Europe

Is the Coronavirus a Bioweapon?

Let’s see:

  • It kneecapped China’s economy (America’s primary rival).
  • Virus hit just before Lunar New Year in China, the country’s biggest travel holiday, for maximum impact.
  • Also spread in Iran, another of America’s chief geopolitical rivals. In particular, several Iranian politicians have contracted the disease. A prominent adviser to Ayatollah Khomeini died from the virus.
  • An Israeli company’s suspicious comments about producing a vaccine. It claimed it had already been developing a Coronavirus cure before the outbreak of the virus, and had decided to begin developing a Coronavirus vaccine out of “pure luck.”

There are claims that the virus actually originated in the US, rather than China. At least one Chinese official is publicly claiming that the US military brought the virus to China in Ocotber 2019 under the guise of the Wuhan Military Games, which took place that month.

Of course, while the disease initially hit China the worst and then Iran, it is now spreading rapidly in a lot of countries considered to be America’s allies. South Korea, Italy, France, Spain and Germany are all getting hit badly.

In fact the virus has largely plateaued in China, and Europe has become the epicenter, according to the World Health Organization. Based on the official reports from China, the worst is over for them:

It has plateaued in South Korea and it seems they largely have it under control there, but it is not under control in Europe.

So if this virus was an American bioweapon, there has been an awful lot of collateral damage. But this is all under the assumption that only cases and deaths matter. What if infecting a lot of people wasn’t the ultimate goal for whomever released the virus?

To the extent that people discuss conspiracy theories about the Coronavirus, they think along the lines of it being a weapon intended to kill lots of people.

But I don’t think that’s accurate. If the Coronavirus was indeed a bioweapon, and whomever unleashed it intended it to kill lots of people, by any objective measure, they have failed spectacularly at that. It’s tough to say with certainty just how many people have been infected by this virus given that we’re taking the official numbers at face value and assuming they haven’t been underreported by any country. But even if we triple the official numbers, that’s still not a lot of people in the grand scheme of things.

No, I think if this was a bioweapon, the real goal was something else. To figure out what that something else is, let’s look at what the virus has succeeded in doing:

  • Fear
  • Economic disruption

It has succeeded in spreading fear and disrupting the economy. If those outcomes were the actual goal of the coronavirus, then they didn’t even need an actual disease. They only needed a media fear campaign.

In fact, it seems that every year since Y2K there has been some media fear campaign over something or other:

ESI-cFEU4AE4hcs.jpg

And don’t forget Global Warming™, which has been an unrelenting fear campaign for the past 15 years.

Why would they want us to be afraid? A scared populace is a controlled populace. And it makes us more likely to give up our freedoms in exchange for perceived safety.

But there is one highly compelling reason that suggests the Coronavirus isn’t a bioweapon orchestrated by the elite, or the Pentagon going rogue, or what have you: it has exposed the structural deficiencies of the globalist world order. Open borders and free trade turn epidemics into global pandemics. Globalization means a virus in one country can spread to countless other countries and even bring down the whole global economy.

Pat Buchanan recently argued quite convincingly that the Coronavirus could end up delivering a knockout blow to the globalist ideology.

“In retrospect, was it wise to have relied on China to produce essential parts for the supply chains of goods vital to our national security? Does it appear wise to have moved the production of pharmaceuticals and lifesaving drugs for heart disease, strokes and diabetes to China? Does it appear wise to have allowed China to develop a virtual monopoly on rare earth minerals crucial to the development of weapons for our defense?

As for the “open borders” crowd, do Democrats still believe that breaking into our country should no longer be a crime, and immigrants arriving illegally should be given free health care, a proposition to which all the Democratic debaters raised their hands?

In this coronavirus pandemic, people now seem to be looking for authoritative leaders and nations seem to be looking out for their own peoples first. Would Merkel, today, invite a million Syrian refugees into Germany no matter the conditions under which they were living in Syria and Turkey?

Is not the case now conclusive that we made a historic mistake when we outsourced our economic independence to rely for vital necessities upon nations that have never had America’s best interests at heart?

Which rings truer today? We are all part of mankind, all citizens of the world. Or that it’s time to put America and Americans first!”

It’s probable that once the dust settles and this thing has run its course, the coronavirus will have done irrevocable damage to the credibility of the ruling globalist elite. Nationalist ideologies have already been growing in popularity since at least 2015, and the rapid global spread of this virus will only boost their appeal.

How many normal people have been red-pilled against globalism due to the coronavirus? More and more people are going to start rejecting open borders and free trade after seeing how a virus can spread around the world. The idea that China’s (or any other country) problems shouldn’t be our problems resonates with people on a very fundamental level.

Now, just because this virus destroys the credibility of the globalist elites does not mean it wasn’t orchestrated. It’s possible the military went rogue and did this on its own, believing it to be in its interests rather than those of the civilian elite.

Or maybe the globalist elite was on-board with the military’s plan and it was simply botched. Never discount the possibility that the elite can be incompetent sometimes. They may be powerful but they’re not all-powerful. They make mistakes sometimes. After all, they failed to foresee that 9-11 and their power grab after it (Patriot Act/mass surveillance, world policing, endless foreign wars, massive ramp-up in military spending, etc.) would backfire into a lot of the driving force behind the resurgence of nationalism and isolationism.

So what’s the verdict? I don’t know. I reflexively distrust the mainstream media/government narrative on just about everything, and the coronavirus is no different. But it’s tough to see how this benefits anyone. The economic impact in America (and everywhere else) is likely to be severe, and if anything, this only further damages the public’s faith in the ruling elite and its official ideology of liberal globalism.

But we haven’t yet seen the endgame. Maybe they’re planning on rolling out some sort of vaccine in the darkest hour that people will desperately accept. Or maybe they’ll use the virus to roll out sweeping policy changes regarding quarantines, lockdowns and other authoritarian measures, similar to the Patriot Act following 9-11.

It’s tough to say because we’re still in the middle of it. We’ll have to wait and see what changes the elite seeks to implement with the virus as justification.

 

White Guilt: Not Just for Americans

It’s not just in America where the Globalist Uniparty has succeeded in promoting the idea of white guilt in order to dismantle and dispossess white populations.

White guilt is pervasive in Europe, too:

“The European parliament has overwhelmingly backed a watershed resolution calling for reparations for crimes committed in Africa during European colonialism.

The bill urges European member states to introduce a series of sweeping reforms aimed at tackling ‘structural racism’ facing millions of Afro-Europeans.

It calls on the countries to implement nation-wide strategies to deal with discrimination in education, health, housing, policing, the justice system and politics.

The resolution – approved by 535 MEPs, with 80 votes against and 44 abstentions – also calls on European member states to declassify their colonial archives, covering the most disturbing periods of Europe’s colonial past, and issue public apologies.”

While the article uses the term “reparations,” it does not mention any sort of large-scale cash payment white Europeans must make to Africans. That’s generally what the term “reparations” refers to in America.

However, the article describes “reparations” as reforms that ensure “Afro-Europeans” are favored by the system in virtually every way. That’s similar to what happened in America following the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s: in order to “make up” for slavery and Jim Crow, white Americans would be treated as second-class citizens until all the wrongs were righted.

White people in America have White Guilt over slavery, white people in Europe have White Guilt over colonialism.

The common theme is that white people are the Great Menace of the World.

All white people on earth are Guilty.

There is a coordinated international effort to demonize, demoralize and eventually dispossess all white people.

D3rq2pVXoAIXmB8.jpg

Britain is Officially Conquered

Islam is not only Britain’s future, but its present:

https://twitter.com/FTPmedia1/status/1109057460235579392

You do not see this type of symbolic virtue signaling in Muslim countries when a Muslim terrorists kills a bunch of Westerners.

Britain is a conquered country. It cannot be denied any longer.

This tweet sums it up:

afdsdsafdsaf.PNG

What’s going on?

What’s going on is Western Civilization has let go of the rope. It no longer has any will to survive.

It’s Time for Britain to Go Full Yellow Vest

Democracy is not self-maintaining. Elites will not simply honors the voters’ decisions when they go against the elite’s wishes because That’s What The Rules say.

Without vigilance and accountability, democracies are doomed. Having blind faith that the politicians will do what you want them to is suicidal.

Right now in Britain, Parliament just voted to take the “No Deal Brexit” off the table. “No deal” was basically Britain’s only leverage in negotiating the terms of Brexit with the EU, and now that’s gone.

They are currently trying to delay Brexit from March 29 to June. The strategy is “delay and eventually derail.” If they can’t stop Brexit now, they’ll delay it to give themselves more time to hatch a new scheme.

Look at this clusterfuck:

“LONDON (AP) — British lawmakers were voting Thursday on whether to scuttle the already dwindling chances the U.K. will leave the European Union this month as scheduled, but EU officials warned they would only allow a delay if the country made a fundamental shift in its approach to Brexit.

“Allow.” That right there is why Brexit is a necessity.

Prime Minister Theresa May grudgingly granted the vote after Parliament twice rejected her EU divorce deal and also ruled out leaving the EU without an agreement. Withdrawing from the EU without a deal could mean major disruptions for businesses and people in the U.K. and the 27 remaining countries.

Yeah yeah yeah. That’s a bunch of bullshit. It’s a scare-tactic by the elite to screw the whole Brexit process into oblivion. “Major disruptions for businesses!” That’s what they said about the Brexit vote, and it never came to pass.

That was from AP, a Uniparty Globalist Propaganda outlet.

Here’s the actual story from Breitbart:

“Brexiteers have reacted with anger after the House of Commons voted to stop the UK leaving the EU without a deal, whilst the Tory Party is in disarray after Prime Minister Theresa May lost control of her own motion.

Veteran Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage said immediately after the vote, “A total disgrace, Parliament no longer represents the people,” adding, “This is a Parliament of outright liars. We will have to fight them again. And mark my words — we will beat them once more.”

Mr Farage later penned a piece for The Telegraph, where he confirmed what he had written in 2017 that “The great Brexit betrayal has begun,” noting, “Well, although it pains me to say it, the vote in Parliament to take no deal off the table proves that, 20 months ago, I was right.”

Now, above, when I said the Globalist Uniparty’s strategy is “delay and eventually derail,” here’s what I’m talking about:

“Donald Tusk today revealed he will urge EU leaders to agree a ‘long extension’ to Article 50 – delaying Brexit by up to two years to give the UK time to ‘rethink’ – if Theresa May‘s deal is voted down a third time next week. 

The President of the European Council’s intervention on Twitter this morning will bolster claims that the UK would not leave the EU until 2021 unless Mrs May can persuade the DUP and Brexiteers to back her divorce deal – because some in the EU want to play ‘hardball’ and push for a delay of two years. 

Ireland’s Foreign Minister Simon Coveney also said today the EU is likely to offer Britain a 21-month delay to Brexit while Taoiseach Leo Varadkar added that if the UK changes its mind it would be welcomed back ‘like the prodigal son’.

The PM’s deal will be put to another vote next week, just 15 days before the country is due to leave the EU on 29 March, after MPs including a ‘gang of four’ rebellious Cabinet members helped to vote to permanently rule out No Deal Brexit. 

May told the Commons that if she loses a third time she will forced to ask Brussels for a long delay to Britain’s departure from the EU at a summit on Thursday.”

They’ve had nearly three years to negotiate and formalize Brexit, and now they want another two years?

This is totally rotten.

It’s becoming clear that democracy is no longer in existence in Britain. The people voted for Brexit, but the politicians are resolved to deny them Brexit.

When this happens, the only solution is to take to the streets like the Yellow Vests of France–that, of course, or surrendering and admitting to be ruled by an antidemocratic oligarchy of globalists who care nothing for the well-being of the citizens of their respective nations.

 

Swedish Leftists Admit Immigration is About Ethnic Cleansing in White Countries

The leftwing globalists always show their true colors eventually:

“Sweden’s ambassador to Hungary has received protests from the Hungarian government following Social Security Minister Annika Strandhäll’s incendiary tweet against Budapest’s policy to completely exempt mothers of four from taxes.

Strandhäll wrote that Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s demand for “more genuine Hungarian children” was offensive, “reeked of the 1930s” and effectively offset the benefits of feminism.

“What is happening in Hungary is alarming. Now Orban wants more ‘genuine’ Hungarian children to be born. The policy reeks of the 30s. A right-wing populist you need smokescreens for what this type of policy does to the independence women have been struggling for”, Strandhäll tweeted.”

But I thought declining birthrates in the West were a major problem?

According to the globalists, we need millions of migrants because we can’t increase our populations ourselves, organically.

In other words, because the native populations of Western nations are not reproducing adequately, we need migrants to ensure our populations increase at the same rates they did in the 20th century.

But when a nation like Hungary implements policies to increase birth rates in the native population, and expressly rejects the idea of importing migrants to increase the population, the globalists freak out.

Not importing migrants to replace your native population is Nazism, apparently.

The globalists are rarely so honest about their intentions: they want to ethnically cleanse white Western nations and replace their populations with third world migrants.

It was never about birthrates. It has always been about demographic replacement.

“Viktor Orban’s call for “Hungarian children” didn’t resonate well with the Swedish press, either. Sydsvenskan‘s columnist Sofia Nerbrand wrote that Orban “should be ashamed” of steps to stimulate childbirth in Hungary.

“Viktor Orban’s stated goal is that the Hungarian people will increase with the help of white Hungarian offsprings, not migrants,” Nerbrand wrote, calling this approach ‘unsavoury’. “Rhetoric and politics that put one’s own people first and shut out the others should have no place in today’s Europe.”

All but the most outlandish caricatures of modern leftwing globalists can parody their sheer lunacy. They are nearly impossible to parody because their actual, genuine statements equal and often surpass the parodies. You can’t tell the difference.

Globalists: “Your native population is growing too slowly. You need migrants.”

Orban: “What if we simply implement policies to increase the birthrate among our native population?”

Globalists: “No. That is not allowed. You MUST import millions of third worlders. Do not attempt to boost the birthrate among native Hungarians. Your population increase will come exclusively from migrants.”

They’re actually saying this now.

And how is this not ethnic cleansing?

They’re declaring that your population increase must come from African and Middle Eastern migrants alone, and that if Hungary attempts to boost birthrates among actual ethnic Hungarians, it is literal Nazism.

Fortunately Hungary doesn’t care what the globalists say:

Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto called Strandhäll’s statement “unacceptable” and noted a big difference between Sweden and Hungary in terms of politics.

“Hungary spends money on families, while Sweden spends it on migrants”, Szijjarto said.

Europe now stands at a crossroads. Most of the major, Western European powers have already decided to take the path of open borders and political correctness, which will lead to multicultural oblivion.

Eventually one day, the Swedish people will be but a memory because their Feminist Government has decided that the future of their country is African and Middle Eastern migrants, not ethnic Swedes. Like the Phoenicians, the Celts and countless other ethnic groups no longer in existence due to conquest and displacement, the Swedes will exist only in the pages of history books.

But other nations, like Hungary, are rejecting this suicide pact foisted on them by powerful nations like Germany, as well as elite institutions and governing bodies like the EU and the UN.

The policy differences today between self-confident, nationalist countries like Hungary and suicidal globalist nations like Sweden will only become more apparent in the coming decades. But the time for choosing is now.

“Allahu Akbar” Translated to English Means: “Diversity is Our Strength”

Just kidding.

Here’s a headline from Germany:

“Afghan and Iranian Asylum Seekers Rampage Through German Town, Injuring 12”

“The Bavarian town of Amberg is in shock after a group of asylum seekers from Afghanistan and Iran rampaged through the city Saturday night. Four attackers aged 17 to 19 randomly beat exiting passengers at the train station, and then moved to the city center to continue their rampage.

According to reports, the attackers shouted “kafir” (a derogatory term meaning “non-Muslim,” “unbeliever”) and “n**ger” at some victims.

In all, 12 victims ranging from ages 16 to 42 needed medical attention. A 17-year-old victim was treated for severe head wounds.”

The West certainly has a knack for integrating and assimilating all these Muslim migrants. They sure seem to love our secular Western way of life!

But still, don’t the benefits of mass invasion migration outweigh the cons? I mean, yeah, Europe is experiencing a rash of terrorist attacks, rapes and child sex rings, but at the same time, “Asylum Seekers” are rampaging through progressive European towns imposing their 7th-century “values” on the native populace by violent force!

So much cultural enrichment! Learn to love it, you boring old white people.

At least you’ll have great kebab.

Those Who Make Peaceful Revolution Impossible Make Violent Revolution Inevitable

I’ve kept abreast with the ongoing Brexit “negotiation” (read: surrender) playing out in Britain because in two major ways, it parallels the Donald Trump saga here in America:

  • Both Brexit and Trump were democratically-achieved populist uprisings against corrupt, entrenched ruling classes that have led both nations to the brink of ruin.
  • The repudiated ruling classes in America and Europe are both trying to overturn the will of the voters who chose Trump and Brexit.

Trump and Brexit are intertwined and represent pivotal moments in the history of the Anglosphere. Brexit and Trump are part of a wider popular rebellion against the same corrupt, politically correct leftwing globalists in charge here in America, and in Britain and Europe.

If the elites are allowed to kill Brexit, I feel Britain might be “lost” forever, and that would be very bad for America. Brexit is Britain’s final stand: will Britain regain its independence, national identity and sovereignty, or will it be crushed under the bureaucratic fist of the dystopian EU superstate?

British Prime Minister Theresa May replaced David Cameron in 2016 after the Brexit vote. Cameron staked his entire Prime Ministership on Remain prevailing, and when Brexit won he was forced to resign. May was chosen as his successor, however May was never a full supporter of Brexit, and often equivocated on her position. It’s likely May was even secretly fully on-board with Remain. Still, she was determined to be the right person to lead Britain forward in the wake of the Brexit vote. She and her cabinet have been negotiating the terms of Brexit for over two years now, and at last the contours of her “deal” are coming into focus.

Regardless of her original position on Brexit in 2016, it’s undeniable by now that May lacks either the desire or the ability to do right by the British voters who chose to leave the EU. Perhaps she lacks both. The terms she has negotiated with the EU are simply unacceptable for anyone who voted for Brexit. Recently, Jacob Rees-Mogg, a rising Conservative star and prominent Brexiteer (and hopefully the next Prime Minister) stood in Parliament and denounced May’s “deal”:

“My right honorable friend [May], and she is unquestionably honorable, said that we will leave the Customs Union. Annex 2 says otherwise.

My right honorable friend said that she will maintain the integrity of the United Kingdom. The whole protocol says otherwise.

My right honorable friend said that we will be out of the European Court of Justice. Article 174 says otherwise.

All my right honorable friend says and does no longer match.”

Rees-Mogg also said that May’s deal “is not Brexit” and that it “must be rejected.”

Nigel Farage called May the “worst and most duplicitous Prime Minister in British history” and he’s 100% correct. May is so awful it’s hard to put into words.

Fortunately, numerous members of her cabinet have submitted their resignations in protest to her “deal” and it is likely May will be out by the end of the week. Rees-Mogg is said to be supporting Boris Johnson, who publicly campaigned for Brexit before the vote, to be the next Prime Minister. Hopefully, May will be sent packing and true Brexiteers can come in and save Brexit.

What’s at stake in Britain is not simply whether it gets good terms for its departure from the EU, but whether or not democracy still genuinely exists.

In his 2016 book “Why Vote Leave,” Daniel Hannan, a Conservative MP and prominent Brexiteer, documented over a half-dozen instances where the EU outright rejected the results of elections that did not go its way:

Screen Shot 2018-11-19 at 9.30.53 AM.png

Paul Joseph Watson claims that May’s Brexit deal was specifically designed to be so bad that it would lead to a second Brexit referendum vote, which the EU hopes will go its way, unlike the 2016 vote. Then, the EU–conniving, corrupted snakes that they are–will claim Remain was the will of the people.

If the voters choose Brexit and their elites overrule them, then what is the point of voting anymore? If the voters choose Trump and the swamp rises up in defiance to destroy him, then why would we ever waste our time with elections again?

Time and again we’re seeing elites reject and subvert democracy when the voters defy them. This is not how it’s supposed to work.

When voters reach the ends of their ropes, and still they are denied the right to vote for the changes they desire, things will get ugly.

The political establishment, in both America and Europe, has been telling voters to go fuck themselves for the past two years.

If the elites think Trump and Brexit are bad, wait until voters come to the conclusion that voting doesn’t actually mean shit. I say it all the time but it’s important to remember: democracy is nothing more than a way to affect political change without violence.

If the elites do not allow voters to affect change with the vote, they’re making a very dangerous wager that the voters will simply accept defeat, and accept the fact that they are not allowed to have a say anymore.

Perhaps the elites will be able to get away with it. Perhaps the voters will simply give up and get the message: the elites know best, and democracy is dead.

But perhaps the voters will be stubborn and insist on getting what they want. At that point, with voting no longer an option, what else can the people do but take up arms?

I must be clear: I do not want a violent uprising. The last thing I want is for democracy to collapse. It’s the elites, in their profound arrogance and entitlement, who are the ones setting us on a course for violence. They’re the ones breaking the social compact.

Western democracy rests on the agreement among the people that we do not have to go to war with one another so long as we are able to resolve our political question by way of the ballot. If one side does not hold up its end of the bargain, then what other option is left for the rest of us?

This is not a threat of violence. It’s a simple request that the elites start holding up their end of the social compact: just give the people what they voted for.

download.jpg

Western Europe is Still Paying the Price for World War I

As we commemorate the 100th anniversary of the end of World War I, an often unremarked consequence of the war is the major demographic ruin Western European nations inflicted upon one another. This is just an example:

In the top photo, we see hundreds of young men who went off to war in 1914. In the bottom photo, we see that only 28 men returned.

An entire neighborhood in England saw its young men decimated:

Here is another tweet that places WWI in perspective:

Ann Coulter summed it up:

Nations like Germany, France and Britain are still to this day paying the price for the demographic ruin they inflicted upon each other in the Great War.

In just one battle, the Somme Offensive, Britain, France and Germany lost a combined 1.2 million men. In the Battle of Verdun, over 800,000 men lost their lives.

Countries do not simply lose almost an entire generation of young men and remain the same. They suffer the consequences long into the future.

In the normal course of things, “survival of the fittest” is the rule. The process of natural selection ensures that the strongest and fittest rule the gene pool and reproduce.

But if a great war wipes out most of a nation’s best young men, the whole process is turned on its head. The Great War not only robbed Western Europe of a generation of great young men, but also robbed it of future generations of great men.

This could explain why the British Empire declined and faded away so rapidly: on the eve of WWI in 1914, Britain was unquestionably the world’s preeminent power. At that time, the sun still never set on the British Empire and the Crown had colonies and territories on every continent. From India to Australia to Canada to Egypt, Britain quite literally ruled the world. But that was the peak. Within a generation from the end of World War II, Britain’s empire was gone:

British_Empire_evolution3

This gif shows the rise and fall of the British Empire from 1492 to 2007, and you can clearly see its rapid decline following the end of WWII.

This happened for a reason:  Britain had lost most of its good young men in the World Wars. They lost their future.

Britain, France and Germany today are shells of what they were in early 1914. The reason? They robbed each other of their demographic futures in the terrible battles of the First and Second World Wars.

The crumbling nations you see today are direct results of the unimaginable human devastation they wrought upon one another a century ago.