ministry of truth

The New York Times Goes Full-Blown 1984-level Propaganda: “Pregnancy Kills. Abortion Saves Lives.”

Please excuse me while I pick my jaw up off the floor:

Please read that again: “Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

“Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

“Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

“Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

“Pregnancy kills. Abortion saves lives.”

They really just don’t give a fuck anymore, huh?

They’re like, “We’re telling massive lies straight to your faces and we don’t even care who knows it lol.” They want you to know that there’s nothing you can do to stop them.

Uniparty propaganda is now so shameless that they’re straight-up saying “Pregnancy kills, abortion saves lives.”

The end-goal of their propaganda is now more obvious than ever: depopulation.

The Uniparty elites support abortion because the elites support depopulation. Smaller populations are more easily controlled.

Of course they’ve convinced the useful idiots in the streets that abortion is about a “woman’s right to choose,” but it’s not. It’s about depopulation and eugenics.

Haven’t you noticed just how many of their policy initiatives result in depopulation?

Do you think the elites are unaware of the fact that the US has aborted over 61 million babies since 1973? And that over 1.5 billion babies have been aborted worldwide since 1980?

Virtually nothing happens that they don’t want and plan to happen. You cannot seriously believe that the Uniparty elite doesn’t know exactly what the score is.

What’s the end-goal of “environmentalism”? It’s not Saving The World–the world doesn’t need saving.

The end-goal is you not having kids:

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 4.54.58 PM.png

If you want to Save The Planet™, do your part by not having children!

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 4.55.15 PM.png

Because A Study™ said so!

What’s the point of so-called “Female Empowerment”?

Depopulation. If women are working into their 30s and beyond, they’re having fewer kids. Working women are great the for the Uniparty: first of all, they’re an untapped supply of labor, which in turn drives down the price of labor. Second of all, working women aren’t having children, leading a declining birthrate, which in turn the Uniparty’s propaganda outlets will use to say, “We are in a population crisis! The only way to solve it is with millions of more poor, third-world immigrants!”

Why does the elite celebrate and promote homosexuality? Because it’s sterile. The elite wants more and more gay people because that means fewer births.

I already know what you’re going to say: “But you’re born gay! How can the elite create more gay people?!”

First of all, you are not born gay. There is no evidence of any “gay gene” existing, and that’s according to a 143-page John’s Hopkins study from 2016:

“Studies of the brains of homosexuals and heterosexuals have found some differences, but have not demonstrated that these differences are inborn rather than the result of environmental factors that influenced both psychological and neurobiological traits,” the report explained. “One environmental factor that appears to be correlated with non-heterosexuality is child sexual abuse victimization, which may also contribute to the higher rates.”

The study was unable to conclude specifically why people are gay, but it was clear in stating that there is not anywhere near sufficient evidence to prove people are born gay.

It’s one of those things people just believe because, well, that’s what Good People believe. Plus they’ve heard it repeated a bunch of times on TV, in movies, on the news, etc.

This goes to show you that repeating something enough times does, in fact, make it “true”–at least in people’s minds.

But “Born This Way” has never been proven by actual science.

Which means sexuality is either a conscious choice, or it’s a product of external/environmental influences. What might those external influences be? Well, like the study said, being sexually abused as a child is a big one. Other non-sexual forms of emotional trauma are another. Then there’s the influence of viewing pornography starting at an early age. And then finally there’s the cultural/social angle of it, meaning propaganda and indoctrination.

How else do you explain the fact that Millennials are “the gayest generation“?

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.33.46 PM.png

Millennials are also the generation that has been most bombarded with pro-gay propaganda. Big coincidence, I’m sure!

In 2017, NBC News reported the results of a survey that showed 20% of millennials identified as LGBT.

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.35.29 PM.png

Gay people have historically been around 2-4% of the population, and now all the sudden we have a generation that’s 20% gay–meaning 5-10x gayer than previous ones?

You’re telling me that’s not a product of cultural brainwashing and propaganda?

If being gay was entirely biological and natural, we would expect the gay proportion of the population to remain static or at least fluctuate very little over time. If one’s sexuality has nothing to do with external factors, we would expect the gay percentage of the population to be the same today as it was in 1919, 1519 and even 2019 B.C. But it’s not. All of the sudden it’s skyrocketing.

So that means either people today are being brainwashed to be gay or the Uniparty is putting something in the water to turn people gay.

Could be both, honestly.

It’s pretty simple: Pro-gay propaganda makes it socially desirable to be gay. More people than ever nowadays are claiming to be gay. It’s obvious what’s going on.

Folks, there are no accidents in politics. This is not all just a coincidence.

Today’s ruling Uniparty elite is every bit as obsessed with eugenics as the Nazis were. They just go about it in less-obvious ways.

The Uniparty Elite may not have death camps (at least that we know about) but 61 million aborted babies in the US since 1973 speaks for itself.

And the above whopper by the New York Times claiming that pregnancy kills and abortion saves lives is not the first time America’s supposed “paper of record” has gone to bat for the Depopulation Agenda:

Screen Shot 2019-03-26 at 12.06.44 PM.png

Parenting is so hard these days. Better to just avoid it altogether.

“But,” you may ask, “if the Elite want depopulation, then why do they want more immigrants to solve the supposed population crisis?”

Because poor immigrants from the third world are easily controlled. Just give them Free Shit from the government and they’re yours.

The goal is to depopulate America of Americans and repopulate it with “New Americans” who will be subservient to the Uniparty Agenda.

If you haven’t noticed, the Democratic Party’s dominance of national elections is based entirely on foreign-born voters:

Screen Shot 2019-05-22 at 6.17.31 PM.png

No wonder Republicans have only won the popular vote once since 1988.

The goal is to sever our connection to 1776 because of what America As Founded represents: individual liberty, freedom of speech, self-determination, actual human empowerment, self-government, the right to bear arms, etc.

All of those things are Problematic for the Uniparty. And so this is why they want to depopulate America of Americans and repopulate it with poor foreigners who don’t really understand what it means to be free, and who have no connection to 1776.

Are you getting it now?

The Uniparty elite wants all the statues and monuments to the past erased and removed. That’s all part of the plan. Don’t you understand how it works by now? First they come for the stuff that nobody will defend, like the Confederate Statues, then they’ll come for the George Washingtons and Thomas Jeffersons–because they owned slaves!

And, oh, wouldja lookit that? Mayor Pete Buttwhatever is now calling for the erasure of Thomas Jefferson’s name from American society.

They come after the indefensible targets first, then they go for their real targets. That’s why they banned Alex Jones and Milo first. Then they’ll come for the “more reasonable” dissidents like Paul Joseph Watson and Steven Crowder, etc.

They want this country to completely start over–without any of that bullshit the original Founding Fathers came up with, like the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence.

They want an America where the people don’t know what it means to be free. And they’re gonna get it, too.

Depopulation is the means; power and control are the ends.

 

“Media” Brainwashing Works

I present to you the result of American “media” propaganda:

This kid has no idea why he’s kneeling. He only knows that he’s seen Famous People On TV kneeling for the national anthem.

Propaganda works. Our children are being indoctrinated by evil people to believe lies.

 

Is Ruth Bader Ginsburg the Real Reason Pelosi is Trying to Prevent the SOTU?

I’m sure most of us assumed Nancy Pelosi’s reasons for preventing President Trump from delivering the annual State of the Union address in the House chamber were a combination of the following:

  1. Straight-up pettiness.
  2. A pathetic attempt to gain leverage over Trump.
  3. An attempt to actively suppress the President’s voice and prevent him from speaking directly to the nation about his immigration policies.

But what if it has something to do with the potential incapacitation or even death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg? During a State of the Union address, the nine Supreme Court Justices join the House and Senate bodies in the audience, and sit prominently in the front row, meaning Ginsburg would be in attendance.

If the State of the Union address is held and she is not in attendance, it raises some obvious questions: Where is she? What is the state of her health? How long has she been unable to leave her home? When will she be able to return? Is she able to fully carry out her duties as a Supreme Court Justice in her state?

Perhaps the real reason Pelosi is stonewalling the State of the Union is because she wants to delay it until Ginsburg is healthy enough to attend.

Or, many are even suggesting it’s because Ginsburg already dead and the Democrats are trying to keep it a secret for as long as possible.

Keep in mind that Ginsburg hasn’t been seen publicly in weeks and the Uniparty media could not be less interested in finding out why. I’ve seen some claims that she was last seen 18 days ago, but when I Googled “Ruth Bader Ginsburg last public appearance” the top result was from December 15, 2018, when she did an interview in New York with NPR. We don’t really have a solid answer for when she was last seen.

Also, recall that when First Lady Melania Trump underwent a medical procedure and wasn’t seen in public for several weeks back in May 2018, the media was all over it: “FIRST LADY HASN’T BEEN SEEN IN 18 DAYS!!!” the headlines blared:

Screen Shot 2019-01-28 at 1.12.19 PM.png

So the media definitely keeps tabs on these things. They are fully aware of how long it has been since Ginsburg was last seen, yet they’re not asking any questions and demanding to know the truth. That’s because they already know the truth and are in fact working to cover it up, rather than expose it.

We know how important Ginsburg is to the left. If she leaves the Supreme Court and Trump appoints her successor, the court will have a 6-3 Republican majority. This will be a major sea change moment in the history of the court.

Leftists know the end is near for Ginsburg, yet persist in a state of willful self-delusion over the whole thing, with “journalists” writing pathetic propaganda pieces about how she supposedly is a gym rat and her workouts are so intense that even young men in their 20s can’t handle them.

Is it that much of a stretch to believe the Democrats and their propagandists in the media are covering up the true state of Ginsburg’s health, or even that she is dead?

Would you put it past the Democrats? Would you put it past the Uniparty media?

I’m not saying I think Ginsburg is already dead, because I don’t see how Democrats would benefit from keeping that a secret–unless they really are planning on keeping it a secret for the next two years, when they hope to have a Democrat in the White House.

At most they could delay the news of her death breaking a few weeks, perhaps a month. What would they gain from that?

It’s possible they’re trying to wait out the end of the current Supreme Court term, which ends in late June. The Supreme Court generally hears cases from October through June, with the months July through September being off-months.

But can they really go full Weekend At Bernie’s with her until July? No way, right? Even if the Uniparty media works tirelessly to stonewall and keep the secret, it will somehow get out over the course of the next five months. It’s impossible to keep that a secret.

Right now, their official line is that Ginsburg is healthy and recovering at home, “staying on top of her work” there. What’s more likely is that her clerks and staff are doing everything for her, writing her opinions for her and making statements to the press.

But even this is unacceptable: a major part of being a Supreme Court Justice is being present in the courtroom and hearing the oral arguments of a case. Right now we have eight of the nine Justices present hearing arguments.

At the very least, we deserve to have a time frame for when Justice Ginsburg will be back and able to fulfill the requirements of her job. If she has to miss work for an extended period of time, she owes it to the American people to at the very least say so.

Preferably, Ginsburg would just resign and spend her remaining days with her loved ones, but Democrats will not allow that to happen.

***

Fox News briefly ran this graphic last week, then claimed it was a “technical error”:

5c45eed32bdd7f285a6ccf13-750-375.jpg

Why would they even have the graphic prepared in the first place? How could they accidentally run it?

Could it be that the person responsible for putting the graphic on live TV was either not in-the-know that Fox’s official stance on the matter was to be part of the cover-up? After all, Fox has been slowly becoming more and more anti-Trump and pro-Establishment as of late. Or, could the person who ran the graphic potentially have been trying to subvert his Establishment superiors and get the truth out to the public?

This is more believable than, “Whoops, due to a technical error we accidentally created a graphic for Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death, and then also accidentally put it on live television for the whole country to see.”

What’s Going on With Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Health?

The Ministry of Truth is in full phalanx-mode over Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s health. What, exactly, is going on with her? We can’t get a straight answer. The only time any news of Ginsburg’s health is mentioned in the Uniparty “media” is when they can spin it into a positive.

Yet clearly she’s not doing well. Back in September, she made an appearance at George Washington University Law School in front of a large crowd, and could barely keep her head up. Not only that, merely speaking seemed taxing and laborious for her. Look at this footage:

She is obviously in failing health. It often took her a while to respond to questions, she loses her train of thought, and her voice is soft and weak. She weighs no more than 70-80 pounds and can barely lift her head.

We are not buying for a second that this woman is in good health.

As we recently heard, she had cancer “nodules” (I put the word in quotes only because I have no idea what a “nodule” is and don’t want to pretend otherwise) removed from her lungs. A week ago, the Supreme Court’s official statement on the matter was as follows:

“Post-surgery evaluation indicates no evidence of remaining disease, and no further treatment is required.”

According to the Ministry of Truth, she’s fit as a fiddle and ready to get back into her Killer Workouts which are so balls-to-the-wall a 27-year-old POLITICO reporter could not even handle them. Doctors estimate that Ginsburg will live to be 117, and plans to run in the Boston Marathon this summer.

Okay, I made some of that stuff up, but sadly not all of it.

Anyone with a functioning brain can see that the woman in the video above is clearly in failing health and has no business being on the Supreme Court in that state. It’s straight-up cruel of Democrats to force her to remain on the bench in her condition solely because of their overriding and all-consuming hatred of Donald Trump. They don’t care a lick about her as a person, they only care about #Resisting Trump. If they had any compassion at all, they’d let her retire and live out her remaining days in peace and privacy with her friends and family.

Returning to the original question of her cancer: maybe it’s just me, but does anyone else have no recollection of hearing about her being diagnosed with cancer several months back? I do not remember hearing anything about it in the Uniparty “media”. Do you?

A Google search shows that Minitrue remarked on Ginsburg’s cancer surgery on December 21 of last year, but only the surgery.

I narrowed the dates on the search to prior to Dec. 21, 2018, but nothing came up–nothing about a diagnosis of cancer:

dsafadsfasfa.PNG

As far as I can tell the general public had no idea Ruth Bader Ginsburg had cancer prior to December 21, 2018.

I’m not talking about when she was diagnosed with colon cancer in 1999, or pancreatic cancer in 2009.

I’m talking about this past year. Where was the announcement that she had lung cancer?

It doesn’t appear there was one.

A physician named Brian Joondeph wrote an opinion column yesterday in the Daily Caller asking a few questions about Ginsburg’s recent surgery:

“The statement is curious, however. As a physician myself, I am acutely aware of medical wording and nuance. With medical malpractice attorneys hiding behind every corner, physicians are careful how they create medical statements, especially when there is little absolute certainty in the medical world.

“No evidence of remaining disease” could simply mean that they removed the two cancerous nodules they found on a lung scan after her recent fall. If these nodules represent cancer that spread from her previous colon or pancreas cancer, the doctors removed what they found in her lungs. This doesn’t speak for cancer that might have spread to her liver, brain or bones.

“No further treatment is required” might imply that she is cancer free. It could also suggest the opposite, that she has metastatic cancer that is no longer treatable, other than hospice care, and that further treatment is futile at this point, hence not required.

The media were giddy with excitement that the liberal lion of the court was ready to get back to her job of thwarting President Trump. TMZ caught a glimpse of her, “emerging for the first time” from her Washington, D.C., apartment. CBS reported that her recovery is “on track” with “no sign of remaining cancer.”

Fox News echoed the others by saying her recovery was “on track”, although they curiously described her recent surgery as, “early-stage lung cancer surgery.” Not so if it was metastatic cancer, meaning stage four and quite advanced.”

The bottom line here is that Minitrue is oddly tight-lipped about Ginsburg’s health as of late. We don’t fully know what’s going on.

And this isn’t just me saying that; it’s a practicing physician saying it. She might have stage-four cancer and we wouldn’t even know.

All this leads to the recent (within the past few days) rumors swirling that Ginsburg now has pneumonia and is in failing health. Of course, there’s nothing about her possibly having pneumonia coming from the Ministry of Truth, but a website called the Santa Monica Observer was the first to report it two days ago:

“As any reader of the Santa Monica Observer knew last September, Ruth Bader Ginsburg has developed lung cancer. The 85 year old Supreme Court Justice had surgery as quietly as possible on December 22, 2018.

Following surgery, she has developed complications including pneumonia. Pneumonia often afflicts elderly post surgery patients in the US, since antibiotics have resulted in Multi Resistant Strains of the lung infection.

The left and the main stream media have tried to put on a brave face as Ginsburg missed three straight days of argument this week, interviewing cancer doctors to say that she would recover. They claimed that she was working in her hospital room, knowing that it was untrue.

No one in the media or in the Democratic party want to face the awful truth that President Donald Trump is about to replace one of the Court’s most liberal justices.”

You might be thinking, “What the hell is the Santa Monica Observer? No credibility.” That’s a valid concern because I, too, had never heard of the Santa Monica Observer until today, but apparently they were the first to report on her initial lung cancer diagnosis back in September, which they were then attacked by Minitrue over, even though it wound up being borne out by events:

“When we broke the news in September, which we obtained from a confidential source in Justice Ginsburg’s inner circle, the left went on attack.

Snopes.com labelled our prediction that Ginsburg would undergo cancer surgery then retire, #FakeNews. Sadly it wasn’t.”

Here’s what Santa Monica Observer said in September:

“U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has had a re-occurrence of malignant melanoma, she has told her law clerks. Ginsburg was treated in 1999 for colon cancer and had surgery in 2009 for pancreatic cancer.

She has told key Democratic members of the Senate about her medical condition, including ranking Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee Dianne Feinstein. This explains in part the “take no prisoners” attitude of the Democrats during the Kavanaugh nomination, carefully orchestrating weak 37 year old allegations against Kavanaugh by Women he barely remembers knowing in High School and College.”

Is Santa Monica Observer correct? Only time will tell, but the pneumonia rumors are swirling and have more credence now given that Fox News just reported Ginsburg had to back out of a scheduled speaking event in New York that is not until February 6.

If Ginsburg is so healthy and fully recovered, as the Ministry of Truth is reporting/wishing, then why did she back out of this scheduled event that is taking place several weeks in the future?

A site called “Inquisitr” tried to “debunk” the recent pneumonia rumors with an article headlined, “Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is Not Fighting ‘For Her Life’ With Pneumonia, Despite Outlet’s Claim.” But the Inquisitr piece only attacks the credibility of the Santa Monica Observer, pointing out that SMO claimed Ginsburg had melanoma when in reality it was an early form of lung cancer.

However, we don’t know that she doesn’t have melanoma. We have only been told by Official Sources that she had the lung cancer cleaned up.

And even if we grant that SMO was incorrect about the melanoma claim, they were still correct overall about her having some form of cancer, and that was back in September.

In case you were wondering, apparently, lung cancer surgery often leads to pneumonia for older patients. Joondeph:

“The latest concern is that Justice Ginsburg could develop pneumonia, a common complication of lung surgery, particularly in the elderly and infirm. Pneumonia is often called “the old man’s friend” not to be sexist but because, “left untreated, the sufferer often lapses into a state of reduced consciousness, slipping peacefully away in their sleep, giving a dignified end to a period of often considerable suffering.”

The bottom line is, if Ruth Bader Ginsburg has pneumonia, we are not going to hear about it from the media.

Her health is a closely guarded secret, which can only mean that the outlook is not good.

A Step Closer to 1984

This is military-grade gaslighting from the Washington Post:

dsafdsffdsdsfsfdsafsf.PNG

Um, a President making a political argument isn’t “propaganda.” It’s politics.

We need to establish an Iron Law: whenever the “media” accuses our side of some offense, they, not us, are invariably guilty, and egregiously so, of that very thing.

They’re the fucking propagandists.

It is pure gaslighting and full-on psychological abuse to accuse Trump of propagandizing. He’s the President. Every President since the invention of the television has gone on TV to make his case for his preferred policies.

The difference now is that Trump is the first one to actually pose a threat to the Uniparty’s grip on power.

A couple more points about this headline:

  1. It’s in the “Style” section?
  2. “The Washington Post: Democracy Dies in Darkness.” The article headline directly below it: Smother this President’s message in darkness. But I guess “Democracy” for them is a subjective term: only certain groups and politicians qualify for it.

But the most important takeaway here is that they are now comfortable with floating the idea of censoring President Trump so that he cannot get his message to the American people. They want to leverage their power over our televisions. It won’t be long until they actually do it.

It will probably happen before the 2020 election, honestly. They can’t take the risk that Trump is reelected, so they’ll go full 1984 on him in order to stop him.

They’re claiming this is to prevent Orange Man from “spreading misinformation” and “propaganda”–because they’re the only ones who get to do that!–but it’s obvious they want to “edit” and censor him because he’s too effective at making the case for his policies and worldview, and against theirs.

The Uniparty Elite cannot simply allow a guy like Trump to undermine them and all the power they have amassed over the past several decades simply because Trump had the audacity to get elected President.

They had a good thing going for a long time, and Trump is ruining it. So now they’re openly floating the idea of silencing the President of the United States.

This is nothing new, either: they’ve wanted to ban him from Twitter for a while.

And now a Washington Post writer thinks the networks should decide what a President can and cannot say to the nation:

“After Tuesday night’s debacle in the Oval Office, television network executives should be spending the day in their spacious offices practicing a simple word: No.

No, Mr. President, you may not break into prime-time programming to fundraise and mislead.

They’ll need to practice because you can be sure that the request will come again. And again.

Let’s be clear: There was no — zero — news in President Trump’s address to the nation last night.

There were high-drama quotes: “crisis of the soul.” There was fearmongering: “I’ve met with dozens of families whose loved ones were stolen by illegal immigration.”

But there wasn’t anything of substance that we haven’t heard many times before.”

If they had their way, Trump would never be allowed to say what he wants on TV. He would never be allowed to make his case for his preferred policies. The TV networks would overrule him. They’d say, “No, Trump, you’re not allowed to say this on our network. We don’t believe there is any substance. The nation does not need to hear this.” And then he would be banned from Twitter so he couldn’t make his case there, too.

The bottom line is that they want to regain control over the messaging. They want to cut him off from the American people.

They want him entirely silenced, and it’s because he’s too effective. It is absolutely not because he lies so much. It’s because they lie so much and cannot allow the American people to hear the truth.

I’m done pretending any of this is motivated by honest political disagreement, too.

This is a ruling oligarchy desperate to crush all dissent. Nothing more.

Other liberal fascists like Don Lemon have promoted the idea of putting Trump’s speeches on tape delay so that The Networks, who know what’s best for us, can decide what the we see and, more importantly what we don’t.

Don’t worry, they’re going to just censor out All Of Trump’s Lying Lies because they don’t need them clouding our perfectly molded and programmed minds. They’re just going to show us the highlights–only the stuff that’s relevant and deemed appropriate!

I, for one, appreciate the Ministry of Truth’s looking out for us. They have our best interests in mind, not their own!

Big Brother Loves Me Back!

Y’know, it would probably be best if they just censored Trump out of our lives entirely.

They Know Best.

Got that?

John Sexton brings up a great point:

“Wasn’t it just a few weeks ago that the media rallied around Jim Acosta to ensure he wouldn’t lose his press access to shout things at the President? Now the same people want to take the public microphone away from the President himself. And they expect us to believe partisanship has nothing to do with it.”

If Jim Acosta loses his White House Press pass and can no longer freely shout partisan talking points over the President, it is the greatest crisis of human rights in the history of Western Civilization.

But it is Responsible and Good for them to censor the President and determine what he can and cannot say to the nation over the airwaves.

Enemy. Of. The People.

***

More and more each day I’m convinced this country is already past the point of no return. There is no reasoning with people who are this malevolent and controlling.

The political divide is not between two competing but equal sides, left and right. It’s between the ruling class and the subjects.

It’s dominant culture vs. counterculture. The People vs. the Deep State.

You might disagree with your neighbor on healthcare or what the marginal tax rate should be, but ultimately you’re going to be on the same side when the shit hits the fan because at the end of the day, you’re both Subjects of the ruling class.

Right now in France, left and right have basically converged in their mutual disgust and discontent with the government: the Yellow Vests come from across the political spectrum. The movement has transcended politics and become a popular rebellion against the ruling class.

That’s what the future holds in America. It’ll be top vs. bottom, not left vs. right.

Former NYT Editor States the Obvious: “NYT Unmistakably Anti-Trump”

Obviously we all know this to be true, but it’s significant who this is coming from:

“A former executive editor of the New York Times says the paper’s news pages, the home of its straight-news coverage, have become “unmistakably anti-Trump.”

Jill Abramson, the veteran journalist who led the newspaper from 2011 to 2014, says the Times has a financial incentive to bash the president and that the imbalance is helping to erode its credibility.

In a soon-to-be published book, “Merchants of Truth,” that casts a skeptical eye on the news business, Abramson defends the Times in some ways but offers some harsh words for her successor, Dean Baquet. And Abramson, who was the paper’s only female executive editor until her firing, invoked Steve Bannon’s slam that in the Trump era the mainstream media have become the “opposition party.”

Here’s the money quote:

“Though Baquet said publicly he didn’t want the Times to be the opposition party, his news pages were unmistakably anti-Trump,” Abramson writes, adding that she believes the same is true of the Washington Post.

“Some headlines contained raw opinion, as did some of the stories that were labeled as news analysis.”

We all know this to be true, but now it’s so obvious and undeniable that even former editors of the New York Times are saying it.

Remember, Jill Abramson is such a leftist she keeps an Obama doll in her purse. But the Times is too partisan even for her.

I keep saying: the “mainstream” media is nothing more than the propaganda arm of the Uniparty Establishment. The acronyms may change–CNN, NYT, ABC, CBS, NBC, WP, AP–but they’re all just different names for the same Uniparty Propaganda factory known at this site as the Ministry of Truth.

That last point Abramson made, though, about the headlines containing “raw opinion” along with the stories that were “labeled as news analysis”: that’s where the real problem lies. That’s true propaganda.

Over Christmas I was on a cruise, and the newspaper they had for breakfasts was a little condensed version of the New York Times in pamphlet form. I took a picture of it one day because the front page was a shining example of propaganda disguised as news:

Screen Shot 2019-01-02 at 12.16.13 PM.png

You’re getting straight-up opinion on the front page of the paper. The whole entire newspaper is an opinion section. The main problem is that they not only refuse to admit it, but they will vehemently and righteously deny any bias at all.

“As he rattles market, Trump blames Fed.”

“Stung by rebuke, Trump forces Mattis out early.”

It’s all opinion disguised as news.

And now it’s so bad that even former editors of the paper are admitting it.

We need to stop treating these Ministry of Truth organs as legitimate news outlets. They deserve none of the prestige and credibility they are and have been bestowed.