The virus, the riots and the mayhem all prove one thing: the elites are getting desperate.
If their power was secure, none of these drastic actions would be necessary. The elites are waging mass psychological warfare on the American people in the form of months of quarantines and mass terror in the form of riots, and it’s all because they’re afraid.
They need this country divided and on the brink of civil war.
The more desperate they get, the worse the news will tell you things are.
This is their Hail Mary, their kitchen sink, their desperation ploy.
They’re only doing this because they feel threatened. They feel their power and influence slipping away.
Nobody trusts the news anymore. Everyone knows Hollywood is a pedophile-infested cesspool. Everyone knows about the Deep State now. The Uniparty does not control the White House for the first time in decades.
The elites wouldn’t have to orchestrate this horrible chaos if they were solidly in control. It’s a sign of their desperation.
The way to understand the riots is to understand who’s behind them. These are the three main types of people out there destroying the country right now:
Genuine peaceful protesters. It doesn’t seem like there’s many of them because the clips we see on the news and social media only focus on the violence, but there are genuine peaceful protesters out there. Unfortunately, these people are far outnumbered by now and the worst part is, they are enabling and encouraging the next two groups of people by continuing to take to the streets every night.Opportunistic looters: they saw the peaceful protests out in the street and saw an opportunity to score a new 4K television. These are the people who by their own admission don’t give a shit about George Floyd, they just saw an opening and took it. See this young man for example:Antifa Types: they saw the chaos caused by the opportunistic looters and decided to jump in and start trying to dismantle the Racist Sexist Fascist Nazi Capitalist System. I have a hunch Antifa are behind most of the wanton violence and mayhem. You see a bank smashed up and spray-painted “down with capitalism” or something like that, you have to figure that’s Antifa at work.
Of course, there’s more than just those three involved here: there’s the brick-providers, importantly. How did all those pallets of bricks get dropped off in cities all around the country in spots where there would be “demonstrating” later that night. These are your “table setters.”
We’re talking Soros-types who are orchestrating this behind the scenes. You think these protests and riots just come together spontaneously? Not a chance. There’s no way you could make this nationwide without serious planning by a network of experienced professional agitators and political organizers. There’s even demonstrations in London and Amsterdam and I believe even in New Zealand.
All of this is made worse by the fact that it comes after two and a half months of quarantine. With the outside world mostly shut down and people starting to go stir crazy after all this time spent at home, you can’t be surprised that people were eager to join this nationwide rampage, if only because it was the first taste of freedom in months. Whoever is orchestrating the mayhem knew the lockdown would ensure maximum participation and destruction.
A certain type of person is attracted to riots/mass demonstrations in general because of anonymity of the crowd that allows them greater “freedom” than usual. In any situation like this, you can loot and vandalize and even set a building on fire and there’s a low probability you’ll even get caught. But now, add on the fact that people have been cooped up inside for two months and you’ve got some real potential for mayhem.
There’s no way this is a coincidence. Whoever planned this out took full advantage of the fact that people would be extra restless and eager to get out of the house and unleash some pent-up energy.
In fact, this past week of mayhem has been so well-organized and planned out it’s hard to avoid concluding the whole thing–including the death of George Floyd, including the Coronavirus itself–has been planned out since the beginning.
I highly recommend watching this TV episode from 1968 called “The News Benders,” directed by someone named Desmond Lowden. It was part of a TV series called “Thirty-Minute Theatre,” aired on the BBC between 1965-1973. The IMDB page describes the series thusly: “An anthology drama series of short plays shown on BBC Television.”
It appears to be similar to the Twilight Zone in that each episode has nothing to do with the last or the next–all the episodes are self-contained storylines and plotlines. So there is no background needed to understand what’s happening in this episode.
It’s 28 minutes long but I promise you, it will fly by. It’s worth your time.
Just watch it and let me know what you think.
Is this just a scary idea, or could it actually be how the world truly works?
The money quote:
J.G.: “For the past ten years, people have been looking at our fake newsreels, listening to our fake commentaries.”
Larkin: “And they accept it for the truth?
*J.G. nods*
Larkin: “And you can do it. . . Stop 100 people in the street, and how many of them have actually seen a missile or a satellite? They’re just told they exist, and they believe it.”
J.G.: “Now you’re getting there. I knew you would.”
It was very difficult to track down this clip. I first saw part of it on Owen Benjamin’s livestream and then found the full 28 minutes on YouTube after a bit of digging. The full show was only uploaded to YouTube yesterday. A five-minute excerpt was uploaded in 2011 but as of today it only has around 900 total views.
I saw that it was uploaded to archive.org in January of this year. I downloaded the clip and have it saved to my computer, and uploaded the full video here to my site.
“The message from Israel arrived on an otherwise unremarkable afternoon for 36-year-old Beau Villereal. At his family’s sprawling 42-acre property outside Live Oak in Florida’s rural north, Villereal sat alone in his bedroom trawling for news about Donald Trump to share on the rightwing Facebook page he runs with his mother and father.
The messenger, who gave her name as Rochale, asked Villereal to make her an editor of Pissed off Deplorables, a self-described “pro-America page” that feeds its thousands of followers a steady diet of pro-Trump, anti-Islam content.
“I totally understand you,” she wrote. “I’m from Israel and this is … really important to me to share the truth. Please give me a chance for a day.”
The Guardian article claims the Israelis are targeting the “far-right” but that’s probably not entirely accurate, as the real far-right despises Israel and Jews and would never be susceptible to coordinating with Israel. Plus, most real far-right social media accounts have long since been banned. In reality, what the Guardian is calling “far-right” Facebook pages are simply relatively newer, pro-Trump pages of the non-traditional variety. They consider anything on the right other than National Review and the Weekly Standard to be “far-right.” But in reality, much of what outlets like the Guardian and other leftwing Establishment outlets call “far-right” are actually pretty mainstream right.
At any rate, Israeli disinformation agents see right-wingers as their best way to gain a foothold in America. The inherent pro-Israel, anti-Islam bias of the American right makes mainstream right-wingers the perfect targets.
Let’s continue with the article:
“About 1,000 miles north in Staten Island, New York City, Ron Devito was tapping away on his laptop to the 20,000 followers of his pro-Trump Facebook page, Making America 1st, when he received a similar message, this time from someone using the name Tehila.
“She pitched to me that she was a good editor, she could provide some good content to increase likes and views on the page,” Devito told the Guardian. “Could I just give her a chance and let her post her stuff, right? So I figured, ‘What the heck, give it a shot’.”
Villereal and Devito weren’t the only ones. Over the past two years, a group of mysterious Israel-based accounts has delivered similar messages to the heads of at least 19 other far-right Facebook pages across the US, Australia, the UK, Canada, Austria, Israel and Nigeria.”
A Guardian investigation can reveal those messages were part of a covert plot to control some of Facebook’s largest far-right pages, including one linked to a rightwing terror group, and create a commercial enterprise that harvests Islamophobic hate for profit.”
This only makes sense when you accept the fact that we have been lied to about 9-11.
I am not yet completely certain who was really behind 9-11. Like with the Kennedy assassination, we can only speculate as the political and media establishments still maintain the “official story.”
But what I’m saying is that I do not believe 9-11 was merely a terrorist attack by Al Qaeda that caught America off-guard.
There are too many questions. For instance, Tower 7 collapsed despite not even being hit by a plane. It looked like a perfect controlled building demolition. And Larry Silverstein, the man who bought the World Trade Center just months before the 9-11 attacks, took out a massive insurance policy on the buildings that eventually netted him billions of dollars. That’s barely even scratching the surface; there’s much more.
9-11 was, if not orchestrated by the government, at least carried out with our government’s prior knowledge. Read about the Project for a New American Century, a neocon think tank founded in the late 1990s:
“The threat posed by US terrorism to the security of nations and individuals was outlined in prophetic detail in a document written more than two years ago and disclosed only recently. What was needed for America to dominate much of humanity and the world’s resources, it said, was “some catastrophic and catalysing event – like a new Pearl Harbor”.
Richard Perle is one of the founders of the Project for the New American Century, the PNAC. Other founders include Dick Cheney, now vice-president, Donald Rumsfeld, defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, deputy defence secretary, I Lewis Libby, Cheney’s chief of staff, William J Bennett, Reagan’s education secretary, and Zalmay Khalilzad, Bush’s ambassador to Afghanistan. These are the modern chartists of American terrorism. The PNAC’s seminal report, Rebuilding America’s Defences: strategy, forces and resources for a new century, was a blueprint of American aims in all but name. Two years ago [Note: article written in 2002] it recommended an increase in arms-spending by $48bn so that Washington could “fight and win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars”. This has happened. It said the United States should develop “bunker-buster” nuclear weapons and make “star wars” a national priority. This is happening. It said that, in the event of Bush taking power, Iraq should be a target. And so it is.”
Prior to 9-11, a think tank comprised of the same men who would eventually hold powerful posts in the Bush Administration expressed a desire to invade Iraq (among other “rogue states”) and said that a “Pearl Harbor-type event” was needed to spur the so-called “New American Century.”
These guys sure got their Pearl Harbor-like “catalyzing” event the following year, once they had all ascended to prominent posts in the US government.
Depending on who you talk to, you’ll get different explanations (“conspiracy theories”) regarding 9-11. The “Dancing Israelis” meme that has popped up in recent months is compelling, yet of course circumstantial, evidence that the Mossad was behind 9-11.
Now, again, the details on who was really behind 9-11 are still murky and probably will be for decades.
But I do know this:
Israel wants America to hate Muslims.
Israel’s ultimate goal for, at least the past 20 years but probably the last 40 years, has been to manipulate America into destroying Iran, Israel’s greatest enemy.
As with the Kennedy Assassination, in order to demystify things, it’s important to simply look at the aftermath: who benefitted? Who got what they wanted?
With 9-11, the beneficiaries were the neocons in the government (all of them hardcore Zionists) and Israel itself.
Just months after 9-11, President George W. Bush used his first State of the Union address in January 2002 to define the “Axis of Evil,” which according to him was comprised of Iraq, Iran and North Korea, as well as Libya, Syria and Cuba. That “Axis of Evil” is better described as the Neocon Regime Change Wish List. By early 2003, we were at war in Iraq. Libya’s government was toppled eight years later by NATO. Syria’s government has been under constant assault for the past seven-plus years of civil war, but has managed to hang on with help from Russia. This is why the neocons in Washington are so irate that Trump has not only rebuffed their numerous attempts to lie us into greater involvement against Assad in Syria, but that he is pulling us out of Syria entirely.
This was all planned out two decades ago. And it was all predicated on 9-11, which got Americans into the mindset of accepting wars in the Middle East against supposed “terror-supporting nations.” It relies on Americans hating Muslims.
If you accept, or merely allow yourself to entertain the possibility, that the official 9-11 narrative of a cut-and-dry terrorist attack isn’t true, then most of the reasoning behind our anti-Muslim hatred collapses.
In other words, I said to myself, “If Muslim terrorists weren’t actually behind 9-11, then I don’t really have much of a reason to dislike Muslims, do I?”
We are being used.
The best way to understand all the “foreign influence” in America is to recognize that America’s military is the most powerful force on the planet, and that a great many nations–especially our “allies”–are constantly seeking to steer it and manipulate it into doing their dirty work for them.
In this light, it makes perfect sense that a shadowy Israeli group (undoubtedly Mossad) would seek to sow anti-Muslim on the American right.
October 15, 2019 October 15, 2019 / By Hohenzollern
They were trying to depict Northern Syria as a war-torn hellscape by using footage of an event in Kentucky from a few years ago. They got caught:
“Mistaking.”
Uh: They got caught fabricating. It was not a mistake. The mistake was getting caught, not using the fake footage.
They are trying to keep us in Syria by any means necessary.
“Oh my goodness! Look at all this horrible bombing going on! We can’t leave Syria now!”
Not gonna work.
By the way, what’s with all these neocons saying our presence in Syria is small-scale and low-cost, while also claiming that we make a world of a difference there? Which is it?
They’re trying to tell us that our involvement there is not significant enough to worry about, but also that we’re the only ones standing between the Kurds and certain annihilation.
Well, which is it? Because it can’t be both.
Our supposedly small-scale, small-footprint military presence in Northern Syria can’t possibly be enough to keep the full might of the Ottoman–sorry, Turkish–army from devouring the Kurds, right?
September 24, 2019 September 24, 2019 / By Hohenzollern
First the media employed David Hogg to scream at us about how we need to disarm For The Kids, now they’re using a 16-year-old Swedish kid named Greta Thunberg to guilt us into Taking Action™️ against Climate Change (which isn’t real), also For The Kids.
Hogg was an insufferable brat, but this Thunberg kid is something different.
There’s something deeply creepy about her:
Right off the bat, my first thought is that there’s no way this weird girl appeals to any significant number of people. She’s not charismatic at all, and I think most people would agree she’s pretty creepy with her constantly-on-the-verge-of-tears, Super Duper Impassioned act.
I’m just not buying it. It’s just not convincing to me.
She’s either an actor or she’s been badly brainwashed by cruel adults who hope to use her to push the climate change angle of the assault on Western Civilization. “Don’t reproduce because Greta Thunberg says so!”
It’s probably both.
But again, I just don’t see the appeal of this girl. It feels put-on, contrived.
I can’t see any way in which she became this popular naturally and on her own. I don’t hear any normies talking about her.
Which means if there’s no organic support for her, it must be a propaganda operation. She did not become this big of a figure on her own.
But sure enough, the media is treating her as if she’s an organic viral sensation.
This is one of those all-too-common scenarios where the media coverage is the tail attempting to wag the dog of public opinion: she’s not receiving tons of media coverage because people are buzzing about her–instead, she’s being shoved down our throats by the media in order to push an agenda on us.
It’s important to recognize when this is happening, because these days it’s most of the time. People need to stop and ask themselves why, all of the sudden, every legacy media outlet is bombarding us with nearly identical “coverage” of this creepy Swedish teenager. It’s deliberate.
They’re rarely just “covering the news” or reporting on what’s happening. Instead, they’re creating the news, and selectively informing us only on what they want us to pay attention to–even if they have to create the story themselves.
The media did it with Barack Obama in 2008, turning him into a worldwide phenomenon and eventually US President. Their nonstop positive (and positive is a major understatement) coverage of Obama was what made him so popular.
This is what they’re doing with Greta Thunberg, only on a smaller scale. It should be obvious by now that it’s a faux-viral story coordinated by the biggest names in the legacy media:
CNN even ran a column by a former Obama State Department PR official:
Rolling Stone was on the same page:
The coordination is so obvious. “Powerful.” “Unforgettable.” “Passionate.”
The media makes Greta Thunberg important by “covering” her non-stop, and then the media continues to cover her because she’s important. It’s Fake News from beginning to end. At no point was there any organic origin here.
The whole Greta Thunberg thing feels like an elaborate PR operation foisted upon us by wealthy, powerful liberal elites. It’s Astroturfing 101.
But my own research hasn’t turned up any definitive proof of this, so I cannot report it with certainty.
Still, I don’t doubt that Soros is behind all this.
And finally, why is Thunberg (or, rather, her handlers) wasting time in the US? China is far and away the world’s biggest polluter and carbon emitter. In fact carbon emissions in the US have gone down over the past 20 years:
Why doesn’t Greta Thunberg go yell at China and India to stop reproducing and to give up all their sovereignty to the UN?
Because the people shoving her down our throats don’t want control of China and India, they want control of America and Europe.
According to the media, the “Give me your tired. . .” poem on the Statue of Liberty is the be-all, end-all of American immigration policy, so authoritative and unquestionable it might as well be part of the Constitution (even though the media doesn’t much care for the Constitution).
That’s why Ken Cuccinelli, the acting director of the Citizenship and Immigration Office, recently got himself into trouble with CNN’s Erin Burnett–for daring to question the holy dogma of THE POEM establishing America as the world’s homeless shelter:
“Erin Burnett was not going to let Ken Cuccinelli off the hook for his despicable rewrite of Emma Lazarus’ poem on the Statue of Liberty. Instead, she pinned him to the wall and watched him squirm like a worm on a hook.
There was a back and forth where he ultimately accused her of “twisting this like everybody else on the left has done all day today.” That accusation simply prompted her to bring receipts.
“You’re saying — it’s important — you’re saying it’s important to stand on your own two feet,” she said. Cuccinelli agreed with that.
Burnett then informed him (again) that the poem did not say that, and again he deflected, first blaming the NPR reporter for bringing it up (how dare they?) and then Burnett.”
THE POEM DOES NOT SAY THAT, BIGOT!
“She was having no part of his little dance, coming back to bring her receipts, after repeating how he had bastardized the poem to be one for ugly xenophobes instead of an inspiring invitation.
“However it came up, you said, ‘Give me your tired and poor who can stand on their own two feet, not become a public charge,” she reiterated.
Again, he agreed, unapologetically.
“The poem reads, ‘give me your tired your poor huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore, Send these, the homeless tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!’ Wretched refuse. That’s what the poem says America is supposed to stand for. So what do you think America stands for?” she asked.”
Replace the word “poem” with “Bible” and CNN’s Erin Burnett is no different from a religious zealot.
Cuccinelli’s response:
“Well, of course that poem referred back to people coming from Europe where they had class-based societies. Where people were considered wretched if they weren’t in the right class. And it was introduced — it was written one year — one year after the first federal public charge rule was written that says — I’ll quote it — any person unable to take care of himself without becoming a public charge, unquote, would be inadmissible in the terms that my agency deals with, they can’t do what’s called adjusting status getting a green card becoming legal permanent residents. Same exact time, Erin, same exact time. And the year is went on the statue of liberty, 1903, another federal law was passed expanding the elements of public charge by Congress. This is a — this is a central part.”
Decent response by Cuccinelli, but he is under no obligation to try to interpret the poem in a way that bolsters his stance on immigration.
The poem is pro-open borders, period.
But that’s okay because we are not under any obligation to agree with it or live according to its message.
We don’t have to care what Emma Lazarus thinks about immigration.
Anytime we talk about immigration, open borders propagandists like Erin Burnett will screech “BUT THE POEM! THE POEM SAYS!”
But who cares? Not me.
The important thing Ken Cuccinelli brought up was the “Public Charge” law, enacted one year before Lazarus’ stupid poem was affixed to the Statue of Liberty, which denies immigration to Lazarus’ exalted “wretched refuse” of other countries–i.e. immigrants who can’t take care of themselves and who are a drain on taxpayers.
Cuccinelli, who is spearheading the Trump administration’s effort to, not even enact but merely resumeenforcement of, the “public charge” laws already on the books, has real legal precedent on his side. Erin Burnett has a stupid poem on her’s.
In fact, Ken Cuccinelli and the Trump administration have 374 years of legal precedent on their side when it comes to public charge laws.
“The English colony of Massachusetts enacted the earliest American public charge laws in 1645. The arrival in the colonies of undesirables spurred other colonies to enact similar laws. “By the end of the seventeenth century American colonists were especially reluctant to extend a welcome to impoverished foreigners and the ‘Rogues and vagabonds’ that England had so graciously decided she could spare.” Many colonies protected themselves against public charges through such measures as mandatory reporting of ship passengers, immigrant screening and exclusion upon arrival of designated “undesirables,” and requiring bonds for potential public charges.
For example, a law enacted in colonial Massachusetts in 1700 kept out the infirm who had no security against becoming public charges. The law required ship captains to post bonds for “lame, impotent, or infirm” passengers who were “incapable of maintaining themselves.” The bond requirement sought to prevent the new arrival from becoming reliant on public relief. Without a bond from the captain, the vessel had to return the person to his home country.
New York adopted a law in 1691 that required an immigrant to have “a visible Estate” or “a manual occupation” or “give sufficient surety, that he shall not be a burden or charge to the respective places, he shall come to Inhabit.” Delaware in 1740 sought to exclude potential public charges, including “any such infant, lunatick [sic], aged, maimed, impotent or vagrant person;” the colony thus enacted a law whose title was to “Prevent Poor and Impotent Persons [from] being Imported.” Following American independence, states either automatically continued to enforce colonial-era public charge laws or reaffirmed those laws.”
Since the very beginning of this country, we have sought to avoid being saddled with unproductive burdens via immigration.
We don’t want immigrants coming here to take advantage of our public services.
It is not our side who are the radicals attempting to go against the American tradition on immigration.
It is instead the open borders globalists of the past 20-30 years who have decided to reverse centuries of American immigration policy in order to flood the country with poor third-worlders.
We are under no obligation to care what their stupid poem says.
In the wake of the mass shootings in Texas and Ohio this past weekend, the media’s rush to politicize them and blame them on President Trump went to appalling lengths. They are now just straight-up lying directly to our faces. They’re making stuff up out of thin air in order to generate outrage and provoke hatred.
And they’re telling the most vicious lies imaginable, too. Blood libel territory.
If you thought the worst the media could do was accusing Trump of treason and selling the country out to Russia, you’d be wrong.
No matter how bad the media’s lying gets, it can always get worse.
MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski said on Morning Joe that President Trump wants mass shootings to happen:
On "Morning Joe" this morning, Mika Brzezinski actually accused the President of the United States of WANTING mass murders to happen.
This is not some random fringe internet news outlet. This is our mainstream media, and one of the most-watched morning shows in the country. pic.twitter.com/NlmWpV1Fw0
She said it’s fair to “deduce” that Trump actually wants these shootings to happen.
MSNBC’s Nicole Wallace wanted to join in on the fun. To give a little background, Wallace is an astonishingly angry and hateful woman with a history of saying terrible things. Last year she said claimed that during the 2016 primary campaign she advised Jeb Bush to punch Donald Trump in the face. She also said she wanted to wring the neck of former White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders:
MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace said she wanted to "run-up" to Sarah Huckabee Sanders and "wring her neck"
And this woman is supposedly a “Republican strategist.” (Not anymore, of course. But it goes to show you the type of “conservatives” who were leading the GOP prior to 2016. Don’t ever try to tell me the Uniparty isn’t a real thing.)
This week Wallace said Trump is “talking about exterminating Latinos”:
MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace falsely claims that Trump is “talking about exterminating Latinos”
This is a complete lie and is extremely dangerous rhetoric in today’s volatile atmosphere pic.twitter.com/S5Yda6MUQR
The media is completely out of control. Rich liberal white women, in their boundless desire to virtue signal, are completely out of control.
This is a problem getting worse at an exponential rate. The media has gone from accusing the President of treason–bad enough as it is–to accusing him of wanting mass shootings to happen and wanting to “exterminate Latinos” in just a few short years.
Stop watching “the news.”
Do not enable this vile mass-brainwashing operation.
I know a lot of people think that while the media is clearly biased, it’s still important to watch the news to “stay informed.” But this is an outdated way of thinking.
Perhaps in the past it was important to watch the news to stay informed.
But the “news” isn’t even the news anymore. It is 24/7 lies and propaganda.
You are better off consuming no TV news whatsoever.
Please, do your country a favor and stop giving the media viewers. They are, without a doubt, the enemy of the American people.
At the very least, they can’t fill your head with lies if you’re not watching. Best case scenario, enough people stop watching and cause them to go bankrupt.
“The moment the dressing-room door is closed, he lunges at me, pushes me against the wall, hitting my head quite badly, and puts his mouth against my lips. I am so shocked I shove him back and start laughing again. He seizes both my arms and pushes me up against the wall a second time, and, as I become aware of how large he is, he holds me against the wall with his shoulder and jams his hand under my coat dress and pulls down my tights.
I am astonished by what I’m about to write: I keep laughing. The next moment, still wearing correct business attire, shirt, tie, suit jacket, overcoat, he opens the overcoat, unzips his pants, and, forcing his fingers around my private area, thrusts his penis halfway — or completely, I’m not certain — inside me. It turns into a colossal struggle. I am wearing a pair of sturdy black patent-leather four-inch Barneys high heels, which puts my height around six-one, and I try to stomp his foot. I try to push him off with my one free hand — for some reason, I keep holding my purse with the other — and I finally get a knee up high enough to push him out and off and I turn, open the door, and run out of the dressing room.”
CNN even brought this lady on to speak with Anderson Cooper, hoping that she would at long last give them the story they had been so desperately seeking to bring down Donald Trump’s Presidency. But things went off the rails quickly:
“Carroll began by saying that she didn’t feel like a victim, arguing that she hadn’t been “thrown on the ground and ravished.”
“The word ‘rape’ carries so many sexual connotations,” Carroll explained. “This was not sexual. It just … it hurt … it just was …”
Cooper interrupted then, saying, “I think most people think of rape as a … it is a violent assault, it is not sexual.”
Carroll, nodding her head, fired back, “I think most people think of rape as being sexy. Think of the fantasies.”
Anderson Cooper quickly realized the woman was a nutcase and cut to commercials. You can watch the bizarre scene for yourself:
Something is wrong with her. Anderson Cooper cut straight to a commercial after she made that comment. pic.twitter.com/kNb1roWrHB
Cooper knew within 30 seconds that the whole thing was a debacle.
CNN also spent months engaged in wild speculation about Trump’s alleged affair with pornstar Stormy Daniels, and that somehow Trump’s alleged payment of “hush money” to Daniels constituted some sort of high crime that could eventually lead to his impeachment. We all remember this well:
“Last August, former Trump attorney Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to a variety of offenses, including campaign contribution violations. He told a federal court in New York that he had arranged payments to Daniels (whose real name is Stephanie Clifford) and former Playboy model Karen McDougal at Trump’s direction. In November, he also pleaded guilty to lying to Congress.
In their sentencing memorandum, prosecutors drew attention to the payments, leading observers to speculate that they would try to indict the president on campaign finance violations.
Michael Avenatti, Daniels’s attorney at the time, told NPR in August: “Donald Trump is either going to resign. He’s going to be removed from office by impeachment, or I’m going to beat him in 2020.”
“Stormy Daniels released a new statement, in which she shockingly denies ever having a sexual affair with Donald Trump even though she gave an on the record interview already claiming that she did.
Did they or didn’t they?! Stormy Daniels, 38, is now denying that she had sex with the current Commander-in-Chief, Donald Trump, 71, in 2006 and conducted an 11-month affair with him, even though she gave a detailed interview to InTouch magazine, in which she detailed their alleged affair. The former porn star issued a new statement, obtained by TMZ on Jan. 30 in which she claims that she and Trump have both denied the alleged affair multiple times. She also alleges that she is not changing her story because she received $130,000 in compensation. “I am not denying this affair because I was paid ‘hush money’ as has been reported in overseas owned tabloids,” the statement reads. “I am denying this affair because it never happened.”
Huh? I thought this alleged affair was going to bring down the President? CNN spent months on end giving Stormy Daniels’ claims extensive coverage, basically making the story the centerpiece of their programming for a prolonged period.
And don’t even get me started about the whole “Russian collusion” business. It was outlandish and unbelievable from the start, and it originated from the Clinton Campaign itself, yet the entire media establishment treated it as if it was the most legitimate news story ever for over two years.
There have been other wild claims made against Donald Trump over the past few years, all of which have fallen apart, but the common theme is that the supposedly respectable, professional media outlets have taken them all seriously and presented them to viewers as if they were probably true.
In their eyes, it’s a win-win for them: if the wild claims somehow turn out to be true, then they bring down their most hated enemy, Donald Trump. If the wild claims turn out to be nonsense, then they quickly move on and pretend they never covered the story, never suffering any consequences for their recklessness, with the silver lining being that many Americans will have at least heard of the #FakeNews allegations and believe them to be true.
The media frequently runs false accusations about Trump that quickly fall apart, and they do this because they know more people will see the blaring headlines than will see the quiet retractions. This is how they fill people’s heads with lies–lies they want people to believe.
I call this practice “‘If true’ journalism,” whereby the media repeats baseless yet explosive claims about Trump and attempts to cover its collective ass by adding in the little caveat “if true” after the claims. They can repeat any sensational claim about Trump and then deny that they were pushing lies by pointing out the “if true” caveat they included.
Putting “if true” behind every outrageous allegation about Trump makes it so the media can’t be accused of spreading lies, even though no self-respecting journalist would ever run an “if true” story.
Thus, we have millions of brainwashed Americans who falsely believe that Trump has done all of this stuff simply because they Saw It On The News.
But what if the media treated Barack Obama this way? What if, instead of ignoring all the outlandish and explosive claims made about and against him, thus relegating them to only gain any traction at tabloids like National Enquirer and The Globe, the media took every one of them seriously and gave them extensive air time? Remember, CNN was fixated on the Stormy Daniels story for months and the Russian collusion hoax for years.
Well, then, as I said above, people would believe Obama is a crack-smoking homosexual.
Larry Sinclair is a gay man from Chicago who in 2008 came forward with numerous allegations about Obama’s supposed gay past in Chicago prior to being elected to the Senate in 2004. He also said Obama used crack-cocaine in his presence.
Sinclair gave an hour-long press conference on the matter:
Now, I don’t expect you all to watch the full hour-long video. But if you just watch Sinclair for a few minutes, despite the fact that he admits early on he’s a convicted felon, you should at least be able to agree that he comes off as more believable than obvious nutcases like E. Jean Carroll, who CNN felt deserved a platform on their network to share her claims about Trump.
But unlike Carroll, Larry Sinclair was not given any coverage from the supposed “mainstream” media. He was ignored, brushed aside and quickly forgotten.
“A prominent member of Chicago’s homosexual community claims Barack Obama’s participation in the “gay” bar and bathhouse scene was so well known that many who were aware of his lifestyle were shocked when he ran for president and finally won the White House.
“It was preposterous to the people I knew then to think Obama was going to keep his gay life secret,” said Kevin DuJan, who was a gossip columnist in Chicago for various blogs when Obama was living in the city as a community organizer and later a state senator.
“Nobody who knew Obama in the gay bar scene thought he could possibly be president,” said DuJan.
DuJan, founder and editor of the Hillary Clinton-supporting website HillBuzz.org, told WND he has first-hand information from two different sources that “Obama was personally involved in the gay bar scene.”
“If you just hang out at these bars, the older guys who have been frequenting these gay bars for 25 years will tell you these stories,” DuJan said. “Obama used to go to the gay bars during the week, most often on Wednesday, and they said he was very much into older white guys.” Obama, DuJan said, is “not heterosexual and he’s not bisexual. He’s homosexual.”
Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen, who worked with the National Security Agency from 1984 to 1988 as a Navy intelligence analyst, confirmed DuJan’s claims.
“It is common knowledge in the Chicago gay community that Obama actively visited the gay bars and bathhouses in Chicago while he was an Illinois state senator,” Madsen told WND.
DuJan said that during Obama’s first presidential campaign, “there was fear in the gay community” about talking openly about Obama being homosexual, particularly after the murder in December 2007 of Donald Young, the openly gay choir director at Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ, who was known to be a close friend of Obama.”
If the media had applied the same standard to these claims about Obama as it does to wild allegations about Trump, then Larry Sinclair, Kevin DuJan and Wayne Madsen would have become household names back in the late 2000s.
If the media treated all the claims about Obama like they treat the claims about Trump, Americans would believe Obama is gay.
“You can count on Joan Rivers to say something controversial, even when asked about a good deed.
The comedian called President Obama gay and the First Lady a “tranny” during an on-the-street interview filmed earlier this week.
The 81-year-old was asked about officiating an impromptu gay wedding at her New York City book signing Monday, followed by a question about whether she thinks the U.S. will first see a gay president or woman president. “We already have it with Obama, so let’s just calm down,” the TV host responded.
Before walking away from the reporter, Rivers said “You know Michelle is a tranny.” When asked to confirm her eyebrow-raising statement, she said, “A transgender. We all know. It’s okay.”
There’s video of Rivers saying this, although it wasn’t easy to find on YouTube for some reason:
Now why didn’t the major mainstream media outlets give Joan Rivers an abundance of airtime and coverage to discuss her shocking claims?
Part of it is that the media simply had no interest in doing so, but an equally important part of it is that Joan Rivers was dead just two months after making this shocking remark! She died during a routine endoscopy surgery, after which her family sued the hospital for medical malpractice:
“The family of Joan Rivers has settled a medical malpractice suit against the New York City clinic where the comedian died.
“In accepting this settlement, I am able to put the legal aspects of my mother’s death behind me and ensure that those culpable for her death have accepted responsibility for their actions quickly and without equivocation,” said her daughter Melissa Rivers in a statement on Thursday.
Joan Rivers died Sept. 4, 2014, at age 81. The comedian’s death came days after she stopped breathing after undergoing a routine endoscopy at Yorkville Endoscopy in Manhattan.
Melissa Rivers filed the suit in 2015 in State Supreme Court in Manhattan, alleging that the doctors performed unauthorized medical procedures, as they were caught taking a selfie with the Fashion Police star while she was under anesthesia.
Melissa Rivers’ attorneys Ben Rubinowitz and Jeff Bloom did not disclose the amount of the settlement, but said they wanted to “make certain that the focus of this horrific incident remains on improved patient care and the legacy of Joan Rivers,” according to the Associated Press.
The lawsuit alleged that doctors at the clinic mishandled Rivers’ procedure by performing a laryngoscopy on her vocal cords without consent, instead of an endoscopy. According to the AP, the suit claimed that when an anesthesiologist expressed concern over what the procedure would do to her ability to breathe, she was told that she was being “paranoid.”
The official cause of Joan Rivers’ death was that she died because the doctors had cut off the oxygen supply to her brain. So much for being “paranoid.”
An accident during a routine surgery not long after Rivers said on-camera that Obama is gay and Michelle is a tranny?
It shouldn’t be a surprise that many people started asking questions about whether her death–which her doctor has even said was “100% preventable“–had anything to do with her remarks about the Obamas.
So why didn’t Joan Rivers Truthers get primetime slots on CNN to discuss the matter? Why was Anderson Cooper not taking seriously the claims that the Obamas had Joan Rivers killed for exposing the truth about them?
It’s a rhetorical question. We all know the answer. The media was determined to make Barack Obama President and had his back the whole time.
Now, am I saying all this stuff about the Obamas is true? No, that’s not my point here. I don’t know whether any of it is true or not.
My point is to illustrate the staggering degree to which Democrats are shielded by the press contrasted to the way Trump is automatically presumed guilty of just about any allegation against him no matter how outlandish and unfounded.
Millions of Americans believe Trump is a Russia-colluding rapist simply because the media wants them to believe it. Conversely, very few Americans believe that Obama is a gay man and Michelle Obama is a transgender because the media does not want them to believe so.
The collapse of the Russian Collusion Conspiracy theory is a stark lesson for a whole new generation that the media and supposed authorities in this country are complete and utter liars.
Watch as the media spends nearly two years boldly proclaiming that “the end” was near for Trump, that the walls were closing in and that Trump was finished due to a Russian Collusion “scandal” that the media made up:
Today, the left’s last best hope to impeach Trump after all else had failed, Robert Mueller, was summoned before Congress by Desperate Democrats because apparently they believed Mueller had more to say about Trump’s supposed criminality than he wrote in his office’s 448-page report, released several months ago.
I really have no idea what the Democrats thought today would achieve for them. Mueller has long since released his office’s report and it concluded there was no collusion, no obstruction and no reason to impeach Trump. Did they think Mueller was holding out? Or were they looking for some soundbite they could, through their dishonest accomplices in the media, misconstrue and manipulate into a justification for impeachment. It’s probably the latter.
But unfortunately for them, their champion Mueller looked like a doddering, senile old man who was used mainly as a legitimacy-granting figurehead for the Special Counsel investigation, which was staffed up and carried out by hardcore partisan Democrats.
Mueller gives the impression that he was hidden away in an assisted living home while other people conducted his investigation and wrote his Report
The old man was completely lost during today’s hearing. At one point he apparently claimed (or admitted, your choice) that he did not know what Fusion GPS was. Fusion GPS was the origin of the Steele Dossier, which itself was the basis for the entire Russiagate conspiracy theory and subsequent investigation:
Robert Mueller literally just said he wasn't familiar with Fusion GPS. My Lord. My Lord.
He was either lying or telling the truth and I’m not sure which is worse.
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), who is turning into a real superstar, took Mueller to task over Mueller having hired Peter Strzok and an unnamed FBI agent who said “Vive La Resistance!” to the Special Counsel investigation. This exchange between Gaetz and Mueller was really indicative of how the whole thing went:
Just brutal. I almost felt bad for Mueller. He was left stuttering.
Gaetz had more highlights as well:
Mueller Is Finished. Toast. Done. Rep. @mattgaetz buried him.
Gaetz: Can you state that the Steele dossier wasn't Russian disinformation? Mueller: Dossier is before my time. Gaetz: So were Manafort's crimes. You charged him. Mueller: Not my purview. Gaetz: IT IS IN YOUR REPORT! pic.twitter.com/e0hHqW0wcC
The whole thing was just an embarrassment for Democrats.
Humiliating: Rep. Hakeem Jeffries spends five minutes trying to get Mueller to agree that Trump committed obstruction. At what was supposed to be the climax of the questioning, Mueller responds: "I'm not supportive of that analytical charge"
So Russiagate is now officially over, dead and buried. Of course Democrats are going to keep trying to dig it up and breathe life into it endlessly–I’m sure they’ll want to summon other members of the Mueller team to Capitol Hill after Mueller himself didn’t give them what they wanted. But the verdict in the court of public opinion is in: this whole thing was bullshit.
I hope most Americans realize today that they were lied to about Trump and Russia for nearly three years by the media, the entertainment industry and the political establishment. It was all lies.
I also hope most Americans, having realized that the elites lied to them about Russiagate, now start to wonder what else the elites have been lying about. Russian Collusion was not the first lie, nor will it be the last.
In conversations over the course of the two-plus year Russian Collusion Witch Hunt, people asked me if it’s really true that Trump colluded with the Russians. I said all along absolutely not. It’s all been made up.
People had a hard time believing that when I would tell them. They just couldn’t believe that the big cable news channels, the major newspapers, Hollywood and the late night talks shows were all lying.
Yet they were.
Most people in my generation are too young to remember the WMD fiasco during the Iraq War, but now we have our own version of it in the Russiagate Hoax.
The mainstream media should be forever discredited now that the conspiracy theory they bombarded the nation with for two years has gone down in flames. No one should ever again trust CNN, NYT, Bezos Post and all the rest given the absolute certainty with which they promoted Russiagate. Tune them out forever.
And then ask yourself, “If they lied about Russiagate, what else are they lying about? How far back does the lying go?” Because that’s the real rabbit hole.
