depopulation

Why I’m Inherently Skeptical of 5G

Lately there’s a lot of talk about 5G.

Does it cause coronavirus? I don’t know.

Is it bad for you in general? I don’t know.

There’s a lot I don’t know about 5G. I’m not an expert in this field so I’m not going to pretend to be one.

But I’m inherently skeptical of 5G for one simple reason: because there is no obvious need for it.

4G LTE works perfectly fine for me. It’s plenty fast. I’ve never once thought “Damnit, LTE sucks! I wish we had something faster!”

There is nothing wrong with 4G. I can watch YouTube videos perfectly fine with no buffering 99% of the time. Netflix, Hulu, Disney+ and HBO Go work perfectly over LTE.

Yet 5G is sold to us as being super fast:

“Remember in “The Amazing Spider-Man” when Peter Parker runs a Bing search (we know, Bing?) on Dr. Kurt Connors and instantly gets results? Your Web pages never load that fast. “That’s Darth Vader’s computer there,” Ericsson Chief Technology Officer Ulf Ewaldsson quipped. Pages usually take a second or two to load, even on a fast connection. With 5G, those results will come immediately.

Or if you wanted to kick back and download the movie “The Guardians of the Galaxy,” it would zip to your device in 15 seconds instead of the 6 minutes it takes via 4G.”

Yes, how did we ever live with one second loading times for search engine results and six-minute movie download times?

We don’t need 5G. LTE is fast enough.

Yet they’re selling 5G to us based on how much faster it will be.

I’m not buying it. There’s got to be some other reason for 5G.

And as if there weren’t enough reasons to be wary of 5G, the New York Times has already played the “RUSSIA!!!” card:

external-content.duckduckgo.png

Putin wants you to be afraid of 5G! If you are skeptical of 5G, you are a Russian Agent!

You wouldn’t want to be a traitor now, would you? Good. Then shut your damn mouth while the 5G antenna is installed on the streetlight in front of your house.

Scientific American published an op-ed in October 2019 entitled, “We Have No Reason to Believe 5G is Safe.”

“The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced through a press release that the commission will soon reaffirm the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that the FCC adopted in the late 1990s. These limits are based upon a behavioral change in rats exposed to microwave radiation and were designed to protect us from short-term heating risks due to RFR exposure.  

Yet, since the FCC adopted these limits based largely on research from the 1980s, the preponderance of peer-reviewed research, more than 500 studies, have found harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating.”

In other words, the FCC’s radio frequency radiation exposure limits are out of date.

“Citing this large body of research, more than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger exposure limits. The appeal makes the following assertions:

“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.”

So all these bad things can happen to us (and animals and plants) even at radio frequency radiation exposure levels that the FCC has deemed “safe.”

Here’s where 5G comes in, and why it’s unique compared to previous generations of wireless technology (4G, 3G, etc.):

“The latest cellular technology, 5G, will employ millimeter waves for the first time in addition to microwaves that have been in use for older cellular technologies, 2G through 4G. Given limited reach, 5G will require cell antennas every 100 to 200 meters, exposing many people to millimeter wave radiation. 5G also employs new technologies (e.g., active antennas capable of beam-forming; phased arrays; massive multiple inputs and outputs, known as massive MIMO) which pose unique challenges for measuring exposures.”

So what are the effects of millimeter waves on humans? I’m sure you’ll be shocked to learn that they’re not good:

“Millimeter waves are mostly absorbed within a few millimeters of human skin and in the surface layers of the cornea. Short-term exposure can have adverse physiological effects in the peripheral nervous system, the immune system and the cardiovascular system. The research suggests that long-term exposure may pose health risks to the skin (e.g., melanoma), the eyes (e.g., ocular melanoma) and the testes (e.g., sterility).”

Virtually every part of the elite’s overall agenda has depopulation in mind: abortion, LGBT rights, female empowerment, male disempowerment, vaccines, etc. It can’t be a coincidence that 5G can cause sterility.

The government doesn’t seem to care what health risks 5G–or any wireless technology at all, for that matter–cause:

“Since 5G is a new technology, there is no research on health effects, so we are “flying blind” to quote a U.S. senator. However, we have considerable evidence about the harmful effects of 2G and 3G. Little is known the effects of exposure to 4G, a 10-year-old technology, because governments have been remiss in funding this research. Meanwhile, we are seeing increases in certain types of head and neck tumors in tumor registries, which may be at least partially attributable to the proliferation of cell phone radiation. These increases are consistent with results from case-control studies of tumor risk in heavy cell phone users.

5G will not replace 4G; it will accompany 4G for the near future and possibly over the long term. If there are synergistic effects from simultaneous exposures to multiple types of RFR, our overall risk of harm from RFR may increase substantially. Cancer is not the only risk as there is considerable evidence that RFR causes neurological disorders and reproductive harm, likely due to oxidative stress.”

Neurological disorders? That’s some scary shit.

“As a society, should we invest hundreds of billions of dollars deploying 5G, a cellular technology that requires the installation of 800,000 or more new cell antenna sites in the U.S. close to where we live, work and play?

Instead, we should support the recommendations of the 250 scientists and medical doctors who signed the 5G Appeal that calls for an immediate moratorium on the deployment of 5G and demand that our government fund the research needed to adopt biologically based exposure limits that protect our health and safety.”

I don’t trust 5G.

If you do trust it, that means you’re simply accepting the word of telecom industry “experts” and leaving your fate in their hands. What, exactly, have the elites done to earn your trust?

There is no obvious, pressing need for 5G, yet they’re rolling it out anyway. This, to me, has always struck me as suspicious. “5G is faster,” they tell us. But LTE is fast enough.

There’s something else they’re not telling us.

I’d advise getting out of cities as soon as possible.

***

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on 5G:

Screen Shot 2020-04-07 at 2.05.57 PM.png

 

 

The New York Times Goes Full-Blown 1984-level Propaganda: “Pregnancy Kills. Abortion Saves Lives.”

Please excuse me while I pick my jaw up off the floor:

Please read that again: “Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

“Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

“Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

“Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

“Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

They really just don’t give a fuck anymore, huh?

They’re like, “We’re telling massive lies straight to your faces and we don’t even care who knows it lol.” They want you to know that there’s nothing you can do to stop them.

Uniparty propaganda is now so shameless that they’re straight-up saying “Pregnancy kills, abortion saves lives.”

The end-goal of their propaganda is now more obvious than ever: depopulation.

The Uniparty elites support abortion because the elites support depopulation. Smaller populations are more easily controlled.

Of course they’ve convinced the useful idiots in the streets that abortion is about a “woman’s right to choose,” but it’s not. It’s about depopulation and eugenics.

Haven’t you noticed just how many of their policy initiatives result in depopulation?

Do you think the elites are unaware of the fact that the US has aborted over 61 million babies since 1973? And that over 1.5 billion babies have been aborted worldwide since 1980?

Virtually nothing happens that they don’t want and plan to happen. You cannot seriously believe that the Uniparty elite doesn’t know exactly what the score is.

What’s the end-goal of “environmentalism”? It’s not Saving The World–the world doesn’t need saving.

The end-goal is you not having kids:

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 4.54.58 PM.png

If you want to Save The Planet™, do your part by not having children!

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 4.55.15 PM.png

Because A Study™ said so!

What’s the point of so-called “Female Empowerment”?

Depopulation. If women are working into their 30s and beyond, they’re having fewer kids. Working women are great the for the Uniparty: first of all, they’re an untapped supply of labor, which in turn drives down the price of labor. Second of all, working women aren’t having children, leading a declining birthrate, which in turn the Uniparty’s propaganda outlets will use to say, “We are in a population crisis! The only way to solve it is with millions of more poor, third-world immigrants!”

Why does the elite celebrate and promote homosexuality? Because it’s sterile. The elite wants more and more gay people because that means fewer births.

I already know what you’re going to say: “But you’re born gay! How can the elite create more gay people?!”

First of all, you are not born gay. There is no evidence of any “gay gene” existing, and that’s according to a 143-page John’s Hopkins study from 2016:

“Studies of the brains of homosexuals and heterosexuals have found some differences, but have not demonstrated that these differences are inborn rather than the result of environmental factors that influenced both psychological and neurobiological traits,” the report explained. “One environmental factor that appears to be correlated with non-heterosexuality is child sexual abuse victimization, which may also contribute to the higher rates.”

The study was unable to conclude specifically why people are gay, but it was clear in stating that there is not anywhere near sufficient evidence to prove people are born gay.

It’s one of those things people just believe because, well, that’s what Good People believe. Plus they’ve heard it repeated a bunch of times on TV, in movies, on the news, etc.

This goes to show you that repeating something enough times does, in fact, make it “true”–at least in people’s minds.

But “Born This Way” has never been proven by actual science.

Which means sexuality is either a conscious choice, or it’s a product of external/environmental influences. What might those external influences be? Well, like the study said, being sexually abused as a child is a big one. Other non-sexual forms of emotional trauma are another. Then there’s the influence of viewing pornography starting at an early age. And then finally there’s the cultural/social angle of it, meaning propaganda and indoctrination.

How else do you explain the fact that Millennials are “the gayest generation“?

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.33.46 PM.png

Millennials are also the generation that has been most bombarded with pro-gay propaganda. Big coincidence, I’m sure!

In 2017, NBC News reported the results of a survey that showed 20% of millennials identified as LGBT.

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.35.29 PM.png

Gay people have historically been around 2-4% of the population, and now all the sudden we have a generation that’s 20% gay–meaning 5-10x gayer than previous ones?

You’re telling me that’s not a product of cultural brainwashing and propaganda?

If being gay was entirely biological and natural, we would expect the gay proportion of the population to remain static or at least fluctuate very little over time. If one’s sexuality has nothing to do with external factors, we would expect the gay percentage of the population to be the same today as it was in 1919, 1519 and even 2019 B.C. But it’s not. All of the sudden it’s skyrocketing.

So that means either people today are being brainwashed to be gay or the Uniparty is putting something in the water to turn people gay.

Could be both, honestly.

It’s pretty simple: Pro-gay propaganda makes it socially desirable to be gay. More people than ever nowadays are claiming to be gay. It’s obvious what’s going on.

Folks, there are no accidents in politics. This is not all just a coincidence.

Today’s ruling Uniparty elite is every bit as obsessed with eugenics as the Nazis were. They just go about it in less-obvious ways.

The Uniparty Elite may not have death camps (at least that we know about) but 61 million aborted babies in the US since 1973 speaks for itself.

And the above whopper by the New York Times claiming that pregnancy kills and abortion saves lives is not the first time America’s supposed “paper of record” has gone to bat for the Depopulation Agenda:

Screen Shot 2019-03-26 at 12.06.44 PM.png

Parenting is so hard these days. Better to just avoid it altogether.

“But,” you may ask, “if the Elite want depopulation, then why do they want more immigrants to solve the supposed population crisis?”

Because poor immigrants from the third world are easily controlled. Just give them Free Shit from the government and they’re yours.

The goal is to depopulate America of Americans and repopulate it with “New Americans” who will be subservient to the Uniparty Agenda.

If you haven’t noticed, the Democratic Party’s dominance of national elections is based entirely on foreign-born voters:

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.17.31 PM.png

No wonder Republicans have only won the popular vote once since 1988.

The goal is to sever our connection to 1776 because of what America As Founded represents: individual liberty, freedom of speech, self-determination, actual human empowerment, self-government, the right to bear arms, etc.

All of those things are Problematic for the Uniparty. And so this is why they want to depopulate America of Americans and repopulate it with poor foreigners who don’t really understand what it means to be free, and who have no connection to 1776.

Are you getting it now?

The Uniparty elite wants all the statues and monuments to the past erased and removed. That’s all part of the plan. Don’t you understand how it works by now? First they come for the stuff that nobody will defend, like the Confederate Statues, then they’ll come for the George Washingtons and Thomas Jeffersons–because they owned slaves!

And, oh, wouldja lookit that? Mayor Pete Buttwhatever is now calling for the erasure of Thomas Jefferson’s name from American society.

They come after the indefensible targets first, then they go for their real targets. That’s why they banned Alex Jones and Milo first. Then they’ll come for the “more reasonable” dissidents like Paul Joseph Watson and Steven Crowder, etc.

They want this country to completely start over–without any of that bullshit the original Founding Fathers came up with, like the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence.

They want an America where the people don’t know what it means to be free. And they’re gonna get it, too.

Depopulation is the means; power and control are the ends.