second amendment

St. Louis Prosecutor Confiscates Famous Couple’s Guns Because America Is Not A Free Country Anymore

Missouri Senator Josh Hawley (R) just wrote a letter to US Attorney General William Barr demanding a constitutional rights investigation into St. Louis’s political persecution of the McCloskeys, the now-iconic rich couple that brandished guns to shoo away an unruly mob that had invaded their gated neighborhood:

“As you are well aware, the country is facing a moment of significant public unrest and discord. As many Americans are peacefully exercising their constitutional rights to free speech and protest throughout the country, still others are exploiting this moment as an opportunity to sow violence and destruction. Too often, peaceful demonstrations have devolved into tense standoffs or violent riots, with threats and attacks on businesses, innocent bystanders, and law enforcement officers.

One such incident occurred in St. Louis, Missouri, where a family reportedly faced a mass of demonstrators trespassing on their property and threatening them. When help from the police or from nearby security failed to arrive, this family, the McCloskeys, did what any reasonable person would do: they retrieved their lawfully owned firearms and defended their property and their lives. The confrontation was resolved with no one being hurt.

Unfortunately, this family is facing new threats, not from demonstrators but from the local government. St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner is now threatening to prosecute not the trespassers, but the McCloskeys, and she is using the powers of her office to target them. Her office has seized their firearms, and police have applied for warrants in the case, with an indictment believed to be imminent.

This is an unacceptable abuse of power and threat to the Second Amendment, and I urge you to consider a federal civil rights investigation into the St. Louis Circuit Attorney’s Office to determine whether this investigation and impending prosecution violates this family’s constitutional rights. There is no question under Missouri law that the McCloskeys had the right to own and use their firearms to protect themselves from threatened violence, and that any criminal prosecution for these actions is legally unsound. The only possible motivation for the investigation, then, is a politically motivated attempt to punish this family for exercising their Second Amendment rights. Indeed, this is part of a troubling pattern of politically motivated prosecutorial decisions by the St. Louis Circuit Attorney, who has not seen fit to prosecute many violent offenders,  and who has expressed hostility to gun rights in the past. Recently, reports indicate that she declined to pursue charges against dozens of individuals arrested during a weekend of riots in the city.

The Second Amendment is not a second-class right. No family should face the threat of harassment or malicious prosecution for exercising that right. The Department of Justice must ensure that all Americans’ rights are protected from this kind of abuse of power.”

God Bless Senator Hawley. Most Republican politicians are fake allies who talk tough but ultimately are not on our side. Josh Hawley is one of the few that seems to be a genuine patriot, and who actually realizes that as a US Senator, his primary job is to secure and defend liberty for the American people.

Thank God Sen. Hawley is not letting this injustice go unchallenged. If this tyrannical St. Louis prosecutor was allowed to confiscate this couple’s guns without charging them with a crime, it would have set a horrible precedent going forward.

But just to be clear: an unruly mob broke into a private, gated neighborhood and a family that lived in that neighborhood came outside with guns in hand in an attempt to discourage the mob from attacking them or their house. And instead of bringing charges against the people in the mob, the City of St. Louis confiscated the guns of the McCloskeys, the people trying to protect themselves and their home from the mob.

We now live in an upside country where criminals roam free and unprosecuted, while the law-abiding citizens are relentlessly

Why is it like this?

Because our decaying ruling class is now at the point where, in its desperation to cling to power, it enforces the laws only to suppress those it perceives to be threats.

It’s called “anarcho-tyranny” and we’re living in it:

Screen Shot 2020-07-16 at 4.16.08 PM.png

Anarcho-tyranny is a term coined in 2003 by Sam Francis, a conservative political writer:

“Unwilling to control immigration and the cultural disintegration it causes, the authorities instead control the law-abiding.

This is precisely the bizarre system of misrule I have elsewhere described as “anarcho-tyranny”—we refuse to control real criminals (that’s the anarchy) so we control the innocent (that’s the tyranny).”

We are now at the point where our culture has sufficiently disintegrated, and the present social unrest is a byproduct of that. This is why our ruling class has adopted a system of anarcho-tyranny, where rioters and looters ago unprosecuted and law-abiding citizens exercising their Second Amendment rights are met with the full wrath of the law.

***

Contrary to what a lot of hardcore gun owners say, the state can come and take your guns. You are not going to resist. Are you really going to refuse the cops when they show up at your door and demand you to hand over your guns? Are you going to open fire on them? No, you’re going to hand them right over.

You’re not going to die to keep your guns. You’re not going to open fire on police when they come to confiscate your guns.

It’s not going to go down the way you think it will. A mass gun confiscation will not be announced far and wide. They’re not going to give people the option to prepare and organize a coordinated resistance plan. Anyone who does resist violently will be killed or arrested and portrayed as a lunatic and have their reputation slandered in the media. None of their friends will want to associate with them and come to their defense. It’ll be like Waco or Ruby Ridge: you’ll be branded as a nutcase so no one will have any sympathy for you.

Cops are not going to refuse to follow unconstitutional orders, either. You’re delusional if you’re banking on that happening. Most cops want to keep their jobs, they want to keep their pensions, they don’t want to rock the boat. They’ll follow orders. The biggest lesson of the communist & Nazi atrocities of the 20th century is that most people will just follow orders while unthinkable acts of evil are carried out by the state.

People think they’ll shoot the people that come to take their guns. They think they’ll shoot and then The Revolution will begin all over the country and they’ll be fine. Not gonna happen: You will be isolated, they will come to your house to take your guns, no one will come to your aid, and you will hand those guns over just like the McCloskeys did. If you start shooting, you will be met with superior firepower and neutralized.

The civil war will not start the moment they come for your guns. If you fire on the cops, people will not rally to your cause and join you in resistance to the government.

This is why we need genuine Patriots like Josh Hawley in government, so that it never comes to the point where the police are going door-to-door and confiscating guns.

Florida Passes Law Allowing Teachers to Carry Guns at School–Hopefully, More States Follow Suit

Hopefully Florida is the first of many states to implement this no-brainer policy:

I cannot for the life of me understand why people oppose this.

“Back-to-school shopping: one bullet-proof vest.” Does this dumb person holding that sign realize she’s saying teachers are not to be trusted with guns?

Do they not. . . trust themselves with guns? Are they saying teachers are not to be trusted with guns?

Are teachers more liable to pull a gun on one of their students than some mentally defective, fatherless problem-child pumped full of psychoactive drugs?

Good God.

And this doesn’t require teachers to carry guns. It only allows them to, if they choose.

Why would a teacher oppose having the option to be armed in the era of mass school shootings? It takes a special kind of stupid to say, “No, I’d rather not have the option to be armed if and when some fucked-up kid decides to live out his twisted, deranged fantasy and become the next Nikolas Cruz.”

You have to be brainwashed beyond all hope to oppose this.

I’m sure the liberal response here will be that arming teachers isn’t the answer–gun control is the answer.

They’d prefer to just disarm everyone so only Our Lord & Savior, The Government has access to guns.

Hello, dummies? Did we not go over this with Parkland? The armed officer whose sole job it was to protect the students from potential shooters cowered in fear outside while the shooting was taking place.

It takes a while for the police to arrive after they’ve been notified of the shooting. By the time they arrive there are already many casualties.

The government cannot protect you. The government is not your savior.

And the whole idea of “gun control” is nonsensical: just because some politicians sign a piece of paper doesn’t magically make all the guns disappear.

The bad guys won’t follow the law. All you’ve done is take the guns away from good, law-abiding citizens.

You cannot un-invent the gun, no matter how badly you want to. Until you find a way to un-invent the gun, “gun control” policies are nothing more than a fantasy–and a dangerous one at that.

The bottom line is that we are in a vicious cycle when it comes to school shootings. When they happen, we publicize them all over the news (except the recent Colorado shooting where the shooter was a Trump-hating leftwing tranny, the “media” doesn’t want to talk about that at all), which only further incentivizes the next psychopath to shoot up his school. All the while our schools are the softest targets imaginable for bad people: most of the schools in this country are “gun free zones,” which are essentially huge, blinking neon signs for wolves that say “UNPROTECTED SHEEP READY FOR SLAUGHTER.”

When a store owner or a home owner experiences a break-in, he will then take steps to beef up security by buying a gun, cameras and a security system. It’s common sense. A woman who is mugged walking home one night will, at the very least, start to carry mace around in the future. Ideally she’d buy a handgun.

After more than a dozen school shootings in the past 20 years, you’d think by now we would learn our lesson: our schools are soft targets and all the bad guys know it.

The idea behind arming teachers is to discourage potential future school shooters. No longer are our schools shooting galleries for Zoloft-addled demons.

The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.

Tyrannical Dem Congressman: NUKE Gun Owners Who Won’t Disarm

You’ve gotta see it to believe it:

Screen Shot 2018-11-16 at 4.17.06 PM.png

Earlier this year, Rep. Eric Swalwell (Tyrant-CA) proposed a “gun buyback program” but with a twist: if gun owners didn’t “voluntarily” “sell” their guns back to the government, they would be prosecuted.

I’m not sure why this was brought up today, but it was. And the gun debate ended with a Democratic Member of Congress entertaining the idea of nuking gun owners.

Shorter Eric Swalwell: don’t even try to resist. We’ll nuke your redneck asses if you don’t give up the guns.

Boy, I wonder why those nutty conspiracy theorist conservatives are concerned about the government going tyrannical, and thus want to arm themselves.

This country is really headed for a bad place.

Ten years ago, would you believe it if someone told you that Democrats in 2018 would be fantasizing about nuking gun-owners?

The fact that a Member of Congress is entertaining this idea is terrifying, and also deeply depressing. Functionally, we are not a single country anymore.