white privilege

White Privilege is a Lie

Every country’s majority population has “privilege.”

I wouldn’t have white privilege in the Congo. In fact I’d have the opposite of white privilege.

Saying the majority population in a country has a built-in advantage or “privilege” in that country is a self-evident truth.

It’s more like home-field advantage than anything.

But now it’s seen as bad and evil–instead of an obvious fact of life–for America to favor the particular ethnic group that has represented the historical majority in this country for three-plus centuries (going back before the founding).

Eradicating “white privilege” in America has been the main focus of affirmative action policies since the late 1960s. It has become secular America’s de facto religion: white people must recognize and denounce their original sin of “white privilege” or else be condemned as Racists™️.

Even lots of white “conservatives” have accepted and internalized the idea of white privilege. The difference between them and the woke, self-hating white leftists is only that they feel no guilt and angst over their white privilege. But many still acknowledge white privilege is a thing.

Norway is a country built for and by Norwegians. Its culture and customs are made for Norwegians. Norway is a Norwegian’s natural habitat. It’s where they come from and where they are meant to live. It’s made for Norwegians. They made it, and it made them.

The idea of “Norwegian privilege” didn’t even exist until the first Swede walked across the border and settled down in a foreign country built by and for Norwegians.

A lion does not have “lion privilege” over a penguin that immigrates to the Savannah. The Savannah is simply the lion’s natural habitat. The Savannah was there before the lion so the lion adapted and made the Savannah his home. The penguin that immigrated from Antarctica should not blame the lion for being better able to survive and thrive in the Savannah, just as the lion cannot blame the penguin for the penguin being more at home in Antarctica if the situation was reversed.

The idea of white privilege in a white country is as stupid as saying the 49ers had “49er Privilege” at their home stadium in the NFC Championship Game, and that the Green Bay Packers were helpless victims because they did not enjoy the same home field advantage.

It will soon be illegal to say but it doesn’t make it any less true: America is and has been  a white country since day one. The elites are doing everything they can to change that but until they do, America is still a white country. So of course white people are going to have the natural advantage here. Same goes for England and Germany and Sweden. A white country means a white society and hence a natural “bias” toward white people.

A Black Country results in a black society and an inevitable bias toward black people over all others.

If there are 100 people in a room and 95 of them are Asian, with the remaining 5 being white, the whites will not have any sort of privilege or advantage to speak of.

It’s just natural. In-groups, out-groups. Majorities, minorities.

People are naturally “biased” to favor their own kind. However, modern white liberals may be the first ethnic subgroup in human history to actually have trained themselves (or, if you prefer, been trained) to be biased against their own ingroup and in favor of outgroups. The media, Hollywood and the education system have really done a number on white liberals.

Through this lie of “white privilege,” lots white people are being brainwashed to actively work to demolish their own race.

They have been convinced that America is “biased” towards white people, and that this is wrong and must be changed. They are driven by a tremendous sense of guilt over their perceived “privilege” over helpless minorities.

But it’s not even technically “biased.” I put that word in quotations for a reason: because it’s not really accurate to say America is “biased” toward white people. It was a white country and a white society, until other people started showing up. Then, by definition, it became “biased” toward its white majority, but only because outsiders started moving there. There’s no such thing as an in-group until an out-group is introduced. There’s no majority until there’s a minority.

From the earliest days of America until the waves of mass foreign immigration that began in 1965 with the Ted Kennedy Immigration reform, America was a 90% white country. So the idea of white privilege didn’t even exist: it was simply a white country. There was no consciously-developed system where the people in power said, “We’ve got to make sure this country favors white people.” It was just an inherent byproduct of the fact that America was a 90% white nation. No one ever thought about the idea of “white privilege” or keeping white people atop the racial pecking order.

The term “white privilege” didn’t even exist until the 1960s, and only entered the mainstream vocabulary in the 1990s:

white privilege.PNG

“White privilege” wasn’t a thing until the 1960s, when our government decided that we were to be a “diverse” country instead of a white one.

You can’t expect a native population to suddenly and immediately bend over backwards to cater to a newly-arrived minority of outsiders. That’s not how it works. Outsiders generally have to be the ones to change and adapt to the customs and ways of their new country. They have to assimilate–in other words, try to be like the native population as much as they possibly can to fit in.

You can’t just move to someone else’s country and then complain that the people who were already there, who have historically populated that country, have “privilege.” Well, no shit they do: it’s their country. They founded it, they built it, and they make up its society. Of course it’s “biased” towards them.

It’s their country.

If you don’t like it, then go back to your own country where it’s “biased” towards you.

I can’t move to Pakistan and claim society’s biased towards Pakistanis. That’s idiotic.

Outsiders in foreign lands are naturally at a disadvantage, and probably always will be no matter how much they assimilate. As long as you’re the minority group, you will always be at a disadvantage compared to the majority group.

It sucks but it’s a fact of life no matter where you go. If you don’t like it you can leave.

But of course none of the people complaining about “white privilege” actually will leave, will they? No, because it’s objectively better here, and they all know it.

But that doesn’t stop them from wanting to have their cake and eat it too: they want to come here because it’s better than their old country, but they also don’t want to be treated as foreigners.

Well, tough shit. You can’t have it both ways. You want home field advantage? Then go back home.

You want to live in our land of opportunity? Then you forfeit your home field advantage. You’ll have to adapt to the new playing field.

Weigh the pros and cons, then make a decision.

Fortunately for you this country you bash for having “white privilege” is also the most hospitable and most welcoming to foreigners and immigrants in the world. Immigrants can get rich and famous and beloved in this country. Immigrants can make it to the top—hell, one was even President. Even if your dream is not fame and fortune, there are plenty of immigrants who become wealthy, successful, secure and happy in this country. There are countless examples of foreigners who have come to America and overcome the supposed albatross of “white privilege.”

They made it. Why can’t you?

I’m white, and most of the landlords I’ve had in my life weren’t white. Most were first or second generation immigrants. What kind of “white privilege”-based society would allow that? I’ve had plenty of nonwhite bosses. (Even nonwhite female bosses. Some patriarchy.)

And try being an American expat in another country. See how far your white privilege gets you. Here are a couple of examples of what it’s like to be a foreigner living in Japan. Spoiler: it’s not easy.

The idea of “white privilege” is completely illogical to anyone who thinks about it for more than 10 seconds. The shark has “shark privilege” over me when I’m in the ocean, but he probably couldn’t do much to me when he’s on dry land, my turf.

I have as much “white privilege” over a black immigrant from Nigeria as he has “black privilege” over me in his own country. Actually, a black Nigerian has it much easier in America than a white American would have it in Nigeria. The evidence is in the number of black Nigerians that want to immigrate to America and the lack of white Americans that want to immigrate to Nigeria.

If you believe in white privilege in America but not in black privilege in Nigeria, you’ve been brainwashed.

You should ask yourself, “By whom?” And “why?”

***

To sum up, racial-majority “privilege” is not:

  1. Unique to America.
  2. A deliberately-constructed system.
  3. Unjust.
  4. In need of rectification.

Now, there is a very big difference between a society that deliberately discriminates against and oppresses certain groups on the grounds of ethnicity, and a society that is simply inherently favorable to the people that a. built that society, and b. have been the majority population in that country historically.

The idea that America has a deliberately-constructed system in place designed specifically to oppress nonwhites is just nonsense. That system (“Jim Crow”) was dismantled decades ago. And the system we created after Jim Crow has been a system designed to rectify the sins of Jim Crow. Most social policies enacted since the 1960s have had the express goal of favoring nonwhites, if anything.

Everyone knows the post-Jim Crow era has been the “affirmative action” era, but “affirmative action” is better described as nonwhite privilege.

Hire someone for a job because they’re not a white male. Grant someone admission to a college that they otherwise couldn’t get into because they’re not a white male. Hold non-white males to a different set of laws and rules simply because of their skin color or gender.

Everyone has a story from their own life where they’ve seen nonwhite privilege at work. It’s the law of the land.

Why do you think Elizabeth Warren pretended to be an Indian? If America was truly based on white privilege, then why would she have made efforts to claim she wasn’t white?

Of course, the whole idea behind nonwhite privilege is to level the playing field–in other words, give preferential treatment to non-white males so that they can “catch up” to white males, who were previously the supposed privileged group.

But that still doesn’t change what affirmative action is. It’s nonwhite privilege.

Affirmative action is nonwhite privilege.

Why do you think the next 007 is a black woman? It’s not because Ian Fleming’s books describe 007 as a black woman. It’s not because casting a black woman as 007 would lead to more ticket sales.

It’s because our cultural elites have decided that White Men Are Bad and their time is over. It’s because they believe there are too many Old White Men around. In fact, the term “Old White Men” has become a pejorative over the past five years or so.

The Cultural Marxists want cultural redistribution.

So not only is the idea of “white privilege” in America nonsensical, if anything the opposite exists today.

So Much White Privilege in America: Black Man Rapes White College Girl in NYC “Because of Slavery”

“Us minorities have been through slavery,” the man said:

She deserved it. Because of slavery.

This story broke on the 18th, two days ago.

Are you seeing it all over the news? Is it getting wall to wall coverage on CNN?

No.

Because the exact opposite of white privilege exists in this country.

People in this country are led to believe that white people can get away with anything, but a black man can rape a white woman and claim it was “because slavery” and the media’s reaction is: 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️.

Further, what would compel a black man in 2019 to seek justice for slavery, which ended in 1865?

He was never a slave, the woman he raped was never a slave-owner. So why would he do this?

This is another example of the media and mainstream American culture radicalizing people and the real-life consequences of that indoctrination. No one ever calls the media out for its “inflammatory rhetoric,” or for inciting violence.

It’s always President Trump who is accused of inciting hate crimes–even though most of those hate crimes end up being hoaxes.

The media is never held to account for all the violence it instigates.

So. Much. White. Privilege.

Being white in America puts you at such an advantage that ethnic minorities are desperate to avoid being counted as white on the next census for fear of missing out on all the great benefits of diversity quotas:

“Certain ethnic groups are opposing their classification as “white” on the upcoming 2020 Census because they say the diversity quotas of corporations and universities will hurt their educational and job opportunities.

Wasn’t there a time in America where people were denied jobs and opportunities due to the color of their skin? I think they had a name for it, but it’s not coming to me. . .

“Arab and Persian residents in the United States told the Los Angeles Times that while they plan to participate in the 2020 Census, they fear they will be lumped in with the racial category of “white” Americans.

The U.S. is home to about three million southwest Asian, North African, and Middle Eastern residents, according to an analysis by the Times. The vast majority, about 80 percent, have called themselves “white” on previous census surveys.

The ethnic groups, though, fear declaring themselves “white” will give them a disadvantage in the education system and job market, as universities and corporations have favored diversity quotas.”

Drop an alien in from outer space and tell him that in a nation of whites and nonwhites, nonwhites get preferential treatment in applying for jobs and colleges, as well as in school funding–oh, and they’re also allowed to be racist and even encouraged to advance racially supremacist ideas and policies. Then ask the alien which group, white or nonwhite, is “privileged.”

The answer is obvious.

Back in the 1960s and 1970s, the Civil Rights movement convinced the ruling political class that, yes, minorities (at that time just black people) really were second-class citizens and that the situation had to rectified. We refer to the period of black oppression preceding the Civil Rights Era as “Jim Crow.”

So the Great Society and Affirmative Action programs of the Johnson and Nixon administrations (yes, even that supposed racist right-winger Nixon was all about affirmative action and big government programs) essentially created a system where, in order to eliminate white privilege, the system would attempt to “make up” for a century of oppression and begin favoring nonwhites over whites.

It was seen as the only way to eventually bring about equality between blacks and whites in America: if the system had for centuries favored whites and oppressed blacks, then it was time for blacks to be favored and whites to more or less take a back seat. In time, due to the preferential treatment, blacks would eventually “catch up” to whites and then we could transition to a system where all the races were treated equally.

That was the idea.

But here’s the thing: the government-enforced preferential treatment and welfare for nonwhites a. backfired disastrously and did not actually improve conditions minority communities, and b. still continues to this day, with no end in sight.

There was no timetable for the affirmative action system; it was just implemented and left in place indefinitely. And so we’ve had a system that favors nonwhites and disfavors whites for over five decades now.

***

If America is still racist and oppressive to nonwhites, then here’s the question: why is it universally agreed that Jim Crow ended in the mid-1960s?

If America is still extremely racist and oppressive to nonwhites, then what is the present period (1965-present) called? Why don’t we continue to use the term Jim Crow to describe this present-day supposed nightmare for nonwhites?

🚨 White Privilege Alert! Black Pro Boxer Goes on Anti-Gay Rant, Media Mum

Imagine if a white guy did this:

https://twitter.com/EditinKing/status/1108141824416337920

Transcript:

“If any fag, punk-ass n*gga come up on me, tryin’ to touch me, or all that gay shit, I’m letting you know right now: if I ain’t got my gun on me, I’m knockin’ you the fuck out. If I got my gun, I’m shooting you in the face. I’m not playin’ around. That’s on God. I don’t like gay shit.”

Media headline if he was white: “Gun-toting redneck threatens to punch and SHOOT gay people in his presence.”

If a white guy threatened to shoot any gay people in his presence, he would be under immediate FBI investigation and his career would be over.

This would be all over the news and we’d be subject to endless panel discussions about how gays in America are under assault by white people.

But yeah, we need to worry about white privilege in this country.

White people can get away with anything, man.

In completely unrelated news, I have a new favorite boxer.

CNN “Analyst” Accuses Sirius XM Host David Webb of Benefiting From White Privilege, Has No Idea Webb Is Actually Black

This is rich:

Of course the CNN “analyst” instinctively tries to accuse someone of white privilege without even knowing their race.

This is a revealing glimpse into how their minds work.

“You’re only successful because of your white privilege!”

“I’m black.”

LMAO

The CNN “analyst,” upon realizing that one does not need “white privilege” to succeed in America, then humbly vowed to reevaluate her grievance-based ideology. “Y’know, maybe I was wrong about this,” she mused. “I’ve got a lot to learn. Maybe I was blinded by racial resentment and am being held back not by white oppression, but by my own victim mentality. This has been a real epiphany for me. Trump 2020!”

Just kidding. She didn’t say any of that.