France Looks Like a Third-World Warzone Right Now

Apparently ethnic violence has broken out in the city of Dijon, France between Algerian immigrants and Chechen immigrants. Strong warning for violence and gruesome imagery:

Dijon is in east/central France, about 190 miles southeast of Paris. I’m not going to pretend I know anything about this situation, only that it’s quite striking to see Algerians and Chechens going to war with one another in France.

Is this what Western nations are reduced to, thanks to Diversity?

Add France to the list, along with the US, of nations that are both First and Third World at the same time.

The Wall is Going Up

The Supreme Court delivers:

Trump is right to point out the Rule of Law aspect, as this should never have been a matter for the courts to decide in the first place. There is no genuine constitutional question as to whether President Trump can do this; it’s only become a question because leftwing Open Borders federal courts accepted the case after it was filed dishonestly by leftwing Open Borders groups.

No matter what sort of legal jargon this gets bogged down in, never lose sight of the main point: should we have a border wall or not? Democrats are doing everything in their power to stop the wall from going up and make it seem like this isn’t ultimately about the wall, but it is.

Now 100 miles of fencing can go up:

Build it.

Now, the US-Mexico border is almost 2,000 miles long so we’re going to need a lot more than this to get it fully secured, but I’ll take this nonetheless.

For a while I’ve been trying to find a graphic that shows the most porous sections of the border and after some time I was able to find this:

My initial assumption was that the Rio Grande portion of the border was the most naturally secure due to the presence of the river, but apparently the opposite is true: the Rio Grande is where the highest number of illegals are apprehended.

Perhaps that’s because southern Texas is the southernmost part of the US mainland and thus the closest part of the border for most Mexicans.

Also, Google Map’s terrain view shows that much of the US-Mexican border and especially northern Mexico is a desert, meaning it’s far more difficult to traverse than the Rio Grande valley:

Mexico’s population density map bears that out: nobody really lives in that north/central desert region. The population is mostly concentrated in the southern/central part of the country:

So of course the southern tip of Texas would be the most common destination for most illegals coming from (or through) Mexico.

Anyway, border walls work. Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu agrees:

The Israeli wall is almost impenetrable:

A fence worked in Hungary:

And of course the most heavily secured border on earth, the Korean DMZ, has a big ass fence. Nobody gets through.

Walls work. And we need a big one along our entire border to keep out the illegals.

“Send Her Back”

This gives me hope for the future. Despite the bombardment of politically correct multiculturalist propaganda, Americans still aren’t afraid to stand up for their country against invaders and subversives:

It gives me hope to see that not all Americans have been bullied into accepting the lie that we have to welcome and accept foreigners who don’t even try to hide the fact that they hate us.

This is a woman who has referred to 9/11 as “some people did something.”

Ilhan Omar has said that America is “not going to be the country of white people,” and we’re supposed to sit here and act like that’s not blatant racism and support for white genocide.

How come it’s racist to say America, a country that was consistently 87% white/13% black for two centuries, is a white country? It’s just a fact. But Ilhan Omar wants to change that fact. It doesn’t make you a bad person if you disagree strongly.

We are under no obligation to accept “refugees” who come here and want to implement a demographic replacement of the historical majority of the country.

If I went to her native Ethiopia and, after some time living there, I ran for political office and won and upon taking office I confidently pronounced that “this is not going to be the country of black people,” people would be rightfully pissed. They let me in, and I repay them by basically telling them it’s my country now, not theirs.

The fact that we didn’t send Ilhan Omar packing the moment she said that is extraordinary and shows just how conditioned Americans are to accepting foreigners who obviously hate this country and everything it represents.

But as last night’s Trump rally showed, not all of us believe the lies.

Outside of the fact that she went through a citizenship ceremony, where is the evidence that Ilhan Omar is an American? It should be obvious from her words and actions, but it’s not. In fact her words and actions indicate someone who hates America.

But she went through a citizenship ceremony so according to the Politically Correct cowards she’s Just As American As Anyone Else!

She is the first invader member of Congress and thankfully there’s still some people who see straight through it. They don’t buy this bullshit that says stepping on to America’s Magic Soil automatically makes anyone as American as Elvis Presley.

“Send her back” is the visceral reaction of patriotic Americans who instinctively recognize a traitor in their midst.

Oh shut up. Quit playing dumb.

You know exactly what this is: Ilhan Omar is not only unAmerican, she’s anti-American. This is way more than simply “saying something President Trump doesn’t like.” This goes way beyond mere disagreement.

This woman committed immigration fraud by marrying her brother in order to gain citizenship, then used that wrongfully-gotten citizenship to run for Congress, where she was able to win because her district is full of Somali Muslims just like her who simply voted for her in ethnic solidarity, and now she uses her ill-gotten political power to subvert and destroy America from within. And she has the tacit approval of leftist elites who hate America as much as she does, as well as cowed “conservative” media who through years of shaming and psychological abuse by the media and Democratic Politicians, have genuinely come to be as pro-immigrant as the Democrats despite not benefitting from it like the Democrats do.

This woman–who hates white people, flippantly dismisses 9-11, and committed immigration fraud to gain her citizenship here–does not belong in America.

I’m glad there’s still some Americans out there who aren’t afraid to say so.

Notorious Xenophobic Racist Barack Obama: Just Because You Come From a Poor, Crime-Riddled Country Doesn’t Mean You’re Entitled to Asylum in the U.S.

Obama in 2014:

“Typically, refugee status is not granted just because of economic need, or because a family lives in a bad neighborhood, or poverty.”

Today’s Democratic Party, led by Ocasio-Cortez and her radical, open borders pals, are basically claiming that anyone who wants to immigrate to America is a refugee and must be allowed in.

Kinda crazy to think that just five years ago the Democrats were in favor of some form of restriction on immigration.

These nutcases today make Obama look like a right-winger.

The Democratic Debate Revealed Just How Far Along the Plan to Fundamentally Transform America Is

I caught a bit of the second Democratic Presidential debate. I usually don’t watch Democratic debates because there’s literally nothing they can say that will make me vote for them, but in this case I kind of wanted to see how Biden handled himself as the frontrunner, as well as how Bernie has changed over the past few years. Plus I wanted to see if Andrew Yang could possibly seize the opportunity to get out his message of free money for everyone and gain some momentum (he didn’t).

A few takeaways:

1. The Whore (Kamala Harris) was really off-putting. There’s just something about her that is repellant. She’s way too theatrical, over-the-top. I just felt like she was acting. She was so animated to the point where it felt unnatural. When she spoke, I felt like I was watching a robot whose “passion” and “bombast” settings were turned up too high.

2. The idea of Biden vs. the reality of Biden appear to be colliding head-on. For some reason he had become, in people’s minds, a “dignified elder statesman”–a wise, stoic old graybeard–over the past five or so years because after the 2012 election, he really didn’t get much media attention. But he is and always has been a total buffoon who can’t go five minutes without sticking his foot in his mouth. Biden is a doddering old man who has run for President and lost (badly) twice in the past, and I hope people are starting to remember why.

The guy has zero—absolutely zero—appeal outside of being associated with the Great Liberal Messiah Barack Obama. If Obama had not chosen Biden to be his running mate in 2008, and Biden remained in the Senate for the past 10 years, he would not be running for President right now. The only reason Democratic voters like him is because they can’t vote for Obama a third time, so Biden must be the next-best thing, they believe. Biden remains the front-runner, but will he remain so after he’s been in the public eye for long enough that people start to remember why they didn’t like him prior to 2008?

3. Really odd strategy for “Mayor Pete” to make his main message “Republicans Are Bad Christians Because They Are Against Open Borders.” Why does this guy keep bringing up the Bible and using it to attack Republicans? Who does he think this appeals to? Angsty 20-year-olds who just dyed their hair blue and came out as “gender non-conforming” to lash out at their parents? The young urban professionals who think they’re smarter than everyone because they Went To College and watch Jon Oliver? Lame.

4. Why was Andrew Yang unable to seize the moment and vault into the upper echelon of contenders? Well it’s probably because he wasn’t allowed to:

That’s absurd! What a ridiculous conspiracy theorist Andrew Yang is! We all know the Democrats would never rig a primary!

Ultimately, though, what little of the debate I caught told me everything I have to know about not only the Democratic Party in 2019, but the country itself.

The portion I caught was them all tripping over one another to show they were more Against Borders than the next. “I’m gonna let them all in!” “Oh yeah? Well I’m gonna let them all in AND give them free healthcare!” “That’s nothing: I’m gonna let them all in, give them free healthcare, and then I’m gonna abolish ICE entirely so the rest of Latin America is allowed to pour into this country behind them!”

The Democrats are not the party of open borders; they are the party of No Borders. They do not see a distinction between America, Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, and the rest of Latin America. The debate proved that much.

At one point, the moderator asked Joe Biden point-blank if he thought people who had committed no crime other than crossing the border illegally should be sent back, and in a rambling answer he basically said no, they shouldn’t.

So the Democratic Presidential candidates are all on record saying it should not be illegal to move to this country without first applying for citizenship. Anyone on earth can be an American so long as they just walk across the border.

And the whole time I’m wondering: does this actually appeal to my fellow countrymen and women? There are people out there who actually agree with this?

I’m not the only one who thought this:

There is no pro-border Democratic candidate. They have no interest in winning “Middle America” as traditionally understood because they gave up on “Middle America” decades ago. They are the party of the wealthy and of the poor–everyone in between is of no interest to the Democrats.

But the larger point is that the definition of “Middle America” has changed.

What last night made me realize was that the Uniparty’s plan to demographically remake this country is pretty far along. It’s in advanced stages. When you have one party’s politicians fighting among one another over who will do the most to totally erase the border between our country and Latin America, you know things have gotten out of hand.

At this point all they’re really doing is arguing about how to best put the finishing touches on the demographic transformation of America. They’re all in agreement that America should be turned into an extension of Latin America, they simply disagree with one another on which one of them gets to oversee and accelerate the process.

But there is no disagreement on the fundamental question of “Should America simply fling open its door and allow potentially the entirety of Central America to migrate here en masse?” To that question they all answer yes.

We have already lost our country when one of the two parties’ presidential candidates are fighting among one another to be the most amenable and welcoming to illegal immigrants.

Even little Warmongering Ben noticed how obsessed the Democrats were with bending over backwards for illegals:

But little Warmongering Ben missed the point: those are mainstream positions. They might not have been mainstream positions in the America of, say, 20 years ago, but they are now. The Democrats have fundamentally remade our country.

Those candidates knew their target audience last night. Politicians only say something if it can help them appeal to voters and get elected. They wouldn’t be talking about opening the border if they didn’t think it would appeal to a large number of voters. And that’s the worst part of it: the realization that such a large number of voters—or, more accurately, “Americans”—are in favor of open borders.

The Democratic candidates were appealing to foreigners last night, straight-up. That’s their target audience. By “foreigners” I mean first or second-generation immigrants, legal or illegal. That’s the Democratic base. That’s who the Democratic Party now officially serves. Last night made me realize it.

At first I was going to say the Democratic debate shows that their party no longer represents America, but that’s not totally accurate: what it shows is that they have already succeeded in fundamentally transforming America. We are already living in post-America.

The definition of “American” has changed over the past several decades, and it is now becoming apparent. There are now enough foreigners living in America that the Democratic Party doesn’t even attempt to appeal to white Americans. Mass immigration has brought in so many foreigners over the past 40-50 years that the people who founded and populated this country for the better part of two-plus centuries are no longer even on the Democrats’ radar.

And that includes black people, too. Outside of their sporadic “Cops Are Racist!” outbursts, Democrats no longer really even pretend to care about black people because the black population is not booming the way Hispanic and immigrant populations are. In terms of economics, illegal immigration probably hits blacks the hardest. The media tries to downplay it, but it’s no secret that Hispanics and blacks don’t really like each other. In LA, Hispanic gangs are literally ethnically cleansing black neighborhoods. But the Democratic Party does not care. They take the black vote entirely for granted and focus on catering to the ethnic groups that are growing the fastest.

To us, the illegal immigrant-centric Democratic debate last night seemed bizarre and totally outside the mainstream. But that’s only until you realize that the definition of “mainstream” has changed along with the country’s demographics. Anyone who felt alienated by last night’s Democratic Debate needs to understand: you are not part of their vision for America’s future, or even its present. You are an obstacle, a hindrance to be done away with.

“I can’t believe these Democrats are talking so openly and brazenly about allowing illegals into my country!”

The Democrats’ reply: “Your country?”


One thing I did like was Bernie’s closing statement about taking on the money interests. On that point, I totally agree with him.

But, like Will said, he totally undercuts his whole “anti-establishment” message when he talks about how he wants to open up the border and shower illegal immigrants with free money, healthcare and government benefits.

Bernie is a fraud.

Trump: I’m Slapping Some Big Ol’ Tariffs on Mexico Until They Stop Allowing Illegals to Pour Over Our Border

This is the right move, Mr. President. Hit ’em where it hurts:

This will finally create some urgency in the Mexican government to get a handle on the border situation.

Trump is sending a loud-and-clear message that we will not tolerate this anymore.


Hundreds of African Migrants Storm Paris Airport, Demand Open Borders and Chant: “France Does Not Belong to the French”

I’m wondering how long Tucker will be allowed to discuss this stuff and remain on air. Last night he discussed the recent occupation of a French airport by African migrants making “political demands.”

I wonder what those “political demands” were?

If you guessed “making French citizenship a global human right in order to allow untold more millions of Africans to move into and reverse-colonize France,” please collect your winnings.

“At one point a leader of the demonstrator chanted this into a loudspeaker: ‘France does not belong to the French. Everyone has a right to be here.'”

Africans see rich, advanced France not as having anything to do with the French. Africans see it as their “right” to enjoy the relatively advanced way of life of the French.

When Western Civilization is finally overrun by enough poor third-worlders seeking not to change their nationalities and assimilate but to simply enjoy the comforts and benefits of our nations, then they will finally learn, after it’s too late, just how much the relative material and economic superiority of the West compared to the rest of the world has to do with Westerners themselves.

This is why I maintain that third-world immigrants who have already made it to America and Europe ought to be the biggest immigration opponents out there: do you really want to turn your new country into your old one? Because that’s what will happen if you get your wish for more open borders.

As Tucker alluded to, Kirsten Gillibrand, the Democratic Senator from New York running (unsuccessfully) for President, recently announced that if elected President she would literally abolish the US border and allow migrants to flood in in unlimited numbers:

“During an interview on CBS’s Face The Nation, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand said, as president, she would end the detention of all border crossers and illegal aliens, instead, releasing every foreign national arriving at the U.S.-Mexico border into American communities if they are claiming asylum.

“As president of the United States, I would not fund any for-profit prisons, I would not lock up these families, I would have a humane immigration policy where people … would have lawyers and have a proper asylum process,” Gillibrand said.

“I wouldn’t keep them in detention at all,” Gillibrand continued. “I wouldn’t … as president of the United States, I wouldn’t use the detention system at all … if someone is seeking asylum, I would assign them a lawyer.”

Wonderful. The rich, liberal white lady wants to overrun this country with migrants because she haz #Compassion.

“Yes, poor, unwashed masses of the world: hurry into America and take a crack at the great piñata. Plunder this rich and bountiful land; enjoy the society its citizens have built. Leech on to and extract the riches of the native population via government welfare and redistribution programs until your host is exhausted.”

It is imperative that we do not allow any of these Democrats near positions of power, but it is especially imperative that we do not allow rich, liberal white women (like Gillibrand) with their Savior Complexes, into the White House.

Signs of Hope: Volunteer Militia in New Mexico Defending U.S. Border Because Our Government Either Cannot or Will Not

This gives me hope for the future of our country:

“Trump’s army: More than 300 asylum seekers surrender to armed militia of ‘New Mexico residents, veterans and ex-cops’, after crossing the US border.

Three hundred asylum seekers surrendered to ‘United Constitutional Patriots’.

Armed militia group claims to be made up of New Mexico ex-cops and veterans, who patrol the border.

One of the militia, Jim Benvie, recorded a group of migrants trying to enter the US on Tuesday.

The group handed themselves in and Border Patrol arrived to process them.

Benvie has documented the armed militia’s encounters with asylum seekers for the past two months.

Border Patrol said it does not condone the group’s actions.”

Americans are not going to take this lying down. They will not sit by while their country is overrun by ungrateful scofflaws.

We now have so many illegals pouring over the border that our Border Patrol cannot possibly handle them all. The situation is unmanageable because Washington refuses to address the problem.

Our homeland is being invaded and our government is complicit.

It’s a beautiful thing to see the American people rising up and taking action after being forsaken by their government.

It gives me hope that the American people will not go quietly into the night.

How the Uniparty Works: Republican Pretends to Disagree With Dems on Open Borders

This, right here, is a perfect example of how the Uniparty works: Mitt Romney knows damn well the Democrats will never “put aside the partisan bickering” and do something about the open border–after all, they want thousands of illegals pouring into America every single week.

This is how Romney pretends to disagree with Democrats, and how he can plausibly claim he’s against open borders. “Hey, I tried to get something done on the border, but gosh darnit, wouldn’t you know it? Those Democrats wouldn’t budge!”

Republicans always “call on Congress to act” when they know damn well Congress won’t lift a finger.

But then Republicans can say, “Hey, we tried, but Congress wouldn’t act. Oh well.”

That was the plan all along.

The plan is to be seen raising a big fuss about Those Dastardly Democrats, Darn Them!

But that’s it. No action at all.

Keep in mind that Senator Romney, who supposedly wants to secure the border, voted against President Trump’s emergency declaration to build the wall.

He says we need to go through Congress to secure the border, even though he knows Congress will never, ever, ever in a million years secure the border.

This is how Republicans support open borders while pretending to oppose open borders.

Hopefully you get what I’m talking about when I use the term “Uniparty.”

Here’s how the Uniparty works:

The Democrats call the shots.

The Republicans pretend to oppose the Democrats, but it’s all for show.

It’s all designed to give the American people the impression that they actually have a choice in how their country is governed, when really they don’t.

The Republican Party is like the Washington Generals, that team that always loses to the Harlem Globetrotters.

Republicans are the losers-by-design. They always lose, the Democrats always win.

The only reason the Republican Party exists is to give the public the illusion that America is not a One Party State.

“Hey, we’re not like Communist China or the Soviet Union or North Korea: we actually have a CHOICE when it comes to our politics. We have TWO parties! We’re freeeeeeee!”

Really? We have a choice?

If we have a choice then why is one of our two parties completely and totally impotent?

When has it ever done anything that its voters actually voted for?

The tax cuts? Is that why you voted for Trump? Were tax cuts even mentioned during the 2016 campaign? As I recall it, Trump’s three main points during the campaign were 1. Build the Wall, 2. Drain the Swamp, 3. Hillary is a Crook. That’s why people voted for him. Not tax cuts.

I’m not saying the tax cuts aren’t good–I’m saying they were not top priority for Trump or his voters during the 2016 campaign, and yet as soon as he took office, suddenly tax cuts became top priority.

As far as I can tell, the wall is not built, the swamp is not drained and Hillary is not in prison. But we got some tax cuts.

So please, try again: when has the Republican Party ever done anything that its voters actually voted for?

Oh, we get “conservative judges” on the federal judiciary?

Then why have multiple judges appointed by Republican George W. Bush overturned Trump Administration policies? Why is it a well-documented phenomenon that Supreme Court Justices get more liberal the longer they serve? Why has Chief Justice John Roberts, appointed by George W. Bush, slowly drifted leftward over time and now become the court’s “swing vote”?

And most importantly, why don’t we ever see the opposite happen–that is, why don’t we see Democrat-appointed judges drift to the right over time?

Why is it always “conservative” judges getting more liberal with age?

Because that’s how the Uniparty system is designed. That is how the political system in America works nowadays. We live in a one-party state.

We laugh at all those supposedly inferior foreign countries like Russia and Turkey with controlled and token opposition parties–“haha, idiots, they think they actually have a choice in their elections.” but the joke is also on us: that’s how America works, too.

Just like democracy in Russia, Turkey and China is a sham, it has become a sham here, too. It’s just that most of us don’t yet realize it.

There are Democrats, and Democrats who call themselves Republicans.

That’s it.

A Choice for America: Borders or Avocados?

I think we know which way the millennials will go:

No! Not Avocados! I can’t go one day without avocados! Open borders forever!”

The most affluent and plentiful society in the history of mankind, which has not had to make any serious, collective sacrifice for the greater good since at least the Oil Crisis of 1973, but probably not since World War II is offered a choice: attempt to do something about the mass invasion of your country by way of its southern border, or avocados.

In other words, most of the country does not know the meaning of “sacrifice for the greater good,” and so would be OUTRAGED™ and extremely Mad Online at the prospect of having politics affect their lives in any way whatsoever.

“You’re telling me this situation at the border is going to affect ME personally?! DAMN YOU, DRUMPF!”

It sucks to say but we have become so spoiled as a country that the idea of sacrifice for the greater good is probably completely unacceptable to most Americans. We’ve been at war continuously since 2001 but it’s always been an “over there” war with no real change to domestic American life “over here.” The civilian population has not had to make any sacrifices whatsoever for the war on terror, outside of maybe going through TSA at the airport.

And what a disgrace by NBC News and whichever other Uniparty Propaganda Outlets are pushing this angle: “Open borders are good because guacamole. Mmmmm.”

It’s an even greater disgrace that it’ll actually work on most people.