They’re Coming After Mount Rushmore

The New York Times has made it official: the cultural revolutionaries are coming for Mount Rushmore:

They’re going to try to dynamite it one day. Maybe this year, maybe next year. Who knows. But one day they will try.

They seek nothing less than the complete and total erasure of American history. They want to rebuild this country from the ground up as BLM-istan. All white people–demonized now as “racists” in order to justify their disenfranchisement–are to be either destroyed or turned into sycophantic self-loathing cucks (aka White Liberals).

Luckily this ultra-radical viewpoint and vision for America is far on the fringe and not nearly as popular as the media portrays it to be.


“To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.”

-Alesksandr Solzhenitsyn

American Heroes

“Peaceful” protesters peacefully broke into their gated community, and peacefully formed an angry mob in front of their house.

They decided they weren’t going to be the victims:

Screen Shot 2020-06-29 at 11.13.25 AM.png

Screen Shot 2020-06-29 at 11.14.22 AM

Screen Shot 2020-06-29 at 11.13.40 AM.png

This St. Louis couple are American heroes.

So of course the media is demonizing them to no end:

Screen Shot 2020-06-29 at 11.15.11 AM.png

Peaceful, huh?

Here’s the gate to their neighborhood after the “peaceful protesters” were done with it:


If they were so “peaceful” then why did they break into this private, gated community?

Forget the media. Protect your castle.

If the “peaceful protesters” had beaten this couple senseless and ransacked their home, the media would have completely swept the story under the rug.

Don’t be a victim. Don’t count on anyone else to protect you.

Don’t expect “justice” if the mob comes for you: the media are on the mob’s side.

You are on your own out there.


Apparently, the full story is that these “peaceful protesters” peacefully broke into a private gated community because that’s where the Mayor of St. Louis lives and they wanted to peacefully form an angry mob at the Mayor’s house.

You can read more about them here.

Thankfully this was not a random incursion into the suburbs by the Peaceful Angry Mob. In fact, this neighborhood was only a few miles outside of downtown St. Louis.

Still, don’t take any chances.

Liberals Spreading Misinformation With Doctored Photo on Social Media



Trump is so evil and fascist, he gassed innocent Peaceful Protesters™ so he could go take his Hitler picture! Fascisty FASCIST!

I’m sorry, dummies, but the Hitler picture is fake. Here’s the original:


I eagerly await the hordes of Blue Checks on social media to denounce this as a “doctored” image.

Any minute now, Twitter will “Fact Check” people sharing this image and flag them as Fake News.

Will the Government Actually Treat Antifa Like a Terror Group?

Rep. Matt Gaetz brings up an interesting point:

Note of course that Twitter has “flagged” this tweet for “glorifying violence.”

Media, like CNN, are also on Antifa’s side:

CNN is unbelievable. They’re too cowardly to outright defend Antifa so they have to resort to technical objections and legalese nonsense that they themselves clearly don’t even believe. “The government has no authority to do so!”

CNN demonstrated no such reservations when it came to labeling WHITE SUPREMACISTS as terrorists:

Our media is now actively aiding and abetting officially-designated terrorist groups.

Not only that, but we have prominent politicians who have sons and daughters who are part of this terrorist group. This is the son of current Minnesota Attorney General and former US Congressman Keith Ellison:

Screen Shot 2020-06-02 at 2.30.57 PM

What are we supposed to make of this? Is this where we are as a nation–where not only can we not agree on who is a terrorist group and who isn’t, but where the son of a prominent Democrat joins the terror group?

So what’s the deal? Are we going to declare war on Antifa like we did ISIS and Al Qaeda? Does Antifa get arrested on sight? Do we ship them off to Gitmo and waterboard them?

I don’t know how this works. But the way I see it, if you’re gonna designate someone a terror group, you better mean it. You better actually treat them like you treat terror groups. Otherwise it’s a hollow gesture.

The Three Types of People Out in the Streets

  • The way to understand the riots is to understand who’s behind them. These are the three main types of people out there destroying the country right now:
    1. Genuine peaceful protesters. It doesn’t seem like there’s many of them because the clips we see on the news and social media only focus on the violence, but there are genuine peaceful protesters out there. Unfortunately, these people are far outnumbered by now and the worst part is, they are enabling and encouraging the next two groups of people by continuing to take to the streets every night.
      Opportunistic looters: they saw the peaceful protests out in the street and saw an opportunity to score a new 4K television. These are the people who by their own admission don’t give a shit about George Floyd, they just saw an opening and took it. See this young man for example:
      Antifa Types: they saw the chaos caused by the opportunistic looters and decided to jump in and start trying to dismantle the Racist Sexist Fascist Nazi Capitalist System. I have a hunch Antifa are behind most of the wanton violence and mayhem. You see a bank smashed up and spray-painted “down with capitalism” or something like that, you have to figure that’s Antifa at work.

    Of course, there’s more than just those three involved here: there’s the brick-providers, importantly. How did all those pallets of bricks get dropped off in cities all around the country in spots where there would be “demonstrating” later that night. These are your “table setters.”

    We’re talking Soros-types who are orchestrating this behind the scenes. You think these protests and riots just come together spontaneously? Not a chance. There’s no way you could make this nationwide without serious planning by a network of experienced professional agitators and political organizers. There’s even demonstrations in London and Amsterdam and I believe even in New Zealand.

    All of this is made worse by the fact that it comes after two and a half months of quarantine. With the outside world mostly shut down and people starting to go stir crazy after all this time spent at home, you can’t be surprised that people were eager to join this nationwide rampage, if only because it was the first taste of freedom in months. Whoever is orchestrating the mayhem knew the lockdown would ensure maximum participation and destruction.

    A certain type of person is attracted to riots/mass demonstrations in general because of anonymity of the crowd that allows them greater “freedom” than usual. In any situation like this, you can loot and vandalize and even set a building on fire and there’s a low probability you’ll even get caught. But now, add on the fact that people have been cooped up inside for two months and you’ve got some real potential for mayhem.

    There’s no way this is a coincidence. Whoever planned this out took full advantage of the fact that people would be extra restless and eager to get out of the house and unleash some pent-up energy.

    In fact, this past week of mayhem has been so well-organized and planned out it’s hard to avoid concluding the whole thing–including the death of George Floyd, including the Coronavirus itself–has been planned out since the beginning.

    “Law and Order” Just Became The Most Important Issue in the 2020 Election

    Social media might seem to be decidedly in support of the rioters and looters.

    But the Silent Majority wants law and order.

    The people in the suburbs are worried this is going to spill over into their neighborhoods.

    Trump’s response since George Floyd’s death has been good. He immediately ordered an FBI investigation of the matter.

    The people who think Trump is “racist” are always going to think that. Nobody who thought Trump wasn’t racist before this now thinks he is.

    The only way Trump loses support here is if he doesn’t take action and reimpose some law and order in the burning cities.

    The majority of Americans want law and order. They want peace. That’s what Trump needs to focus on here. These are the people that put him in the White House.

    He shouldn’t waste his time trying to sympathize with the marauders and looters. He should appeal directly to his base: the people who want him to bring order to the chaos.

    This is not the time for a “unity” or “healing” speech. It’s time for Trump to stand up for the silent majority by restoring law and order to our burning cities.

    The media is going to have a cow but it doesn’t matter. The media is less relevant by the day. In fact the best campaign strategy for Trump would be to do the opposite of what the media wants every step of the way. The more hysterical the media reaction, the better the policy.

    This is perhaps the best thing that could have happened for Trump in terms of the election. Joe Biden has no choice but to take the side of the rioters and looters.

    All Trump has to do is step up and re-secure the burning country. He’s getting bad advice from whoever is preventing him from doing this. I know from his “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” tweet the other day that his initial instinct was to crush this insurrection with massive force.

    But someone talked him out of it. Bad move. Trump needs to be the law and order candidate. This is not a time for “unity” and “sympathy.” People are not looting and burning down major cities because they’re in emotional pain.

    These are violent, marauding thugs and Trump appealing to them in any way is an act of massive weakness and insecurity.

    Ignore the media, ignore social media: the majority of Americans want peace and tranquility. They are not on the side of these rioters.

    This is Trump’s moment to step up and impose some law and order; to take our country back from the barbarians. To strike a blow against chaos on behalf of the civilized, law-abiding folk. If he fails to do this, he cannot credibly claim to be the law and order candidate again.

    The Paradox of Modern Liberalism

    In one sentence:

    Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 7.49.17 PM.png

    That’s it.

    The reason they can’t answer the question is likely because they haven’t really thought about their ideology comprehensively. That is, they haven’t evaluated all of its individual positions for logical consistency with one another. It’s like how they support both Islam and gay rights when the former is incompatible with the latter. Or how they claim to advance black people’s interests while also supporting mass immigration, which harms black people the most economically.

    Probably the reason they hold all these contradicting viewpoints is that they simply support whatever makes them feel good about themselves.

    “I support open borders because I have compassion; I care about people.”

    “I support universal healthcare because I have compassion; I care about people.”

    “I support Islam because I support Oppressed Minorities™.”

    “I support gay rights because I support Oppressed Minorities™.”

    Most of it boils down to virtue signaling, whether conscious or unconscious.

    (Also, many leftists are leftists because it’s socially desirable to be a leftist. They want to be on the same side as all their favorite celebrities and TV personalities. They want to be able to fit in with Mainstream Culture. They don’t want to be shunned by the herd.)

    Lately I have made a concerted effort to not dump on normal, everyday leftwingers. The reason is because a. low-hanging fruit is generally the province of clickbaity, mainstream TPUSA-style Conservatives™, and b. because for the most part, it’s not leftists’ fault they are the way they are.

    They’re programmed that way. 12 years of public schooling, 4 years of college, constant bombardment of propaganda by Hollywood, the media, Madison Avenue (i.e. the advertising industry) and Corporate America will do that. A sizable percentage of the population is what I would consider “Default Liberals,” meaning people who are liberals simply because that’s how they’ve been programmed. They’ve just accepted the propaganda and never questioned it.

    Ordinary, everyday leftists are not our enemies; the Elites who have brainwashed them are our enemies. It’s a very important distinction.

    We need to start focusing on the true enemy, and also recognize that there’s a lot of leftists out there that can one day be our allies.

    The elites want us divided every which way, and probably the single greatest divide in this country today is political. If we spend all our time and energy on Owning The Libs, then we’re not focusing on the true enemy.

    Some–I’d even say many–of the most effective voices on our side are ex-liberals. In fact, I’d say that more often than not, they make for the strongest advocates of America First nationalism, because they fully understand what we’re up against having been on the other side.

    Honestly, looking back on it, I was basically a liberal for a long time. Of course, I considered myself a conservative, but basically I was a liberal who just wanted lower taxes. Again, I’ve never thought of myself as a liberal. I’ve never voted for a Democrat. But I didn’t care about immigration one way or another, and I basically thought the best course of action was to let the left win on gay marriage and abortion because they were silly social issues getting in the way of the Real Issues: simplifying the tax code and cutting taxes for big business so that big business would magically fix everything.

    What I’m saying is, lots of people who are now our strongest allies were once liberals. Then, one day, they either opened their eyes or had their eyes opened by someone else.

    Not everyone is born 💯🇺🇸😎Based & Redpilled💯🇺🇸😎.

    So my goal is to both focus on the true enemy–the Beast–and open people’s eyes.

    Sometimes tough love is necessary, and I’ll happily dish it out when needed. But if we’re going to open people’s eyes and redpill the Default Liberals, we can’t be hostile and malicious toward them. They’re already programmed to reject our ideas because they’ve been told we’re Racists, and there’s literally nothing worse than Racists, so just don’t listen to those Evil Racists.

    For the most part, ridicule doesn’t change people’s minds. We’re not going to redpill them by ridiculing them.

    But maybe pointing out these contradictions to them will plant the seed and nudge them in the right direction.

    Save your ridicule and vitriol for the elites–the people who truly deserve it.

    Here’s What They Think About You

    The media’s contempt for Trump voters, laid bare for all to see:

    They had to know this was not going to help CNN regain credibility. They had to know this was, as the blue checks say, “bad optics.”

    But they didn’t care. They couldn’t contain themselves. Their disdain for Middle America is so intense that they could not refrain from spending a full minute smugly and maliciously ridiculing Trump voters with cackling condescension.

    Their hatred is palpable. It’s uncontrollable. They are happily telling you how much they hate you straight to your face.

    Not just your ideas.

    You. Personally.

    It’s personal. They hate you.

    They do not see you as a fellow American. They see you as the enemy. They would defend ISIS before they spoke a kind word about you.

    You are their #1 enemy in the world.

    And yet they whine and cry when Trump calls them the enemy of the people. Jim Acosta bawls like a child when Trump voters make fun of him at rallies.

    When we ridicule them, it’s an “assault on the free press,” it’s unconstitutional, it endangers their lives, they claim.

    But then they turn around and do this.

    If you ever wondered why our elite would allow the opioid crisis to spiral out of control, why it would allow the economy to be completely hollowed out by global free trade and illegal immigration, and why it would allow the middle class to be decimated, this is why.

    They want it to happen because they hate you. They hate you more than you can possibly imagine.

    The media may piss you off, but I promise you the hatred they feel for you–you personally–greatly surpasses whatever animosity you may have for them.

    They want your children to be murdered by illegal immigrants, and then they will be the loudest voices in the room demanding the illegal that killed your child be let off the hook. They want your communities flooded with dangerous drugs, which your children will overdose on and die. They want immigrants to take your jobs and leave your family broke and miserable. They want your kids’ minds being corrupted by sexual deviants and degenerate celebrities. They want to turn your own kids against you by indoctrinating them with leftwing ideology.

    They want you to suffer under a regime of anarcho-tyranny where the barbarians and gangbangers and degenerates run amok while the peaceful, law-abiding folk don’t even have so much as the freedom of speech to speak out against the destruction of their country, or the right to arm themselves for self-defense.

    They want to destroy you.

    This clip from CNN should make it clear just how intensely they hate you and want you destroyed.

    In light of this I simply cannot see how or why this country can remain intact for much longer.

    New York Times: Yes, the Deep State is “Alive and Well” and is Trying to “Bring Down Trump”

    From outlandish rightwing conspiracy theory to confirmed by the New York Times:

    But they obviously try to put a spin on it by saying it’s just Honest Public SERVANTS who are trying to save us from Trump.

    They’re doing this for your own good, you ungrateful peasants! (Even though the header picture they chose for the article clearly has a dark and shadowy vibe to it.)

    The most annoying part of this–besides them attempting to gang-rape 250 years of American democracy–is them trying to act like they’re the Good Guys the whole time.

    I’m sorry but you cannot have it both ways. You can’t be executing an obvious anti-democratic coup to destroy a duly-elected President while also being the good guys.

    Just own it, you slimy bastards. Own the fact that you are the bad guy, the tyrants, the sinister cabal.

    Now, people might nitpick here and say that this is the opinion section of the New York Times, but come on: we all know the opinion section is just where they put the material they can’t publish in the “news” section because it’s too obviously partisan.

    The Opinion section has the blessing of the Editors one way or another. We all know how this works.

    The New York Times has confirmed the existence of the Deep State as well as the fact that it is actively trying to undo the result of the 2016 election–and, presumably, rig the result of the 2020 election.

    Trump-Ukraine Call Transcript Released: The Real Scandal is that the Bidens Were Up to No Good in Ukraine

    The transcripts of Trump’s July 25 call with the new Ukrainian President have been released.

    This all started when a few weeks ago, a “whistleblower” came forth and alleged that President Trump had engaged in a “quid-pro-quo” with the Ukrainian President in an attempt to launch an investigation into Joe Biden’s son’s shady dealings in Ukraine. It was even claimed that Trump threatened the Ukrainian President if he did not do as Trump asked.

    We’ll get to everything, but first: The “quid pro quo” angle. I’m not going to say there’s no hint of a quid pro quo in the transcripts. Trump opens up the call by reminding the Ukrainian President how good the United States has been to Ukraine, and then later in the call asks for two favors, one pertaining to the Crowdstrike server, the next pertaining to Joe Biden’s son, Hunter.

    Any requests Trump makes or favors he asks for should be viewed in the context of what he initially said about the US having been very good to Ukraine. Basically Trump is suggesting the Ukrainian President owes him one.

    It’s a very general, nebulous “quid pro quo” but it can basically be summarized as “You know the United States has been a very good friend to Ukraine under my watch. Now would you please do me this favor. . .”

    Of course, there’s nothing specified by Trump. It’s far less of a quid-pro-quo than Obama’s infamous “more flexibility” comment he made to former Russian President (aka figurehead) Dmitri Medvedyev in 2012. And there’s definitely not any “threat” to withhold foreign aid, or pressure being exerted.

    What Trump said does not constitute any sort of pressuring or intimidation. It’s not like Trump said, “Hey, you better investigate Joe Biden and his crackhead son or else I’m gonna hang you out to dry.” There’s nothing like that.

    But I don’t even care about whether there was any “quid pro quo” between Trump and the Ukrainian President. That’s not the real issue here.

    The real issue here is what were the Bidens up to in Ukraine?

    It was a pretty ingenious move by Trump to release the transcripts because of this relevant bit:

    Screen Shot 2019-09-25 at 11.23.27 AM.png

    Trump: “There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it. . . It sounds horrible to me.”

    Any honest person reading the transcript should be far more alarmed to learn that Joe Biden’s crackhead son (who also slept with his deceased brother’s widow) was being prosecuted in Ukraine–and that Joe Biden himself stepped in to get him off the hook–than that Trump was trying to get the matter investigated.

    I bet most people were unaware that Biden’s son was being prosecuted in the Ukraine. But now, after Trump released the transcripts, more people know.

    This has been my view the whole time: the same Democrat politicians and media propagandists who have spent three years demanding politically-motivated investigations into Trump over made-up scandals are now #Outraged that Trump is trying to investigate their side?

    And didn’t they employ a British spy named Christopher Steele to investigate Trump’s supposed corrupt dealings with Russia?

    The same people now screeching “Abuse of power!” had no problem at all with the Hillary Campaign working hand-in-hand with the Obama intelligence community to investigate Donald Trump both during the 2016 election and over the first couple years of Trump’s presidency.

    Obama’s actions against Trump in 2016 objectively constituted the greatest abuse of power in the history of our country. It’s not even up for debate. Using the intelligence community to spy on and undermine the Republican Presidential nominee over a made-up scandal during an election is unprecedented corruption, and Obama did it.

    But beyond that, it all goes back to this question: “Investigate Biden for what, exactly?”

    The blue checks are shrieking stuff like this:

    Screen Shot 2019-09-25 at 11.50.44 AM.png

    Has it ever occurred to them that perhaps Joe Biden and his son did something wrong and need to be investigated?

    No. In their minds, Democrats are completely above the law. Our “reporters” are totally uninterested in the question of whether the Bidens did anything wrong. In the spirit of the famous Nixon quote, the media’s mantra is “If a Democrat does it then it’s not illegal.”

    So what, exactly, was Hunter Biden being prosecuted for? Rep. Jim Jordan summarizes:

    Screen Shot 2019-09-25 at 11.55.20 AM.png

    So. . . . . let me get this straight: the Democrats are claiming President Trump abused his power to get the Ukrainians to do him a favor, but it was actually Joe Biden who abused his power to get the Ukrainians to do him a favor?

    They really are unbelievable. I say this all the time but it always turns out to be true: whatever crimes they accuse our side of, it is they who will inevitably be found to be guilty of those very same crimes.

    It wasn’t Trump strong-arming Ukraine for favors, it was Biden.

    Here’s the Biden Scandal in more detail, via Fox News:

    “In March 2016, then-Vice President Biden told Ukraine’s then-President Petro Poroshenko that the Eastern European nation would not get a $1 billion U.S. government loan guarantee unless it fired Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin, who was investigating Burisma Holdings — a natural gas extraction company whose board of directors included Hunter Biden, the veep’s son.

    Shokin told The Hill’s John Solomon that plans for his probe “included interrogations and other crime-investigation procedures into all members of the executive board, including Hunter Biden.”

    The bottom line: the media and the Democrats are worried about what will happen if the Bidens are investigated. This is an attempt to cover-up a potentially damaging scandal for Joe Biden, who much of the D.C. Establishment views as their best hope of getting Trump out of office in 2020 and getting the Globalists back in power in America.

    This is very calculated. It’s not simply Trump Derangement Syndrome insanity and trying to get Trump impeached yet again.

    They’re trying to squash any investigation into the Biden family. They know this could potentially blow up on them.

    Biden knows it:

    Screen Shot 2019-09-25 at 11.56.19 AM.png

    Just because they’re trying to make this into a Trump scandal, don’t be under the impression that they’re not totally aware of what the true scandal is here.

    But, of course, the D.C. Establishment is collectively not very bright and unable to control its burning hatred for Trump, so this is likely to blow up in their faces: now more and more people are aware that Hunter Biden was being prosecuted in Ukraine.

    No matter how much they try to avoid this part of the story and make it about Trump’s supposed “abuse of power,” they can’t.

    If they would have just kept their mouths shut and not been so impulsively desperate for impeachment, then perhaps they could have prevented the American public from finding out that the Democrat frontrunner for President’s son was being prosecuted by the Ukrainian government.