liberals

California Can’t Even Keep The Lights On

California has been in the midst of a major heatwave the past few days. Today it was over 110 degrees in Los Angeles. Woodland Hills, in the Los Angeles area, hit a record of 118 degrees. So the Mayor of LA ordered residents to turn off their air conditioners:

This is the reality of the third-world nation of California–America’s biggest state with nearly 40 million citizens, and which, if it were its own country, would be the 5th largest economy in the world. California has Hollywood and Silicon Valley, several top universities, and many of the nations richest citizens.

And they cannot figure out how to keep the grid working during a heat wave. I get that California has lots of people, and that it’s much hotter than most other states which puts its power grid under far more stress than other states. But they should still be able to figure this out.

Not allowed to use their air conditioners, Californians naturally flocked to the beach:

But the Coronavirus!

Turns out people would rather not die of heat stroke.

Liberals Spreading Misinformation With Doctored Photo on Social Media

Wow, Trump is JUST LIKE HITLER:

EZhKsOtX0Ao9Mwl

Trump is so evil and fascist, he gassed innocent Peaceful Protesters™ so he could go take his Hitler picture! Fascisty FASCIST!

I’m sorry, dummies, but the Hitler picture is fake. Here’s the original:

EZh6XX0U0AEX_fZ

I eagerly await the hordes of Blue Checks on social media to denounce this as a “doctored” image.

Any minute now, Twitter will “Fact Check” people sharing this image and flag them as Fake News.

The Paradox of Modern Liberalism

In one sentence:

Screen Shot 2020-02-07 at 7.49.17 PM.png

That’s it.

The reason they can’t answer the question is likely because they haven’t really thought about their ideology comprehensively. That is, they haven’t evaluated all of its individual positions for logical consistency with one another. It’s like how they support both Islam and gay rights when the former is incompatible with the latter. Or how they claim to advance black people’s interests while also supporting mass immigration, which harms black people the most economically.

Probably the reason they hold all these contradicting viewpoints is that they simply support whatever makes them feel good about themselves.

“I support open borders because I have compassion; I care about people.”

“I support universal healthcare because I have compassion; I care about people.”

“I support Islam because I support Oppressed Minorities™.”

“I support gay rights because I support Oppressed Minorities™.”

Most of it boils down to virtue signaling, whether conscious or unconscious.

(Also, many leftists are leftists because it’s socially desirable to be a leftist. They want to be on the same side as all their favorite celebrities and TV personalities. They want to be able to fit in with Mainstream Culture. They don’t want to be shunned by the herd.)

Lately I have made a concerted effort to not dump on normal, everyday leftwingers. The reason is because a. low-hanging fruit is generally the province of clickbaity, mainstream TPUSA-style Conservatives™, and b. because for the most part, it’s not leftists’ fault they are the way they are.

They’re programmed that way. 12 years of public schooling, 4 years of college, constant bombardment of propaganda by Hollywood, the media, Madison Avenue (i.e. the advertising industry) and Corporate America will do that. A sizable percentage of the population is what I would consider “Default Liberals,” meaning people who are liberals simply because that’s how they’ve been programmed. They’ve just accepted the propaganda and never questioned it.

Ordinary, everyday leftists are not our enemies; the Elites who have brainwashed them are our enemies. It’s a very important distinction.

We need to start focusing on the true enemy, and also recognize that there’s a lot of leftists out there that can one day be our allies.

The elites want us divided every which way, and probably the single greatest divide in this country today is political. If we spend all our time and energy on Owning The Libs, then we’re not focusing on the true enemy.

Some–I’d even say many–of the most effective voices on our side are ex-liberals. In fact, I’d say that more often than not, they make for the strongest advocates of America First nationalism, because they fully understand what we’re up against having been on the other side.

Honestly, looking back on it, I was basically a liberal for a long time. Of course, I considered myself a conservative, but basically I was a liberal who just wanted lower taxes. Again, I’ve never thought of myself as a liberal. I’ve never voted for a Democrat. But I didn’t care about immigration one way or another, and I basically thought the best course of action was to let the left win on gay marriage and abortion because they were silly social issues getting in the way of the Real Issues: simplifying the tax code and cutting taxes for big business so that big business would magically fix everything.

What I’m saying is, lots of people who are now our strongest allies were once liberals. Then, one day, they either opened their eyes or had their eyes opened by someone else.

Not everyone is born 💯🇺🇸😎Based & Redpilled💯🇺🇸😎.

So my goal is to both focus on the true enemy–the Beast–and open people’s eyes.

Sometimes tough love is necessary, and I’ll happily dish it out when needed. But if we’re going to open people’s eyes and redpill the Default Liberals, we can’t be hostile and malicious toward them. They’re already programmed to reject our ideas because they’ve been told we’re Racists, and there’s literally nothing worse than Racists, so just don’t listen to those Evil Racists.

For the most part, ridicule doesn’t change people’s minds. We’re not going to redpill them by ridiculing them.

But maybe pointing out these contradictions to them will plant the seed and nudge them in the right direction.

Save your ridicule and vitriol for the elites–the people who truly deserve it.

Partisan Politics is a Trick Used by the Uniparty Establishment to Divide and Conquer the People

The greatest trick the Establishment ever pulled was dividing the electorate into fiercely competitive and adversarial factions. The end result is that the people are fighting each other instead of their true enemy. Divide and conquer.

The main theme of traditional Left vs. Right American Politics has been Democrats having their fury trained on Big Businesses and how evil the Private sector is, while Republicans are fixated on the evils of big government.

Each side sees the other as the puppet of their great Satan: Democrats see Republicans as in thrall to big business, Republicans see the Democrats as the party of big government.

And here’s the thing: they’re both right.

But both sides miss the real problem: big business and big government are two sides of the same coin: the Uniparty.

The Uniparty is the unholy alliance of big business and big government.

As long as you’re missing the bigger picture and only focusing on one side, the Uniparty wins.

The great trick is to keep Democrats and Republicans divided and attacking one another instead of the Uniparty.

“But there’s lots of genuinely evil people on the left! We need to fight them!”

That’s true. I’m not saying there aren’t anti-white racists on the left. I’m not saying the abortion lovers aren’t out there and in need of thwarting. I’m not saying Antifa isn’t out there. There are indeed lots of genuinely bad people on the left, and it’s perfectly fine to oppose them and their agenda.

But they’re the minority. The vast majority of Democrats are decent people, albeit deeply misled. They’re all not the nutty, unrepentant lunatics we see on Twitter and on Fox News. Most Democrats aren’t going to bark at you about proper gender pronouns.

Democrats also need to realize Republicans aren’t all Evil Racist Nazis hellbent on killing everyone who isn’t a white Christian. Republicans aren’t all gun-toting inbred hicks.

The real enemy is the Uniparty Machine. It’s the big corporations and the politicians they control. Big business and big government have become one, and that’s the true enemy.

They’re the ones flooding our country with poor immigrants. They’re the ones shipping all the jobs overseas. They’re the ones causing housing bubbles. They’re the ones killing us with opioids and poisonous pharmaceutical drugs. They’re the ones who have decimated black families and inner cities.

Keep your eyes on the prize: the only way we will ever actually defeat and dislodge the corrupt Uniparty is when Americans finally realize who the true enemy is.

As long as we’re fighting each other, we’re not fighting the Uniparty.

Trump Exonerated, but Mueller Report Will Not Change a Thing

Readers of this site, but mainly the old site on Medium before it got deleted, will know that I have rejected this Trump Russia Collusion Conspiracy Theory since it began in late 2016.

I have constantly pushed back on everything: every leak, “bombshell,” and confident media declaration that the “Walls are closing in” every step of the way.

I haven’t written about the Russia probe much as of late because it has already been clear for months that there was no collusion or conspiracy with Russia. The whole thing had become boring, tedious. It stopped being fun to debunk the latest “bombshell” report on Trump and Russia because it became abundantly clear there never was any collusion.

But at long last, the day has come where Special Counsel Robert Mueller has concluded his investigation: there was no collusion.

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 7.19.54 PM.png

The reason I have pushed back since the start is because the premise of the whole thing was on-its-face absurd: it required believing Russia can actually alter the outcome of a US presidential election in the first place.

Collusion Conspiracy Theorists could never convincingly explain how Russia altered the outcome of the election. But they were willing to believe the implausible scenario that Russia Made Hillary Lose because in 2016 they had come to believe that her victory in the election was a given, and that there was no way she could possibly lose.

When Trump shocked everyone and won, Uniparty Establishment figures and Democratic voters did not have a reckoning with reality or ask themselves why they didn’t see it coming, and what prevented them from doing so. They didn’t say, “Hey, maybe we’ve been living in a bubble. Maybe we need to expose ourselves to other ideas and news sources so our worlds aren’t shattered like this again.”

No, instead what they did was concoct an outlandish excuse for why their supposedly unstoppable candidate lost to the candidate who supposedly had no chance: “Trump only won because he colluded with Russia!”

The Russia Collusion Conspiracy served two important needs for despondent leftists in the wake of Trump’s victory: it delegitimized the result of the election, and provided a way to hopefully overturn the result of that illegitimate election.

They didn’t believe in the Conspiracy because it was compelling, they believed it because they needed it to be true. Their goal since the election was to get Trump impeached as soon as possible, and the Mueller probe was the most promising means to that end.

In this regard, it was never really about Russian Collusion at all: that was merely a means to an end. It has always been about impeachment, and they will cling for dear life to whatever story they feel can lead them there: Russia Collusion, obstruction, Stormy Daniels, 25th Amendment, whatever. It’s always been about finding a means to an end.

The second reason to have been skeptical of Trump Russia Collusion from the start was the sheer ridiculousness of idea that Trump would actually reach out to Russia and basically sell his soul in exchange for the Presidency.

How could people come to believe that a prominent American businessman and celebrity, who has never before had his allegiance to America questioned, and who was never said to be in bed with the Russians, suddenly became a Russian Pawn in 2016? Where was all the Trump Russia talk before 2016? Trump had been famous for decades prior to running for president and there was never any talk that he was actually a traitor for the Russians.

It was always ludicrous to believe Russia had acquired an American Presidential candidate. It requires a ridiculous belief that the Kremlin is so powerful and omnipotent that it could actually steal the American presidency.

But people didn’t step back and think about how absurd the whole thing was. They didn’t ask themselves if it was more likely that Russia manipulated 63+ million Americans into voting for a Kremlin Pawn, or that the people who voted for Trump did so because he actually, I don’t know, genuinely appealed to them.

The third reason the Russian Collusion Conspiracy was always unbelievable is that as time passed and Republicans in Congress (namely Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows) and in the media (namely Mollie Hemingway, Lee Smith, Andy McCarthy, Michael Doran and Victor Davis Hanson, among many others) began pushing back on the narrative, they found compelling evidence that the whole thing was actually a set-up by the deep state and the media.

In other words, the real conspiracy has been revealed: the Clinton campaign, the Obama intelligence community, and the “mainstream media” worked together to attempt to frame Trump for Russian collusion. The fabrication emerged from them, not from any suspicious activity on Trump’s part. This is a critical distinction because it demonstrates the malicious nature of the whole thing: those peddling the Russian Collusion theory did not simply get it wrong, they knowingly leveled false accusations against this President for the sole purpose of taking him down.

Fourth, Trump Russia Truthers also could never explain how, if it was Wikileaks’ email dumps about Clinton that made her lose, why the public should not have been allowed to learn those **true facts** about Hillary Clinton.

First, during the campaign, they insisted that there was nothing important revealed about Hillary in the Wikileaks emails. Then, when Hillary lost, they claimed it was the Wikileaks emails that made her lose. Obviously both cannot be true, but let’s take them at their word on the last one because it is their official position now.

How is it that revealing true facts about Hillary Clinton constitutes “manipulating” an election, while hiding those very same true facts about Hillary Clinton was not in any way manipulating an election?

This was all lost in the hysteria over Wikileaks: why, exactly, was it bad that the public got to learn more about Hillary? Why should those emails have been kept secret? Only because they reflected badly on her, and many others in the media, in a negative light? I thought transparency was a good thing.

If the emails were full of false information, Clinton Partisans should have said so. But they didn’t. They only claim that the Wikileaks emails hurt Hillary and should have never been released, leading us to the inevitable conclusion that they would have preferred we remain in the dark about Hillary Clinton.

Even if you accept the premise that Wikileaks is a Kremlin “cut out” or whatever the media/Deep State started calling it, and even if you accept the premise that Wikileaks’ actions were the means by which Russia boosted and supported Donald Trump’s campaign, then how exactly does Wikileaks exposing true facts about Hillary Clinton constitute manipulating or rigging an election?

It would seem to me that the concealment of True Facts constitutes rigging an election more than the release of them.

And this is a position taken by all of the hardcore Russia Conspiracy Theorists in the media as well, just not when it comes to Hillary Clinton. Consider that they’ve been saying Trump’s hush money payments to Stormy Daniels and other models he slept with constitutes “manipulating an election” because he prevented the public from knowing the truth about him.

So for those with the capacity for free and independent thought, as well as a distrust of the “media,” it was quite clear all along that the Trump-Russia Collusion conspiracy theory was a load of nonsense.

And this leads to the next major point about the Mueller conclusion: it will not change much.

On our side, it’s not as if Trump supporters can possibly think any lower of the media.

Best case scenario it might cause prominent Republican journalists and pundits, who for some reason still give the “mainstream media” the benefit of the doubt and the presumption of good faith and credibility, to slowly realize the truth.

But on the whole, this will not turn many people against the “media.” If you don’t realize by now that the “mainstream media” is pure Uniparty Propaganda, you never will.

Democrats will not stop believing Trump colluded with Russia. And even the few who do give up the Collusion angle will still not give up the impeachment mission: they will quickly move on to the next pretend scandal.

I can’t tell you how many “IT’S MUELLER TIME” memes I’ve seen in response to Trump’s tweets, or in response to pro-Trump statements on social media: liberals thought it was a given that Mueller would bring down Trump. It was only a matter of time. They were so certain of it and will not just accept that they were massively wrong.

Just look at how out-of-control the Mueller worship was:

D2XBkOLWoAE6yv3.jpg

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.02.08 PM.png

coming-soon-fb-fbi-to-a-prison-near-you-every-27587507.png

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.02.34 PM.png

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.03.37 PM.png

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.02.53 PM.png

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.04.29 PM.png

And here’s my personal favorite:

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.04.59 PM.png

You can buy “It’s Mueller Time” pint glasses, shirts, mugs, signs, buttons and more:

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.06.11 PM.png

I hope it’s starting to sink in just how brainwashed these people are.

I mean, my goodness:

Here we have Bill Maher admitting he’s been brainwashed by the media, and that whatever cable news says, he believes.

This is the leftist mindset in a nutshell: they will not–cannot–accept reality.

This will not cause any additional people to lose faith in the media, including the people for whom this Mueller probe was their reason to get out of bed in the morning. Again, this is because it was never truly about Russian Collusion, but rather impeachment. The impeachment dream is still there even if the Russian Collusion dream is dead.

This will not cause any Democrats to reflect and reckon with reality. They will not think to themselves, “Boy, maybe I’ve misinformed and lied to. Maybe I should start listening to the people who have been calling this Russia business a hoax for the past two years.”

They won’t do that because it was never about letting the facts guide them. They didn’t believe in the Russia Collusion Conspiracy because it seemed to be true, but rather because they needed it to be true. It was based on emotion.

Worst of all, the media will not be held accountable for this, or anything else, ever. The media was doing exactly what it was designed for: relentlessly pumping out Democratic Party propaganda.

If you think there will be consequences for the media after this, you are wrong. They will move on from this like it never happened. Like they didn’t spend the past two-plus years screaming about Russian Collusion and the Walls Closing In and predicting Trump and his family would be carried out of the White House in handcuffs.

The “media” will move right on to the next bogus impeachment pipe dream as if this whole Russia business never happened.

Look at this spin:

A “cover-up”!

Really? I thought Mueller was the most honorable man in America:

Screen Shot 2019-03-24 at 8.05.41 PM.png

Now he’s part of the cover-up?

We don’t have a media. At least, the so-called “mainstream media” is not a media in any real sense: it is 100% a Uniparty propaganda factory.

To understand how bad things have gotten, recall that the New York Times and Washington Post won Pulitzer Prizes for their coverage of a made-up scandal. The Pulitzer Prize is, like the Academy Awards, now worthless and indicative of nothing but producing Uniparty propaganda.

If we actually had a media, this would ruin the careers of loads of prominent television personalities (they don’t deserve to be called journalists) and politicians, namely:

  1. CNN–the entire network.
  2. The Washington Post
  3. The New York Times
  4. Rachel Maddow
  5. Joe Scarborough & Mika Brzezinski
  6. Rep. Adam Schiff
  7. Rep. Jerry Nadler
  8. Rep. Maxine Waters
  9. Rep. Ted Lieu
  10. Benjamin Wittes

But we don’t have a media. We have a Uniparty Propaganda Department. And so none of those people or outlets will be punished or held accountable, because they were simply doing their jobs.

 

White Liberal Elites: Tolerance and Diversity for YOU, But Not For US

White leftists are known for their long-winded lectures on how Americans are stuck in the past and need to change their views to be more tolerant and open-minded about alternative lifestyles and changing cultural and demographic trends.

“Stop being such a Christian fundamentalist on homosexuality. You’re a dinosaur. It’s [current year]. Get with the program; there’s nothing wrong with being gay. For Pete’s sake, it’s [current year].”

You all need to be more open-minded, modern and progressive when it comes to gays, immigrants and minorities, they tell us.

Just know that they don’t really mean any of it. Not a word.

Look at how Mika Brzezinski tried to criticize Mike Pompeo:

Wait. Haven’t Mika and the rest of the white liberal elite been berating us regular Americans for our supposed insensitivity towards gays, and lecturing us that there’s Nothing Wrong With Being Gay? And then Mika says this?

The elites are not more accepting of homosexuality than the rest of us. They just pretend to be. In fact, they’re probably less accepting of it.

If an average American said what Mika said, it would be considered a “gay slur.” If they said something like this while at work, HR would be all over them. They’d be subject to mandatory sensitivity training at minimum, or more likely just fired.

If someone on Fox News said about Obama’s Secretary of State what Mika said about Trump’s, it would be a national media firestorm with wall-to-wall coverage, and the Fox person would certainly lose his or her job.

But here’s the thing: a Fox News conservative wouldn’t say something like Mika said. Because most prominent conservative commentators have been re-educated on the matter of homosexuality, among many other matters which we’ll get to shortly.

When a prominent conservative like Ben Shapiro says something like, “I’m colorblind when it comes to race,” or “I have no problem with homosexuality,” they probably genuinely mean it. Because they have actually taken the liberal elite’s lecturing to heart.

Over the past decade or so, most conservatives have come to believe that they really do need to “get with the program” and that they really were intolerant and bigoted.

Yes, in the back of their minds, they may still have their reservations about homosexuality, but they’ve repressed those reservations for long enough that for all intents and purposes, they not only tolerate homosexuality but often go out of their way to show how approving they are of it. As it pertains to most mainstream conservative pundits, if they truly don’t like gays, you’ll never know it because they’ll never say it out loud. It’s a prejudice that is confined entirely to their own private minds. As Steve Sailer once said, “What goes unsaid eventually goes unthought.”

In contrast, white liberal elites like Mika, who love to call regular Americans homophobes, don’t care who knows what they really think about homosexuality. All that stuff they say about how using “gay” as an insult hurts and oppresses the gay community? Yeah, all of it went out the window the moment Mika called Mike Pompeo “butt boy.”

The supposedly enlightened and progressive white liberal elites constantly lecturing us don’t actually believe a word of what they say. And it’s not just about gays.

You think the white liberal elite is excited about America becoming a majority-minority nation? Maybe for you they are. But for Dem politicians, it’s only because they’ll benefit electorally. And for rich liberals, it’s only because they’ll get cheap gardeners and janitors. Remember when Kelly Osborne tried to argue against Trump’s immigration policies by saying “If you kick every Latino out of this country, then who is going to be cleaning your toilet?” That’s how they view immigration: more Latinos equals cleaner toilets and more Mexican food options!

Hispanic immigrants, to white liberal elites, are little more than a permanent underclass of servants.

The white liberal elite does not want minorities and immigrants living in their gated, mostly-white communities–they just want them living in your communities. As Victor Davis Hanson put it earlier this year:

“For those who live at the nexus of illegal immigration, life is lived quite differently than in the past, from the trivial to the existential. A few examples suffice. Last night I was awakened by automatic gunfire on the road at 2 a.m.; the shots came from a long-ago-sold farmhouse of one who was a friend and neighbor for 50 years, but whose house is now rented out to gang members, many from Mexico. No worry, within an hour, the shrieks of resumed cockfighting returned as usual.

[. . .] The logic of illegal immigration is that the guilty host must accommodate the uninvited but more virtuous guest, not vice versa. When I find a dumped rotten canine carcass with a rope still around its skeletonized neck or a tossed disemboweled chicken, I surely must not privilege my own culture and think that dog- or cockfighting is barbaric. Perhaps the pile of used hypodermic needles dumped by my barn were left by accident? Today I pick up sacks of wet garbage with the owner’s name and address on several bills: Does one redeliver back to the dumper, and if so, armed or not? Or does one find it not cost-effective to do so? (Do not suggest “call the authorities” — that is a complete waste of time.) These are the small, mostly trite decisions that a person at the nexus of illegal immigration makes every day.

When Jerry Brown or Nancy Pelosi lectures the state on its illiberality, or on the immigration sins of Donald Trump, or the advantages of nullification and a sanctuary state, we assume that these are just the penultimate chest poundings and virtue signals of rich septuagenarians about to go into apartheid retirements in Napa or Grass Valley.”

The white liberal elite lectures us about being more tolerant and inclusive while our communities are destroyed, yet they all live in gated white communities.

If you ask them, they’re doing us a favor by making our communities more “diverse.” We should be thanking them, because we all know Diversity Is Our Strength. It’s what they’ve been drilling into our heads over and over for years.

But when they say “Diversity Is Our Strength,” they don’t mean their strength. Turns out they’re not huge fans of diversity when it pertains to themselves.

White leftists in California want more more more more more immigration, but they don’t want their kids in the same schools as the children of those immigrants:

“Why not cease the current stampede to private academies that has left the public schools of the greater coastal corridor non-diverse and near apartheid?

The huge Los Angeles Unified School District is now over 70 percent Latino, as whites and Asians have fled the arrival of immigrant children. It’s much the same in Silicon Valley, where private prep schools are expanding enrollments to meet the demand from affluent members of the tech industry.”

Private, mostly-white schools for the white liberal elite; public, integrated schools for your children.

But I thought Diversity is a universal and unquestioned Good Thing? I thought we could all benefit a little Diversity in our boring, plain white lives? Apparently they were only talking about us, not themselves. They don’t need any Diversity, they’re perfect the way they are. It’s us plebes who need to see the light.

Prior to leaving office, President Obama mandated that America’s suburbs get more “diverse” by taking aim at restrictions against low income housing in traditionally wealthier, whiter neighborhoods.

However, upon leaving office, Barack and Michelle then moved into a multi-million dollar mansion in Kalorama Heights, one of the whitest, wealthiest and most exclusive neighborhoods in D.C. The Obamas’ neighborhood is described as “diplomat-studded” and their neighbors include current and former Cabinet Secretaries, Supreme Court Justices and the world’s richest man, Jeff Bezos.

For some reason, I don’t think Obama was talking about Kalorama Heights when he said the suburbs need to be more “diverse.”

This is how they roll.

But you? You’ve taken to heart all their accusations of your intolerance and benightedness.

The average American has listened to what the elites said about his outdated thinking on gays and is now more accepting of homosexuality than the elite.

The average American is more open to living next door to someone of a different race than are the elite.

The average American is more willing to allow immigrants into his community than are the leftwing elite.

You can tell this is the case from slip-ups like Mika’s. At the end of the day, homosexuality is still an insult in her mind. Her go-to insult for Mike Pompeo is “butt boy.”

Steve Colbert tried to “burn” Trump by saying, “The only thing Donald Trump’s mouth is good for is being Putin’s cock holster.” And the left loved it. “Ohhh! Snap! SICK BURN, Colbert! Trump, you just got owned! FAG! YOU’RE GAY, TRUMP! HA HA HA HA”

When you say it, it’s a “gay slur.” When they say it, it’s a SICK BURN.

These are the same people that piously call us bigots at every opportunity.

For decades leftwing elites have browbeaten us normal Americans for our supposed bigotry, intolerance and lack of open minds–to the point where in an amazingly short period of time, the leftwing elite has basically retrained tens of millions of Americans into genuinely accepting things which were almost universally rejected for decades.

Did you know that in 2004, only 31% of Americans supported gay marriage, while in 2018 the number has doubled to 62%. That’s a remarkable shift in attitudes nationwide and it was mostly driven by sanctimonious lecturing from leftwing elites like Mika Brzezinski and Steven Colbert.

For most of our history, the average American has basically gone off of his natural human instincts: disapproving of homosexuality because it’s a deviation from the norm; skeptical of other races because people innately prefer to live among those who are the same as they are; worried about the demographic transformation of their nation and communities because that’s the way human beings have been hard-wired for millennia.

Yet the white liberal elites told us we were not only misguided for going by our natural human instincts, but terrible people as well. We’re bigots, racists, homophobes, transphobes, Islamophobes. This constant shaming and lecturing from white liberal elites has actually had the effect of profoundly changing American attitudes towards gays, trannies, racial minorities and immigrants. It’s kind of unprecedented.

As far as tolerance of gays goes, we’re probably the most “progressive” society since at least the ancient Greeks, perhaps the Romans (things got pretty gay towards the end of Rome, as Richard Nixon noted when he remarked “the last six Roman emperors were fags.”)

Racially? Come on. No other country on earth has all the races living together. Name me one other country that has significant numbers of whites, blacks, Hispanics, East Asians, South Asians and Middle Easterners. It’s no contest. America is the most racially inclusive and harmonious society the world has ever known. Furthermore, virtually every white American goes out of their way to avoid doing anything that could get them labeled a “racist.” Most white Americans live in a state of constant fear of being labeled “racist” because it could result in losing one’s job, friends and social status. Daily life in white America is now basically a continual (and ultimately futile) struggle to prove that one is Not Racist–just like the white liberal elites want.

Immigration? Gallup polls show that, worldwide, over 700 million people desire to emigrate from their home countries. Most of them currently live in Africa or Latin America. And guess where they want to move? America. 21% name America as their preferred destination, far and away the top choice. The next highest country on the list of most desired locations for immigrants is Germany with 6%. Then on the list come Canada, the UK, France and Australia. (Wow! Would you look at that! All predominantly white countries ruled by liberals who constantly criticize the native populations for being racist.) If America is intolerant towards immigrants, then why do so many hundreds of millions still desperately want to come here?

These elite white liberals are completely full of it. Even by their own twisted standards, which are designed to constrain and oppress you, you are infinitely more virtuous, tolerant and open-minded than they are. Do not ever let them lecture you on your own backwardness again. They can’t tell you shit.