anti-white racism

Great News: Trump Orders All Federal Agencies to Cease Promoting “Critical Race Theory”

By now you have probably noticed that anti-white racism is on the rise in America, especially within the younger generations, and especially among younger whites. All this talk of “systemic racism” against minorities, “white privilege,” “white fragility” and the obsession with portraying history as little more than white people abusing nonwhites–where did it come from? How did it just spring up so rapidly and take root?

It’s called “critical race theory,” and it is a corrosive acid eating away at the foundation of America. It is the origin of concepts like those listed above, as well as concepts like “microaggressions,” and “intersectionality.” It does not promote racial harmony, it promotes racial division and hatred. And not only are young people being indoctrinated with its concepts at school, but federal government agencies are including it in their employee training.

So last night, President Trump ordered all federal agencies to immediately cease and desist indoctrinating employees with critical race theory concepts. A memorandum from OMB Director Russell Vought was sent out to all heads of executive branch departments and agencies saying the following:

It has come to the President’s attention that Executive Branch agencies have spent
millions of taxpayer dollars to date “training” government workers to believe divisive, antiAmerican propaganda.

For example, according to press reports, employees across the Executive Branch have
been required to attend trainings where they are told that “virtually all White people contribute to racism” or where they are required to say that they “benefit from racism.”
According to press reports, in some cases these training have further claimed that there is racism embedded in the belief that America is the land of opportunity or the belief that the most qualified person should receive a job. These types of “trainings” not only run counter to the fundamental beliefs for which our Nation has stood since its inception, but they also engender division and resentment within the Federal workforce.

The President has directed me to ensure that Federal agencies cease and desist from using
taxpayer dollars to fund these divisive, un-American propaganda training sessions. Accordingly, to that end, the Office of Management and Budget will shortly issue more detailed guidance on implementing the President’s directive. In the meantime, all agencies are directed to begin to identify all contracts or other agency spending related to any training on “critical race theory/9 “white privilege,” or any other training or propaganda effort that teaches or suggests either (1) that the United States is an inherently racist or evil country or (2) that any race or ethnicity is inherently racist or evil. In addition, all agencies should begin to identify all available avenues within the law to cancel any such contracts and/or to divert Federal dollars away from these unAmerican propaganda training sessions.

The whole letter can be found at the link above.

This is fantastic news. Trump is striking directly at the heart of the brainwashing operation that is ripping this country apart and turning the younger generations into social justice fanatics. We are finally fighting back in the culture war. Finally, the right is using the massive weight of the federal government to reverse the cancerous spread of Marxist ideas.

You may have noticed that in the second paragraph of the quote block above, it says “according to press reports”. That’s an interesting line. It means Trump caught wind of the federal government’s critical race theory indoctrination through the news. But which program?

Well, it just so happens that this past Wednesday night, Tucker Carlson had a guy named Christopher Rufo on his show, and Rufo explained to Tucker the extent to which critical race theory had “infiltrated” the federal government and poisoned the minds of so many government employees:

On September 2, Christopher Rufo goes on Tucker Carlson’s show and exposes critical race theory to the country. On September 4, President Trump issues an executive order outlawing the use of critical race theory in federal government training programs.

I’m sure this isn’t a coincidence.

Tucker Carlson is the second-most important man in America behind only President Trump.

Now, it remains to be seen whether or not the federal agencies will actually comply with this order, since most of the time they blatantly disregard President Trump’s orders.

But this will make a difference. This is action–not just words–taken by President Trump to pull this country out of the racial nosedive it has been in for the past seven years.

“I Am A Racist” — Utter insanity at Northwestern U Law School

The secular religion of Wokeness:

All white people must admit their original sin of “racism.” No matter what.

Our society now entirely revolves around the word “racism,” whether you’re a devout member of the Church of Wokeness, a hardcore alt-righter or somewhere in between. Not a day will go by without you dwelling upon, discussing, and either leveling or fending off accusations of “racism.”

The most racially, religiously and culturally inclusive society in the history of the world is now neurotically and pathologically obsessed with the concept of “racism.”

This is insanity.

Closer and closer they inch to calling for White Genocide

Pharrell Williams: “America’s past and Present Are Racist. We Deserve a Black Future.”

What the hell does this mean? I read the article. He doesn’t specify what a “Black Future” means.

Does it mean a future devoid of white people? Does it mean a future where white people are subjugated and oppressed?

Every day these radical black activists get closer and closer to just outright saying it: they want a race war. They want white genocide.

How else can you interpret him saying, “We deserve a Black Future”?

America is a white nation. It has been since Day 1. That’s what Pharrell means when he says “America’s past and present are racist.” Racist, in their eyes, means simply “white.” To be white is to be racist, to be racist is to be white. That’s how they view things. It’s their way of demonizing and dehumanizing white people, because when one is branded a “Racist,” they effectively become sub-human. They no longer have rights; it’s open season on them. They can be robbed, beaten, fired from their job, potentially even killed, and it’s all justified, Because That Person Is A Racist. “Racist” has essentially become the n-word for white people. It means more or less the same thing. It’s not loaded with the same history, but give it time. At the very least it’s equivalent to being called a witch in 1620 Salem Massachusetts.

They aim to demonize us to the point where their rabid footsoldiers will commit acts of violence against us–because they think we’re the evil and dangerous ones. It’s like the whole “Punch a Nazi” thing. They really and truly believe every Trump supporter is a literal Nazi, like the ones they learned about in school and see in so many Hollywood movies, and so given how evil Nazis are, it’s not only appropriate to punch them, it’s imperative. When you have demonized someone badly enough, they cease to be seen as human beings and become monsters, and at that point there is no action that can be taken against them that is too radical.

That’s the reality people like Pharrell Williams want for white people. They want to dispossess white people of their country. It’s simply a fact that America was founded as an Anglo-Saxon Protestant nation and was overwhelmingly white protestant for nearly 400 years (counting pre-1776 Colonial America). To even say that fact is now considered taboo. Pharrell wants to ensure America ceases to be a white country and has a “black future.” He is openly calling for a hostile takeover of America based entirely on race, and white people are not even allowed to mention it, much less oppose it, lest they be “canceled.”

It’s kind of brilliant when you think about it: “We have to be racist against white people because white people are racist.” That’s like their entire M.O. I only hope they’re not so completely brainwashed that they can one day have an epiphany and realize “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”

I hate that these hardcore antiwhite racists have forced me to view the world through a racial lens. This was not how I was raised or how I saw the world growing up. In fact, up until a few years ago I didn’t really think much about race at all. But as the black left has become more and more vocally anti-white–encouraged of course by the media and the Democratic Party–it’s impossible not to be aware of the fact that this country is fracturing along racial lines.

They say it’s “racist” that a majority white country is mostly run by white people. Well, in what other country is that not the norm? In what other country in the world is it seen as wrong for the majority population to be in control?

Only in 21st Century America, the empire crumbling from within due to the Fifth Column consisting of the media, one of its two major political parties, its entertainment industry, its academic system and most of its most powerful corporations.

If you don’t like the fact that America is a white country predominantly run by white people, then go somewhere else. If it’s so horrifying and miserable to be a minority here, then why not just leave?

We all know why. Because Pharrell and every other black celebrity denouncing Evil White America knows they have it much better here than they would anywhere else.

I have no doubt Pharrell is full of shit. If he really believed the stuff he’s saying, he wouldn’t accept money from white people who buy his music. He wouldn’t live in a Beverly Hills mansion. As a minority in a white country, he’s done extraordinarily well for himself, becoming a world-famous multi-millionaire. He’s part of the Elite. He could easily renounce all of his fame and fortune–after all, because it was ill-earned through an evil white system. But he won’t. He just spouts off whatever anti-white bullshit he’s told to in an effort to keep stoking the flames of black rage.

But the problem is, people do believe this shit. It does influence people. The BLM mobs terrorizing the country’s major cities right now are openly terrorizing white people, and it’s because they’ve been brainwashed by the media, the Democratic Party and Hollywood:

According to video livestreamed by, dozens of activists marched through a residential area pounding drums, flashing lights on windows, yelling through loudspeakers, and demanding that residents give up their homes.

“Get the f*** out so we can come back!” one activist yelled. “All y’all white motherf***ers get the f*** out of our neighborhoods so we can come back!”

“Get the f*** out and give us our sh** back!,” he yelled. “Reparations baby!”

Another yelled, “Pay the fee! Open your purse!”

This is what the media has done to our country. This is what people like Pharrell Williams are encouraging. This is the extent the Democratic Party will go to in its desperate attempt to retake power.

I am heartened by the number of black conservatives I’ve seen over the past few years. Judging from social media, it seems like there are a lot more black people who are rejecting the Democratic Party and its Racial Tribalism Agenda than there were four years ago.

I don’t think the average black person thinks like Pharrell Williams or those BLM marauders in Seattle, however there are plenty of black people out there who hate white people like Pharrell does.

Pharrell and these other anti-white black celebrities–like Nick Cannon, who said white people are “closer to animals” and “a little less”–are no more than pawns and puppets of the Power Establishment who are told what to say in order to further divide this country along racial lines.

They want black people to hate white people, because that will in turn make white people return the favor, and ensure that this country can never be unified.

THe Department of ANtiracism: Coming Soon?

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey has donated $10 million to Dr. Ibram X. Kendi (birth name Henry Rodgers) and his “Center for Antiracist Research” at Boston University:

So who is Ibram X. Kendi? According to POLITICO: “Ibram X. Kendi is a professor of history, director of the Antiracist Research & Policy Center at American University, and author of ‘How to Be an Antiracist‘.”

Here’s an excerpt from a piece he wrote:

To fix the original sin of racism, Americans should pass an anti-racist amendment to the U.S. Constitution that enshrines two guiding anti-racist principals: Racial inequity is evidence of racist policy and the different racial groups are equals. The amendment would make unconstitutional racial inequity over a certain threshold, as well as racist ideas by public officials (with “racist ideas” and “public official” clearly defined). It would establish and permanently fund the Department of Anti-racism (DOA) comprised of formally trained experts on racism and no political appointees. The DOA would be responsible for pre-clearing all local, state and federal public policies to ensure they won’t yield racial inequity, monitor those policies, investigate private racist policies when racial inequity surfaces, and monitor public officials for expressions of racist ideas. The DOA would be empowered with disciplinary tools to wield over and against policymakers and public officials who do not voluntarily change their racist policy and ideas.

Before we get into how dangerous his ideas are, please take note of the level of intellect on display here: “Racial inequity is evidence of racist policy.”

This kind of ubergenuis-level insight gets you not only a cushy Department Head job at a prestigious university, but a $10 million “no strings attached” donation from the CEO of Twitter.

Really, though? Is “racial inequity evidence of racist policy”? Want to know how to make sure a group never progresses or improves it lot? Tell them all their problems are caused by “racist policy” and that they don’t have to change anything. Make them think that the government is their only hope of things getting better for them.

But let’s move on to the rest:

His “anti-racist amendment” to the US Constitution “would make unconstitutional racial inequity over a certain threshold, as well as racist ideas by public officials (with “racist ideas” and “public official” clearly defined).”

So does that include the fact that black people are 13% of the country and commit 53% of the murders? What about the fact that nearly 75% of black children are born out of wedlock? Are those “racial inequities” going to be unconstitutional”?

And how can something be deemed unconstitutional if no one can be found guilty of it in a court of law? For example, he’s saying the disparity between white and black average income levels should be deemed unconstitutional. But who, specifically, do you sue for that? And how are we ever supposed to agree which policy or law is responsible for those racial inequities?

Why don’t we just declare other abstractions like “evil” to be unconstitutional?

All bad things are Unconstitutional! Now what?

The point, of course, is to render whiteness “unconstitutional.”

Here’s the real fun part: “It would establish and permanently fund the Department of Anti-racism (DOA) comprised of formally trained experts on racism and no political appointees.”

Ohhh, so that’s how he’s going to figure out which policies are unconstitutional: a government agency.

Apparently the EEOC isn’t good enough. This Orwellian-named Department of Antiracism will, like all modern things done in the name of “antiracism,” be little more than an excuse to be racist against white people. This is reminiscent of the French Revolution’s Committee for Public Safety, which actually existed to send enemies of the revolution to the guillotine.

And these “formally-trained experts” will be coming straight out of academia, brainwashed to perpetuate the Victim Narrative forever and, like all government agencies ostensibly designed to solve a problem, have no shortage of perverse incentives to ensure that problem is never solved. After all, without the specter of Racism! looming at all times, people like Ibram X. Kendi wouldn’t have jobs.

The agency would also “preclear” all federal, state and local public policies to ensure they don’t “yield racial inequities.”

It would even be able to “investigate private racist policies,” which I’d assume means within private businesses, but also, who’s to say it doesn’t extend to churches, clubs, fraternal orders, charities, fantasy football leagues, and every other group or organization in the country?

Not only this, but it would be on a permanent witch hunt “monitoring public officials for expressions of racist ideas.” In other words, the Thought Police.

So it would be the most powerful government agency ever imagined, with no apparent constraints on its power at all.

The biggest question about this proposed Department of Antiracism is this: “Does it protect white people?” Because it’s coming from the people who also say it’s impossible to be racist against white people. Kendi says “racist ideas” will be clearly defined, but the scary part is who’s defining them.

The stupidity of Ibram X. Kendi’s ideas is rivaled only by how dangerous they are. In normal times, you could laugh somebody like Kendi off as a nutcase, but we are not living in normal times. The CEO of Twitter just endorsed this guy’s ideas with a $10 million donation, “no strings attached.” This isn’t just talk.

Spot The Difference

Not all hate crimes are created equal:

The race is always relevant when the perpetrator is white. But when the perpetrator is not white, we just get “25-year-old man.”

By the way, I’ve been seeing a lot of people try to downplay and dismiss the Cannon Hinnant story by saying, a. It was a local story and shouldn’t be national news, and b. What’s there to be outraged over given that the killer was quickly apprehended?

Let me address the two:

  • First, I would love it if we were more locally-focused. Stories in other states generally don’t impact us much if at all, and yet we get all worked up over them nonetheless. But that’s not how the media works. George Floyd was a local Minneapolis story that they made into a national crisis. So unfortunately we have to fight fire with fire.
  • Yes, Cannon Hinnant’s killer was quickly apprehended. But so was George Floyd’s. That didn’t stop anyone from making a huge deal out it.

NYTimes: “White Parents” Are What’s Wrong With the Education System

Another day, another instance of anti-white racism being normalized in America:


The best case scenario is that the formerly serious and respectable NYTimes is now using racially incendiary headlines and rhetoric in a cheap attempt to drive clicks and generate buzz.

The worst case scenario is, well, do I even really have to say it?

They’re going to be sending white people off to death camps while repeating over and over again: “IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO BE RACIST AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE.”

Is BLM Racist or Marxist?

Jeremy Carl of American Greatness makes the case that BLM is not Marxist, but racist:

“Radio host Mark Levin called BLM “Marxist and violent surrogates” of the Democratic Party, while former talk show host Neal Boortz said, “Black Lives Matter has been hijacked by Marxist revolutionaries.” Rudy Giuliani has called BLM a “Marxist” organization, as has former police chief Bernard Kerik, who referred to BLM as a group that “uses black lives to promote their Marxist and communist agenda.”

I don’t mean to pick on these individuals in particular; many of them are good patriots and conservatives who have explicitly denounced BLM’s racial politics. But at the same time, we must be clear: Marxism doesn’t define the Black Lives Matter movement—anti-white racism does. 

It is understandable that some conservatives—in particular, older conservatives—are more comfortable speaking the language of anti-Marxism than anti-white racism. Marxism is a traditional enemy for all conservatives, while many conservatives, particularly older ones, have been relentlessly trained by our left-wing media to parrot the canard that any mention of the Left’s anti-white racism is a sign of “white identity politics” or even worse, “white nationalism.”

But there are two problems with accepting this dubious formulation.

First, BLM is fundamentally driven by racism and not Marxism. Second, the structural dynamics of BLM are diametrically opposed to a Marxist analysis of class struggle.

To understand why BLM’s racism is a much greater threat to America than its Marxism, we should remember that even among our miseducated American youth, there is precious little desire in the United States for actual Marxism.By a generous count, anything resembling a true Communist Party took far less than 1 percent in the 2016 presidential election. 

But while Marxism thankfully still has a very small market share in the United States, anti-white racism unfortunately has a significant and growing one.”

Hold up. The claim is that: “Marxism has a very small market share in the U.S.” because the Communist Party didn’t even get 1% of the vote in the 2016 election.

That is not sufficient proof that “Marxism has a very small market share.” For one, a self-described socialist (Bernie) nearly won the Democratic Nomination. He got 43% of the vote in the primary. Marxists don’t need the Communist Party–they have a significant foothold in Democratic Party, despite the fact that its Elite stole the nomination from Bernie (twice). At the very least they’d conclude a path to power is far more realistic by taking over the Democratic Party than forming a third party.

A Gallup poll from earlier this year found that 76% of Democrats would feel comfortable supporting a socialist for President. What’s worse, 45% of independents said the same.

It is definitely not safe to assume that “Marxism has a very small market share in the United States.” Just because I don’t vote for the Official Communist Party USA Candidate in an election does not mean I am not a Marxist.

That’s a silly claim by Jeremy Carl. But let’s move on and see what else he says:

“America is now just 60 percent white non-Hispanic and a majority of those under the age of 16 are now ethnic minorities. 

And while America’s white population is wealthier than the black population,  Asian-Americans—who constitute a much smaller percentage of the overall population—now earn far more money than whites. The sad and ugly truth that the “BLM is Marxist” crowd ignores is that Black Lives Matter is a movement about dispossession and disinheritance—dispossession of America’s cultural heritage through attacks on statues of American heroes such as Washington, Lincoln, and Theodore Roosevelt, and dispossession of material inheritance through unwarranted demands for financial reparations. 

In other words, it’s a shakedown operation based in hatred.

This overt call for dispossession and disinheritance makes the rapidly declining white majority uncomfortable—particularly older people who grew up in 1960s and 1970s America where 85 percent or more Americans were white and non-Hispanic. It’s much easier for them to talk about “Marxism,” than to face reality.”

And that reality is that the Black Lives Matter’s reparations scam is just an updated version of the old Al Sharpton shakedown operations of the 1980s—but it is now part of a much larger and more powerful coalition that can make more onerous demands without the crudity and overtness that characterized the work of Sharpton or fellow race hustler Jesse Jackson.”

This is a good point. BLM is the new Al Sharpton. We know this because we haven’t heard really anything out of Al Sharpton throughout all of this, have we?

But still, that does not address the fundamental reality of reparations. What are reparations but a massive, Marxist redistribution of wealth?

Carl finishes up:

“Black Lives Matter is not, in any meaningful historical sense, a Marxist group, and conservatives need to stop saying that it is. Indeed, it is a movement that is supported overwhelmingly by corporate America, one that just this week announced hundreds of millions of dollars of support from billionaire vulture capitalist George Soros.

It is a group of race-slanderers that seeks to dispossess millions of Americans of all backgrounds who value America’s heritage and history, but is particularly keen to focus on white Americans as targets. It is run by a cynical rainbow coalition of “community activists” and corporate overlords who hope that the tiger they have unleashed eats them last, or even better, that it will be so sated by feeding on the desperation of America’s beleaguered middle class that it will not even bother to notice them.

We need to be clear on what Black Lives Matter is if we are going to win in our struggle against the group. They’re not Marxists, they’re racists.”

Let’s grant that BLM is genuinely anti-white. It is a full-blown black supremacist organization with lots of people who believe, like Nick Cannon does, that white people are “a little less,” “closer to animals” and “true savages.” I don’t think BLM wants to kill all white people–nor do most of the clueless NPCs who claim loose affiliation with BLM simply because they agree with the statement “black lives matter.”

But I’ll grant that many of BLM’s most die-hard members probably envision a future for America where white people are a severely oppressed and persecuted minority.

But here’s the question: What then?

What is the end goal of anti-white racism? What does BLM believe white people are depriving them of? There has to be a reason to go after white people. I just don’t believe BLM is a psychotic and genocidal group that wants to slaughter all white people just for the hell of it. If that was their goal, then why haven’t they started doing that? Why don’t they attack white people on sight?

Why do they allow white people–in fact, lots and lots of white people–into BLM?

To me, it’s simple: the real goal isn’t to eradicate whitey, it’s money and power. That’s the whole point of the racial grievance industry & victimhood narrative in general.

Anti-white racism is a means to an end. Marxism is more of an end than racism, but still leaves a lot of questions.

BLM and the reparations movement is Racial Marxism: instead of advocating for a massive redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poor, they want a massive redistribution from white to black. It’s both racist and Marxist.

When you take away all the virtue-signaling upper-middle class liberal white women who just want to feed their egos, what is the core appeal of BLM and the “racial justice movement” in general? It’s a material/financial improvement in one’s life through political activism and/or political violence.

It’s “You wronged me, now pay me.”

It all relies on the same Marxist rhetoric of the Wicked Exploiters vs. the Noble Exploitees: the White Man stole the land from the Natives, then built up all his wealth and power on the backs of black slave labor. So now it’s time to rise up against the White Man and take what’s rightfully ours! That’s the 1619 Narrative of America.

That’s fundamentally Marxism, just through a racial lens. It’s Racial Marxism. It relies on anti-white resentment to achieve a Marxist redistribution of wealth and power.

The Democratic Party has been making Marxist appeals for at least the past 10-12 years. At first it was the classic economic Marxism pitch, which made sense in the wake of the Financial Crisis and the bailouts. People were hurting financially back then, and Economic Marxism had more appeal. Remember Obama’s “You Didn’t Build That” remark? The 2012 election was, in many ways, framed as a battle between Socialism and Capitalism. Apparently, in 2012, the two most searched words in the dictionary were “socialism” and “capitalism.”

But not too long after the 2012 election (specifically after Trayvon Martin and Ferguson) the Marxist appeals from the left shifted from economic to racial.

There are two possible reasons for this shift:

  1. With 5-6 years having passed since the Financial Crisis, people were in better shape economically and no longer harbored as much class-based resentment. So the Elite had to find a new way to keep people angry.
  2. OR: the Elite feared the class-based resentment and anti-rich, anti-corporation anger they had been cynically stoking was at risk of getting out of control and actually posing a threat to them, so they had to quickly redirect all that rage somewhere else, and they chose police/white privilege.

Whatever the reason, there was clearly a shift around 2014 from class war to race war.

Jeremy Carl is correct to bring up Corporate America’s support for BLM. You can’t be Marxist if George Soros and most of the powerful tech billionaires support you, can you?

In theory, no. But more than anything, corporate sponsorship of BLM reveals the split in the movement between the cynical upper echelon and the useful idiot masses. The leaders of the movement secretly have very different goals from the foot soldiers and True Believers in the streets. All the Marxist rhetoric is a means to an end.

There’s a reason “real communism has never been tried.” It’s because it’s never been about real communism. Marxism has always been used as a vehicle to overthrow an existing regime and replace it with a new one–a way to redistribute power from one group of elites to a new group. It’s sold as a way to redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor masses, but that’s only to garner popular support.

Marxism isn’t even about Marxism: it’s about wealth and power. Evil, manipulative men use Marxist rhetoric to convince disgruntled masses to mobilize and ultimately overthrow some ruler or ruling class identified as the root of all evil. In reality, the evil, manipulative leaders of the Marxist revolution have no intention to reward their followers, they just use the masses to take somebody else’s money and power for themselves.

And right now, the Power Elite in America have tricked BLM into believing Trump and his mostly-white supporters are the root of all evil and must be overthrown, and then Racial Justice will be achieved. And then I’m sure those fat reparations payments they’ve been talking about lately will be close behind.

Now I’m not saying that Trump has no power. Obviously, yes, Trump is the President and that counts for something. I’m not trying to say he has zero power. But his first term has shown that Official Washington and the whole American power edifice in general is in many ways stronger than the President. They have plenty of options at their disposal to counter Trump’s moves. The White House is far from the be-all, end-all.

Trump is up against not only the media, not only Fortune 500, not only Silicon Valley, not only all the big city mayors, not only Hollywood, not only Academia–he’s also up against the government he’s supposed to be in charge of. The intelligence community, the pentagon/military industrial complex, the State Department, the Congress, and often the Federal Judiciary. Even the CDC and Fauci, who seems determined to make Trump look as bad as possible and draw out the lockdowns until after the election.

The government is full of bureaucrats and officials whose names you’ve never heard and who nobody ever voted for who nevertheless believe it’s their duty to oppose Trump’s every move even if it means blatant insubordination to the President. The three administrations prior to his were part of the Globalist Uniparty Elite, meaning the government Trump inherited was and largely remains fully stocked by people on-board with the Globalist Uniparty agenda. And it’s not like he can just fire them and replace them with real Patriots and MAGA Agenda people, because for three decades the only people able to move up the ranks in government are those on-board with The Agenda. So they’re the only ones with the qualifications, and the only ones who could pass a nomination vote in the Senate.

In short, Trump is in the lion’s den, atop an executive branch full of Uniparty Loyalists who are trying to undermine him at every turn. He’s an outsider in a town of insiders who very much liked the way things were running before those flyover state morons elected the nasty orange man to derail the gravy train and spoil the fun.

So this is why despite being President, Trump is still a major underdog, and it’s wrong to view him as “The System” or the sole possessor of power in America. The American power establishment is made up of far more parts than just the Presidency, and right now, those other parts are trying to retake the Presidency by convincing BLM that Trump and his white privilege-having voters are the source of all their problems.

Elite support for Black Lives Matter is about keeping the American people divided, distracted and docile. It might seem crazy to describe America in 2020 as docile, but do you really think the Elites couldn’t squash these riots and looting and protests in a second if they actually wanted to? Of course they could.

They want the riots to continue. They want the chaos. The rioters are not threatening the power elite whatsoever. The riots are the opposite of threatening to the Elite because the riots are against the Elite’s enemy, Trump.

I have a few theories on why the Elite supported and funded the riots and none of them have anything to do with either racial genocide or a Marxist revolution:

  1. They were “bait” for Trump. The elite figured Trump would respond with massive police and military force to crush the rioting and protesting, at which point the media and Democratic politicians would at long last have their proof that TRUMP IS A RACIST FASCIST RACISTFASCIST!
  2. They were organized in order to allow people to blow off steam after several months of quarantines. If you recall, prior to the George Floyd incident, there were actual grassroots protests against the quarantines and business closures. Those were widely condemned by the media and squashed by state and local governments. The Race Riots were to distract people from quarantine, and hopefully have them channel their rage towards Trump.
  3. Guilt weak-willed white people into supporting Joe Biden as penance for the murder of St. George Floyd, while also stoking black rage and hopefully translating that into higher black voter turnout for Biden in the election.

I think it’s probably a combination of the three. But ultimately, the elites want the American people fighting one another, rather than fighting the elites. They want people blaming all their problems on Trump (the avatar of “white America”) instead of the real oppressors.

Of course the corporations and the elites support BLM: BLM is marching and rioting and screeching against Trump, who is the enemy of the elite.

BLM isn’t part of a grand, long-term plan. There’s no way the elites would fund and support a nascent Marxist revolution that will one day be their own demise.

And they don’t want BLM to eradicate the white race.

The elites have already succeeded in reducing the white population of this country from 90% to 60% since 1965. They’re waging the real race war through mass immigration, birth control, abortion, pornography, turning American men into beta soyboys via the war on traditional masculinity, promoting feminism (aka Man Hating), ruining women by encouraging them to be whores, and encouraging women to go into the workplace instead of having kids.

The Elite have already got the War on White People under control. They don’t need BLM’s help there.

The Elite’s support of BLM is more improvised and ad-hoc than you think. It is 100% about getting rid of Trump.

Black Lives Matter uses racism, Marxism and Racial Marxism to appeal to the masses, but the Elite and corporate support for BLM belies its true purpose: keep most of the country divided and distracted with a burgeoning race war, and help get Donald Trump out of the White House.

CNN’s Anderson Cooper: It’s “Exciting” that Whites Will One Day be the Minority in America

He also called the demographic decline of white people “progress”:

I thought “replacement theory” was a myth?

Sometimes they let the veil slip and reveal their true intentions.

Anderson Cooper is “excited” by the prospect of an America where white people are no longer the majority?

Why is that?

People should spend some time pondering that question.


FACT CHECK: Ilhan Omar says “Whites Are Causing the Most Deaths in This Country” — Is She Correct?

Let’s have a look at her claim:

“Our country should be more fearful of white men across the country, because they are actually causing most of the deaths within this country. We should be profiling, monitoring and creating policies to fight the radicalization of white men.”

Quite a claim, and I’m sure the masses who have been brainwashed to Hate Whitey (including a lot of white people themselves) believe it instinctively.

But are white people really “causing most of the deaths in this country?”

According to the CDC’s data going back to 1999, the black homicide rate has been more than quadruple the white homicide rate consistently:


Only Asians have a lower murder rate than whites.

Matt Walsh of the Daily Wire:

“According to the Department of Justice, white people (not just men) commit about 45% of the murders in the U.S. That seems high until you consider that white people are over 60% of the population. Whites are therefore underrepresented in the homicide department by about 15%. Blacks commit a little over 50% of the murders in America, despite accounting for only 13% of the total population. Those are the simple facts of the matter. Facts cannot be racist.”

I rate Ilhan Omar’s comment: FALSE.

She’s either racist against white people and was trying to stir up racial animosity against whites, or she’s totally oblivious to the hard data and was just talking out of her ass.

Choose one.

Me? I don’t give her the benefit of the doubt. She’s trying to provoke anti-white violence.