalists who could get confirmed to high-level government jobs. I’ve remarked in the past that Trump himself could only get into government by running for President, in other words by the American people themselves putting him there. He couldn’t get confirmed to a Cabinet post by the Senate. In order to get genuine MAGA Nationalists into government, we need to take the decision out of the Swamp’s hands and put it directly to the American people at the ballot box. The Senate would never allow a true MAGA Man like Tucker Carlson to be appointed to a high-level government post, meaning the only way to get him into government is by putting him there ourselves at the ballot box.
  3. Tucker would steer Trump in the right direction. While Trump’s White House is filled with globalists and neocons and Establishment parasites because they’re the only ones “qualified” for those top jobs, Tucker would be the voice of the MAGA movement in Trump’s ear at virtually all times. He would be able to steer Trump in the correct direction whenever the Neocons and Globalists come to the President with one of their new schemes. The Swamp has been trying (and in many ways succeeding) to commandeer the Trump presidency. Tucker would bring an end to that quickly.
  4. Tucker has his priorities in line: he knows what Trump’s base wants and he will be able to effectively steer Trump towards those ends. Currently, Trump is surrounded by Swamp Creatures who are trying to steer him away from his base. Outside of war with Iran, another major–major–issue Tucker would push Trump in the right direction on is Big Tech censorship. Lately Trump seems to be paying more attention to the fact that his supporters are being silenced and deplatformed online, but Tucker Carlson would make that issue front-and-center for the President. Tucker would be Trump’s direct line to the millions of Americans who rallied to him in 2016, something Trump has been sorely missing since taking office.
  5. Naming Tucker as his running mate for 2020 would not only be of immense benefit to Trump in terms of implementing his political agenda and staying on the right track, it would also rally his base immeasurably. This move would make a major splash, in a good way. Excitement levels on our side would go through the roof. Trump-Tucker 2020 would be the MAGA Dream Ticket. It would be like pairing LeBron James with Kawhi Leonard.

For those of you who don’t believe this is possible because Tucker Carlson is just a cable news personality with no experience in government: hello? Did you forget where Donald Trump himself came from?

Trump needs a true ally by his side for the long fight ahead–for both the 2020 election and his second term. Trump cannot do it alone. There is no better person than Tucker Carlson for this role. We need Tucker, representing the MAGA movement and the American patriots who put Trump in the White House, to be installed as President Trump’s right-hand-man ASAP.

Plus, as mentioned in the article, this would obviously set Tucker up beautifully for a run at the Presidency in 2024.

But that’s a long way off. We still have to focus on 2020.

Now, all that said, do I think it’s likely Trump will make this move? No, not particularly.

To my knowledge it’s never been done in modern American history. In 1972, Democratic nominee George McGovern originally chose Thomas Eagleton to be his running mate, but reports came out that Eagleton underwent electroshock therapy to treat his depression earlier in life, and eventually the controversy caused McGovern to replace him with Sargent Shriver. Today is a different situation because it would not be a scandal forcing Pence off the ticket, but rather a straight-up political decision in favor of a better running mate.

I think the only time a President ever replaced his Vice President was Lincoln ditching his first-term VP Hannibal Hamlin for Andrew Johnson in 1864. This would be a similar type of situation, of course minus the Civil War backdrop.

So it’s a really big deal for a President to switch running mates–with or without scandal. It would be more or less unprecedented.

That’s why I’m skeptical that Trump will actually go through with this.

However, if there was any presidential candidate with the balls to make a move like this, it’s Donald Trump. So don’t count it out entirely. Just because it’s unprecedented doesn’t mean it can’t happen. There’s a first time for everything.

The Democratic Debate Revealed Just How Far Along the Plan to Fundamentally Transform America Is

I caught a bit of the second Democratic Presidential debate. I usually don’t watch Democratic debates because there’s literally nothing they can say that will make me vote for them, but in this case I kind of wanted to see how Biden handled himself as the frontrunner, as well as how Bernie has changed over the past few years. Plus I wanted to see if Andrew Yang could possibly seize the opportunity to get out his message of free money for everyone and gain some momentum (he didn’t).

A few takeaways:

1. The Whore (Kamala Harris) was really off-putting. There’s just something about her that is repellant. She’s way too theatrical, over-the-top. I just felt like she was acting. She was so animated to the point where it felt unnatural. When she spoke, I felt like I was watching a robot whose “passion” and “bombast” settings were turned up too high.

2. The idea of Biden vs. the reality of Biden appear to be colliding head-on. For some reason he had become, in people’s minds, a “dignified elder statesman”–a wise, stoic old graybeard–over the past five or so years because after the 2012 election, he really didn’t get much media attention. But he is and always has been a total buffoon who can’t go five minutes without sticking his foot in his mouth. Biden is a doddering old man who has run for President and lost (badly) twice in the past, and I hope people are starting to remember why.

The guy has zero—absolutely zero—appeal outside of being associated with the Great Liberal Messiah Barack Obama. If Obama had not chosen Biden to be his running mate in 2008, and Biden remained in the Senate for the past 10 years, he would not be running for President right now. The only reason Democratic voters like him is because they can’t vote for Obama a third time, so Biden must be the next-best thing, they believe. Biden remains the front-runner, but will he remain so after he’s been in the public eye for long enough that people start to remember why they didn’t like him prior to 2008?

3. Really odd strategy for “Mayor Pete” to make his main message “Republicans Are Bad Christians Because They Are Against Open Borders.” Why does this guy keep bringing up the Bible and using it to attack Republicans? Who does he think this appeals to? Angsty 20-year-olds who just dyed their hair blue and came out as “gender non-conforming” to lash out at their parents? The young urban professionals who think they’re smarter than everyone because they Went To College and watch Jon Oliver? Lame.

4. Why was Andrew Yang unable to seize the moment and vault into the upper echelon of contenders? Well it’s probably because he wasn’t allowed to:

That’s absurd! What a ridiculous conspiracy theorist Andrew Yang is! We all know the Democrats would never rig a primary!

Ultimately, though, what little of the debate I caught told me everything I have to know about not only the Democratic Party in 2019, but the country itself.

The portion I caught was them all tripping over one another to show they were more Against Borders than the next. “I’m gonna let them all in!” “Oh yeah? Well I’m gonna let them all in AND give them free healthcare!” “That’s nothing: I’m gonna let them all in, give them free healthcare, and then I’m gonna abolish ICE entirely so the rest of Latin America is allowed to pour into this country behind them!”

The Democrats are not the party of open borders; they are the party of No Borders. They do not see a distinction between America, Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, and the rest of Latin America. The debate proved that much.

At one point, the moderator asked Joe Biden point-blank if he thought people who had committed no crime other than crossing the border illegally should be sent back, and in a rambling answer he basically said no, they shouldn’t.

So the Democratic Presidential candidates are all on record saying it should not be illegal to move to this country without first applying for citizenship. Anyone on earth can be an American so long as they just walk across the border.

And the whole time I’m wondering: does this actually appeal to my fellow countrymen and women? There are people out there who actually agree with this?

I’m not the only one who thought this:

https://twitter.com/jeffgiesea/status/1144602155422273542

There is no pro-border Democratic candidate. They have no interest in winning “Middle America” as traditionally understood because they gave up on “Middle America” decades ago. They are the party of the wealthy and of the poor–everyone in between is of no interest to the Democrats.

But the larger point is that the definition of “Middle America” has changed.

What last night made me realize was that the Uniparty’s plan to demographically remake this country is pretty far along. It’s in advanced stages. When you have one party’s politicians fighting among one another over who will do the most to totally erase the border between our country and Latin America, you know things have gotten out of hand.

At this point all they’re really doing is arguing about how to best put the finishing touches on the demographic transformation of America. They’re all in agreement that America should be turned into an extension of Latin America, they simply disagree with one another on which one of them gets to oversee and accelerate the process.

But there is no disagreement on the fundamental question of “Should America simply fling open its door and allow potentially the entirety of Central America to migrate here en masse?” To that question they all answer yes.

We have already lost our country when one of the two parties’ presidential candidates are fighting among one another to be the most amenable and welcoming to illegal immigrants.

Even little Warmongering Ben noticed how obsessed the Democrats were with bending over backwards for illegals:

But little Warmongering Ben missed the point: those are mainstream positions. They might not have been mainstream positions in the America of, say, 20 years ago, but they are now. The Democrats have fundamentally remade our country.

Those candidates knew their target audience last night. Politicians only say something if it can help them appeal to voters and get elected. They wouldn’t be talking about opening the border if they didn’t think it would appeal to a large number of voters. And that’s the worst part of it: the realization that such a large number of voters—or, more accurately, “Americans”—are in favor of open borders.

The Democratic candidates were appealing to foreigners last night, straight-up. That’s their target audience. By “foreigners” I mean first or second-generation immigrants, legal or illegal. That’s the Democratic base. That’s who the Democratic Party now officially serves. Last night made me realize it.

At first I was going to say the Democratic debate shows that their party no longer represents America, but that’s not totally accurate: what it shows is that they have already succeeded in fundamentally transforming America. We are already living in post-America.

The definition of “American” has changed over the past several decades, and it is now becoming apparent. There are now enough foreigners living in America that the Democratic Party doesn’t even attempt to appeal to white Americans. Mass immigration has brought in so many foreigners over the past 40-50 years that the people who founded and populated this country for the better part of two-plus centuries are no longer even on the Democrats’ radar.

And that includes black people, too. Outside of their sporadic “Cops Are Racist!” outbursts, Democrats no longer really even pretend to care about black people because the black population is not booming the way Hispanic and immigrant populations are. In terms of economics, illegal immigration probably hits blacks the hardest. The media tries to downplay it, but it’s no secret that Hispanics and blacks don’t really like each other. In LA, Hispanic gangs are literally ethnically cleansing black neighborhoods. But the Democratic Party does not care. They take the black vote entirely for granted and focus on catering to the ethnic groups that are growing the fastest.

To us, the illegal immigrant-centric Democratic debate last night seemed bizarre and totally outside the mainstream. But that’s only until you realize that the definition of “mainstream” has changed along with the country’s demographics. Anyone who felt alienated by last night’s Democratic Debate needs to understand: you are not part of their vision for America’s future, or even its present. You are an obstacle, a hindrance to be done away with.

“I can’t believe these Democrats are talking so openly and brazenly about allowing illegals into my country!”

The Democrats’ reply: “Your country?”

***

One thing I did like was Bernie’s closing statement about taking on the money interests. On that point, I totally agree with him.

But, like Will said, he totally undercuts his whole “anti-establishment” message when he talks about how he wants to open up the border and shower illegal immigrants with free money, healthcare and government benefits.

Bernie is a fraud.

The Latest Media Fairytale: It’s Finally Joe Biden’s “Turn” to be President

The Uniparty Establishment would like you to forget everything you know and dislike about Joe Biden, because it’s time for the Media propagandists to put lipstick on a pig in a pathetic attempt to repackage him and sell him to you as fresh and attractive.

Wow, it’s finally Joe Biden’s time.”

No, it’s not. Please stop.

After nearly five decades of Public Service™️, America’s Lovable Uncle, Joe Biden, might finally get his turn in the White House. What a storybook moment.”

Come on.

Biden deserves this after patiently waiting his turn and serving our country so honorably for so long.”

Oh for the love of God. . .

They tried this same shit with Hillary: “It’s finally her turn.”

They preferred you not mention the fact that Hillary was rejected by the voters in 2008 when she originally sought the Presidency. That was supposed to be “her turn,” but she lost embarrassingly to a guy who had only been in the Senate for two years before he ran for President.

She didn’t “wait her turn” at all. She tried to run in 2008 and lost!

The Uniparty is trying to hype these career politicians’ multi-decade campaigns for the White House as sentimental, storybook and inspiring. Get the hell outta here.

No one is mentioning that Joe Biden first ran for President in 1988, or 31 years ago (pictured above). He had to drop out of the race before the first primary vote because he was caught plagiarizing.

2020 is not the culmination of a life of government service for Biden. He hasn’t patiently wait his turn at all; he lost.

But 1988 was not the end of Joe Biden’s presidential ambitions. He tried to run for President again in 2008, this time actually making it to the Iowa Caucus, only to come in a distant 5th place with under 1% of the vote. He promptly dropped out of the race.

Joe Biden 2020, like Hillary 2016, is an absolute fairytale. The only thing different about Joe Biden now from his last failed bid for the White House is his association in liberal/Establishment minds with Obama. And if Obama can’t run, Obama’s former Vice President must be the Next Best Thing, right?

That was basically the thought process for Hillary, too: “Well, if we can’t get Bill again, Hillary’s gotta be the Next Best Thing, right?” The only thing that changed about Hillary between 1992 and 2008 was that her husband was President. Bill’s presidency enabled everything Hillary has done in her political career since 2000, when she was basically handed a Senate seat in New York because of her husband.

Joe Biden is the male Hillary Clinton, the only difference being that Biden got elected to the Senate on his own and not due to who his spouse was. But like Hillary’s perceived legitimacy as a presidential candidate was only due to who her husband was, Biden’s perceived legitimacy for the presidency is 100% a product of the fact that he was Obama’s VP.

Biden: the Next Best Thing nostalgia candidate.

The media narrative on Biden is massively detached from reality.

The thought of Joe Biden finally getting the job he deserves after decades of Public Service™️ doesn’t warm anyone’s heart.

Biden is trying to make it seem like after two terms as Vice President, he was happy to ride off into the sunset of old age as a Dignified Elder Statesman™️ (also a total fairytale given what a loutish, boneheaded creep we all know him to be). But, according to the Uniparty Fairytale, the stoic and revered Biden could not sit idly by while his country was ruled by a Fascist Nazi Usurper, so Biden, reluctantly, decided to run for President in order to save the nation from Trump.

Makes you want to puke, no?

Keep in mind that while Uniparty Propaganda is now trying to depict Biden as a dignified and respected Elder Statesman, this is a man the Onion lampooned for years as a national joke–the Obama Administration’s comic relief; the kooky (77-year-old) uncle who talks out of his ass and gets a little too handsy with younger girls.

It all started in 2009:

Basically the Onion portrayed Biden as a burnout stoner stuck in 1986. This became a running joke on the site for the duration of the Obama Presidency:

The Onion articles were funny because they were kinda believable; that’s what makes a good parody. The underlying idea was that Biden was not to be taken seriously.

But now the Uniparty Media is trying to pretend Biden is this revered and accomplished Public Icon.

It seems like we’ve forgotten almost overnight exactly who Joe Biden truly is.

Hello? This is still the same Joe Biden, people.

Remember when his hairplugs were a running joke? Remember when he himself was a running joke?

It’s the same Joe Biden as ever.

Don’t believe a word of this Biden Fairytale. The reality is he’s the only viable Uniparty Establishment candidate out there, and so he must be brought out of retirement to oust the Outsider in the White House and return things to the Globalist Uniparty Status Quo.

Biden is pure Uniparty Establishment.

Joe Biden’s Greatest Hits: The Diversity Party Will Love Him!

Joe Biden, the 76-year-old six-term Senator and two-term Vice President, is officially running for President in 2020. Polls have him at the top of the heap in the Democratic field, although it remains to be seen whether he’ll maintain his lead once he jumps into the fray.

The Democratic Party has changed quite a bit since Biden’s last election in 2012–it’s more Woke, more Diverse, and more intolerant of old white men than ever. In honor of his announcement, I thought I’d go over some of his best moments–beyond the “Creepy Uncle Joe” stuff–in case they had been forgotten, given that it’s now been seven years since he was last directly involved in an election.

Will the party of Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar accept Biden in light of this stuff? You be the judge.

First, there’s Biden describing Barack Obama in 2008, just as Obama burst on to the scene of American politics and took the nation by storm. Biden used some interesting words to describe Obama:

“I mean you’ve got the first sort of mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean that’s a storybook, man.”

Biden was blown away by the fact that Obama was “articulate, bright, clean and a nice-looking guy” despite being an African American. Wow, just incredible! Who would have thought we’d ever see the day?

Then there was that time in 2008 when Biden said “you cannot go into a 7-11 or a Dunkin’ Donuts without a slight Indian accent.”

He was talking to an Indian guy and bragged that Delaware’s biggest population increase came from Indian immigrants. Biden then proudly proclaimed that, in fact, there were so many Indians in Delaware that you couldn’t even walk into a 7-11 or a Dunkin’ Donuts without a slight Indian accent.

Never let it be said that Joe Biden is not a friend to the Indian-American community.

Then there was that time in the 1990s when Joe Biden said of young black men that we must “take them out of society” because in 15 years, they’re going to be “predators”:

“Unless we do something about that cadre of young people, tens of thousands of them, born out of wedlock, without parents, without supervision, without any structure, without any conscience developing, because they literally have not been socialized, they literally have not had an opportunity. We should focus on them now, not out of a liberal instinct for love, brotherhood and humanity–although I think those are good instincts–but for simple, pragmatic reasons: if we don’t, they will, or a portion of them will, become the predators 15 years from now. And Madame President, we have predators on our streets, that society has, in part because of its neglect, created.

Again, ti does not mean that because we created them that we do not take them out of society to protect my family and yours from them. They are beyond the pale, many of those people. Beyond the pale. And it’s a sad commentary on society: we have no choice but to take them out of society.”

He doesn’t use the term “black” here but it’s quite obvious who he’s talking about.

Will the Diversity Party like this?

Finally, I don’t know what to make of his 1975 comments opposing de-segregation and busing. Have a look:

“I think the concept of busing … that we are going to integrate people so that they all have the same access and they learn to grow up with one another and all the rest, is a rejection of the whole movement of black pride,” said Biden. Desegregation, he argued, was “a rejection of the entire black awareness concept, where black is beautiful, black culture should be studied; and the cultural awareness of the importance of their own identity, their own individuality.”

In “colorblind,” post-MLK America, Biden’s comments would certainly have been received negatively. The whole ethos from the 1960s until quite recently was to forget about race and treat everyone equally. It was all about being Americans–not white Americans, not African-Americans–and integrating and mixing everyone, because close proximity to one another would automatically erase all racial differences and gaps.

But might Biden’s 1975 have been unintentionally 2019 Woke?

Post-Ferguson, America’s racial activists have done a 180 on the whole idea of promoting a colorblind society and integration. Now, racial differences are to be emphasized and overriding. Black people are to be treated differently because of their race. White people are to be discriminated against because of their race.

So Biden’s comments from back in the 1970s that racial integration would erode black culture might actually be well-received by the Democratic Party of 2019. Nevermind that Biden was probably making the comment cynically and just looking for an ostensibly pro-black excuse to continue the pro-white policy of segregation–Biden was woke before woke was a thing!

The Uniparty is Real: McCain Family to Formally Endorse Joe Biden for President

From Establishment Republicans to Establishment Democrats, just like *that*:

“The late Sen. John McCain’s family plans to support former Vice President Joe Biden’s White House bid, backing the Democrat not only in his party’s crowded primary race but also in a general election matchup with President Trump, the Washington Examiner has learned.”

It may seem like ancient history now, but keep in mind: McCain lost to Obama-Biden in the 2008 Presidential election. And now McCain’s family is endorsing the guy who was part of the ticket that denied him the presidency.

That is some serious, serious cuckoldry right there.

Or at least, it would be some serious cuckoldry for a man to die and then, just a few months later, we see his wife and daughter endorsing the guy who beat him in a prior presidential election. But I’m sure the late Senator totally approves of his family formally supporting a Democrat for President.

“A former McCain campaign official with close ties to the family said support for Biden was a given, but they needed to calculate how they could best help the former vice president.”

This is how the Uniparty Establishment rolls. There are no “principles” at all among these Establishment-types. They will happily support a Democrat for President–even a Democrat who was part of a ticket that beat their late father in a prior Presidential election–and not think twice.

The only “principle” they have is taking and retaining power. And right now, power is in the wrong hands–Trump’s. The McCains will support Biden to bring power back into the right hands.

You’d be hard-pressed to find a better example of the Uniparty Ruling Class at work than the McCain family happily supporting Democrat Joe Biden for President in 2020.

Now that Joe Biden’s Creepiness Has Resurfaced, the Uniparty Establishment is Rushing to Defend Him

We Right Wing Conspiracy Theorists™ have been pointing out Joe Biden’s creepiness for years:

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 1.32.12 PM.png

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 1.29.51 PM.png

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 1.30.14 PM.png

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 1.40.21 PM.png

This guy consistently gets way too close for comfort to just about any woman–or girl–that has the misfortune of coming within arms reach of him.

Here he is KISSING Chuck Grassley’s wife on the lips:

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 1.52.56 PM.png

We’ve been saying this for years: what the hell is wrong with this guy, and if he’s this handsy in public, how much worse must he be in private?

Our valid questions about this creep have consistently been either ignored or dismissed as Conspiracy Theorism by the “mainstream media.”

But now the Creepy Uncle Joe storyline is back in the public eye again, and not because of us pesky rightwingers: this time, it’s a Democrat who is apparently trying to #MeToo the former Vice President.

An article entitled “An Awkward Kiss Changed How I Saw Joe Biden” by a woman named Lucy Flores is making rounds:

“In 2014, I was the 35-year-old Democratic nominee for lieutenant governor in Nevada. The landscape wasn’t looking good for my party that year. There were no high-profile national races to help boost turnout, and after the top candidate bowed out of the governor’s race, “None of the Above” ended up winning the Democratic primary.

So when my campaign heard from Vice-President Joe Biden’s office that he was looking to help me and other Democrats in the state, I was grateful and flattered. His team offered to bring him to a campaign rally in an effort to help boost voter turnout. We set the date for November 1, just three days before election day.

[. . .]

I found my way to the holding room for the speakers, where everyone was chatting, taking photos, and getting ready to speak to the hundreds of voters in the audience. Just before the speeches, we were ushered to the side of the stage where we were lined up by order of introduction. As I was taking deep breaths and preparing myself to make my case to the crowd, I felt two hands on my shoulders. I froze. “Why is the vice-president of the United States touching me?”

I felt him get closer to me from behind. He leaned further in and inhaled my hair. I was mortified. I thought to myself, “I didn’t wash my hair today and the vice-president of the United States is smelling it. And also, what in the actual fuck? Why is the vice-president of the United States smelling my hair?” He proceeded to plant a big slow kiss on the back of my head. My brain couldn’t process what was happening. I was embarrassed. I was shocked. I was confused. There is a Spanish saying, “tragame tierra,” it means, “earth, swallow me whole.” I couldn’t move and I couldn’t say anything. I wanted nothing more than to get Biden away from me. My name was called and I was never happier to get on stage in front of an audience.”

Now nothing in Flores’ story is Weinstein-esque and disqualifying, nor does she break any new ground as it pertains to Creepy Uncle Joe–unless of course you consume a news diet of exclusively Uniparty Propaganda, in which case Biden’s creepiness has never before been brought to your attention.

But the real story, again, is that the complaints against Biden today are now coming from Democrats rather than Republicans.

Why are Democrats turning on Biden? Because the party’s leftwing base can already see what’s happening: Biden 2020 is just like Hillary 2016, i.e. the Establishment Approved™ candidate who will talk a big game about “change” and “feeling your pain,” but ultimately exists to protect the status quo.

In every election, the Uniparty Establishment pushes candidates from each party on the American public. They have their “frontrunner” candidates that they want most, but they also have backups in case their frontrunners flop. For example, in the 2016 GOP primary, the Uniparty’s “frontrunner” was Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio was their backup.

Almost every time, the Uniparty Establishment’s candidates become the major party nominees.

If the American people must be allowed to vote, and the Uniparty Establishment can’t really do anything about that, then they will rig our elections by making us choose between two Uniparty candidates, who despite being from different parties can each invariably be counted on to continue the same Uniparty policies: pro-Big Business, pro-endless war, pro-immigration, pro-free trade, anti-American.

That’s why I use the term “Uniparty.”

No matter who wins the election, the Uniparty always wins.

The only time in recent history when the Uniparty’s chosen candidate did not win a major party nomination was 2016, when Donald Trump beat out Jeb Bush.

You could also argue for 2008, when Obama beat out Hillary Clinton, but Obama was always full Uniparty Establishment. He may have seemed like the longshot outsider candidate in 2008, but the eagerness with which major corporations (three of his top seven largest donors were Megabanks) and Establishment politicians flocked to him proved otherwise.

And so Joe Biden is the Uniparty Establishment’s frontrunner candidate for 2020 for obvious reasons: he’s a known quantity, having been in politics for over 45 years and therefore fully corrupted, and is about as Establishment as it gets these days.

The Uniparty Establishment hopes Biden will be able to appeal to white working class voters in the Rust Belt–who after several decades of voting Democrat went for Trump in 2016–and bring the White House back in to Uniparty Establishment hands.

This is why you’re seeing the Uniparty Media spring to Biden’s defense. The Bezos Post spins it thusly:

C’mon, it’s just “Biden’s affectionate, physical style.” Bezos Post also wrote off Biden’s creepiness as part of his “warm, upbeat persona.”

I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that the Bezos Post has for the past two months now been attacking Bernie Sanders, one of the few Democratic candidates not controlled by the Uniparty Establishment:

D3BSHTuUcAASgF1.png

Yesterday’s edition of Meet the Propagandists Press continued the Defend Joe mission:

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 1.56.55 PM.png

Please excuse me while I vomit over the phrase “fleshy world of 60s and 70s politics.”

And here we’ve got Establishmentarian Dick Durbin playing defense for Biden:

Screen Shot 2019-04-01 at 1.57.25 PM.png

It could not be more transparent what’s going on here.

Despite the fact that the increasingly “diverse” Democratic Party is growing increasingly unaccepting of white people, the Uniparty wants Biden as the 2020 Democratic nominee because they know the path to retaking the White House goes through the Rust Belt, and a Diverse™ Democratic nominee like Kamala Harris or Cory Booker will have little to no appeal in those critical states.

But the Democratic base (more nonwhite and socialist than ever) can already sense that the Powers That Be are forcing a white, male neoliberal, Biden, on them. And so the rebellion against Biden has begun.

This is not just my speculation, either. Lucy Flores herself admitted it after she published her article about Biden:

Flores was a Bernie supporter in 2016 and is on-record opposing Biden. She was recently spotted at a Beto rally.

The Democratic base does not want Biden.

No, the Democratic base wants to be force-fed Beto O’Rourke instead.

“We don’t want the hand-picked candidate of the Uniparty Establishment! We don’t want another Hillary Clinton!”

They want Beto, a media-manufactured, astroturfed pseudo-phenomenon foisted upon idiots who believe they’re supporting a “movement” and going against the Establishment.

But guess again: there would be no Beto O’Rourke if the Establishment Media did not build him up and promote him 24/7 last year.

I live in Chicago and saw multiple people walking around with “BETO” shirts and laptop stickers. The guy was running for Senate in Texas. The only way he gains national prominence is through a deliberate and concerted media effort. The media wouldn’t shut up about Beto skateboarding and playing in a rock band. It’s utterly laughable to suggest Beto is a grassroots, anti-Establishment candidate.

Beto is Obama all over again.

Revolt against Biden and the Uniparty all you want, Democrats.

Just know that the Uniparty has backup candidates, and the Fake Hispanic from Texas you’re swooning over has Establishment written all over him.